Open Thread.
Make a new account
The next evening, the 29th, Mrs. BTAL to be rushed to the hospital. She spend 8 hours in the ER then into emergency surgery to remove her spleen and other internal bleeding issues. She lost over a gallon of blood (which had been pumped into her in the ER) during the surgery then was put straight into ICU. 24 hours later they transferred her from the local/regional hospital to Addenbrookes in Cambridge as her condition was beyond what they could handle.
She spent 18 days in ICU. 15 of those days she was completely sedated while they dealt with mechanically supporting her blood pressure then kidneys and respiration.
After ICU, it was another 5 days in the liver ward followed by a transfer back to the regional hospital for yet another 8 days in a general hospital ward.
The ward Dr. who processed her discharge prescribed all the wrong drugs. One in particular would have been fatal if we had left the hospital with it. Thankfully an observant nurse caught the issue.
Here's the bullet points regarding the British NHS.
The good:
End of story, our 7 day trip turned into a 7 1/2 week trip.
As for the NHS report, all that really suprised me was the bill. Only 100k? Spend that much time in a hospital bed stateside and aspirin charges alone will reach 5 figures...it sounds crazy, but could 100k be considered discount?
The waiting is to be expected in a universal coverage country...the screw-ups I think could happen anywhere. Last time I was in the ER I couldn't get a decent blanket out of them either, and the sick were on gurneys lining the halls, waiting for rooms. Parent
Then there was the "silly" costs. Every pays for parking at all the hospitals. They outsource the enforcement and the fees are not cheap.
Then something as silly as phone and TV are a pay for service and outsourced. I fully understand that TV is not a medical necessity, but when someone is stuck in a hospital bed for days and weeks, even soap operas can be a welcome distraction. Again, an outsourced service that wasn't cheap.
Thanks for the kind words. Parent
I don't remember whether they charged me for the phone or not. Either way, with cell phones that's not a big deal anymore. Parent
Since I prefer not to watch TV and find having 1 to 12 TVs going non stop annoying, I would prefer to go back to having lower room costs and people renting TVs. Parent
Also glad you had family there - doesn't everyone of a certain age dread the possibility of falling ill away from home?
Worse, I keep thinking about your wife not really being in a position to grieve the loss of her sister in the moment, but having to deal with it while trying to recover from major health problem.
Best wishes to you both (it's hard in a different way on those at the bedside, unable to do much but keep eyes and ears opem, ask questions, etc. - but exhausting nonetheless).
Better days! Parent
I hope your Mrs. is doing better.
A friend of mine had the same almost fatal prescription thing here. The doctor was getting ready to give her a shot of penicillin (she is highly allergic) and had not read her chart. The nurse caught it and when the doctor realized that he had almost killed a patient he began shaking. Parent
When dealing with BC/BS International, they explained a service they provide in which they open a case and assign a team of nurses/practitioners who contact by phone the foreign hospital and nurses to monitor the treatment. IMHO, it is probably a two-part system. One to protect their customer but also to make sure the foreign providers don't over treat for the billable income. Parent
For what it's worth, my grandmother's doctor in California nearly killed her by prescibing a medication that had already been banned by the FDA, for causing liver failure. Indeed, after three days on the drug, her liver started shutting down. It was a very close call. Parent
As my friends in college would say, Hater-aid is a drink that doesn't refresh but is consumed wherever competitions are held.
And yeah, I know the facts of the 1980 election. You should read up on Ted Kennedy and how he grabbed Carter's book. Parent
Usually, when he gets caught making it up, he just ignores it and moves on to another commentor/thread. Parent
What is "The likely answer" for $500 Alex? Parent
Guess which posts you never respond to ... Parent
Maybe you should just become comfortable with the idea that I know a lot of bizarre facts. Parent
BTW - Corbin denied (under oath) taking the books, and Shirley's accusations have never been established. IIRC, Carter also accused George Will of stealing the debate book. Parent
And yeah, I know the facts of the 1980 election. You should read up on Ted Kennedy and how he grabbed Carter's book.
