Here's a new open thread, all topics welcome.
Make a new account
The rest of your comment is silly, Biden and Warren, I mean seriously. Speaking of grandpas.
I still think it's going to be Hillary, but I sincerely hope that Bernie pulls in a lot of votes, and the rest of the Dem party isn't stupid enough to ignore that loud message from the left/youth. A lot of people are hungry for a dramatic shift in economic policy.
While I think Sanders represents me better, HRC represents the democratic party better and I think she would be able push her legislation though with better results than Sanders.
Really, when it comes do to it, I will put winning the Presidency over my personal wants because having another republican, especially Trump is a burden I don't think the country can bear. But given the recent trend, that might not be a choice I have to make.
If Sanders can continue to show that he can win in the general then I will be a happy camper, if not, HRC is about the best back-up one can have and will be happy casting that vote as well. It's nice to have two good viable candidates that actually have some substantial differences.
I just glad I am not a republican and have to decide between Trump, Cruz, or Rubio, that would be like getting kicked in the junk, knowing that I will be voting for someone wholefully unqualified to be President and possibly someone who actually thinks all out woes will be solved with walls and religious bans. Parent
But if my choices are Bernie or any of the GOP choices, of course I will be happy to vote Bernie. Parent
And I'd even go so far as to say that a majority of his support is pro-Bernie, not anti-Clinton. Hillary can't do anything about the anti-Clinton stuff if she wins. But she can certainly address the pro-Bernie people. Parent
Sanders and O'Malley are not at all alike in my view. Though I confess I just don't listen to O'Malley...sorry dude, you may be fine, it is just not your year. Parent
Parent
For some potential sadness, take a gander at the internals of the polls especially the antipathy of male respondents. Maybe a fluke; maybe the looking-for-a-new-face (or shiny penny) thing; maybe we wait until the U.S. reaches 300; maybe and more maybes for me today.
Once again, I am reminded that strong & powerful women in our country--not token strong, but the top-line definition--sometimes get called those things that rhyme with "witch." (Like the comments cast Geraldine Ferraro's way when she acceded to the VP candidacy in the 1980s.) Parent
But we earned them Parent
The economy is always going to be the catalyst with voters. And despite last month's employment numbers, too many people in the U.S. are not personally experiencing the gains. Part-time jobs, contract work, low wages, no benefits, high rents. Where the economy is concerned, Sanders is tapping into the zeitgeist, Clinton is not. I would love to see a woman in the White House as much as anyone, but Clinton is not going to get there if the majority of energized voters view her as being aligned with Wall Street.
If Clinton continues to falter, it will be because she is not connecting with voters who are still feeling the pain of the recession.
And, as a side note, the idea that it's only black Americans in prison who convert to Islam strikes me as really out of touch, not to mention racist.
Sure. There is the factor of economic pain - and the fact that HRC's major donors include some of those responsible for the misery...
But there is also the fact that she is so gung-ho for our military involvement in the civil wars of countries in the M.E.
There is also the distasteful fact that she is criticizing Obama for not getting us further involved in Syria soon enough! Ugh! Just what we need.
The "new flavor" aspect of Sanders is that he comes across as honest - intellectually honest. This is a contrast, like it or not, with the constant bobbling and weaving of Mrs. Clinton and the rest of them.
I would love to see a woman in the White House. It would be about time. If that woman were Elizabeth Warren, I would be thrilled out of my mind.
But if the choice is yet another corporatist-militarist... include me out. Parent
In 2008, I dragged my mother out in the ice to vote for Clinton but over the last 8 years (several of those years spent in Afghanistan), I just can't vote for her. I can't do it. She is reckless and this country doesn't have a foreign policy (hers or Obama's) that has made an ounce of sense.
I am back in the States now (permanently I hope and free to speak)and have been sick and stuck in bed for a week. Over that time, I have watched more cable news than I ever want to again, and the more she attacks, the less I like her. Listening to her lecturing, whining and hypocrisy - as she calls into one cable show show after another - just increases my dislike for her.
I think Hilary is totally disconnected from ground truth in this country and while I think she is far better than Donald Trump (light years), I do not think she grasps the anger or the fact that her normal playbook will not work. Pandering is not going to cut it in 2016 and her constant changes in positions on critical issues like trade grates on my nerves.
If she can lose people like me, and my mom who is in her 70's, she can't win because I don't think the under 35 crowd will come out in enough numbers for her to beat the really angry crowd.
