The most prominent may be the case of Dale Helmig, who was finally declared innocent of killing his mother by a Missouri judge in November, after 17 years in prison. I've been familiar with Dale's case since 2000, when I was part of the first film showcasing his probable innocence, TNT's Was Justice Denied? For the film, former prosecutor Charlie Stone and I interviewed Hulshof, the judge who was replaced ten days before trial after reportedly opining he might toss the case out, Hulshof's co-prosecutor, Dale's defense lawyer, several trial witnesses, Dale's relatives (including his father Ted whom many think should have been the main suspect), and of course, Dale in prison.

Dale did not get a fair trial. Last month he was finally freed from prison, to await the state's appeal of the judge's decison or a possible retrial.

Gov. Nixon yesterday maintained his faith in the death penalty. As to why he commuted Clay's sentence, he said only it was due to a number of factors:

Among those were the "involvement of a number of folks'' and a court system that "had some issues," with the case, he said. He offered little elaboration. He said most of the concerns about the case had been reported by the media.

Since most of the media reports on Clay's case and the others include accounts of the alleged improprieties of Ken Hulshof, I'm not buying that Hulshof wasn't a factor.