I will be on Daily Kos Radio. Listen here.
Podcast here.
Open Thread.
Make a new account
In laymens terms, looks like they'll e-bomb social media with positivity about your company for a fee, to offset all the social media complaints from your actual whiny customers. It's a living I guess;) Parent
Isn't that kind of like GW Bush advising against rushing into wars in the middle east on very little real, verifiable information from fully vetted sources? Parent
It was the one about Bain and just as an aside in the art world the middle class working artists are suffering horribly with horrid sales ever since Dec 2008. Public art artists did OK over the last couple of years since their projects originated and were funded before 2008, but now they are having troubles. On the other hand the secondary market is hot hot hot. That is the investment level art buying, you know, getting a Warhol at auction or thru a dealer for example. It is a reflection that 99% of people are not buying art but the 1% is having a great time investing. NOT creating any jobs.
Second thing though is that when you are nervous all the time and your dollar buys less and less, you stop thinking about art work. When they are arguing about cutting your retirement, you aren't thinking about artwork. I'm really sorry this is happening to you guys!!!!! Parent
It is a reflection that 99% of people are not buying art but the 1% is having a great time investing.
Yes, art is treated as an investment at a certain level. Usually not for living artists, which is one reason why it was so unusual for artists like Rauschenberg and Johns to sell at auction for bit $$. The story about Rauschenberg is that the guy who bought his work and then sold it for millions in profit at auction taunted the artist. Rauschenberg actually punched the guy at the auction house who sold his work for a great profit to himself....not the artist and then bragged about it to the artist. IF that is true, then I smile in a satisfied way. Parent
Changes in wealth distribution since 2008 mean that the number of high-net-worth individuals (commonly defined as having at least $1m in divestible assets) reached its highest ever level of 11 million last year, holding an estimated $42 trillion in net wealth, according to a report by Capgemini/RBC Wealth Management. Following in the footsteps of wider economic changes, the very top of the art market is enjoying rude health while the middle is struggling. At the recent London sales of impressionist and modern art, Joan Miró's Peinture (Etoile Bleue), 1927, made a record £23.6m, but works of lesser quality were shunned.
The super wealthy can buy art as an investment (not that it proves to be a good or reliable investment), and get some other benefits:
He believes that the market can be better understood with the introduction of a "conspicuous consumption" model. "Art acquisitions are not only about the quality of a work and the price," he says. "If a work hangs on a wall, then the buyer gets a `consumption flow'. They also get some benefits as a signal of the price they paid, so if you formalise that in a quantitative sense, it helps explain the financial sums."
Most painters sculptors etc are supported by the market, teaching or a combination of those. Illustrating, annimation can get work too. Gallery sales have dropped hugely since 2008, I heard that 40% of galleries in NYC closed doors. Now, many might have re-opened, and some simply relocated to the apartments of the dealers and are appointment only now. But still, most galleries have been hit hard, and the ones who deal in the secondary market fair better. And that does not help living artists.
I guess that's a long way to say I'm not sure what the primary motivation is for buying art or if there actually is one. Collections are very different and reflect the collector's spirit, or a curator's sensibility. Parent
I think the whole concept of greed and acquisition and investment when it comes to art is muddy. My own collection is "acquisition"-based: "I must have that (if I can possibly afford it)". And, yeah, I guess I can get pretty greedy. I just can't indulge my greed.
As an aside, my brother was an artist. And because of that, I will never buy "decor" that is mass produced even if I like it. It doesn't usually cost that much more to help support a real live artist with a name and everything. Parent
:-) Parent
I'd never judge D...but after dating a girl who was an absolute Tori freak, I've had my fill for several lifetimes. Parent
It really was, and I didn't know it. Or let myself acknowledge it. Or something. Parent
"Me I'm just a lawnmower, you can tell me by the way I walk." Parent
Old school Genesis...they were always good for a "what in the hell are you listening to?" Parent
"He is currently still in jail because our money has been going to campaigning, so he will serve the time he needs to serve until we can get funds to get him out," said Smith's campaign manager and fiance, SunShine Fox.
