Open Thread.
Make a new account
From the NYT:
But, Mr. Obama said at a news conference, any such compromise to address Medicare, Medicaid, Social Security and the tax system is months away and will first require an effort to build bipartisan trust -- even as Democrats and Republicans battle intensely over how much to cut from the current year's domestic spending. [snip] Now some Democrats and Republicans are re-examining whether the political risks of raising revenues and curbing the most popular social programs might be outweighed by the urgency of addressing the looming budget impact of an aging population and rapidly rising medical costs. [snip] The White House has already opened back-channel conversations to test Republicans' willingness to negotiate about the soaring costs of Medicare and Medicaid, Social Security's long-range solvency and an income-tax code riddled with more than $1 trillion a year worth of loopholes and tax breaks. The Senate Republican leader, Mitch McConnell, all but invited Mr. Obama on Tuesday to start huddling about the issues, and a bipartisan group of senators held a third meeting to write debt-reduction legislation based on the recommendations in December of the majority of a bipartisan fiscal commission established by the president. [snip] After much internal debate about the political risks, House Republican leaders announced that their own budget for fiscal year 2012, which begins Oct. 1, "will lead where the president has failed and include real entitlement reforms" in Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security. But in the Senate, Mr. McConnell signaled a different approach. He indicated he is ready to negotiate now with Mr. Obama to curb entitlement program costs, which, along with military spending and interest on the national debt, are driving projections of unsustainable debt in coming decades. "It doesn't have to be in public," he said. "We all understand there are some limitations to negotiating significant agreements in public. But we're still waiting for the president to lead." [snip] Mr. Obama, on the defensive at his news conference, said it was wrong to say the fiscal commission's majority report "has been shelved" and said "it still provides a framework for a conversation" between the parties. But Mr. Obama also noted that while the commission majority was bipartisan, the dissenters included all three House Republican leaders who were members of the panel, including the new chairman of the House Budget Committee, Representative Paul D. Ryan of Wisconsin. "He's got a little bit of juice when it comes to trying to get an eventual budget done," Mr. Obama said of Mr. Ryan. "So," he added, "I'm going to have to have a conversation with him -- what would he like to see happen?"
[snip]
Now some Democrats and Republicans are re-examining whether the political risks of raising revenues and curbing the most popular social programs might be outweighed by the urgency of addressing the looming budget impact of an aging population and rapidly rising medical costs.
The White House has already opened back-channel conversations to test Republicans' willingness to negotiate about the soaring costs of Medicare and Medicaid, Social Security's long-range solvency and an income-tax code riddled with more than $1 trillion a year worth of loopholes and tax breaks.
The Senate Republican leader, Mitch McConnell, all but invited Mr. Obama on Tuesday to start huddling about the issues, and a bipartisan group of senators held a third meeting to write debt-reduction legislation based on the recommendations in December of the majority of a bipartisan fiscal commission established by the president.
After much internal debate about the political risks, House Republican leaders announced that their own budget for fiscal year 2012, which begins Oct. 1, "will lead where the president has failed and include real entitlement reforms" in Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security.
But in the Senate, Mr. McConnell signaled a different approach. He indicated he is ready to negotiate now with Mr. Obama to curb entitlement program costs, which, along with military spending and interest on the national debt, are driving projections of unsustainable debt in coming decades.
"It doesn't have to be in public," he said. "We all understand there are some limitations to negotiating significant agreements in public. But we're still waiting for the president to lead."
Mr. Obama, on the defensive at his news conference, said it was wrong to say the fiscal commission's majority report "has been shelved" and said "it still provides a framework for a conversation" between the parties.
But Mr. Obama also noted that while the commission majority was bipartisan, the dissenters included all three House Republican leaders who were members of the panel, including the new chairman of the House Budget Committee, Representative Paul D. Ryan of Wisconsin.
"He's got a little bit of juice when it comes to trying to get an eventual budget done," Mr. Obama said of Mr. Ryan. "So," he added, "I'm going to have to have a conversation with him -- what would he like to see happen?"
How is it not clear to people that, just as with health "care," this will all be done and agreed to behind closed doors, and the Obama campaign people will then skitter out into the media like the cockroaches they are, putting their best spin ever on the travesty that will result.