Sheez Parent
Also, going back to the original point: you make a comparison between sore Democrats in 1980, and sore Dems after the primaries. Well, Reagan DID cheat, as everyone acknowledges. Most people also realize that he made a deal with Iran before the election. And you have the .. what is the Yiddish word for this combination of chutzpah and totally jarring inconsistency?.. to compare the cases, as if that lets Obama off the hook? weird. Parent
The fact that Kennedy's closest advisor and confident gave the book to Reagan is COMPLETELY different.
Because I bet that one of Kennedy's closets confidants would never tell Kennedy that he was sabotaging the man Kennedy hated with a passion?
I guess that is one possibility.
Anyway, we are talking here about cheaters. My only point is that any time someone loses, there is a supporter of the loser somewhere that says he cheated, particularly in politics.
No one ever wants to believe that their candidate wasn't as good. There is always a scapegoat.
Always.
That doesn't mean that cheating doesn't happen. It just means that a person who didn't support Obama claiming that he cheated is pretty much expected. Parent
Here is my thing:
I admit that I am a huge Obama fan. Straight off the top. You know my deal. That allows me to admit when it influences my thinking. I am up front about it. It's a fair criticism whenever I get it.
What's silly is when "serious TL commenters" claim to have The Truth and know exactly what democrats think, should think, or would think if they only had the facts.
Me. I have more faith in my democratic bretheren. They are, for the most part, pragmatic, more knowledgable than conservatives and better able to separate the truth from the BS.
I start with the default that democrats aren't stupid. And let's be clear. People here calling Obama a republican for doing what most dems want him to do are pretty much calling the majority of democrats stupid.
Which is fine. Free country. But let's call it what it is. When a minority of the party is calling an action supported by most democrats a complete sell-out, conservative takeover, etc., that's what you are saying. Every dem that signed onto the deal is a conservative who doesn't care about 98% of the country. All of them, right? They are all Hannity's.
But don't get mad when those same democrats, the ones you imply are stupid or traitors or whatever, start ignoring the rants from the left and align themselves with independents to get stuff done. I mean that's the trade off. You dismiss them as ignorant and then they start dismissing you right back.
Then, at some unfortunate point, it will dawn on the far left that they need moderates and independents to do anything.
It will be an odd day to see democrats elated by Obama's re-election while a weirdly disconnected group of democrats is neutral or unhappy.
It'll be odd but somewhat familiar unfortunately. Parent
If I wanted a rock star, I'd support Springsteen. Obama can't play guitar.
If I wanted homilies, I'd ask for some religious leader.
He performed the bait and switch. Or perhaps he just flat out performed a flim-flam, a confidence game.
I do not trust him to operate in the interests of democrats or democratic policies.
I don't care if he fired up crowds-- anyone can do that with proper crowd stimulation. I care what he does or does not do.
Hope this doesn't seem like piling on, but he was long on hat but short on cattle. Parent
That was the "change". I think many people never got that "change" didn't mean "move to the far left".
Fundamentally that is the difference in perceptions that has us speaking at odds. He was plenty substantive and he's done much of what he said he'd do. Parent
Obama isn't the alternative to something worse. He EMBODIES something worse. He should be ashamed, but he is incapable of shame... process has taken over policy. Passing something, even if bad, is more important than protecting the electorate.
I mean no offense to you personally, but my thoughts run thus: Another Obama presidency offers little difference from many, if not most, of the republican pretenders. I will not be party to a democrat running to gut the New Deal.
At the end of the day, one must stand for something, or one falls for everything. "Compromise" doesn't signify any goal, only process.
I regret that the president is empty. My saying he is empty didn't make it so, his actions have.
Good luck with your re-election. We need some real candidate. I predict a crushing two years of job loss and disaffection based on what Obama has done.
I allow you and his followers to reap the whirlwind. Parent
Then people like Geraldine Ferraro and PUMAs started making it about sexism while simultaneously using racism and ABG was created.
Not to restart that whole thing, but it really is times like these that it warms my heart that Obama won. Parent
just sayin'. Parent
Public option Open HCR hearings NAFTA reforms Closing Guantanamo Ban on lobbyists FISA Repealing the Bush tax cuts Allowing imported prescription drugs Cutting earmarks Windfall profits for oil companies Cap-and-trade Immigration reform ...
Of course, "change" is a nice slogan for an election, because it means different things to different people. The problem, of course, is that, after you're elected, all of those same people expect you to live up to their definition of "change".