Smith owes $2,921.46 in child support. He also owes $1,850 in fines for two separate incidents: 1) caught driving with an open container and a suspended license; 2) driving with no driver's license, no insurance, and expired tags.
Which is worse? Driving with no license, expired tags, an open container, and no insurance? The Republicans letting this guy be their nominee? Or letting someone named SunShine Fox handle your finances?
And if you're gonna pass laws that put people in cages, you should at least know what its like to be locked in one.
SunShine Fox sounds like a pron star name...what a pair! Parent
;-) Parent
Not as much as you think, according to many experts:
But the best anecdotal evidence suggests that this kind of thing isn't happening in nearly the proportions you might expect. Kenneth Gross, an election lawyer who represents an array of large corporations, told me that few of his clients have contributed to the social-welfare groups engaged in political activity this year. They know those contributions might become public at some point, and no company that sells a product wants to risk the kind of consumer reaction that engulfed Target in 2010, after it contributed $150,000 to a Minnesota group backing a conservative candidate opposing gay marriage. "If you've got a bank on every corner, if you've got stores in every strip mall, you don't want to be associated with a social cause," Gross told me. None of this is to say that Citizens United hasn't had an impact. Gross and others point out that in the era before Citizens United, while individuals and companies could still contribute huge sums to outside groups, they were to some extent deterred by the confusing web of rules and the liability they might incur for violations. What the new rulings did, as the experts like to put it, was to "lift the cloud of uncertainty" that hung over such expenditures, and the effect of this psychological shift should not be underestimated. It almost certainly accounts for some rise in political money this year, both from individuals and companies. Even so, the Supreme Court's ruling really wasn't the sort of tectonic event that Obama and his allies would have you believe it was. "I'd go so far as to call it a liberal delusion," Ira Glasser, the former executive director of the A.C.L.U. and a liberal dissenter on Citizens United, told me. Which leads to an obvious question: If Citizens United doesn't explain this billion-dollar blast of outside money, then what does?
None of this is to say that Citizens United hasn't had an impact. Gross and others point out that in the era before Citizens United, while individuals and companies could still contribute huge sums to outside groups, they were to some extent deterred by the confusing web of rules and the liability they might incur for violations. What the new rulings did, as the experts like to put it, was to "lift the cloud of uncertainty" that hung over such expenditures, and the effect of this psychological shift should not be underestimated. It almost certainly accounts for some rise in political money this year, both from individuals and companies.
Even so, the Supreme Court's ruling really wasn't the sort of tectonic event that Obama and his allies would have you believe it was. "I'd go so far as to call it a liberal delusion," Ira Glasser, the former executive director of the A.C.L.U. and a liberal dissenter on Citizens United, told me. Which leads to an obvious question: If Citizens United doesn't explain this billion-dollar blast of outside money, then what does?
SNIP
A consequence of McCain-Feingold has been to flip on its head an old truism of politics, which is that incumbency comes with a fixed financial advantage. In the era of soft money, controlling the White House meant that a party could almost always leverage its considerable resources to dominate fund-raising. But today it's much easier to tap into the fury and anxiety of out-of-power millionaires than it is to amass contributions in defense of the status quo. This dynamic probably explains why wealthy Democrats who pioneered the idea of outside money during the Bush years have largely stood down this year, even while conservative fund-raising has soared. It isn't that liberals don't like Obama or grow queasy at the mention of super PACs. It's a function of human nature: nobody really gets pumped up to write a $10 million check just to keep things more or less as they are. If you're a Democrat, there's some good news here. One persistent fear you hear from liberals is that Citizens United altered the balance between the parties in a permanent way -- that corporate money will give Republicans a structural advantage that can never be overcome. What's more likely is that the boom in outside money will prove to be cyclical, with the momentum swinging toward whoever feels shut out and persecuted at the moment. Liberals dominated outside spending in 2004 and 2006. And should Romney become president, they'll most likely do so again.
If you're a Democrat, there's some good news here. One persistent fear you hear from liberals is that Citizens United altered the balance between the parties in a permanent way -- that corporate money will give Republicans a structural advantage that can never be overcome. What's more likely is that the boom in outside money will prove to be cyclical, with the momentum swinging toward whoever feels shut out and persecuted at the moment. Liberals dominated outside spending in 2004 and 2006. And should Romney become president, they'll most likely do so again.
