I mean, at the original bail hearing, what if someone from George Zimmerman's team had said something like:

However, the "material falsehoods" should not contaminate the judge's analysis and ruling in a SYG hearing, an appeal,  or in a subsequent trial, if there is to be one.  Of course, credibility will likely be a consideration in future judicial steps, but it behooves all involved in the judicial process to discern facts, and even material falsehoods.

All George Zimmerman had was his word, and since Trayvon Martin is not around to offer his side of the story, Zimmerman's own testimony that he was fighting for his life is at the heart of the motion to dismiss. And right now, because of this latest development, that may not be good enough anymore to keep this case from going to trial.

De la Rionda: Could you - and you may not have been able to - could you hear whether it was raining at that time or not?

Dee Dee: It was not raining.

All of a sudden, it kind of sounded like to the back left of the unit - and it was raining outside, but we heard kind of a scuffle, or kind of just ruffling around in the bushes.

And it was weird that - it was - it's been raining all night. You know what I mean. For there even to be people out - We were kind of like, 'What are these people doing?'

I heard people talking out there, and I was kinda like, oh gosh, where they - you know, it's pouring rain, why would they be outside? I figure walking their dog or something.

And what would those records consist of?

Along with the passport, O'Mara submitted his original pre-dated notice, the FedEx receipt and the directory listing showing when the notice was drafted.

But the judge said he would delay ruling on the request, in part because he does not know if he has authority to say how the money can be used.

GZ clearly told his wife to hang onto the 2nd passport.

Your smoking gun is like one of those optical illusions that disappears when you look straight at it.

Zimmerman referred to 'my passport', suggesting he knew of only one. His wife's reply was oddly worded, but doesn't clearly show she believed there was more than one passport.

Anyway, people speak oddly sometimes. What matters is that she said nothing that clearly shows that she knew there was a second passport.

it does look like the Zimmerman's original intent was to withhold it.

Was GZ justified or not in shooting TM? If he's justified, why can't you all leave it at that: a mistaken initial criminal profiling of TM by GZ that (in your eyes) somehow turned into a justifiable shooting?

If there is an immunity hearing and a trial, I expect the trial to be anti-climactic. It will re-hash the same evidence as the hearing.

The lead investigator denied any knowledge of Zimmerman's medical records but we later found out the prosecution had a copy of those records at the time of the hearing. I find it hard the LEAD investigator would not have had knowledge of Zimmerman's documented injuries.

They also cited a witness who saw one shadow chasing another when that witness had actually already changed her story to one shadow, maybe, not wearing contacts, etc. by the time of the hearing.

The prosecution stated Zimmerman 'confronted' Martin but then admitted they actually have no evidence to support that claim.

The prosecutors were not the ones applying for bail.

However, Corey and de La Rionda did sit there like potted plants and allow Gailbreath to lead the court down the primrose path, thus destroying all future credibility.

If she were tried on charges related to her husband's ongoing murder case, the resulting media circus could keep the issue of GZs credibility on the front burner for an uncomfortable length of time.

Also on page 42, Serino says he received Zimmerman's medical records confirming his fractured nose on March 9. (So unbeknownst to O'Mara, they had them long before the bail hearing and the records made no difference to their charging decision.)

There is no evidence the Zimmermans knew about the second passport until after Zimmerman was released, just before they gave it to O'Mara.

...during the commision of the aforementioned Second Degree Murder, the said George Zimmerman did carry, display, use, threaten to use or attempt to use a firearm and did actually possess and dischage a firearm and as a result of the discharge, death or great bodily harm was inflicted upon any person, contrary to the provisions of Sections 782.04(2), 775.087(1), and 775.087(2), Flordia Statues.

Okay, he admitted to firing the weapon.  He had a legal concealed weapon permit so carrying is not at issue.  But where are they getting the "display" and the  "threaten to use" if not one witness has come forward to say that they actually saw him with any weapon of any kind, much less the Kel Tec?  Even with the changes to their testimony...no gun.

Anybody know or hear anything about this other video?

When is the defense likely to get GZ's statements to Sangord PD investigators?  It's my current understanding that they do not yet have these materials but that they will be shared with the defense before trial  - but would they have to be shared before a pre trial hearing such as a SYG type motion is filed?  I'd assume the defense would need these but what are the legalities here?  How long can the prosecution drag out full discovery sharing?  I got the impression that Lester is saying whatever the defense gets, the media will get, too in a broad sense.   Is this how others saw the judge's words?  

Lester agreed with the media lawyers that he (Lester) should personally go through it all and decide what to redact.

The media lawyers argued that statute and case law say a statement isn't a 'confession' unless it admits all elements of the crime. Lester agreed. I think that means anything redacted from Zimmerman's statements will be for some other reason.

W-9, who accuses Zimmerman of racism, was mentioned as a candidate for heavy redaction.