Heh ... Parent
The only thing most TL commenters know for sure is what they, individually, think, and most of us are pretty clear that we speak for ourselves only. You won't see a lot of poll-citing here, for the very reason that we are more concerned with expressing our individual views than in trying to make polls work for us.
You keep saying that most Dems want Obama to do what he's doing, but you never address the question of whether that is approval in the specific, or the general. Just like this latest poll-recital, where you would have us believe that it means something that some percentage of Democrats approve of this latest deal when no one even knows the details of it. What are Dems saying about whether they want Obama to fix entitlements, if fixing them means a loss of benefits? What are they saying about whether they want heating assistance to the poor reduced, or progams that support child nutrition cut?
Do you care at all about the policy? I see that occasionally, you express your own dissatisfaction with what's happening, but what does that mean if you aren't willing to do anything about it, other than keep voting for it?
Independents are not going along for this ride to anywhere near the extent they did in 2008. I read an article in the Post yesterday, about a college student who campaigned for Obama in 2008; what's he doing this year? Working to draft Mitch Daniels to run for president. Mitch Daniels, the Republican. Ancedotal, but instructive that Obama's not going to be able to count on any particular demographic as he did in 2008.
You're singing from the same songbook that Obama's been singing from: "we don't need you."
Seems like a pretty dismissive attitude from someone who says - says - he wants to hear from everyone. And, since you are the guy who wants as many people in the tent as possible, you need to make up your mind: if you don't want to hear what we have to say, ignore us at your peril. Parent
I don't think that will take long to disprove. How about we keep track of that, eh. Parent
If there were just one or two commenters with a slightly more moderate position, I wouldn't feel compelled to defend 2/3 of the democrats from charges that they have no idea what they are talking about and need to stop being so ignorant. Parent
This just isn't a place where you can throw things out there without someone checking them for veracity. And calling you on it when it's clear someone is just talking out of his or her a$$.
But, if you're going to take that approach, you might want to stick around to answer for some of the things you post. Case in point: the other day you insisted that the health-whatever bill wasn't written by lobbyists. I sent you to a site where the lobbyist/legislator connections were mapped out.
You never responded. Parent
Remember?
Anyway, I know that I post a lot and all but the fact that I don't respond to every question or request made of me here either means i didn't see it or don't have the time.
The healthcare bill, like almost every bill of substance that goes through congress, was written with the help of lobbyists. I am sure of that. Parent
And, for the record, you insisted that there was no way the health whatever bill was written by lobbyists. Parent
... you just happen to fail to respond to all the posts where you've been proven factually wrong.
Guess which one is more believable? Parent
I don't see anyone raising their hands to be at the head of the "I was wrong" line, so spare me th command that I fall on the sword and beg apologies.
in any event, you saying that I was wrong doesn't mean that I agree with your analysis and I am sure the feeling is mutual, so step down off the horse. I know it's high and all but you can come down now. Parent
Take your time. I'll wait. Parent
That took 1 second. Parent
Whatever. Too bad they did such a poor job picking. The GOP couldn't have picked a better foil all by themselves.
Maybe after the Obama disaster the party will change the nominating system. Parent
Please see link. The debate was held some time during the summer of 2007. I will try to find the full transcript if possible. I watched the entire debate on television. Parent
I am happy to engage you because i am an adult and don't take my toys and go him when someone disagrees with me, but if you can't handle that, it's cool.
PS: Obama won fair and square. Sorry. Parent
The defense rests your honor. Parent
You're hogging all the bandwidth. Give us a break! Parent
Speaking of which, anyone know what happened to squeaky?
Now those were some "irate" threads :)
Between squeaky, creamcity, and steve m we've lost some very strong/unique opinions around here for various reasons.
Not, IMO, a good thing. Parent
I need back up. Parent
The morning OT got closed out early, robbing other folks who maybe had something else to say. It becomes like a chatroom on facebook. If one doesn't have the opportunity to track the convo every minute...you're out of luck. No big deal...nor a 1st amendment issue. I'll go back to silent reading. Frack it. Parent
Links are always absent when ABG present one of his great facts. When pressed for a link, the link provided did not substantiate ABG's fact but more or less disproved it.