About the time that Bain has utterly burned Clear Channel to the ground, DailyKos radio ought to be full steam :) Someday none of us will be able to get our call through because of the crush and we will sit around and talk about the good old days, when we could get through.
If it had been more socially acceptable to be a dominitrix back then, Rand probably never would've written anything Parent
Q: Is masturbation and the use of pornography unethical or irrational? A: Masturbation for men is healthy for several medical reasons and using pornography saves time.
A: Masturbation for men is healthy for several medical reasons and using pornography saves time.
Over at 4aynrandfans.
Apparently there is a following that considers themselves objective and they discuss things... ready, objectively.
I laughed so hard at the pornography comment. Beyond being funny, just to hear someone rationalize it by claiming it saves time. That pretty much fits with the AR philosophy, at first thought, seems reasonable, but in reality, just ridiculous.
I don't have enough Aspirin to venture any further. Parent
Jesus Christ, pretty sure that the day you can't find people willing to sacrifice themselves for others in life or death situations will be the day planet earth explodes. Also, pun much? pun horribly horribly wrong much? OMG, hit delete now please.
If I were in that situation I might be heroic or I might freeze in panic, I don't know because I haven't been, but even if I could somehow magically know for certain in advance that I would do exactly as they did, I'd never try to bask in their reflected glory. Parent
And you call this the "Worst Post on Facebook ever"? Where have you been living - under a rock? Parent
;-D
;-D Parent
I could use some recommendations for our "luau" at work. I don't think Poke or anything with raw fish would be a good idea. Haupia sounds yummy, but probably out of skill set. That leaves me with Spam or pineapple, which is undoubtedly what everyone else will be doing. Parent
(My younger daughter is the baker in the family, and she uses this recipe, which is orginally from the old King's Bakery on So. King Street in Honolulu.)
And honestly, so what if it's not traditional "Native Hawaiian" food? As you freely admitted, your crowd isn't going to go for ahi poke or sashimi, so I don't think you're going to offend the gods with an offering of dessert.
Have fun. Parent
The Daily Telegraph (London, UK) | July 25, 2012 Mitt Romney would restore 'Anglo-Saxon' relations between Britain and America - "As the Republican presidential challenger accused Barack Obama of appeasing America's enemies in his first foreign policy speech of the US general election campaign, advisers told The Daily Telegraph that he would abandon Mr Obama's 'Left-wing' coolness towards London. In remarks that may prompt accusations of racial insensitivity, one suggested that Mr Romney was better placed to understand the depth of ties between the two countries than Mr Obama, whose father was from Africa. 'We are part of an Anglo-Saxon heritage, and he feels that the special relationship is special,' the adviser said of Mr Romney, adding: 'The White House didn't fully appreciate the shared history we have'."
And who knew we were on the outs with Brittan ? Parent
This is, of course, the same Eric Edelman who was implicated in then-Vice President Cheney's scheme back in 2003 to smear Ambassador Joseph Wilson by leaking the identity of his wife, then-covert CIA operative Valerie Plame, to the late conservative pundit Robert Novak.
Like I said, Mittens can't catch a break, even from people who are ostensibly trying to help him get elected. Parent
There is no way they were trying to suggest a white guy will relate better other other white guys and in a way a black guy can't. Even for them that is too much. Parent
Dude can't even handle or understand Obama's "different" America where people sing along to Al Green...he's gonna relate to Pakistan?
Forget too shady to be president, Mitt is too sheltered to be president. Parent
Probably for the best, we can't him getting all nervous, looking like a deer in headlights, and checking his wallet every time he meets a non-Anglo leader. Parent
And who knew we were on the outs with Brittan ?
Because of the cheezy DVD's Obama gave the British Prime Minister and the iPod he gave the Queen as gifts on their official visits.
