Open Thread.
Make a new account
Any other NYC TL'ers wanna get down the tentative plan is heaping mounds of glorious pastrami at Katz's...very cool sh*t!
I know he "means well", but he's paving a road to hell with those good intentions nonetheless.
Just be glad he ain't governor of Alabama, imagine the draconian measures! Parent
I can't believe for such a large diverse community there ain't one motherf*cker who works for the GSA up in here to help us make it happen;) Parent
...take their money, drink their whiskey, screw their women, and vote against `em anyway, you don't belong in [politics]."
-paraphrasing Molly Ivins, who took it from Democratic California State Treasurer Jesse Unruh. Parent
I just love the ones in my yard. Don't know the variety though . . . Parent
And then! a mini-miracle. This year I saw a small planting of some beautiful purple ones in one of those little neighborhood parks that was restored last summer.
Dear God, Please help the irises take over the Spring flower plantings, Amen. Parent
But: I'm looking for a good record cleaning system, something a little better than the common brush and solution RCA sells. Anyone have any setup they can recommend?
Also loving my local Half Price Books, just picked up Led Zep [I], Springsteen's Nebraska and Stevie Wonder's Songs in the Key of Life for $5 each, and Nebraska is in near-mint condition!
http://www.nittygrittyinc.com Parent
http://tinyurl.com/wsjlawarticle
As the authors note, the increase in homicides may not be viewed by everyone as "unambiguously bad." It could be driven by individuals protecting themselves from imminent harm by using lethal force. But it could also be driven by an escalation in violence that, absent the "castle doctrine," wouldn't have ended in serious injury for either party, they say.
I think the reduction in legal sanctions against escalating the violence causes people to skip all the other options they may have and go right for the lethal force. Some people may think that is fine - if someone is in your home they deserve what they get. I just don't agree. Parent
http://tinyurl.com/houstontrial Parent
The judge who revoked George Zimmerman's bond did so after he determined that it was "apparent" that Zimmerman's wife had lied under oath, and clear that Zimmerman "does not properly respect the law."
...
"It is apparent that [Shellie] Zimmerman testified untruthfully at the bond hearing," the judge writes in his order. "The Defendant also testified, but did not alert the Court to the misinformation."
The judge writes that his considered several factors, most of which weighed against Zimmerman. Among them, "this is a serious charge for which life may be imposed; the evidence against him is strong; he has been charged with one prior crime, for which he went through a pre-trial diversion program, and has had an injunction lodged against him" for domestic violence. "Most importantly, though, is the fact that he has now demonstrated that he does not properly respect the law or the integrity of the judicial process," Lester wrote. The only factors that "heavily weigh in his favor," Lester wrote, are "that he turned himself in upon the issuance of the original warrant and has kept authorities abreast of his current location."
Among them, "this is a serious charge for which life may be imposed; the evidence against him is strong; he has been charged with one prior crime, for which he went through a pre-trial diversion program, and has had an injunction lodged against him" for domestic violence.
"Most importantly, though, is the fact that he has now demonstrated that he does not properly respect the law or the integrity of the judicial process," Lester wrote.
The only factors that "heavily weigh in his favor," Lester wrote, are "that he turned himself in upon the issuance of the original warrant and has kept authorities abreast of his current location."
It's been quite a day; between those who want nothing to come between them and their guns, and those who want to purge the voter rolls of non-citizens, I feel like I wandered into Red State. Parent
J may have to start designating some of them as "Non-GZ/TM,"
In an affidavit, prosecutors revealed new details about Shellie Zimmerman's alleged efforts to hide money from the court. Four days before she testified to having no knowledge of the funds, the affidavit says, Shellie Zimmerman began a series of transfers into her account -- totaling $74,000 between April 16 and April 19. The affidavit says about $47,000 more was transferred from George Zimmerman's account to his sister's. Shellie Zimmerman withdrew about $18,000 more cash, prosecutors say. Prosecutors say the Zimmermans used a rudimentary "code" to discuss the money in recorded jailhouse phone calls -- referring to $100,000, for example, as "$100." At least two of the calls, the state alleges, were made while Shellie Zimmerman and her husband's sister were at a local credit union making the transactions. "In my account do I have at least $100?" Zimmerman asked. "No... there's like $8. $8.60," she replied. Zimmerman told his wife to "pay off all the bills" with the money, prosecutors said, including an American Express card and a Sam's Club card. He also instructed her on how to pay for his bail. "According to the affidavit, after her husband was released on bond days after the bond hearing, she transferred more than $85,000 back into his account. A branch manager at their credit union told prosecutors he knew the couple, and saw Shellie Zimmerman talking to her husband on the phone on April 16. The manager said he'd helped Shellie Zimmerman transfer control of George Zimmerman's account, at one point speaking directly to George Zimmerman by phone.
