Sharp definitely has some marbles left. He refused the cop's request to allow a search of his truck. Not that it mattered in the end -- the cop put in a call to a canine officer requesting a dog, for which consent isn't needed. (details from Complaint, available on PACER.)
What was the reason the cop asked to search Mr. Sharp's vehicle in the first place when he was pulled over for following too closely and improper lane use? Maybe the cop started asking Sharp questions about where he was going and had been (which he didn't have to answer but like most people, did), and thought he gave inconsistent answers. But why assume drugs rather than dementia? Given his age, it seems unlikely drug trafficking would pop into the average officer's mind.
p>Also curious: The Complaint charges him with conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute, but not possession with intent to distribute. There's no mention of any other persons in the Complaint.
Sharp told the judge he's never taken an illegal drug in his life. The stop occurred during rush hour on Friday on I-94. Hardly prime DUI hour and there's no mention in the Complaint of him appearing under the influence of anything.
I can't imagine what reasonable suspicion the cop had to radio for a canine officer to bring in a drug dog after an 87 year old driver refused a search for such a minor offense.
Is it being too cynical to think this was no random traffic stop, that the DEA knew from wiretaps or an informant that Sharp would be transporting the drugs, and his travel route, and asked the local police to be on the lookout and make the stop?