<snark> Parent
I suppose one of the fun ("fun") activities we will be able to engage in after the Presidential race is over is how our national discourse on race and the way it affected these campaigns changed from 2008 to 2012. I sense a Romney's money here. It's not as bad as the birth certificate deal (with the accompanying and sustaining winger paranoia), but at the same time, it is pretty terrible, in its own way. The argument here is simply, he's not white, like us traditional rich people. Less "redneck," more country club. How lucky are we to see both play out! Gah. Parent
Bob Hope Airport (Burbank, CA) - The swirling winds of the San Fernando Valley and Burbank's relatively short runways will often make airline pilots earn their keep. (Check out the passenger's comment in the background at 1:21 in this video.) And this is the same airport where in March 2000, a Southwest Airlines 737 arriving from Las Vegas overshot the Rwy. 8 threshold and landed too far down the runway, crashing through a retaining wall and careening onto busy Hollywood Way before coming to rest just outside a service station -- since relocated, for obvious reasons.
Kahului Airport (Maui, HI) - It is not uncommon for airliners on final approach toward Rwy. 22 to buck 50-70 mph headwinds, because the airport is sited in the central Maui plain between the 5,000 foot West Maui Mountains and 10,100 ft. Haleakala, which creates a funneling effect for brisk North Pacific wind currents. This, of course, can sometimes offer passengers a very bumpy ride on final approach.
Juneau International Airport (Juneau, AK) - I think this video speaks for itself. Let's just say that if you trust your pilot's skills and instincts to navigate along Gastineau Channel between glacier-clad mountains and don't worry about it, you'll be treated to one of the most spectacular airport approaches in the United States.
I've only flown into La Guardia once, and really enjoyed it. did not know I was supposed to be scared of all those tight turns that gave me a good view of the ball park! Parent
The LaGuardia approach you are referring to is the Runway 31 freeway visual. Citibank stadium is one of the checkpoints. It is a tight turn. About fifty percent of the time there is a crosswind, making it more challenging. Parent
I would add Love Field in Dallas, it's a next to downtown and the first time I flew in no one told me we would fly so close to tall building I would be able to see the people working.
And the scariest ever, Mexico City, because it's in a bowl, it's a roller coaster both ways. Even the most experienced travelers are white knuckled. Parent
I mention this because at the time I remember saying to my friends, "Wow, what does a large passenger jet do if the pilot isn't perfect in his calculations. I found out several weeks later when an American Airlines jet crashed into the side of the mountain, killing three dozen passengers.
Link
Of course, it's now (thankfully) long gone, but if it were still around, first prize for hair-raising airliner landings would have to belong to Hong Kong's old Kai Tak Int'l Airport, which was built alongside Kowloon Bay. It required a tight circling downleg approach, often in treacherous crosswinds, that skirted the hillsides before dropping down directly over downtown Kowloon on short final. Parent
But, now you've got my mind doing flashbacks to my youth. I think I mentioned here a while back that I had a short gig (when I was 20 something) ferrying Pipers from their factory in Kansas to their owners on the East coast. During that half year I made landings and takeoffs at hundreds of "airports" throughout the "heartland" of America. Now, if you restrict the experience to 4-seaters, a collage of landings at some of those dirt strips would make one helluva entertaining show.
Iowa, nothing but a cornfield from border to border, is a good example. First of all, there are no "airports." As a matter of fact, there no air "strips" either. There are skinny patches of dirt that used a washboard for their template during "construction. There are no spots between the peeks long enough to land a plane, and no length to aerodynamically sustain flight. So, you have to dive at almost 90 degrees, and just before smashing into the ground, pull up 180 degrees causing the plane to stall, and hopefully the plane would settle down without too much structural damage. Add to that, the swath of a corn cutting machine is 35 feet, and the wingspan of a 172 (I also flew Cessnas) is 36 feet, that leaves you with a minus one foot leeway. And, just for jollies, add in 40 mph crosswinds, and you've got the makings of a real fun-time afternoon.
Oh, did I mention that our breadbasket, flyover country is nothing but a grid of high voltage wires and towers?
LOL, thanks a lot, Donald. I'll be cursing you out as I wake up soaked from a night full of nightmares! Parent
I trained on a 172 also. Pretty neat, didn't you just love the "brrrrr" sound of the engine?
lol Parent