And can I just add that I don't want to hear any nonsense about how this is all about Obama's plan to make it look like entitlement cuts are the GOP's idea, just in time for him to emerge from the WH phone booth in his SuperO costume to save us all from their evil ways.
Time to face reality.
images
I thought I was the only one. I loved it when the Scottish Deerhound won. What a cool dog.
And the Westminster show is over 100 years old. What frivolity but so engrossing in its own way.... Parent
I liked the sleek little, white terrier too.... Parent
Or something like that.... Parent
Not sure if making the two super duper dark is racist, if it is, then the cartoon is, but that would be a stretch. Parent
But he really went Michelle Malkin on the cartoonist? Parent
I can see where the huge monkey ears can be considered a race-based insult. Parent
And have I to say, I was not a fan of Michelle Obama, but she is winning me over. I think the Republicans make themselves look silly(ier) by going after her for encouraging people to prevent and reduce obesity, especially in children. Parent
"We will need people who never tune in to Rush or Glenn or Laura or Sean," he said, referring to the popular conservative media personalities.
link link link link link
and this is how Luckovitch (the best in the business IMO) used to draw Bush
this is an interest of mine. I actually considered being a political cartoonist for a while. I used to do them for local newspapers when I was a kid.
if anyone is interested there is a great site. Parent
I'm not entirely convinced there was not race based intent in this case, but will retract based on insufficient evidence! Parent
but what mileage would ODonnell get out of calling out a rube newspaper in Rome GA? Parent
the real one. Parent
But this is all too typical of RW "humor" -- overdone to the point of approaching unfunny nastiness. Parent
So: Yes, stupid -- and bad cartooning, because good cartooning resonates for connection to reality.
But no, not racist. Why even ask if it's racist? That term really has to be reserved for real racism, or the term loses meaning. Parent
Larry O also has his faults, a little more than Rachel it must be said. He should stop shouting at stupid guests and just let his pretty sharp cross-examination stand alone.
And I'm not sure what got into him with this cartoon commentary. It looked like he was trying just a little too hard to score one for white liberals -- or white socialists -- in their attempt to spot and call out anti-black racism on the Right. I thought it was a bit of a stretch, particularly with naming the home town of the cartoonist.
Embarrassing.
But not quite Fox -- they would have put up the guy's actual home address and phone number.
Meanwhile, I've been noticing Spitzer & Cohost have been improving of late ... Parent
In the immortal words of Megatron in Transformers: The Movie, Herman Cain's speech at CPAC really is bad comedy. As you know, I find (black garbage pail kids stricken) black conservatives fascinating not because of what they believe, but rather because of how they entertain and perform for their White Conservative masters. When race minstrelsy was America's most popular form of mass entertainment, black actors would often have to pretend to be white men, who then in turn would put on the cork to play the role of the "black" coon, Sambo, or Jumping Jim Crow. We always need a monkey in the window, for he/she reminds us of our humanity while simultaneously reinforcing a sense of our own superiority. Sadly, there are always folks who are willing to play that role because it pays so well.
dont often agree with powerline but in this case . . .
No, the author doesn't at all take into consideration Cain's individuality; in their sloppy logic they shows their cards: all black people must be Democrats thus, if Cain isn't a Democrat, then he's a captive conservative. The author insults Cain's free will and shows once again exactly what progressives think of black Americans: pawns that must be told what to believe. Humans who lack the cognitive ability to make valid choices. Black Americans couldn't -Cain couldn't - possibly come to the realization of their conservatism alone! They must have been brainwashed! Because progressives don't believe that black conservatives possess the ability to make such rational arguments, they, the progressives, must "save" them. And again, progressives insult black conservatives by insisting that they are victims of stupidity.
A Nationwide Day for Honoring Charles Darwin, but Handled With Caution
There was trepidation on both sides when a squadron of biologists set out to celebrate Darwin Day in rural America during the weekend. The National Evolutionary Synthesis Center in Durham, N.C., which instigated the road trip in the name of scientific outreach, first held a workshop where seven of its Ph.D.'s staged role-playing games and practiced debunking misconceptions about evolution without sounding confrontational.