Other goodies in the last week or so were that 1) Obama appointed the FIRST woman to head the DNC and 2)the Obama health insurance legislation was the same as the 1960's Ted Kennedy plan.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz is the third woman to head the DNC and Kennedy's 1960's health care plan was for nationwide health care centers. This is SOP.
ABG has a whole play book of discounting and distraction techniques which he employs throughout his comments. I thought these techniques were a dishonest debating tactics and disliked them when they were used by Republicans and my opinion has not changed.
ABG goes from claiming to be a liberal to deriding liberals and their policies. Many times these claims are in the same thread. Obama would be proud of how well ABG kicks the DFH.
From my point of view, ABG's comments on the consequences of Obama's policies are the most troubling. According to ABG, it is regrettable that poor people will suffer from Obama's policies but those policies are necessary for Obama to be reelected.
I do not claim that my views are the views of others on this site. As BTB would say, "Speaking only for me." Parent
Nitpicking over minor details like what was in Kennedy's 1960 plan is IMO, counter productive, and as you say, distracting, when there is a larger point being discussed. Fact is you were both wrong, since he wasn't elected until 1962. Thus there was no 1960 plan at all. Parent
Time to be gray, balding, old, and buff!
House Democrats had already been preparing to release their own 2012 budget, under the leadership of Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), the ranking Democrat on the budget committee. The House Dems' budget plan had been in the works for weeks, as Van Hollen had been meeting with every major caucus in his party to craft an alternative to the Republicans' plan. Last week, the GOP's decision to push out Ryan's plan to radically alter Medicare and Medicaid in the middle of the 2011 budget fight threw Democrats for a loop. Now the news of Obama's speech has left Dems on Capitol Hill grappling with another unexpected turn of events that could force them to change their plans, as they won't want to be too out of sync with whatever Obama proposes.
House Dems should be out there pushing a budget that Obama won't necessarily support. The budget has been generally frustrating but if all the House Dems exist to do is peep "me too" after the President speaks, then they're being kind of useless.
Johann Hari sets sail with America's swashbuckling neocons
The conversation ebbs back to friendly chit-chat. So, you're a European, one of the Park Avenue ladies says, before offering witty commentaries on the cities she's visited. Her companion adds, "I went to Paris, and it was so lovely." Her face darkens: "But then you think - it's surrounded by Muslims." The first lady nods: "They're out there, and they're coming." Emboldened, the bearded Floridian wags a finger and says, "Down the line, we're not going to bail out the French again." He mimes picking up a phone and shouts into it, "I can't hear you, Jacques! What's that? The Muslims are doing what to you? I can't hear you!"
Currently, just 37% of liberals Strongly Approve of the president's performance
So according to that poll Obama's intensity rating is -20.
click THE DEAL
Nelson is expected to issue a ruling on the players' request for an injunction to end the lockout some time next week or the following.
So far, the effects of the lockout include:
It's possible Nelson will hold another hearing to evaluate the players' claim that the lockout is causing "irreparable harm", but the topic was argued in both the players' and owners' briefs to the court. "Irreparable harm" was discussed only once in the previous hearing, during Nelson's questioning of the players' counsel.
I'm of the opinion Nelson will rule in favor of the players. If this happens next week, there could be a brief free agency period before the draft (round 1 on Apr 28, a Thursday night). That's something this Philadelphia fan is looking forward to (trading Kevin Kolb for a 2011 draft pick), but I still don't think it's likely.
"A CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey released Monday indicates that the budget agreement that prevented a government shutdown is popular, with Americans supporting it by a 58 to 38 percent margin. But there's a partisan divide, with two-thirds of Democrats and a majority of independent voters backing the deal, and Republicans divided."
"TWO THIRDS OF DEMOCRATS AND A MAJORITY OF INDEPENDENTS VOTERS"
So let me get this straight. Obama is a huge traitor to the democrats for a deal that an overwhelming majority of democrats and most independents support and most republicans don't like.
Hello.
Is this thing on?
And wait until people realize what kind of pudding it is...
Popular support does not make bad policy better. Parent
Wait. What? Parent
For weeks now, the media has been bombarding people with the dire consequences of a shutdown, and in the last few days before the agreement was reached, they hit them with "our heroes in uniform won't be paid!" and every other ooggeddy-boogeddy scare tactic, so it's hardly surprising to find support for avoiding the shutdown.