So, as much as I think Sanders is deficient in foreign policy, I have to go with him. I am willing to take that chance just as angry people on the other side are willing to throw the dice on Trump. I want to vote for someone that has principles. I just don't think Clinton has any left except on Women's rights but Sanders 30 year record is stellar there.
My sense is that there are a lot of people that feel as I do and the more they get to know Sanders' record, they will like him.
I also think that turn out will be the key. This will be a base election to be sure but in 2016 the Dems need the youth vote and if they don't have it (and I don't think they will turn out in record numbers for Clinton), we are toast.
That is my two cents anyway. Parent
This crap is coming primarily from the world's number one supporters of terrorism, the Saudis, and from the Israeli right-wing..
Two entities Hillary somehow missed hearing about and refuses to ever acknowledge in public. Parent
The American people will chose strong and wrong over weak and right any day of the week. Parent
His bombastic crap will force US allies to respond to whatever crazy shit he puts out there and he will look like a man with no friends abroad. The best thing for Trump is no big foreign policy incidents because he can't control himself before crowds baiting him on or right wing reporters that want to bomb Iran.
While Americans say they don't care what other countries think of us, that tune changes quickly when war is on the table. Parent
Can Hillary do better? Sure she can but Bernie's appeal according to the polls is mostly upper income whites.
And tax rates? If he wants the same ones that they have in Sweden it's 40%. Parent
Pretty sure that Sanders is making a point about income inequality, taxes, and services, without actually pledging to turn U.S into the next Sweden.
My response to you is: if Sanders doesn't appeal to you, then don't vote for him. Parent
So, I guess you have no interest in or need for things like this:
Income and Wealth Inequality College Tuition Free and Debt Free Getting Big Money Out of Politics and Restoring Democracy Creating Decent Paying Jobs A Living Wage Combating Climate Change to Save the Planet A Fair and Humane Immigration Policy Racial Justice Fighting for Women's Rights Fighting for LGBT Equality Caring for Our Veterans Fighting for Disability Rights Strengthen and Expand Social Security Fighting to Lower Prescription Drug Prices Improving the Rural Economy Reforming Wall Street Real Family Values War and Peace War Should Be the Last Option: Why I Support the Iran Deal
So, none of this would make your life better? Or is Clinton your "but, wait, there's more!" candidate, who's going to do more and better than that?
You don't know what tax rates he "wants?" Up above, you said "you read somewhere" that he had pulled out of SC; apparently you aren't aware that he's doing a tour of historically black colleges and universities, beginning Thursday at - well, lookie here....South Carolina State University. Then where? Tennessee State University, Alabama State University, Jackson State University, Florida A&M University, Virginia State University, Howard University, the Atlanta University Center and Benedict College. Yeah, I guess he's just pulling out of everywhere but Iowa and NH.
Honestly, why not just say that you support Clinton and aren't interested in even knowing what Sanders is all about? Maybe that would put some kind of limit on the utter crap you post here.
Please, I beg of you, stop posting about Sanders as if you have even a clue about him. Parent
And he wants to send the money to the states and let them deal with things. Well, that's great for people who live in some states but here in GA and other states in the south he might as well be saying I'm going to screw you because they know you cannot depend on people like Nathan Deal to do the right thing and the majority of governorship's are controlled by Republicans. He wants to give them MORE power?
And then there's the Hyde Amendment. He has said nothing about getting rid of it and how is that going to work with single payer? Are women going to have to buy separate insurance in a single payer system? He has big overarching ideas but seems to not have a solid plan for enacting any of them. Parent
The differences between Hillary and Bernie are way more a difference in tactics and priorities then any kind of ideological gulf.
Come on
A Fair and Humane Immigration Policy Racial Justice Fighting for Women's Rights
I don't pretend that Hillary is the best on every single issue, she isn't, but she is willing to take steps in the right direction on virtually all of them.
Bernie has some great ideas but to me they sound more aspirational rather than operational, so to speak. Single payer, free tuition, repeal Glass Steagall, sounds like music to my ears, but I see them all as extreme long shots.
When I look at most Bernie supporters I actually see very little ideological difference between us. However it often seems to me they look upon Clinton supporters as heretics and traitors to the cause only because we have a different opinion on the best course to achieve progress towards the goals we all strive for. Parent
It pains me that people like Georgia don't seem to have any appreciation for the leftward shift Bernie Sanders has brought to this contest, or for the clear and present energy and excitement he has been generating among Democrats.