The National Evolutionary Synthesis Center in Durham, N.C., which instigated the road trip in the name of scientific outreach, first held a workshop where seven of its Ph.D.'s staged role-playing games and practiced debunking misconceptions about evolution without sounding confrontational.
this was the headline on HotAir:
"You want to send evolutionary biologists out to rural America? On purpose?"
ha ha really really funny.
Violence against journalists was widespread during the unrest that led to Mubarak's ouster. At least 52 journalists came under attack covering the revolution according to the Committee to Protect Journalists.
Anyway, I'm sure she's not OK. The attack was described as "brutal and sustained". And it took
"a group of women and an estimated 20 Egyptian soldiers"
to save her. This was right on the Square.
No way is she OK right now.
To say my heart goes out to her sounds trite. But it feels anything but trite. Parent
Would there be more condemnation if it was Mubarak supporters than if it was members of the pro-democracy protests?
Here is the statement from CBS News:
On Friday, Feb. 11, the day Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak stepped down, CBS chief foreign correspondent Lara Logan was covering the jubilation in Tahrir Square for a "60 Minutes" story when she and her team and their security were surrounded by a dangerous element amidst the celebration. It was a mob of more than 200 people whipped into frenzy. In the crush of the mob, she was separated from her crew. She was surrounded and suffered a brutal and sustained sexual assault and beating before being saved by a group of women and an estimated 20 Egyptian soldiers. She reconnected with the CBS team, returned to her hotel and returned to the United States on the first flight the next morning. She is currently home recovering. There will be no further comment from CBS News and correspondent Logan and her family respectfully request privacy at this time.
In the crush of the mob, she was separated from her crew. She was surrounded and suffered a brutal and sustained sexual assault and beating before being saved by a group of women and an estimated 20 Egyptian soldiers. She reconnected with the CBS team, returned to her hotel and returned to the United States on the first flight the next morning. She is currently home recovering.
There will be no further comment from CBS News and correspondent Logan and her family respectfully request privacy at this time.
Given the circumstances, where it appears Logan's life was in danger, the focus was rightly on getting her to safety, not sticking around a frenzied mob to conduct an investigation. Parent
I thought your reference to the insulting way in which the question was asked hit closer to what I wanted to say, but didn't. Parent
Wil try to find the link I read but apparently the normal societal groping/violence towards women was almost non-existent the first couple weeks as the protesters tried to model society the way they wanted it to be, with equal treatment/respect for either gender and so on....
Then as pro-Mubs infiltrated it began to change.
Again - not much matter to Lara - and may she recover as well and as quickly as possible. Parent
And then I would wonder why you even asked that question. Especially in such an insulting way. Parent
And since this is not an isolated incident of a female foreign affairs journalist being attacked (this seems to be a growing problem), I think it's a fair question to ask. Especially as it may deter other women from going to volatile regions (or their bosses may forbid it - see CBS)
CBS is now considering pulling female journalists from Egypt. Parent
As far as I'm concerned, all anyone needs to know is that is woman was brutally assaulted and raped, which is reprehensible no matter what the politics of those responsible, or the venue in which it occurred.
And I'm pretty sure that Lara Logan, who has been covering the Middle East for years, has reported from war zones, is well aware of the dangers women face there. Parent
What about the men?
It makes the soldiers look good--civically minded.... Parent
I'm SURE it matters to Logan. Maybe her assaulters won't be brought to justice, but maybe they will. We certainly don't want innocent people punished for this now, do we?
I also think that while most of the protests were peaceful, not all of them were. I think there was certainly an incentive to show them that way. The fact that the media had to keep MENTIONING that they were peaceful also should tell you they were trying to tell a story - one that may be mostly true, but not necessarily completely true. It's like having class - those who have it don't have to tell you - you just know it.
What I find amusing is that you, like many others around here, are instantly suspicious of anything that is reported that you don't agree with or from a source you don't like, but will completely buy the party line hook, line, and sinker if it's a message that you agree with. Parent
IMO the media was mentioning how peaceful they were because our country was freaking out over the fact that a country with a different majority religion than ours was undergoing a major upheaval.
The fact that there was some violence is not surprising (and there was some violence). The fact that the vast majority were peaceful is astonishing, and consistent with all accounts.
