home

Tuesday Afternoon Open Thread

Congrats to the Boise State Broncos who won a heartstopper last night in DC over the Virginia Tech Hokies, 33-30.

If I had a vote, the Broncs are #1 AND Kellen Moore is the Heisman Trophy winner. But that's this week. A long way to go yet.

Open Thread.

< The Post Partisan Unity Schtick Revisited | Daley Bows Out: Rahm's Turn? >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Republicans have a sharper message than Dems (5.00 / 2) (#16)
    by jbindc on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 03:29:53 PM EST
    At least, according to Nate Silver:

    Excluding the broad subject of the economy, which we divided into several subcategories like jobs, taxes and deficits, health care was the most frequently mentioned issue. Of the 29 Republicans in these pivotal districts, all but one mentioned it, with many suggesting that the Democrats' bill should be repealed. But health care was also highlighted by 23 of the 29 Democrats, making it the most cited issue among that party as well.

    The Democrats' message was varied. Some, like Colleen Hanabusa, who is running in Hawaii's First Congressional District in Honolulu, had clear praise for the Democrats' health care goals. Others, like Representative Stephanie Herseth Sandlin, a moderate Democrat from South Dakota who voted against the bill, lauded some of the bill's achievements, while criticizing other provisions and calling for further reform.

    Still, most Democrats were willing to engage their constituents on the issue. And beneath the surface, their message was fairly consistent. Most Democrats -- whether they voted for the bill or against it -- suggested that it had been a reasonable start and had worthy goals, but that it required further tinkering.

    What was more striking in our examination was a Republican agenda that appeared in sharper relief than the Democratic one, and which was more readily contributing to their messages to voters on the campaign trail.

    For some Republican candidates, the agenda may indeed begin with the health care bill, which many are pledging to repeal. But there are also issues like the deficit, which more than four out of five Republicans highlighted on their Web sites in some form. Some 60 percent of Republicans, meanwhile -- including some in states far removed from the Mexican border -- addressed immigration, usually advocating tighter border security.

    Democrats, on the other hand, are having trouble articulating a clear set of policy goals. After health care, the issues mentioned most frequently by Democrats were energy, jobs and education - each of which were highlighted by 7 out of 10 Democrats. But these issues do not necessarily lend themselves to a crisp set of policy proposals. The country has been debating various efforts at job creation since the start of President Obama's term, and usually with little consensus. Although Mr. Obama has advanced an education plan, it has received scant attention in Congress, making it hard for Democrats to draw clear contrasts. On energy, the Democrats do have a clearer policy proposal: their bill to introduce a cap-and-trade system, which passed the House last year but not the Senate. Many of the Democrats, however, spoke about "energy independence" in much vaguer terms (as did many Republicans). And a few - like Mike Oliverio, a conservative Democrat in West Virginia -- noted their opposition to the cap-and-trade proposal.

    Arguably, the frequent mention of education on the Democrats' Web sites - as well as another issue, veterans' affairs - speaks somewhat to the weakness of their political position. Few voters will object to these issues: who wouldn't want to support our children, or our troops? But without specific policy proposals attached to them (and more specifically, policy proposals that Republicans have raised objections to) it is not clear that they will motivate Democratic and swing voters to go to the polls.

    SNIP

    Democrats have criticized Republicans for their vague agenda - and certainly the Republicans have not articulated anything as succinct as the Contract With America, which aided their exceptional performance in the midterm elections of 1994. But Republicans do appear to have a message that is at least reasonably clear to voters, and reasonably consistent from one Congressional district to the next: pick us, and we'll repeal health care, secure the border and reduce the size of government. Democrats, meanwhile, who two years ago seemed to have a glut of agenda items, are now having trouble articulating to their constituents exactly what a Democratic vote would gain them. Perhaps that's why Democrats are having trouble both with the sizable number of voters who are dissatisfied with both parties and in motivating their base.


    Sharper as in scalpel, (none / 0) (#38)
    by Militarytracy on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 05:27:25 PM EST
    veins, naked in a nice warm bath?

    Parent
    Looking forward to new season of Dexter? (5.00 / 1) (#57)
    by Lil on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 09:54:01 PM EST
    On September 9th this household (5.00 / 2) (#32)
    by Militarytracy on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 04:36:33 PM EST
    will observe Massoud Day with the nation of Afghanistan.  Sure I had read that Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda had successfully murdered the leader of the Northern Alliance two days before the September 11th attack.  I really did not know who Massoud the Lion of Panjshir was though to his country and his people. I did not know who he was as a person.  I know much more now.  I know that it is his face I search for as I search for resolution in Afghanistan.  I now mourn his loss and we will join Afghanistan on the 9th in the observance of that loss and who he was and what Afghanistan knows she can be with him or without him if she has courage.

