home

Saturday Morning Open Thread

There is college basketball today. My interest is purely investment related: Louisville (-10) (3 units), Michigan (-2) (5 units.)

31-23 ATS, +24 units for MM.

Open Thread.

< Friday Open Thread | US Airstrike Kills 11 Afghani Children >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Those of you (5.00 / 7) (#4)
    by NYShooter on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 03:28:36 PM EST
    Who were planning on attending "Gun Appreciation Day" may want to reschedule for next year, perhaps. While taking their guns out to show them how much they were appreciated five people were accidentally shot at separate incidents at three different shows............so far.

    Fortunately, however, National Rifle Association instructor Eugene Kenny, was scheduled to be at one of the shows, presumably to teach gun safety. Unfortunately, Mr. Kenny won't be able attend, having shot himself in the foot accidentally because he forgot there was a bullet left in the chamber.

    LINK

    A man and his guns are soon parted (5.00 / 3) (#5)
    by MO Blue on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 03:49:47 PM EST
    New Haven Independent reports, "Vazquez said his detectives are also still investigating the theft of a safe last November from Kenny's apartment. It contained around 10 guns--mostly handguns, plus a Saiga 12 rifle. "I took a hit, $8,000 worth of firearms" in that theft, Kenny said."

    Kenny might now wish that the gun he used to shot himself had been stolen as well.

    Also, inquiring minds want to know: Do you get your Gun Safety Certification revoked if you accidentally shoot yourself?

    Parent

    I wonder if Kenny (5.00 / 6) (#6)
    by NYShooter on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 04:01:51 PM EST
    will be getting a job teaching those hundreds of thousands of school teachers who will soon be "packing heat?"

    Anything to "protect the children," of course.

    Parent

    lol; social darwinism. (5.00 / 1) (#53)
    by Mr Natural on Sun Apr 07, 2013 at 12:45:50 PM EST
    Didn't we just have a GAD? (none / 0) (#7)
    by nycstray on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 04:28:18 PM EST
    Good thing it's not a month . . . .

    Parent
    Hey gang (5.00 / 3) (#8)
    by ruffian on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 04:31:36 PM EST
    Been working too hard and feeling too crummy with allergies turned sinusitis to feel like having fun, even virtually with the TL gang.  Getting better though, I am very glad to say. I hate being sick.

    Must say I am more excited about the return of Mad Men tomorrow night than I am about the F4. I'm sure there is betting somewhere on whether Don Draper has an affair or who Joan's next love interest will be. Or both together!


    Sorry you've been feeling bad, ruffian. (none / 0) (#9)
    by caseyOR on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 04:52:34 PM EST
    Glad you dropped by, though.

    Cubs are 2-2 so far on the season, second to Cincinnati in the NL Central, but ahead of the Cards, always good to be ahead of the Cards.  :-)

    Parent

    4 down, and only 158 to go. (none / 0) (#15)
    by Donald from Hawaii on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 06:07:23 PM EST
    :-D

    Parent
    Sorry you are feeling poorly, ruffian (none / 0) (#10)
    by MO Blue on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 05:04:33 PM EST
    Allergies and sinus problems are a real pain. Glad to hear you are doing better.

    Parent
    Thanks! (none / 0) (#36)
    by ruffian on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 07:44:27 PM EST
    And thanks for keeping me up with the Cubbies. Time to check in and get the Cubs app!

    Parent
    The walk-on has given them a spark, they looked (5.00 / 1) (#27)
    by mogal on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 06:55:26 PM EST
    beaten until he came on the court.

     You know the D's could use a walk-on about now.

    Great info MO and (5.00 / 1) (#57)
    by fishcamp on Sun Apr 07, 2013 at 02:14:34 PM EST
    as a sidelight I just found out some new generic pills are the same price as the original pills and are made by the same company.  The price for the generics doesn't go down until another company starts manufacturing them.  Smoke and mirrors again.