Nothing has been "reported" on this other than that it happened. Who did it, if there were other incidents of violence towards women during the protests, remains to be seen. Parent
Studies showed that the more cops on the scene, the more likely the suspect will be shot.....Something about not taking the time to correctly or cautiously assess the scene. At first, it seems counter-intuitive: with more cops and less of a chance of getting killed, there should be less of a need to shoot, right? But it doesn't work out that way.
Less individual responsibility....Just mob dynamics.... Parent
Were they some of Mubarak's people or some of the pro-democracy protestors?
You wouldn't have gotten - at least from me - the kind of reaction you did. It was the "peaceful protestors we kept hearing about" that opened that door.
Why? Because it conveyed - in my opinion - that you weren't buying into the idea that these people were peaceful at all.
Did you ever consider that the reason the media kept stressing the peaceful nature of the protests was because there are too many people in this country who see a crowd that size in the Middle East and automatically think "out-of-control-terrorist-Muslims-who-want-to-get-us?" That maybe that was the counter to those who kept wanting to raise the scary spectre of the Muslim Brotherhood?
It's impossible to put that many people in one place and expect there not to be some violence - and impossible not to know that in a country of such poverty, that there would be those out to take advantage for their own purposes - but given the reason most of them were there, the number of days they were there, and the potential for it to have been a bloodbath, it was, by and large, a peaceful 18 days of protest.
I have no idea what this "party line" is that you see me and others swallowing; I really don't. I pretty much don't have a "party" anymore, just the things I do believe in and appreciate being supported in the few corners of the blogosphere and the media where there are still people willing to stand up for them.
You get piled on not because you don't take this so-called party line, but because people don't feel your comments are honest, and when pressed, the explanations you offer don't do much to dispel that feeling.
It truly does not matter to me what the politics are of the men who attacked Lara Logan, and I'm pretty sure it doesn't matter to her, either - and if tht's a party line, well, so be it. Parent
having said that I way over hearing about Cooper being "injured". in all the times I saw that he did not appear to me to get a scratch. Parent
so it IS sadly a culture thing and I would not assume it is connected to anything political. I doubt if they even knew or cared that she is a reporter. She was at the wrong place at the wrong time. crowd was high on their success and the belief that they can get away with it. Parent
Similar violent crimes happen everyday in all corners of the globe. No disrespect to the victim of this traumatic violent crime, but sorry to say such violent crimes are not unique to Egypt or to any nation in the process of overthrowing its government. Parent
I sincerely hope she's "OK" as in "recovers as well as possible and my heart goes out to her"
Will attempt to review before hitting post next time... Parent
I didn't mean to make you feel bad. Parent
It is unfathomable to me that people can be so mean-spirited about something like this. Parent
I'll be at the World's Most Famous Arena for the big game against Pitt Saturday....Go St. John's!!!
I always thought the sacrament had the qualities of an aphrodisiac myself...but it effects everybody differently so who knows. Parent
On another front, the Iraqi defector, named Curveball by the CIA, has admitted that he fabricated his story that Saddam had biological weapons. Rafid al-Janabi, said he was proud that he had the opportunity to lie so as to give Iraq the "margin of democracy." al-Janabi's claim was featured prominently in Secretary of State Colin Powell's UN address in Feb 2003 when he laid out the Bush administration's case for war. (NYTimes, Feb 16)
Iraq was so yesterday, apparently. Parent
Nothing about Iraq was done in good faith. There are still too many people who think that Bush "made a mistake" instead of "pathologically lied to the country from Sept. 12th onward."
I'm telling you, it'll come back to bite us in the @ss next time we have a Republican President. Torture will come back and we'll find someone new to bomb. And people won't remember why we abandoned those approaches to begin with. Parent
really, I mean who didnt know this guy was full of it at the time.
having said that I believe it should be on the front page of the NYTimes. no idea if its been there. be surprised. the whole thing. the truth is the media doesnt want to cover it because the enabled it. Parent
I don't think Obama should have said anything....
But the Neocons are still out there and the debacle that is Iraq needs to be framed conclusively as the bad faith disaster that it was.... Parent
Read this article the other day and saw this again on the news this AM.
