The point is - you wanna take bets these 2 or 3 sermons were  the only ones Wright gave.

I'll take ten Wrights any day of the week over those birds..

You were asking me about Wright's sermons...I gave you a response....about his Sermons.....

The Sermons played endlessly during the campaign were on tape.  Wright apparently tapes all of his Sermons and then sells them.....So, the opposition research folks apparently just bought the set and cherry picked the most inflammatory ones.

You asked me why I thought there were no other inflammatory sermons, and I gave you my answer.....

This is not like the statement that no one hurled the "n" word during the Health Care debate because it wasn't on tape.  The reason why the issue with Wright's sermons is different is that that all of Wright's sermons--or years's worth of them--are not only on tape but also on sale at the Church.....

If you want to know what Wright's sermons were like--your question to me--then consult the actual evidence....And, I assume that is exactly what Obama's critics did....

Your bias against Obama here has led you to jump the gun mightily.....

I never thought a trial on gay issues and making the anti-gay forces produce admissible evidence made sense--that issue really did not lend itself to such an examination.  It was about values, etc.

Their view was that if and when forced to really come up with concrete evidence to support their bias, the anti-gay folks couldn't and wouldn't.

Such an approach would be similarly instructive on the canard of Obama sitting through 20 years of sermons just like the 3 or 4 that were played during the campaign.

Cream, you asked me about the content of the Wright Sermons--and cited as your evidence that the Black Press reported they were typical of other sermons....Much like the anti-gay literature....relying on vague hearsay....

Go to the actual evidence.   The source.....If there were other sermons that were inflammatory, they should be on tape as many, many (almost all, I think) of his sermons were.  If you find another inflammatory sermon, then you can say that there were more than the ones played during the campaign....

Sean Hannity took credit for reviewing the tapes and finding the three or four that were played. I have no doubt that if his staff had found others that he would not have held those back.....Of course, he would have played them.  Do you really doubt that?

I am totally mystified why you missed the import of my comment--which was without any rancor whatsover.  If you want to rely on the Black Press account of the sermons rather than on Hannity's review of years' worth, then that is your argument--and not the best one imo.  But how you say that my position is somehow putting words in your comment is beyond me.