    I'm with you (5.00 / 2) (#60)
    by gyrfalcon on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 11:31:35 PM EST
    He was sort of like the Bobby Kennedy of Afghanistan, or could have been.  Terrible, terrible tragedy, given there appear to be no both charismatic and honest leaders over there.

    Parent
    Heard on the street (none / 0) (#1)
    by jbindc on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 02:06:05 PM EST
    Daley isn't running for re-election.  Will Rahm run?

    its true (none / 0) (#2)
    by Capt Howdy on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 02:16:04 PM EST
    he isnt.  and no.

    Parent
    Rahm (5.00 / 1) (#4)
    by jbindc on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 02:23:51 PM EST
    Has already publicly said he wanted the job (back in April).  Why wouldn't he run?

    Parent
    interesting (5.00 / 1) (#20)
    by Capt Howdy on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 03:42:51 PM EST
       Meanwhile, a senior Obama Administration official said Emanuel is likely to run for the post.

        "I'd be shocked if he doesn't run," the official said...

        Conversations with plugged-in Chicago Democrats -- and boy are there lots of them! -- make clear that if Emanuel ran, he would be the clear frontrunner although almost certainly wouldn't have the field entirely to himself.

    maybe he will.  particularly if he thinks he is going to be thrown under the bus after november.


    Parent

    Well (5.00 / 3) (#22)
    by jbindc on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 03:45:46 PM EST
    And it would be better than going down on the S.S. Obama if voters still aren't happy with the administration.

    Parent
    and perhaps (none / 0) (#27)
    by Capt Howdy on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 03:52:45 PM EST
    if they get rid of some Rahm like ballast they may stay afloat.  works for everyone.

    Parent
    Can we send some economists (5.00 / 4) (#37)
    by Cream City on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 05:17:34 PM EST
    your way, too?  They'll be right at home in the U of Chicago school of screwed-up economic theory.

    Parent
    The dog would jump ship (none / 0) (#63)
    by Militarytracy on Wed Sep 08, 2010 at 08:01:00 AM EST
    if he is smart.  Even though he played a large role in getting the S.S. Obama where it is.  I'm with Jeralyn, I'm willing to do just about anything for something to take him off my hands.

    Parent
    who knows (none / 0) (#7)
    by Capt Howdy on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 02:41:24 PM EST
    I doubt it.

    Parent
    Best news of Labor Day Weekend... (none / 0) (#3)
    by kdog on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 02:19:48 PM EST
    Woody cut the damn check (finally!)...wide receivers will continue to disappear on Revis Island this season...first victim, Anquan Boldin of B'More.

    Woo-Hoo!

    Great news, eh?! (none / 0) (#5)
    by nycstray on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 02:27:38 PM EST
    they're opening Mon night, right?

    Parent
    You know it Jet Sister... (none / 0) (#12)
    by kdog on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 03:11:28 PM EST
    they made us really sweat it out!

    I tell ya, watching "Hard Knocks" made me dislike Woody Johnson even more, and I lost respect for GM Tannenbaum...I thought they came off lookin' like Mr. Burns and Smithers, if Smithers were a little more clueless.

    Parent

    If, after missing OTA's and training (none / 0) (#6)
    by Anne on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 02:38:37 PM EST
    camp, and only having a week to prepare for what could be one of the biggest - at least, psychologically - games of the season, Revis manages to perform commensurate with his paycheck, I promise I will come back and give him props...as much as that will pain me (I am not a good loser - ask my family!).

    Not going to make any predictions, because I think there's a lot of hype on both sides although, you have to admit, the hype for the Jets has been waaaaay over the top.  Yes, they went to the AFC Championship, but they wouldn't have gotten there had the Bengals and the Colts not laid down in the last two regular-season games - just sayin'.

    So, for now, I am rooting for the Ravens, who have made some good moves this off-season.

    Best of luck to us both!

    Parent

    The Super Bowl hype is outta ... (none / 0) (#8)
    by kdog on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 02:54:36 PM EST
    hand, I totally agree...we still have many problems on offense to correct.  You Ravens will be right there in the hunt, the Colts of course...the Dolphins look good, the Steelers might surprise if they can hang in till Dirty Ben returns...Pretty-Boy Brady always lurking.