    The federal and local offices of my sweet Claire, (5.00 / 2) (#69)
    by MO Blue on Mon Apr 08, 2013 at 10:19:46 AM EST
    the courageous Democratic Senator from Missouri, are not answering the telephones. You get to interact with a recording. I wonder why.

    Putting that recording on the ballet instead of McCaskill next time around might be an improvement.

    Hoping those pure investments (none / 0) (#1)
    by oculus on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 12:20:08 PM EST
    aren't here:

    Intrade

    Up 24 units is pretty decent (none / 0) (#2)
    by Dadler on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 02:12:19 PM EST
    As far as gambling goes in this MM. More than just straight picks, to give you a compliment, you've have a really good handle on amounts to bet on a given game (not counting a couple mulligans maybe we all get with this many games), that's what impresses me anyway.  

    As a fan I'm pulling for Wichita, underdog fever. But my head says no way, probably Louisville.

    And I just read a Mother Jones piece about what Governor Dipsh*t and his Tea Party state government have done to your native Florida. Criminal.

    Peace, my man. And good luck with these last few games. I have my dough on the Cardinals, so we'll see.

    Mother Jones Link (none / 0) (#3)
    by Dadler on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 02:13:37 PM EST
    Interesting Happenings at Rutgers (none / 0) (#11)
    by CoralGables on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 05:15:47 PM EST
    Erik Murdock was fired from Rutgets July 2, 2012

    Erik Murdock turned tapes over to Rutgers in November 2012. (Coach was suspended and fined, no news of tapes leaked out)

    Erik Murdock through an attorney asked Rutgers for $950,000 in December 2012.

    Rutgers refused to pay Murdock.

    The FBI is currently investigating Murdock (known to some as the whistleblower) for possible extortion.

    I just read several articles about this. I cannot (5.00 / 1) (#12)
    by caseyOR on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 05:28:23 PM EST
    figure out why the FBI is investigating Murdock for possible extortion. Nothing I have read reveals any reason for this investigation.

    What am I missing? Or, is the investigating  FBI agent a friend of someone at Rutgers? You know, the way the FBI agent who started the investigation of the Petraeus-Broadwell emails was a friend of Jill Kelley's.

    Parent

    Guess it depends (none / 0) (#14)
    by CoralGables on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 05:58:08 PM EST
    on if he asked for the $950,000 and in return would keep the tapes private.

    Parent
    Couldn't the $950,000 be considered ... (5.00 / 1) (#18)
    by Donald from Hawaii on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 06:28:55 PM EST
    ... a proposed starting point for discussions regarding the alleged wrongful termination of Eric Murdock by Rutgers University, as an alternative to filing a lawsuit?

    Honestly, I'm very hardpressed to see how that's  to be interpreted as extortion, given the fact that Murdock lost his job in July 2012, turned the video over to Rutgers officials in November, and then relayed the request for $950,000 through his attorney the following month.

    It's hardly a coincidence that nearly four months ex post facto, Rutgers officials now allege that Murdock was engaged in extortion, less that 24 hours after Murdock announced that he was filing suit. Why didn't they report it to the feds at the time of the alleged act last December?

    And honestly, if one is truly scheming to extort money from Rutgers officials, why would one go through an attorney to do so and leave a paper trail? Extortion is a job for guys nicknamed Noodles or Guido, not Barry Kozyra, Esq.

    Parent

    We have no idea (none / 0) (#21)
    by CoralGables on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 06:43:11 PM EST
    when the extortion investigation started. All we know is Murdock's timing.

    He sends tapes to the university well after he is fired. He asks for money when the coach is suspended but no news comes out. He turns tapes over to ESPN when the University turns down his request for money.  He files a lawsuit when the coach is fired.

    I see lots of dirty hands and no clean ones so far.