NEW YORK STATE PUBLIC HEALTH LEGAL MANUAL A GUIDE for JUDGES, ATTORNEYS and PUBLIC HEALTH PROFESSIONALS
As to court records, while 45 CFR § 164.512(e) contains special requirements for covered entities in the production of personal health information in response to a trial subpoena or discovery request, once the information becomes part of the court record it is no longer subject to HIPAA. This information then becomes subject to the general statutory and common law requirements that court records are open to the public unless otherwise sealed by the court or made confidential by statute.
Don't be the cause of an outbreak - the public may end up at your doorstep w/the pitchforks.
Donna Lieberman, the executive director of the New York Civil Liberties Union, said the 88-page book reminded her of the CliffsNotes pamphlets that have helped generations of 11th graders get through Macbeth. "Needless to say, this makes me a little nervous," she said, adding that the legal issues the book raised were "nuanced, thorny and difficult, and hard to capture in CliffsNotes."
Yeah...a wee bit nervous. A cheat sheet from hell.
Wouldn't it be better in such a rare doomsday scenario to have the authorities break our sacred rules than to have loopholes around them? Parent
Well, I did get a screen capture last night. Parent
Why didn't NYU fire Nir Rosen over Lara Logan?
Which would have been entirely appropriate. Parent
mediabistro via GG Parent
Who knows, maybe a resignation midway in a fellowship requires Rosen to repay some funding? That would be good karma. Parent
"So," he added, "I'm going to have to have a conversation with him -- what would he like to see happen?"
-- from Anne's comment
How nice we have a President willing to let Paul Ryan decide our fate.
he is the chairman of the budget committee. that makes that statement entirely reasonable. Parent
And tell me, do you think O is going to have a conversation with Ryan so that they can go toe-to-toe?
He's talking about the budget here. Be honest now, when responding. Parent
I think the president is far from Paul Ryan. lets just leave it at that.
emphasis mine. Parent
Because my take is that we will likely be treated to another case of premature capitulation.
If I'm wrong, I'll own up to it. I might need to be reminded, but I'll eat virtual crow publicly.
So? What are you thinking about that meeting? Parent
In fact, I think Ryan is just the person Obama needs in order to build consensus for some of the things he keeps telling us he wants to do - things I still can't believe someone who calls himself a democrat could ever get behind.
Sure, we can wait and see what happens, but try as I might, I can't find a reason to believe that the pattern established even before Obama was elected is about to be broken.
Of course, by the time we can see whatever it is, the chances of undoing it will be nil. Parent
For one thing, the GOP isn't going to shut down the government, expecially not when they have Obama not even bothering to hide his zeal for common ground, much of which is going to hurt those who are already hurting.
For another, Bill Clinton doesn't have what I am beginning to regard in Obama as a deep dislike and disdain for the poor.
To see Ryan/Obama playing out like Gingrich/Clinton is, in my opinion, to be deeply in denial about what is going on. Parent
It does appear that his history of community organizing is central to Obama's identity, seemingly even more important to him than his work as a legislator
He talks about how much he cares, but his actions don't comport with those words.
It's extraordinarily disheartening to see that - on both sides of the aisle - we aren't even arguing about whether we need to make all these cuts - many of which are going to be made on the backs of the least of us - we moved directly to that we need to cut - and now all that's being argued about is what is going to be cut. He's quite nicely put the wealthy off-limits - I guess he doesn't want to impose any sacrifice on them - which means the cuts will come at the expense of those who simply have nothing left to sacrifice.
At every opportunity, Obama finds a way to talk about going after Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid - and if you honestly trust, with Obama's affinity for all things Wall Street, that he's looking to make those programs stronger and better, I might just have some swampland I could sell you. Parent
I'd be happy to be wrong, but we'll see. Parent
My bet is with the President on this one. The primary reason: The anticipation in the Republican party has been much higher than they can meet. To me, it has a lot to do with the expectations of the general public and the various media that feed into that. Parent
Urbana Pops Orchestra invites you to a unique pairing of artwork by paleo-illustrator Todd Marshall and music by members of the Pops.
Im there.
Todds Work. besides what he does here I mean.
Strange guy, though I don't claim to know what his exact game is. Just some suspicions ...
Meanwhile, with apologies to his cheerleader radio friend Amy Goodman, it sure would be nice if we could get a fresh crop of intellectuals to come forward and take up some of the slack -- preferably a younger group with the smarts but without the mean-spiritedness and moral shortcomings.