    The Revis hype, otoh, is totally justified.  He is the best at what he does by far...insanely awesome.  Freakishly dominant.

    Parent

    I'm a little put out (none / 0) (#10)
    by jondee on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 03:01:29 PM EST
    by that Washington deal. What have you done for us lately since your leg injury, Leon? But that's the meat market of football for ya.

    Watch out for Evans Island this year, dog. He's been lookin' good in the pre.

    Parent

    Yep yep... (none / 0) (#11)
    by kdog on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 03:08:03 PM EST
    that's why Revis would have been a fool to play out his rookie contract...look at how the team did Leon dirty, in the football business as usual way.

    Would that be WR Lee Evans? Always liked his game, but he don't stand a chance of seeing any daylight with my man Revis on him...he'll be wishin' T.O. was still around for 2 weeks this season:)

    Parent

    We'll see.. (none / 0) (#14)
    by jondee on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 03:28:01 PM EST
    Lee's seemed to save a lot of his best stuff for the Jets in the past..

    And Spiller's gonna be an extra weapon this season. So the Bills are actually two dimensional, as opposed to .5 dimensional..:)

    Parent

    The Hard Knocks curse (none / 0) (#45)
    by MKS on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 06:04:09 PM EST
    Being on the show Hard Knocks means the Jets are cursed.

    Just like the SI jinx.....

    Parent

    Boise State getting respect (none / 0) (#9)
    by abdiel on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 02:57:58 PM EST
    they are only slightly more popular than Lane Kiffin in the South today.

    The best part of the BCS is that this weekend will showcase Alabama v Penn State and Ohio State v Miami. They're coming right back to make their case. And Boise is now Virginia Tech's #1 fan. They will be rooting heavily that the Hokies win big in the ACC, a la Oregon and the Pac-10 last year.

    Virginia Tech is ACC (none / 0) (#24)
    by jimakaPPJ on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 03:48:50 PM EST
    so us SEC types didn't really care who won, but it was a super game.

    Unfortunately either team could whip us UTer's soundly this year...

    Thanks to Kiffin.

    Parent

    Two very closely (none / 0) (#51)
    by brodie on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 07:12:42 PM EST
    matched teams who played an outstanding game that lived up to the hype.  VT came within inches on the last play of at least tying the game and sending it to OT, but as they say football is a game of inches -- even though the gridiron is actually not marked out in inches, nor are records kept in inches.  

    Boisé State is probably ranked about right, for the moment.  Without having seen them play, I'd suspect Alabama and OSU both have slightly better overall defenses (esp the secondary) than Boisé, but the Idaho squad will have the luxury of the rest of the season and a fairly weak WAC schedule to experiment as needed and shore up weaknesses at their leisure.

    Speaking of weak schedules and leisure, when I saw that Florida would be playing Miami this past weekend, I thought, well I see that the Gators still are refusing to travel outside the cozy comfort zone of the South, but at least they're actually going up against a quality opponent for a change, and Miami has even been improving in recent yrs to become at least a near-powerhouse again.  Then remembering that Miami seemed an unusually strong opener for a FL team that usually schedules cupcake opening opponents, I checked the fine print:  oh, that's Miami of Ohio.  

    Parent

    Libertarians Haven't Ruled Out Murkowski (none / 0) (#13)
    by Capt Howdy on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 03:22:55 PM EST
    Despite Vote

    Alaska Libertarian Party Chairman Scott Kohlhaas told the Anchorage Daily News that talks about a Murkowski bid are ongoing, despite the executive committee's vote last month.


    more (none / 0) (#35)
    by Capt Howdy on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 05:01:18 PM EST
    Haase has already hinted that he's willing to step aside, and -- funnily enough -- he and Murkowski met within the last few hours. Maybe her thinking here is to force the committee to change its mind by having Haase drop out first? In that case, they'd have to choose between picking a replacement or running with no one on the ticket. And if they're going to pick a replacement, why not pick someone who ... actually stands a chance of winning?


    Parent
    cant support the dems and voting green? (none / 0) (#15)
    by Capt Howdy on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 03:28:48 PM EST
    of course you are.

    Republican Runs Street People on Green Ticket

    Mr. Pearcy and other drifters and homeless people were recruited onto the Green Party ballot by a Republican political operative who freely admits that their candidacies may siphon some support from the Democrats.