    Parent

    Lots of dirty hands, absolutely. (5.00 / 1) (#40)
    by Donald from Hawaii on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 10:18:50 PM EST
    Were I in charge of Rutgers University, I'd sack the entire lot of them and offer the job of athletic director to Scarlet Knights' women's basketball coach Vivian Stringer. She very much impressed me with the way she maintained her poise, composure and integrity during the Don Imus scandal, in which her players were derided as "a bunch of nappy-headed hos" on national television by the shock jock.

    None of that poise, composure and integrity was on display this week at Rutgers.

    Parent

    "Shock Jerk" (none / 0) (#54)
    by Mr Natural on Sun Apr 07, 2013 at 12:47:20 PM EST
    I'd also suggest... (none / 0) (#22)
    by Dadler on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 06:44:39 PM EST
    ...if Murdock were really out for financial blood from the start, he wouldn't have waited four months to out the tapes, he would done so the next day. I suspect the man was genuinely tortured, and has admitted as much, and I get the feeling even he had to overcome some of his own jock prejudices and paradigms in order to do the right thing. And  the offer from Murdock sounds, I agree, like, hey, I don't want to sue you, I don't want to go through the hell of it, but I know I'll win, so I'm willing to save you some headaches.

    Parent
    Actually he waited 9 months (none / 0) (#28)
    by CoralGables on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 07:02:46 PM EST
    to send the tapes to ESPN. And only after the school turned him down for money. I see no good. None. And it has to be remembered, it was 90 seconds of tape from three years of practice (one report says 2 years of practice).

    If he was fired after giving the tapes to the AD I see wrongful termination. Since he didn't turn over the tapes to the AD until 4 months after he was fired, he sounds much more like a bitter ex-employee.

    With the schools chief legal counsel resigning his position, I don't think there is much doubt where the idea for fine and suspension came from. Next up will be the Board of Governors who appear to have viewed the tapes and backed suspension.

    The school President on the other hand preferred to take the out of sight out of mind approach by refusing to see the tape.

    Parent

    The Extortion (none / 0) (#65)
    by ScottW714 on Mon Apr 08, 2013 at 08:49:11 AM EST
    Not saying this is what happened, but the the timeline is probable.

    Murdock is fired, he spends 4 months putting a tape together, tries to blackmail school, they refuse, he proves his threat wasn't empty and releases tape to public, attorneys flock believing it was wrongful termination and Murdock can't refuse the dollars they wave in front of his face, or the fact that it would look damn suspicious if he didn't sue Rutgers.

    Rutgers doesn't call FBI for fear of them making it public, but once it goes public, they report the Murdock's attempt to extort cash for the tape(s).

    Again, entirely speculative, just noting that the time line is possible.

    Parent

    Is anybody besides me still having trouble (none / 0) (#13)
    by caseyOR on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 05:36:28 PM EST
    new comments NOT being highlighted?

    You are not the only one, Casey (none / 0) (#16)
    by Zorba on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 06:08:51 PM EST
    The whole "new comments highlighting" thing has been messed up for a couple of days here, and it is getting way more than annoying.

    Parent
    Sometimes yes Sometimes no (none / 0) (#17)
    by CoralGables on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 06:15:16 PM EST
    it started for me more like a week ago when all comments on every thread became listed as new and unread.

    Parent
    Zorba and CG, are you both using Safari? (none / 0) (#41)
    by caseyOR on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 11:25:08 PM EST
    Both using MacBooks or iPads or other Apple products?

    I sent Jeralyn a message about this, and she sent it along to TL's web person. The web person could not duplicate the problem. So, Jeralyn forwarded the message to me asking that I write him directly if I was still having trouble. So, I did. Haven't heard back yet, but I think it would be good to gather as much info as possible to give to him.

    Parent

    It happens with (none / 0) (#42)
    by Zorba on Sun Apr 07, 2013 at 01:48:37 AM EST
    both Safari on my iPad, and Mozilla Firefox on my desktop computer.