Four days before she testified to having no knowledge of the funds, the affidavit says, Shellie Zimmerman began a series of transfers into her account -- totaling $74,000 between April 16 and April 19.
The affidavit says about $47,000 more was transferred from George Zimmerman's account to his sister's. Shellie Zimmerman withdrew about $18,000 more cash, prosecutors say.
Prosecutors say the Zimmermans used a rudimentary "code" to discuss the money in recorded jailhouse phone calls -- referring to $100,000, for example, as "$100." At least two of the calls, the state alleges, were made while Shellie Zimmerman and her husband's sister were at a local credit union making the transactions.
"In my account do I have at least $100?" Zimmerman asked. "No... there's like $8. $8.60," she replied.
Zimmerman told his wife to "pay off all the bills" with the money, prosecutors said, including an American Express card and a Sam's Club card. He also instructed her on how to pay for his bail.
"According to the affidavit, after her husband was released on bond days after the bond hearing, she transferred more than $85,000 back into his account. A branch manager at their credit union told prosecutors he knew the couple, and saw Shellie Zimmerman talking to her husband on the phone on April 16.
The manager said he'd helped Shellie Zimmerman transfer control of George Zimmerman's account, at one point speaking directly to George Zimmerman by phone.
Yikes, if that holds up, SZ is in big trouble. Parent
Since this is an open thread, I'd like to mention that GZ's cell is smaller than the one Bradley Manning occupied at Quantico. Let's not forget that, not only may he be kept in jail, but he may have little or no contact with others. Parent
guilty, or not; awaiting trial,or post trial, the loss of freedom is punishment enough. Xtra legal punishment by prison officials should be as vigorously investigated, prosecuted, and punished as that of the prisoner's in question.
The barbaric sadism which aptly defines many of our institutions is a blight on any country that permits it, especially one that holds itself out as "a beacon of democracy." Parent
And as much as I agree with a lot of aspects of our prisons, when you start comparing us worldwide, we don't look that shabby. Which is definitely not an endorsement of our treatment, more a statement of fact. Parent
It also sheds some light, and raises some eyebrows about the SPD's "thorough investigation" and their determination...."squeaky clean." Parent
I think the judge in your case indicating that you do not respect the law before your trial is a bad thing. I hope Jeralyn doesn't try to spin this and just admits that the Zimmerman's screwed up.
The judge specifically said that the man did not properly respect the law after saying earlier that he had deceived the court. Jeralyn and others jumped all over themselves trying to show that the passport and other issues were innocent slip ups, but the totality of the situation is that the guy and his wife were willing to play fast and loose with the facts to keep him out of jail.
Which is kind of a bad image to project given that his version of the story seems designed in every way to keep him out of jail. Parent
At every turn GZ has done nothing bad made serious errors in judgement. And now he's been called out on one of them by a judge.
I don't see how this can go to trial. They have to convince a jury that not only is he telling the truth, but that he made the right call that night. Something that to me seems highly unlikely. Every decision he has made has been wrong and not just a little wrong, it been the exact opposite of right. He's lost his wife from taking the stand, the judge isn't exactly pleased, and I am sure his attorney is got lumps from banging his head against the wall. And those tapes are going to be some pretty damning to GZ integrity.
Really, GZ, the cops never thought of prisoners using code or taping their conversations. And talking to the banker, damn, them is some big balls you carry.
I wish we could get the non-attorney version of what a client like this brings to the table from a defense attorney, what they say to each other. I bet they even have some sort of name for a client who can't make a good decision to save his life.
I will be shocked if this goes to trial.