    "Did I recruit candidates? Yes," said Mr. May, who is himself a candidate for the State Legislature, on the Republican ticket. "Are they fake candidates? No way."
    To make his point, Mr. May went by Starbucks, the gathering spot of the Mill Rats, as the frequenters of Mill Avenue are known.
    "Are you fake, Benjamin?" he yelled out to Mr. Pearcy, who cried out "No," with an expletive attached.
    "Are you fake, Thomas?" Mr. May shouted in the direction of Thomas Meadows, 27, a tarot card reader with less than a dollar to his name who is running for state treasurer. He similarly disagreed.
    "Are you fake, Grandpa?" he said to Anthony Goshorn, 53, a candidate for the State Senate whose bushy white beard and paternal manner have earned him that nickname on the streets. "I'm real," he replied.



    Shrug (5.00 / 1) (#17)
    by jbindc on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 03:32:49 PM EST
    Dems recruited and ran people under the Tea Party banner.

    Both sides are saying, "We don't have anything positive to offer."

    Parent

    care ot name (none / 0) (#18)
    by Capt Howdy on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 03:34:45 PM EST
    names?  I dont know who you are talking about.

    Parent
    See the Michigan primaries (5.00 / 2) (#21)
    by jbindc on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 03:44:30 PM EST
    from this past May, for starters. At lest one county Dem chair has stepped down because he's accused of forging notarized election documents.

    The Michigan Supreme Court just ruled that the group calling itself "Tea Party" won't be allowed on ballots this November (not to be confused with what we think of as the Tea Party")

    There were also accusations of similar shenanigans in Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and Florida, but I don't know how (or if) those have been resolved.

    Parent

    Somewhat ironically... (5.00 / 1) (#28)
    by kdog on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 03:56:16 PM EST
    these Green candidates are a lot more "real" than your average candidate...I'd vote for any of the Mill Rats and not bat an eye...dead serious.

    Especially the guy running for treasurer with less than a dollar to his name, which puts him in better financial shape than most states!

    Parent

    which sort of (none / 0) (#29)
    by Capt Howdy on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 04:03:19 PM EST
    makes the point, I guess.

    Parent
    Reprise: The ole' dirty tricks (5.00 / 2) (#40)
    by christinep on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 05:45:58 PM EST
    Here is a wee confession: Visited kos site today (and, that is rare for me.) A very interesting story this am: It seems a person using the nom de plume "Huey Long" has commented on occasion in the past there as to the Kentucky Senate race. His comments portrayed himself as a progressive individual who discouraged people from voting for Conway (D) in the fascinating race against Rand Paul (R or Tea Party.) He did not claim that he favored Paul or anything like that...merely argued that the Democrat wasn't progressive, etc. enough for him. 'Turns out that "Huey Long" is in the paid employ of Rand Paul (R or Tea Party), and because he was being paid, his true self was outed. Ah, my and my and my.

    The return of???  And, that is just it. Darn, I cannot remember the sub-trickster in tricky Dick Nixon's campaign ('72?) 'Just trying to recall the name of that other "tricky Dick" who was the famous trickster that sidelined Ed Muskie (D)...and that may have led to the rebound of tricky Nixon?

    This stuff does happen. And, it gets more refined.

    Parent

    Glad you posted this (none / 0) (#46)
    by MKS on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 06:06:07 PM EST
    A concern troll on the payroll of the Republicans....

    Parent
    christine, I think you're (none / 0) (#52)
    by brodie on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 07:22:43 PM EST
    trying to recall the name Donald Segretti, that colorful dirty trickster from the 1972 Nixon campaign ratf***ing fame.  Dick Tuck without Tuck's wit, charm and subtlety.

    See movie All the President's Men and at least the one scene on the apt balcony in Marina del Rey (iirc) with the Segretti character and intrepid reporter Bernstein played by Dustin Hoffman.

    My take -- if not for the dirty tricks, Muskie basically goes on to eventually swat away the McGovern challenge, and we get a much stronger Dem nominee -- and a possible Muskie-McG ticket -- with a potential to make it a contest in the fall.  That or we get a stronger nominee who's only going to be dirty tricked by the Nixon forces into melting down a little later in that election cycle than he actually did, given Muskie's actual sensitive and high-strung temperament that was probably eventually going to be exposed...

    Parent

    Muskie was (none / 0) (#59)
    by gyrfalcon on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 11:28:46 PM EST
    a putz, IMHO, a waffling, establishment centrist Dem.  I didn't much like McGovern, either, but at least we went down fighting.