    Parent
    Firefox on a desktop (none / 0) (#43)
    by CoralGables on Sun Apr 07, 2013 at 07:18:21 AM EST
    so I fit the pattern

    Parent
    Chrome (none / 0) (#44)
    by the capstan on Sun Apr 07, 2013 at 07:48:04 AM EST
    on a Linux desktop.

    Parent
    It Happens Occassionally... (none / 0) (#66)
    by ScottW714 on Mon Apr 08, 2013 at 09:01:44 AM EST
    ...but the work around I use the Find function, then #4, if you are looking for the comments in the 40's.  I do that anyways with new comment by using Find [ne when it working correctly to find the new comments, or find (for me) scottw to find my comments to see if anyone's commented behind me.

    In Firefox, Control & F key opens the find box in the lower left corner of the screen.

    Parent

    Yes (none / 0) (#67)
    by sj on Mon Apr 08, 2013 at 09:11:17 AM EST
    Once the comments are a few hours old then I can be fairly confident that the "[new]" will show up.  I use IE8 on a desktop, IE9 and Firefox on a laptop running Windows 7.

    Parent
    Is anyone else watching Louisville game? (none / 0) (#19)
    by mogal on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 06:36:02 PM EST
    they are down 6 with 16 min to go.  I am shocked, truly.

    Shockers are shocking - up by 8 now. (none / 0) (#20)
    by mogal on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 06:37:47 PM EST


    SHOCKERS!!! (none / 0) (#23)
    by Dadler on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 06:45:26 PM EST
    I love me some underdog.

    Parent
    Overdog is more like it currently (none / 0) (#25)
    by Dadler on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 06:48:09 PM EST
    Gonzaga doesn't feel so badly.

    Parent
    Wow. (none / 0) (#24)
    by brodie on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 06:46:48 PM EST
    Well into 2d half and they're up by 11.  T.O. Loueevull.

    Almost as shocked by this as I was yesterday coming home from 4-day trip to find large crow flapping around my living room.

    More later perhaps -- too stressed out and angry about it (due to my ex's negligence at house during my absence).

    Funny thing though -- I'd just gotten off a United from Houston flight during which I'd watched Anthony Hopkins in Hitchcock.

    True story.

    Parent

    Let's see what happens... (none / 0) (#26)
    by Dadler on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 06:48:59 PM EST
    ...when we're down to about five minutes left and the end is REALLY in sight. But if Louisville doesn't pick it up, that might not matter.

    Parent
    Tied with 5 min to go---Great game! (none / 0) (#29)
    by mogal on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 07:16:57 PM EST


    Two things I hate about (none / 0) (#30)
    by brodie on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 07:32:07 PM EST
    college hoops:  1) too many timeouts allowed and for tv and 2) team scoring allowed call timeout immediately.

    Wichita State just got robbed by the zebra (none / 0) (#31)
    by Dadler on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 07:36:55 PM EST
    terrible jump call, way too quick. awful

    that official should never... (none / 0) (#32)
    by Dadler on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 07:37:27 PM EST
    ...work a final 4 game again. just a wretched choke by the ref. too bad.

    Parent
    Horrendous end to a great game (none / 0) (#33)
    by Dadler on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 07:39:30 PM EST
    This was a case where an official really did play a huge part in deciding the game. Humans are like that tho. Happens. But I'd never put him in a big game again. Congrats to Louisville tho, my money is safe for now. Bet them at the start straight up to win it all at decent odds.

    Well it was a great game (none / 0) (#37)
    by brodie on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 08:04:30 PM EST
    and unlike last game where I thought the Shockers just about gave it away down the stretch, in this one they hung in there rather well and nearly pulled it off.

    Much different game than the Louisville blowout I was expecting.  The Shockers were no fluke and proved they deserved to be in the Final Four.  Congrats to Coach Patina and his second unit on the comeback.

