home

Joe Biden Praises Lieberman For His "Civility"

David Brooks reports:

Vice President Biden sent me a heartfelt e-mail on Thursday that ended: “The Senate will not be the same without Joe’s leadership and powerful intellect. But it is his civility that will be missed the most.”

(Emphasis supplied.) Meanwhile, back on Planet Earth, here was Lieberman's "civlity" in action:

When [Arianna] Huffington said there's nothing in the Duelfer Report to bolster [Joe] Lieberman's conclusions, the senator replied, "I don't think you've read it, sweetheart."

More . . .

Brooks also argues that:

There’s a theory going around that Lieberman was embittered by the trauma of 2006 when Democratic primary voters in Connecticut defeated him because of his support for the Iraq war. There’s little evidence to validate this.

Meanwhile, back on Planet Earth, Lieberman was the instrument that finished the public option. After years of favoring one.

And why did Lieberman oppose a public option? Because "liberal" activists were in favor:

For close to a decade, he got nearly perfect scores from the American Public Health Association, which backs a single-payer health-care system, and in lieu of that, the “public option.” Now, all of a sudden, he’s so outraged by a public option that he’s threatening to filibuster any bill that contains it. The arguments he makes on behalf of his new position are remarkably weak: He says the public option will raise costs, even though the Congressional Budget Office has said no such thing, and even though logic suggests that by competing with private insurers, a government plan will actually drive costs down. Some have accused Lieberman of shifting right in order to win backing from the insurance industry in preparation for a 2012 reelection run. But, in fact, he gets relatively little insurance money, and Connecticut politicos mostly think he won’t run.

So why is he doing this? Because he’s bitter. According to former staffers and associates, he was upset by his dismal showing in the 2004 Democratic presidential primary. And he was enraged by the tepid support he got from many party leaders in 2006, when he lost the Democratic primary to an anti-war activist and won reelection as an independent. Gradually, this personal alienation has eaten away at his liberal domestic views. His staff has grown markedly more conservative in recent years, and his closest friends in Congress are now Republicans John McCain and Lindsey Graham. For Lieberman, the personal has become political, and it has pushed him further to the right.

Joe Lieberman ranks with the most despicable of public figures in the United States in the last decade.

Speaking for me only

< The Roadmap | Gingrich Demonstrates That The First Conservative Principle Is Enraging Liberals >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    "Sweetie" is not civil (5.00 / 0) (#6)
    by Towanda on Fri Jan 21, 2011 at 12:38:31 PM EST
    toward some of us, Senator.

    "Sweetie"... (none / 0) (#24)
    by lentinel on Fri Jan 21, 2011 at 11:01:02 PM EST
    was Obama's.

    Lieberman's was "sweetheart".

    Parent

    Yes. And (none / 0) (#25)
    by Towanda on Mon Jan 24, 2011 at 02:56:36 PM EST
    so what?  Same difference, as the saying goes.  I hope that you are not suggesting that "sweetheart" is civil.

    Parent
    Neither (none / 0) (#26)
    by lentinel on Mon Jan 24, 2011 at 07:14:47 PM EST
    is civil.

    Both are intolerable.

    Both are signs of an arrogance that is gargantuan.

    Parent

    Long past time to go, Joe. (5.00 / 1) (#8)
    by oldpro on Fri Jan 21, 2011 at 01:25:01 PM EST
    "Sweetheart!"

    So sixties...reverting to type or senility?  Was this side of Joe visible to Al Gore when he chose him as a running mate?  Evidently not...nor to the rest of us, either.

    Would Joe be a different person today had the outcome of 2000 been different?  One wonders because it always seems to have been personal with Joe.  For all his protestations, it really was and is always about him.

    Very civil, really... (none / 0) (#16)
    by Lora on Fri Jan 21, 2011 at 06:11:56 PM EST
    I mean, he could have said,

    "You haven't f@cking read it, b!tch."

    /sarcasm off

    Parent

    Al Gore (none / 0) (#17)
    by NYShooter on Fri Jan 21, 2011 at 06:22:55 PM EST
    Was the biggest disappointment, for me, that I can remember. I mean, this is their business, are they so poor at "reading" the American electorate that they missed what so, so many of us felt instantly at Joe L's appointment?.......Loser.

    Was Gore's feelings towards B. Clinton, twisted and molded into an implacable, self destructive IED, shared by his election staff? Couldn't he see, irrespective of his untoward & damaging narcism, that embracing Bill guaranteed him the Oval office?  

    I don't much care that Gore felt bad about his loss, but his shortcomings as a man I thought I knew, turned the country over to G. Bush 2, and  that I can never forgive

    Parent

    I hear you and do not disagree. (none / 0) (#18)
    by oldpro on Fri Jan 21, 2011 at 07:33:05 PM EST
    The minute the "Loserman" signs and stickers went up, I knew it was big trouble, validating that feeling we had but didn't want to encourage.

    Even more significantly to me,the
    Florida count/suit etc. was so badly mishandled on all fronts - PR/politics to legal options - that I despaired of ever again seeing a fighting Dem.  Until Hillary ran.  Then I despaired of the Democratic Party and how they handled the whole thing, start to finish.  

    Never thought I would EVER see a convention without the guts to finish the rollcall vote on the first ballot for fear the anointed one might actually lose and drive black voters