    Parent
    Not much of a fight, (none / 0) (#61)
    by brodie on Wed Sep 08, 2010 at 12:17:59 AM EST
    as I recall.  If it wasn't over by the time the more broadly appealing Muskie was knocked out and the more narrowly acceptable McG emerged, it was certainly over by the time the divisive and disorganized Dem convo was over -- the 2 am acceptance speech seen by no one, the selection of a man for VP with a serious history of clinical depression and electro shock therapy and a nominee who handled it all badly.

    While flawed, if Muskie could have held it together better, toughed it out in private as he regrouped and steadied his campaign, he would have been far better positioned to unite the two quarreling wings of the party and gone on to actually give Dems a real fighting chance.  McG, a decent but politically naive fellow, just wasn't trusted by the moderate Daley-LBJ-Union Bigwig wing, and so went forth into the fall campaign with only half the organizing forces he needed.  

    Game over by July, imo.   Not much of a fight left to fight thereafter.

    Parent

    wasn't progressive enough for him.. (none / 0) (#53)
    by jondee on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 07:24:49 PM EST
    why does that ring so many faint, faraway sounding bells?

    Parent
    Gutsy call... (none / 0) (#19)
    by MileHi Hawkeye on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 03:36:47 PM EST
    ...on the big game yesterday, BTD--oh wait...  Well, you really nailed that CU/CSU game.  Oh...

    WTF is up with the #4 team in the land being unable to complete the Center/QB exchange on anything approaching a consistent basis?

    Make that... (none / 0) (#25)
    by MileHi Hawkeye on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 03:51:54 PM EST
    Mile Hi, what do you think of the Denver Broncs? (none / 0) (#39)
    by magster on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 05:41:21 PM EST
    I'm actually more optimistic this year than last. BTW, I'd rec milehighreport.com and broncotalk.net for Bronco blogging.

    Parent
    It doesn't help my opinion... (none / 0) (#44)
    by MileHi Hawkeye on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 06:03:53 PM EST
    ...of the Boy Genius when he goes and cuts the only Hawkeye on the roster (and a good offensive lineman at that).  Makes it that much harder for me to root for them this year.

    I still think his fate is tied to Timmay.  It will be interesting to see how long he's going to be the back-up/wildcat instead of the starter.

    Can't imagine Mr. Bowlen is all too happy with the salary money he's been throwing down the drain either.  They'd better show some improvement this year--but I'm not convinced they will.  

    Haven't seen much of a running game yet and LenDale going down didn't help.  The Decker kid may be the second coming of Ed McCaffrey, but I wonder how much of pounding he can take on the NFL level.  Losing Elvis is going to hurt more than people realize, I think.  

    Still a pretty weak division, so it is possible they could make the play-offs.  We shall see.

     

    Parent

    The WRs are very deep (none / 0) (#48)
    by magster on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 06:16:39 PM EST
    and the O-line is as good at pass protection as they are bad at run blocking.  The first team offense scored 52 points in 6 quarters.  Orton looked very good.

    There just seems to be more overall competence and talent than at this time last year.

    Parent

    Orton has looked good. (none / 0) (#49)
    by MileHi Hawkeye on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 06:44:28 PM EST
    Don't know about his willingness to throw his body in front of headhunting linebackers though!  Bad enough Tebow doing it...  Would anyone be comfortable with Brady Quinn as the starter?

    I don't think we're really deep at wide-out.  Once you get by the #1's on the depth-chart, there's not a whole lot of NFL-proven talent.  One (1!) regular season reception between the 3 of them.  

    I do like what I've seen of the his Syd'Quan Thompson kid.

    Parent

    'Magic mushrooms' (none / 0) (#23)
    by Capt Howdy on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 03:47:33 PM EST
    ingredient may ease end-of-life anxiety

    (Health.com)  -- Terminally ill cancer patients struggling with anxiety may get some relief from a guided "trip" on the hallucinogenic drug psilocybin, a new study suggests.

    The study included 12 patients who took a small dose of psilocybin -- the active ingredient in "magic mushrooms" -- while under the supervision of trained therapists. In a separate session, the participants took a placebo pill, which had little effect on their symptoms.

    By contrast, one to three months after taking psilocybin the patients reported feeling less anxious and their overall mood had improved. By the six-month mark, the group's average score on a common scale used to measure depression had declined by 30 percent, according to the study, which was published in the Archives of General Psychiatry.



    question (none / 0) (#26)
    by CST on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 03:52:40 PM EST
    you may or may not know the answer too.