    Parent

    It's Basketball (none / 0) (#34)
    by mogal on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 07:42:08 PM EST


    ....not golf. (none / 0) (#35)
    by mogal on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 07:42:51 PM EST
    Go Blue! Lady next to me has (none / 0) (#38)
    by oculus on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 09:00:21 PM EST
    on a maize sweater and fabulous U of M watch. It's doing the job so far. But will I make the 8 pm PDT across the street?

    Go Blue. (none / 0) (#39)
    by MileHi Hawkeye on Sat Apr 06, 2013 at 09:41:20 PM EST
    Enjoy it while you can, because I won't be saying that again after the Big Dance is over!  

    Parent
    BHO is more popular than Jindal in Louisiana (none / 0) (#45)
    by Politalkix on Sun Apr 07, 2013 at 09:27:10 AM EST
    Why?
    Because Jindal has honestly told people about the Republican plan for his state.
    link
    Whenever Republicans speak honestly about their ideology, plans and ideas(remember Barry Goldwaster?), they get kicked in the b*tt by voters. Only marketing gimmickry that hides their true intentions keeps them in contention in electoral politics.

    "Marketing gimmickry" - heh (5.00 / 3) (#46)
    by Yman on Sun Apr 07, 2013 at 10:27:45 AM EST
    Whenever Republicans speak honestly about their ideology, plans and ideas(remember Barry Goldwaster?), they get kicked in the b*tt by voters.  Only marketing gimmickry that hides their true intentions keeps them in contention in electoral politics.

    Sort of like how Obama sold his healthcare plan - "must include a public option", public hearings, no backroom deals, allow importation of cheaper drugs,, etc, etc.

    Parent

    Damn good thing he caved on those (5.00 / 4) (#47)
    by CoralGables on Sun Apr 07, 2013 at 11:48:24 AM EST
    or health care would have been put on the back burner for another 16 years.

    Go for the ideal but always be willing to settle for incremental progress if the only other available option on the table is nothing.

    Just imagine where we might be today if Ted Kennedy was willing to accept incremental progress on health care in the 70's. We would be forty years ahead of where we are now. Idealists are only heroes if they win. If they lose they are the enemy of the good.

    Parent

    Not the point (5.00 / 5) (#50)
    by Yman on Sun Apr 07, 2013 at 12:29:39 PM EST
    It's the hypocrisy of those complaining about "marketing gimmickry" on the part of the GOP, while lauding their guy for doing the same thing.

    BTW -  

    Damn good thing he caved on those or health care would have been put on the back burner for another 16 years.
    - Sorry, most of us don't have a crystal ball (interesting choice of timeframe, though).  It would be just as easy to say that, had Obama actually fought and lead for real reform instead of caving for the Republican plan of '94, we wouldn't have this POS law that's becoming more and more unpopular and will destroy the chance for any real reform, while doing nothing to contain healthcare costs and premiums that people can't afford.

    Just imagine where we might be today if Ted Kennedy was willing to accept incremental progress on health care in the 70's. We would be forty years ahead of where we are now. Idealists are only heroes if they win. If they lose they are the enemy of the good.

    "Just imagine" should be the title for your entire response.  What do you call an "idealist" who makes a list of promises when he needs your vote, then sits back and leads from the rear until you wind up with the Republican Plan of '94?

    Parent

    Well said Yman (none / 0) (#59)
    by Slado on Sun Apr 07, 2013 at 04:43:26 PM EST
    I think we will eventually end up with a two tier system.  Public care for everyone with an additional private system available for Certain specialties and high cost care.

    I wish Obama had pushed harder for a government system so we could have gotten there faster.

    Now we just have a mess.  Those that continue to defend it are more interested in a victory then in actual care for the public at large.  Sure some benefit from the law but way more will be hurt by it that wouldn't if nothing had been done.  

    The idea that you can spend less and provide more care is just a sign of what happens when you believe your own BS.