As I said, the story will be told when people start feeling the consequences of The Deal 2.0. Parent
"Did the GOP leaders give up too much in the budget agreement? Only 25 percent of all Americans think so, but that figure rises to 50 percent among all Republicans," says Holland. "Did Obama and the Democrats in Congress give up too much? Only a third of Democrats feel that way." Parent
There is just no way anyone believes this austerity plan is going to keep unemployment headed down and create jobs.
Well, except you. And Paul Ryan. And - sorry - Obama. Parent
No one, not even our "representatives" in congress know what's in the deal (only delivered to them today)
So what does a poll from the public mean? Nothing! Zero, Zilch, Nada
We know whenever something "get's done" the knotheads posing as informed voters reflexively clap.
p.s. certainly not referring to Mr. Angry Parent
Unfortunately, none of the net reduction in the US unemployment rate over the past year came from increases in the employment-to-population ratio; all of it came from declining labour-force participation. Unemployment has fallen from 10.1% over the course of the past 18 months, but the employment to-population ratio has remained stuck at 58.4%. Perhaps it would be better if unemployed people who could have jobs, and who at full employment would have them, were actively looking for work rather than out of the labour force completely.
Unemployment has fallen from 10.1% over the course of the past 18 months, but the employment to-population ratio has remained stuck at 58.4%. Perhaps it would be better if unemployed people who could have jobs, and who at full employment would have them, were actively looking for work rather than out of the labour force completely.
Not sure how that helps. Parent
My frustration with Obama is that someone so charismatic took office and then decided to be about as uncharismatic as possible. That's disappointing. And he appears content to play defense against the GOP. Not much he can do about that right now, but the GOP got their tax cuts for the rich extended, and now they've got budget cuts larger than they initially imagined as well. If Obama isn't able to change the strategy, the GOP will continue to rack up wins. And that's not from my POV good for the country. Parent
Although we need leadership, a position, a set of positions, and we don't get them. The moveable feast keeps moving away from the people who need to eat. Parent
Geez, why do we keep running slackers? Parent
Really. I have ZERO sympathy for this kind of behavior when we've got millions unemployed right now. Parent
In past pursuits, he never stayed with anything long enough to leave a mark on it.
What lies ahead? Parent
But it became evident on Sunday that they had yet to work out the details of the agreement, which would cut roughly $38 billion from a federal budget expected to exceed $3.7 trillion this year. "You may not be surprised to hear this, but they're still sifting through the areas where they are going to make cuts," Representative Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, the senior Democrat on the House Budget Committee, said Sunday on the ABC News program "This Week." A Republican Congressional aide said on Sunday night that the House and Senate Appropriations Committees were still working on the fine points, since "thousands of budget line items have to be negotiated." link
"You may not be surprised to hear this, but they're still sifting through the areas where they are going to make cuts," Representative Chris Van Hollen of Maryland, the senior Democrat on the House Budget Committee, said Sunday on the ABC News program "This Week."
A Republican Congressional aide said on Sunday night that the House and Senate Appropriations Committees were still working on the fine points, since "thousands of budget line items have to be negotiated." link
Through the Looking Glass....... Parent
Can we just fast forward to 2013 and continue our empirical demise from that point in time?
Damn you Bukowski for being so damn perceptive...
The difference between a democracy and a dictatorship is that in a democracy you vote first and take orders later; in a dictatorship you don't have to waste your time voting.
Because if you really believe anyone polled actually knows what was in the deal, your crazy. The poll had to be taken yesterday, so the deal would have been closed for less than a day, a Sunday.
You make loads of non-sense assumptions, but assuming that Americans know what is in the deal a day after it's reached on the weekend, is one of your most spectacular.
This poll tells me democrats are happier the government didn't shut down than republicans. Shocker. Yet, you tied the numbers right to Obama, as if the question was about Obama, that leap is worthy of some sort of medal fo-sho. Parent
OK. Well technically that's right but ... Parent
But nice try at putting words in ScottW714's mouth ... Parent
He//, - I'd be surprised if many of those respondents weren't just made aware of the deal when the pollster called them.