    Is it the active ingredient that causes the food poisoning or something else?

    Parent

    without googleing (none / 0) (#30)
    by Capt Howdy on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 04:05:04 PM EST
    I would say its possible.  I have had one or two experiences with this and both times I threw up.

    and later after talking to others I found that is very common.  "of yeah, after you throw up its great"

    swell.  you might have mentioned that before.


    Parent

    haha (none / 0) (#31)
    by CST on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 04:18:38 PM EST
    yea...

    I think it's the fact that your body is being poisoned that actually causes the reaction and the trip is caused by your body fighting it or some such thing.  At least that's the explanation I heard in college from people who talked like they knew what they were saying.

    Just wondering because that could be an issue for someone who is using this as medicine.  It would be cool if they managed to seperate the two.

    Parent

    wiki answers (none / 0) (#34)
    by Capt Howdy on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 04:54:23 PM EST
    Eating magic mushrooms is like a voluntary food poisoning, there is a lot going on in the stomach as the mushrooms are being digested and the chemicals released into the brain. That is why in the beginning of a trip you might feel like you need to vomit... it is simply your body's defense doing it's job. Try keeping the mushrooms in for as long as you can if you want to feel the full effects of your dose, though vomiting may also be a sign that you just took too much this time.


    Parent
    Never had even a hint of nausea, (none / 0) (#36)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 05:13:28 PM EST
    and none of my friends either, the few times I indulged back in the day...

    Parent
    Don't worry, Obama is just as cool as ... (none / 0) (#41)
    by Robot Porter on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 05:56:14 PM EST
    Jimi Hendrix.

    The silliest thing about this article is that I bet you a gazillion it's a White House plant.  And that some of the kiddies in the WH actually think this will help.

    Sigh.

    beyone silly (5.00 / 1) (#43)
    by Capt Howdy on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 05:57:25 PM EST
    this is a pretty common expression to reach back 40 years for a "source"

    Parent
    sadly (5.00 / 2) (#55)
    by weltec2 on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 07:49:27 PM EST
    that was one of the high points of his two years in office.

    Parent
    good (none / 0) (#42)
    by Capt Howdy on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 05:56:36 PM EST
    The president of the Big Sky Tea Party Association has been removed from his position and booted from the party after coming under fire for a post he made on his Facebook profile that implied he condones violence against homosexuals.

    Tim Ravndal was removed as president of the local chapter Sunday after the group's board of directors learned of his volatile post on the online social networking site, according to Roger Nummerdor, the former president and a current board member of the group. Nummerdor also said Ravndal is no longer welcome in the party.

    "He's out," he said.



    Like they didn't know... (5.00 / 1) (#47)
    by MileHi Hawkeye on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 06:07:14 PM EST
    ...beforehand about his very objectionable views.  His crime was putting it out for public consumption and getting called on it.  

    Parent
    ArmpitBall's not this Futbol fan's thing, but ... (none / 0) (#50)
    by Ellie on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 06:49:30 PM EST
    ... all in all, has this been a fan-fricken-tastic banner year for sports-potatoes or what?

    From one thrilla to the next with just enough of a cool-down in between to let the BP slide down to normal, just like my pastor, doctor and spousal overlord ordered.

    Lately I've had a lot of (none / 0) (#54)
    by jeffinalabama on Tue Sep 07, 2010 at 07:29:18 PM EST
    days during which I've been too busy to read TL until late. Today was one of them. After reading the threads, I suspect it's better that way.

    So...Auburn-Mississippi State on Thursday. Given the state of the SEC west, an important matchup.

    I hate thursday night away games...

    wowee (none / 0) (#64)
    by Capt Howdy on Wed Sep 08, 2010 at 09:53:29 AM EST
    you really need to see this

    Erial Ali is no ordinary artist. For his Celestial Soul Portraits, the California-based empath requests photographs of his subjects, collects as much biographical information as possible -- especially pertaining to their spiritual beliefs -- and channels their "unique Essence," based on his ability to "hear what's going on inside of people" and envision "a higher plane of existence."

    Since the presumptive Republican presidential front-runners are intensely spiritual people, The Politics Blog commissioned Ali to reveal their true inner selves to the world. He remains adamant that his portraits (made over the last six weeks in Photoshop) are meant neither to mock nor deify, but instead "help create higher potentials for the country and world."

    Palin is featured but Newt and Huck are equally wowee.