    Parent

    Heh (3.00 / 2) (#48)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sun Apr 07, 2013 at 12:14:31 PM EST
    Do you think it is better now???

    People having their hours cut to below 30.....

    People unable to apply for the "health exchange" insurance?

    Premiums increasing??

    Obamacare.... AKA welfare for insurance industry.


    Parent

    I thought I had already answered this for you (none / 0) (#51)
    by CoralGables on Sun Apr 07, 2013 at 12:33:23 PM EST
    Yes it's better now.

    Parent
    Idealists or Deadenders? (none / 0) (#49)
    by Politalkix on Sun Apr 07, 2013 at 12:24:48 PM EST
    "Idealists are only heroes if they win. If they lose they are the enemy of the good."

    Calling these people "idealists" is too generous on your part. I prefer to describe them as "deadenders".


    Parent

    Wow - funny (5.00 / 2) (#52)
    by Yman on Sun Apr 07, 2013 at 12:45:22 PM EST
    What do you call those who complain about the "marketing gimmickry" of the GOP that "hides their true intentions", while lauding their own candidate for doing the same thing?

    Parent
    Bloggers? (5.00 / 2) (#55)
    by Mr Natural on Sun Apr 07, 2013 at 12:49:13 PM EST
    Shame on you Yman (5.00 / 8) (#56)
    by MO Blue on Sun Apr 07, 2013 at 01:25:36 PM EST
    Of course Obama never, ever employs marketing gimmickry or hides his true intentions. ;o(

    Marketing gimmickry position on prescription drugs:

    Promote generic drugs, allow drug reimportation, and allow Medicare to negotiate
    directly with drug companies.

    What Obama did:

    Today's NY Times front page reconfirmed the news that President Obama has made a back-room deal with the pharmaceutical industry to block any Congressional health care legislation that would allow Medicare or most other parts of the federal government to negotiate lower drug prices with the pharmaceutical industry or would allow importation of cheaper drugs from Canada.

    Marketing gimmickry position on taxes:

    The president said he wants to prevent U.S. companies from deferring tax payments by keeping profits in foreign countries rather than recording them at home and called for more transparency in bank accounts that Americans hold in notorious tax havens like the Cayman Islands.

    What the President signed into law:

    The "fiscal cliff" legislation passed this week included $76 billion in special-interest tax credits for the likes of General Electric, Hollywood and even Captain Morgan. But these subsidies weren't the fruit of eleventh-hour lobbying conducted on the cliff's edge -- they were crafted back in August in a Senate committee, and they sat dormant until the White House reportedly insisted on them this week...

    General Electric and Citigroup, for instance, hired Breaux and Lott to extend a tax provision that allows multinational corporations to defer U.S. taxes by moving profits into offshore financial subsidiaries. This provision -- known as the "active financing exception" -- is the main tool GE uses to avoid nearly all U.S. corporate income tax.

    What the President said:

    No family making less than $250,000 will see "any form of tax increase."

    "I can make a firm pledge. Under my plan, no family making less than $250,000 a year will see any form of tax increase. Not your income tax, not your payroll tax, not your capital gains taxes, not any of your taxes."

    What the President proposes:

    Adding insult to injury, the chained CPI also would amount to an across-the-board tax increase on working families.

    According to the Joint Committee on Taxation, switching to a chained CPI would increase taxes by more than $59 billion over the next decade.

    More than three-quarters of the new revenue raised by the year 2021 would come from Americans making less than $200,000 a year. Those making between $30,000 and $40,000 would be hit the hardest, while those making more than $1 million would see virtually no change. What about President Obama's promise that there would be no income tax increases for people making less than $250,000 a year?

    Marketing gimmickry position on Social Security:

    "John McCain's campaign has suggested that the best answer for the growing pressures on Social Security might be to cut cost of living adjustments or raise the retirement age. Let me be clear: I will not do either."