Not sure how to make that any clearer. Parent
because the details of the poll are available you know.
http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2011/images/04/11/rel6a.pdf
Again, I am not even saying that I agree with this budget deal.
I just think that there are levels of criticism.
Claiming that this deal was the result of a closet republican is just silly. Criticisms loose power if they overreach. Parent
It's not even worth doing that. What matters is how you see the plan as a whole.
Anyway, what you are suggesting is an unfair tactic. A very slim majority doesn't like healthcare reform, but if you walk people trough it item by item, they love it.
We should at least be consistent. Parent
A "very slim majority" doesn't like the ACA? I wouldn't be using that as selling point, but knock yourself out.
And, I have no doubt that if you're the one walking people through the ACA, it is a real tiptoe through the tulips, but when people start understanding what it means to them in their real lives, not so much.
I have yet to encounter anyone who "just loves" it - most are trying to figure out why insurance costs even more, and covers even less. Parent
Why does Obama have a -20 intensity rating according to the poll I linked to above?
That's what I'm getting out. People like about 20% of the ACA but dislike the other 80% of it hence the over 50% who want it repealed. You can't say that people like the deal because we don't know what all the details are. When unemployment goes up next year due to the deal, are you going to be singing it's praises? Supply side economics have NEVER worked and they certainly aren't going to work this time.
There's a reason that Obama has a -20 intensity rating and it's crap like this deal that do it. Parent
Second, people like way more than 20% of Aca. As a matter of fact the only thing they don't like intensely is the mandate. And who really likes a new tax?
Earlier this week someone said that Obama was losing the support of younger voters. That was similarly false:
http://content.usatoday.com/communities/theoval/post/2011/03/obama-regains-poll-standing-with-young- people/1
No need to turn this into a poll war, but my only point is that we are calling Obama a traitor and a republican for a deal the democrats overwhelmingly support.
That should factor in to some degree in how we view this. Parent
The reason I linked to Rasmussen is because he is the only one polling INTENSITY. INTENSITY is what caused the massive loss this pass November because Obama's top line numbers were not that bad. Don't you recall people discussing the "enthusiasm gap"? Well, it still exits and it is hugely against Obama.
And if he's only got 67% support from Dems that is horrible. If he loses 1/3 of his voting base he's toast. Kerry got 80%, split independents with Bush and still lost. Obama's Hispanic numbers are down where Kerry's were in '04. To say these numbers are good is just delusional. Parent
If, as widely touted - by Democrats - the Republican plan to cut spending by $61 billion was going to cost some 700,000 jobs, where do you think almost $40 billion will take that number? And is there something we should be cheered by that Obama's agreed-upon amounts are less than what the GOP was shooting for?
And, remember, this isn't over - they're not done yet, according to Obama: this is just a start.
I haven't seen you quoting Krugman lately - could that be because he thinks this is absolutely the wrong approach to move the economy forward? Parent
Jesus Christ on a crutch.
And in case all the "reading" you've been doing hasn't clued you in, all we really know is the dollar amount of the cuts - we still don't know what, specifically is on the chopping block.
Honestly, how is it that you keep thinking you can toss off a statement like you just did and expect anyone to take you seriously? Parent
Here's a link, if anyone's interested. There was one interesting part you left out ...
"But this doesn't mean Obama gets a political boost from the deal. The president's overall approval rating is now 48 percent; in late March, that figure was 51 percent. This is the first time this year that a CNN poll has found his overall approval rating below 50 percent," says CNN Polling Director Keating Holland.
The president's overall approval rating is now 48 percent; in late March, that figure was 51 percent. This is the first time this year that a CNN poll has found his overall approval rating below 50 percent," says CNN Polling Director Keating Holland.
Obama is wrong on the wars.
[the crowd gasps]
I don't agree with Obama's slow withdrawals or escalations (although I do agree with his actions in Pakistan and Libya).
But if you think that means I see him as some kind of conservative hawk, you're mistaken. There is a middle ground people. Forcing Obama to be 100% Conservative or 100% Liberal is silly.
