home

Supreme Court Rules Warrant Needed for Cell Phone Searches

The Supreme Court unanimously ruled in two cases today that police must get a warrant to search a cell phone after arrest.

Roberts noted in his opinion that cellphones "are now such a pervasive and insistent part of daily life that the proverbial visitor from Mars might conclude they were an important feature of human anatomy."

The cases are Riley v. California and U.S. v. Wurie. The opinion is here. Lyle Denniston at ScotusBlog has this analysis of the opinion.

< World Cup Day 14 | Supreme Court Rules Against Aereo TV >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Unanimous... (5.00 / 3) (#1)
    by kdog on Wed Jun 25, 2014 at 02:18:27 PM EST
    is a most pleasant surprise...good to know the boot-licking has some limits.

    Really is nice to see for a change (5.00 / 2) (#5)
    by ruffian on Wed Jun 25, 2014 at 09:11:15 PM EST
    I'm thinking this was too close to home (none / 0) (#2)
    by oculus on Wed Jun 25, 2014 at 03:14:10 PM EST
    for the "originalist"!schtick to prevail.

    Parent
    Yeah... (5.00 / 3) (#3)
    by kdog on Wed Jun 25, 2014 at 03:38:01 PM EST
    even justices have cell phones with dirt in them...I can only imagine what is in Clarence's device! Only the NSA knows....

    Parent
    Oh My! (5.00 / 1) (#4)
    by squeaky on Wed Jun 25, 2014 at 04:25:59 PM EST
    I can only imagine what is in Clarence's device!

    If that is true, you have a very dirty mind..

    Parent