And I also wonder how those donors feel about GZ paying off his credit cards with their money. That can not sit well. Parent
This has nothing to do with whether the case will go to trial.
How about waiting to hear his explanation for why he didn't think the money was available for bond? Parent
I would therefore think that the prosecution's discussion of George's alleged role in any such attempt to conspire would likely be admissible in his criminal trial, once he takes the stand to testify on his own behalf. While it wouldn't reflect directly upon his alleged criminal culpability in taking Trayvon Martin's life, it does strike at the heart of his credibility as a witness.
But Shellie's alleged role in that attempt is tangential at best to the criminal proceedings against her husband, and ultimately irrelevant to the charges against him. Parent
Quite frankly the very fact that's the bond hearing that driving all of this is just going to make the average person decide the whole system is rigged against em. Parent
Seems fair to me...an intruder is an intruder. Authority worshipping gun nuts may be twisted into a pretzel with this one though.
They're going to rally around the Presidential candidate who makes firing cops (and firmen, teachers) the centerpiece of his platform.
makes sense; fire cops, buy more handguns. Parent
Fire the Civil rights division, put a hundred thousand cops on the street. Parent
Now, the discussion is how smart it will be to grab for your weapon when facing a group of heavily armed, vested, night goggle wearing, adrenalin pumped SWAT cops vs facing down a common punk burgler. Parent
I'm just not sure if others inclined to support SYG laws will agree. NRA is facing some backlash from typical supporters for supporting the law. Parent
I don't understand why progressives have chosen this issue. Limiting any constitutional right is not progressive.
Under Florida law, it would've been illegal for Trayvon Martin (a minor) to bear a firearm to defend himself against people who might harm him. So if the government was "Limiting any constitutional right", it was Trayvon Martin whose rights were being limited because the government banned him from exercising his right to bear arms and stand his ground.
If Trayvon Martin had the right to bear arms and Stand His Ground and Trayvon Martin was the one who shot and killed George Zimmerman instead of the other way around, an entirely different story might have been told by Martin which would've explained why he was the one should be able to Stand His Ground and not Zimmerman.
I express my complete support for minors to have the equal right to bear arms and stand his ground in Florida. Unfortunately, I have not heard of any other "supporters" of the right to bear arms say the same thing.
:-P Parent
All games of this double-elimination tournament, which commences on Friday at TD Ameritrade Park in Omaha, have now been scheduled, and are as follows (the final regular season national rankings for CWS participants are included):
Friday, June 15: Game 1 (5:00 p.m. EDT): Stony Brook (No. 89) v. UCLA (No. 1) Game 2 (9:00 p.m. EDT): Florida State (No. 3) v. Arizona (No. 14)
Saturday, June 16: Game 3 (5:00 p.m. EDT): Arkansas (No. 19) v. Kent State (No. 74) Game 4 (9:00 p.m. EDT): Florida (No. 2) v. South Carolina (No. 11)
Sunday, June 17: Game 5 (5:00 p.m. EDT): Game 1 loser v. Game 2 loser (loser of Game 5 is eliminated) Game 6 (9:00 p.m. EDT): Game 1 victor v. Game 2 victor
Monday, June 18: Game 7 (5:00 p.m. EDT): Game 3 loser v. Game 4 loser (loser of Game 7 is eliminated) Game 8 (5:00 p.m. EDT): Game 3 victor v. Game 4 victor
Tuesday, June 19: Game 9 (8:00 p.m. EDT): Game 5 victor v. Game 6 loser (loser of Game 9 is eliminated)
Wednesday, June 20: Game 10 (8:00 p.m. EDT): Game 7 victor v. Game 8 loser (loser of Game 10 is eliminated)
Thursday, June 21: Game 11 (5:00 p.m. EDT): Game 9 victor v. Game 6 victor (if Game 9 victor loses Game 11, Game 9 victor is eliminated, and Game 6 victor advances to championship series) Game 12 (9:00 p.m. EDT): Game 10 victor v. Game 8 victor (if Game 10 victor loses Game 12, Game 10 victor is eliminated, and Game 8 victor advances to championship series)
Friday, June 22: Game 13 (5:00 p.m. EDT): Game 9 victor v. Game 6 victor (Necessary only if Game 6 victor loses on Thursday. Winner of Game 13 advances to championship series.) Game 14 (9:00 p.m. EDT): Game 10 victor v. Game 8 victor (Necessary only if Game 8 victor loses on Thursday. Winner of Game 14 advances to championship series.)
