A C-SPAN caller from Utah first asked Tea Party Representative Dave Brat what they're getting for all the money they're spending, and then had a second question that was more controversial.

"Can I sh!t in your mouth," the caller asked before being hastily cut off by CSPAN's moderator.

"It is one of the first times that astronomers have spotted a planet near to us that has the kind of rocky, solid surface that is thought to be necessary for alien life.

"It is a particularly exciting find because all three planets are of low enough mass to be potentially rocky and have a solid surface, and the middle planet, Wolf 1061c, sits within the 'Goldilocks' zone where it might be possible for liquid water -- and maybe even life -- to exist," said lead study author Dr Duncan Wright in a statement."

This is like no other war we've ever had.  This is a war, believe me.  We're going to have to knock them out and knock them out hard.

So far some of his ideas are killing their families, dropping nukes, and of course my favorite, kicking them off 'our' internet.

But what was Mr Foreign Policy saying 3 months ago:

Let Russia get rid of ISIS. What the hell do we care?

No point other than that no one seems to remember when Trump wanted to let Russia fight ISIS, less than 90 days later he is ready to kill their families.

Seems the DNC was patching their database of dem voters and someone from Sanders minions accessed some Clinton that was not, but should have been protected.

Last night on Erin Burnett Out Front (on CNN), conservative radio talk show host, Ben Ferguson, got into it with Donald Trump's National Spokesperson, Katrina Pierson. The topic was Vladimir Putin's comments regarding Trump, and Ms. Pierson showed that has about as much grasp of foreign policy (and history) as her boss does, which is to say, not much.

FERGUSON: Katrina, with all due respect -- with all due respect, let's be intellectually honest here. Don't tell me that you actually -- maybe the Trump campaign believes this -- that somehow he's a savior in the Middle East and Donald Trump is somehow in line with Vladimir Putin on foreign policy is kind of embarrassing if you actually think that's what the foreign policy of the United States to be, in propping Assad up --

PIERSON: No, let's be intellectually honest here, how many countries has the United States invaded in the Middle East, taking out dictators, creating vacuums, making ISIS grow stronger. Ben, is that what you're saying?

FERGUSON: Are you saying that Donald Trump's foreign policy would be not to go into Afghanistan specifically and not go after al Qaeda after 9/11?

(CROSSTALK)

FERGUSON: You said we had wars in the Middle East. The first war that we're talking about is Afghanistan.

PIERSON: Actually, Iraq is the first war. Actually, Iraq.

FERGUSON: We went in to Afghanistan first after 9/11. You should know that. We went into Iraq second. You should also know that.

American parents want similar things for their children, the Pew report and past research have found: for them to be healthy and happy, honest and ethical, caring and compassionate. There is no best parenting style or philosophy, researchers say, and across income groups, 92 percent of parents say they are doing a good job at raising their children.

Yet they are doing it quite differently.

Middle-class and higher-income parents see their children as projects in need of careful cultivation, says Annette Lareau, a University of Pennsylvania sociologist whose groundbreaking research on the topic was published in her book "Unequal Childhoods: Class, Race and Family Life." They try to develop their skills through close supervision and organized activities, and teach children to question authority figures and navigate elite institutions.

Working-class parents, meanwhile, believe their children will naturally thrive, and give them far greater independence and time for free play. They are taught to be compliant and deferential to adults.

There are benefits to both approaches. Working-class children are happier, more independent, whine less and are closer with family members, Ms. Lareau found. Higher-income children are more likely to declare boredom and expect their parents to solve their problems.

Yet later on, the more affluent children end up in college and en route to the middle class, while working-class children tend to struggle. Children from higher-income families are likely to have the skills to navigate bureaucracies and succeed in schools and workplaces, Ms. Lareau said.

But it is puzzling that lower income parents tend to raise more independent children who defer to authority, while higher class parents raise children to question authority, but the kids expect their parents to solve their problems.

That's great . . . I've been wondering how many other people want to be bombing Agrabah, now that there have been these terrorist attacks!

However, in a Muslim majority country, absent very strong constitutional guarantees or the army stepping in, "free and fair elections" mean the imposition of Sharia law.