    President Obama's new budget:

    Mr. Obama's budget will propose a new inflation formula that would have the effect of reducing cost-of-living payments for Social Security benefits...

    Nope, no marketing gimmickry to be found here.

    Parent

    Weren't you referring to Obama (5.00 / 1) (#58)
    by MO Blue on Sun Apr 07, 2013 at 03:46:11 PM EST
    when you wrote this?

    What do you call an "idealist" who makes a list of promises when he needs your vote, then sits back and leads from the rear until you wind up with the Republican Plan of '94?

    If so, in that context, I have to agree that the term "idealist" is much too generous on your part. Not sure I would go quite this far, but definitely too generous. ;o)

    Calling these people "idealists" is too generous on your part. I prefer to describe them as "deadenders".



    Parent
    squables even within the Republican Party (none / 0) (#60)
    by P3P3P3P3 on Sun Apr 07, 2013 at 05:47:34 PM EST
    as this one proposed by Kansas' Sam Brownback, home to Wi(t)chita's Koch Industries, causes a real loss of Government Revenue that has to be covered

    Parent
    A race to the bottom, indeed. (none / 0) (#61)
    by sj on Mon Apr 08, 2013 at 12:11:29 AM EST
    Article (none / 0) (#68)
    by ScottW714 on Mon Apr 08, 2013 at 09:24:22 AM EST
    The governor says the change would attract business by making Louisiana competitive with states such as oil-rich neighbor Texas, which has no income tax.

    Incorrect, Texas does have an corporate income tax, what they call a Franchise of Margin tax, which is an income tax without deductions, just no personal income tax.

    And this:

    It also calls for a 56-percent increase in the state sales tax.

    LA has some of the highest sales tax rates, I would say they average 10%, which would increase there tax rates to 15.6%, which is insane.

    How that would stimulate the economy more than the current corporate tax seems odd, unless that isn't the goal.

    LA already has may 'enterprise zones' which give huge tax breaks to new businesses.  The problem that I think a lot of these governor forget, to many companies, certainly the ones that care about their employees/product, it's not so much about tax breaks as it is about keeping their employees and/or the skill sets of the employees in these deep red states.

    Offing the ridiculous incentives it takes to get companies to relocate only benefits business, not the local economies.

    Parent

    Re tomorrow night's game: (none / 0) (#62)
    by oculus on Mon Apr 08, 2013 at 12:55:07 AM EST
    vegas insider

    How much emotional support should I invest on the Wolverines?

    Nate: (none / 0) (#63)
    by oculus on Mon Apr 08, 2013 at 01:39:08 AM EST
    Most likely to win tournament
    1. Louisville62.9%2. Michigan37.1%3. Fl. Gulf Coast0%4. Georgetown0%5. Oklahoma0%


    Parent
    RIP Margaret Thatcher (none / 0) (#64)
    by MO Blue on Mon Apr 08, 2013 at 08:05:45 AM EST
    Thatcher was the first woman ever to serve as prime minister of Great Britain. She was also the longest-serving British prime minister of the 20th century. She was 87.

    LONDON (AP) -- Former UK Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher has died from a stroke.

    Condolences to her family.

    A roundup of prison-gang alumnus? (none / 0) (#70)
    by CrimeDawg on Mon Apr 08, 2013 at 10:30:19 AM EST
    Anybody else happen across a white prison gang alumnus (maybe the white prison gangs are like the Marines ... there is no such thing as an ex-) who --since the Texas prosecutor murders-- has been subjected to a pretext stop and unduly long detention without being brought before a judge or being given access to a lawyer, and told by jail officials of a mysterious "hold" by an unidentified third party with no interest in the facts surrounding the pretext stop?  On the strength of one curious event, I wonder if the Patriot Act hasn't been triggered for some sort of a roundup of prison-gang associates without individualized suspicion.

    Paranoid?  Likely.  Clinically paranoid?  Possibly.  But ... just wonderin'.