The two surviving teams from Thursday and / or Friday will then meet for the NCAA College World Series championship, which is a best-of-three series.
Game 1 of the championship series begins on Sunday, June 24 at 8:00 p.m. EDT. Game 2 is on Monday, June 25 at 8:00 p.m. If necessary, Game 3 will be played on Tuesday, June 26 at 8:00 p.m.
All College World Series games will be carried live on the ESPN network (ESPN and ESPN2).
That is all. Parent
Oh, and there isn't anyway to distinguish between proprietary trading and hedging. Parent
It's somewhat better for my blood pressure to get someone else's live-blog take on things!
At this point, don't you feel like you could write the script these people will be reading from today? Parent
Mike wants to talk about this right now because he says that Jamie has apologized for what happened that brought them all here, and so that is all okay now. Parent
Jamie Dimon says that his people treat the customers like they'd treat their own parents.
Jerry Morgan believes in a free market system, and does imply that what JPMorgan does can affect how all of us view capitalism. And now he is talking about the "Living Will" that protects us all from having to pay for JPMorgan's failure. When Jamie Dimon can get all the liquidity he needs from the FED at any time to attempt to earn his way out of all his failures though, he destroys what my dollars is worth. He destroys any incentive that I will ever have to save.
Dimon says he's paid the FDIC 5 billion dollars too, apparently for nothing if you listen to Jamie and I'm supposed to be impressed too with that. Jamie Dimon is literally giving 5 billion dollars to people of the United States for nothing. Parent
I bet he's been religiously practicing his "humble and regretful" facial expressions so we can all see how sincere and honest he is.
Where's my trashcan - I need to barf. Parent
JPMorgan is not in the hedge fund business he also insists to Merkley. So Merkley reads off the facts that when Dimon built his CIO unit he is using government insured deposits to run something that falls under the definition of a hedge fund. Parent
Vitter won't quit touching his face as Dimon discusses what systemic changes would be conducive to him having the business that save the U.S. economy I guess....I can't imagine where this drivel is going....can only speculate that that is what would be improved if Dimon got his way. It is creepy how much Vitter keeps touching and caressing his face while Dimon talks though.
Vitter keeps talking about systemic change within the company needed, but what is that? Do I just guess? Is Dimon supposed to guess? WTF was any of that about? Parent
Dimon says a "new model" has been put into place, but he said previously that this is really the "old model". So the new old model, or the old new model is in place now. Everything's fixed, nothing to see here :) The future is not the past, things change, the old model was a better predictor in April than the new model was, got that :)
And management can't rely on models to run business okay? Jamie says that too....you gotta go with your gut? And Basel iii makes Jamie cry okay? Parent
Also Michael Bennet really liked that offer that Jamie made to Herb Kohl's constituents and if you are in Colorado and JPMorgan has been losing your paperwork and not returning your calls, give Michael Bennet's office a call and leave your name and contact info so that Jamie can take care of you personally too.
The new multi-nation poll finds that "in predominantly Muslim nations, American anti-terrorism efforts are still widely unpopular." Beyond Muslim nations, "in nearly all countries, there is considerable opposition to a major component of the Obama administration's anti-terrorism policy: drone strikes." Specifically, "in 17 of 20 countries, more than half disapprove of U.S. drone attacks." As usual, "Americans are the clear outliers on this issue - 62% approve of the drone campaign, including most Republicans (74%), independents (60%) and Democrats (58%)." But in every other surveyed country besides India (which naturally supports any attacks in Pakistan), more people disapprove of Obama's drone strikes than approve, usually by very wide margins. Indeed, "the policy is unpopular in majority Muslim nations, but also in Europe and other regions as well"; specifically, "at least three-in-four [are opposed] in a diverse set of countries: Greece (90%), Egypt (89%), Jordan (85%), Turkey (81%), Spain (76%), Brazil (76%) and Japan (75%)."