He does a bunch of stuff I like. He does a bunch of stuff I don't like. I give him a B grade overall and that's more than enough to get my vote next year. Parent
It sure would be nice if you could assume wrongdoing based on arrest, but at 13-14 million per year, all it means for sure is chains, mugshot, fingerprints, cage, and hopefully bail. Parent
I'm just not buying this collegiate athlete crime spree hype...the only thing new is 24/7 media so we here about every single arrest, in the past we'd only hear of local arrests, if that. Also, in the past the star athlete would get the courtesy of a phone call to coach instead of of a phone call from jail. We're more obsessed with background checking too. Mix it all together and you've got another faux crime trend...maybe to distract from the exploitive model of big time big money college sports?
College athletes are no more prone to criminal behavior then they ever were, I see no reason to think otherwise. Parent
I was leaning toward anarcho-syndicalism years ago, and there are some fine qualities in the philosophy, especially when compared to plutocracy. I'll send you some links. Can you email me at my new addy, jeffinalabama@gmail.com? Parent
I'm definitely down with lawless voluntary associations...I know law-choked involuntary "democratic" association all too well and ain't too happy with it...ya end up with a DEA running around breaking peoples doors down stealing their property and liberty, troops on foreign soil doing god knows what, and on and on and on. It may help the trains run on time, but it sure is a nasty way to do things. Parent
Somebody get that man an apple.
It does seem like we're going through some kind of replay of the Eighties. From the economy to fashion to music. Maybe squats too will once again become de rigueur. Parent
Since we've allowed our country to be stolen, perhaps the only way to get it back is to steal it back. "This land is my land, this land is your land". No mention of any BofA land:)
I too would love to see a squatters renaissance a la the 70's-80's...turn these lemons into lemonade. Stop being punching bags. Parent
I have a Greek Orthodox cook book put out by a church in N Y somewhere. I've made some of the recipes and they are really good.
Do you dye the red eggs for Easter and put them in the bread? Parent
2 large cucumbers 3 cloves garlic (or more, to taste) 2 cups Greek whole milk yogurt* 2 fronds of fresh dill, finely chopped 1 teaspoon fresh mint, finely chopped Salt Ground black pepper, to taste Ground white pepper, " Ground cayenne pepper, " Kosher salt, " 2 T. olive oil 2 T. fresh lemon juice 1/3 c. sour cream 1/3 c. mayonnaise
Peel and seed the cucumbers (leave a few strips of skin on, for color). Chop into very small pieces (use a food processor). Place into colander and allow to drain 15-30 minutes, then squeeze out any excess water. Crush garlic into a pulp. Mix together cucumber, garlic, yogurt, dill, mint, oil, lemon juice, sour cream, and mayo. Add salt and a dash of black, white, and red peppers, to taste.
* If you can't get Greek yogurt, take plain, good quality whole milk yogurt (about 4 cups), put into a colander lined with cheese cloth, and allow to drain for several hours, until reduced by about half. (The sour cream and mayo are not "traditional," but they sure are good- makes it creamier.) Parent
Avgolemono Soup One large chicken, cut up One onion, quartered Two celery stalks, quartered Two carrots, quartered Two cloves garlic Two-four chicken bullion cubes One cup rice Four eggs, separated Juice of two lemons Boil chicken parts in water, adding chicken bullion cubes, onion, carrots, celery, and garlic. When done, skim out the veggies, set the chicken aside, and skim the fat from the stock. (make sure you have about 8 cups--add canned stock or water plus bullion cubes to make 8 cups, if necessary). Bring the stock to a boil. Add 1/2 to 1 cup rice (depending on how "ricey" you like it). Reduce heat and simmer until rice is done. You can add some of the chicken meat, diced, if you want. Remove the pot from the heat. Separate 4 eggs. Beat egg whites until they peak. Add the beaten yolks, then slowly add the juice of two lemons, beating the whole time. Slowly add the stock, a little at a time, until you have added about two cups worth. Then pour the mixture back into the pot, stirring gently. (Take the skin off of the chicken pieces and brown the chicken in butter to serve alongside, or save the meat that you haven't added to the soup for another use.) Parent
But hey, news has been really good about keeping up with all the really, really important details of the upcoming wedding in another country . . . . and Barry Bonds trial since I'm in his neck of the woods. They keep telling us they will break into programing with the verdict . . . . Parent
Hah! First thing he thinks to say about the late great film legend ... geez ... thanks, Bob.