I'm not attempting to award ownership of these issues to Sanders; rather, I think Sanders has been attempting to remind us that these are our issues - WE own them - and it's up to us to generate the interest, enthusiasm and will to make those aspirations a reality.
I'm too old to have illusions about much of anything, but that doesn't mean I'm too old to hope. I have children and grandchildren who mean the world to me, and I want that world to be kind to them, to provide opportunities for them. I don't want them to have to support my husband and me in a few years.
It is my hope that Sanders stays in this until the last dog dies, because without him, the Democrats have a centrist-that's-too-far-to-the-right nominee who, the moment she becomes the nominee, will put on her right-turn signal and start making common cause with Republicans, in search of voters who miss the old-fashioned Rockefeller Republican party.
Sure, if she's the nominee, I'll vote for her, because what's at stake is too important to take any chances with Republicans winning. We'll know more after Iowa and New Hampshire, maybe, and we'll see where we are.
But, seriously, I have to think I wasn't the only one barking with laughter reading that "Bernie doesn't have anything to offer me," when Clinton isn't offering anything a whole lot different. Parent
I do think Bernie will need to raise middle class taxes to pay for the programs he wants....That has always been a tough sell. Parent
Income tax Sweden has a progressive income tax, the rates for 2014 are as follows: [...] 31% + 25% [= 56%]: above 615,700 kr (88,180 USD and up)[4]
Sweden has a progressive income tax, the rates for 2014 are as follows:
[...]
31% + 25% [= 56%]: above 615,700 kr (88,180 USD and up)[4]
...the employer additionally pays ~31% of each employee's salary directly to the govt.
So if the employee was paid all of the money as salary, like is done in the US, the highest rate is 56% / (100 + 31) + 31% / (100 + 31) = 66.41% Parent
If we changed our priorities, we could have what we need. Parent
appeal is generational (none / 0) (#170) by thomas rogan on Tue Jan 12, 2016 at 05:36:06 PM MDT Actually Sanders mainly appeals to under 45 year olds compared
Actually Sanders mainly appeals to under 45 year olds compared
As for me, I feel younger already. Parent
It is a comment that fits the discussion imo.
Not used to uprating.... Parent
Is Clinton faltering? I dunno - nationally, she's ahead by almost 20 (and a new poll out today has her gaining - she"s ahead by 39). Things are tightening in Iowa, for sure, but in NH she's gaining ground and within the margin of error. (Sanders was up in NH by 14 a month ago in one poll). And like I said before - in the next races after NH and IA, she's up by huge numbers. Maybe that will change, but you're buying the Bernie rhetoric of "she's in trouble" - something people who are running behind say.
And yes, talking about all their ages is silly. Parent
Seems to me, a lot of people know, or are finding out who Sanders is, and what his positions are. He is not as much of an unknown as you may think. And the fact that Obama, a true "new flavor" in 2008 won the nomination should be a signal that Democratic voters are tired of the same old, same old, and are looking for different ideas, or at least, different framing of the same ideas. Parent
However I think the theory is that the rest of the states will "fall in line" should he win NH or IA or both. Speaking from Georgia no, it's not going to change anything down here. Bernie just does not have much of a constituency in GA and probably a lot of other southern states. Parent
I think you're correct that the real sniping is about to begin, because we are now in primary season.
It's the sometime-Dem-voter and the unaffiliated/ independents Clinton needs to be concerned with. Like it or not, if her image of being a hawk who's aligned with Wall Street doesn't change between now and November, she's going to have a problem pulling in the independents and/or unaffiliated voters. This reality seems totally lost on some of her supporters.
And we still won't have a good read on Midwest and Western polling until just before those primaries and caucuses take place. So far, there is a lot of Sanders support in WA State, and the caucus system (which, incidentally, I don't like) will favor him on March 26. Parent
BTW - Hillary picked up the endorsement of another labor union - the UFCW. They will be working for her in Iowa and other places to get people out to vote. The union thinks she and Bernie are both good on economic policy, but she is more electable.
You know, it's yet another grouo of working class people and a solid Democratic constiuency supporting HRC. If she is so beholden to Wall Street, why aren't ALL unions supporting Sanders? Why does she have more endorsements than him? (Oh, I know he's complained about the leadership vs. the members, but funny how he didn't worry about that when he got his few union endorsemwnts) Parent
If she is so beholden to Wall Street, why aren't ALL unions supporting Sanders?
Unions are run by people, and apparently a majority of UFCW voting members view Clinton as more "electable." I'm not sure why that's supposed to be surprising. The "electable" meme is a strong one in our political culture.
If you want to discount that she has an image of being aligned with Wall Street, that's your choice. Better to not be in denial about things, and, instead, be prepared for what happens during the general election. Parent
The contempt heaped upon people who are drawn to his candidacy is really weird. It reads as the bile meted out by right-wing hacks in the media - but it is often coming from people who identify themselves as Democrats. Parent
Here I will stipulate that not everyone here who supports either of these two falls into that category, but plenty do.
Sanders and Clinton agree on more than they disagree. And, IMO, their difference is often one of degree and implementation. They each have strengths and weaknesses. They each are a gazillion times better than anyone on the Republican side. Nothing about either one of them would justify letting a Republican win. Parent
So, you gave me the predictable line. Ho hum.
She's not really about Wall Street, but it'seems a good meme. Parent
She's not really about Wall Street, but it'seems a good meme.
I have no idea what being "about" Wall Street actually means, but the point is that she has the image of being in their pocket. And, when one considers the nearly $3 million in speaking fees she's bankrolled from Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley and the like--in just the last two years--any attempts to paint her as something other than being a friend to Wall Street bankers is just...bonkers.
To put these numbers into perspective, compare them to lifetime earnings of the median American worker. In 2011, the Census Bureau estimated that, across all majors, a "bachelor's degree holder can expect to earn about $2.4 million over his or her work life." A Pew Research analysis published the same year estimated that a "typical high school graduate" can expect to make just $770,000 over the course of his or her lifetime. This means that in one year -- 2013 -- Hillary Clinton earned almost as much from 10 lectures to financial firms as most bachelor's degree-holding Americans earn in their lifetimes -- and nearly four times what someone who holds only a high school diploma could expect to make.
This means that in one year -- 2013 -- Hillary Clinton earned almost as much from 10 lectures to financial firms as most bachelor's degree-holding Americans earn in their lifetimes -- and nearly four times what someone who holds only a high school diploma could expect to make.
She netted $675,000 from Goldman Sachs and $485,000 from Deutsche Bank alone. For giving speeches.
She is viewed as not exactly being "one of us". Most Democrats--most voters of any stripe--do not relate to someone who pays lip service by using populist framing while taking in that kind of money from the people who make their millions and billions by scr*wing the average American worker.
Ignore it and deride it all you want, but her relationship with Wall Street and the bankers who have made her that much richer is a problem for her. How big a problem? I don't know, and neither do you. I do know that hard working middle and lower income voters care about it. Whether it will keep her from winning the White House is anybody's guess. Parent
Not. Parent
More importantly, Reich isn't the only one who thinks Clinton's plan falls short. The Atlantic Monthly agrees with Reich on that point. Are the writers of The Atlantic Monthly also frenemies of Hillary? Parent
Why do politicians persist in thinking they can change the way the world works by forcing regulators to write some more rules and then try to enforce them? What's needed are structural changes that reduce the sources of risk directly--for example, by breaking up large banks or increasing capital requirements by a factor of three--not more regulatory discretion. Yes, those types of structural changes will be impossible to get through a Republican House, but so will every item on Clinton's wish list. Change will take years, and it will take leaders who are willing to make the case over the long term. Clinton's supporters will argue that their candidate understands what she is up against, and that's why her strategy is to give incremental powers to regulators and encourage them to use those powers (even if they aren't actually new). But that was the Obama-Geithner-Summers strategy, and it has had little impact on either the concentration or the mismanagement of the financial system. In the end, the Clinton plan looks like a laundry list of marginally better-than-nothing reforms that are likely to vanish into an abyss of rule-writing and regulatory dithering. If she wanted to position herself as the heir to President Obama--who talked a good game while leaving Wall Street largely as he found it--she couldn't have done a better job.
Clinton's supporters will argue that their candidate understands what she is up against, and that's why her strategy is to give incremental powers to regulators and encourage them to use those powers (even if they aren't actually new). But that was the Obama-Geithner-Summers strategy, and it has had little impact on either the concentration or the mismanagement of the financial system.
In the end, the Clinton plan looks like a laundry list of marginally better-than-nothing reforms that are likely to vanish into an abyss of rule-writing and regulatory dithering. If she wanted to position herself as the heir to President Obama--who talked a good game while leaving Wall Street largely as he found it--she couldn't have done a better job.
Quick! To the Google!
Look up Bernie's plan while you're at it, because I'd guess you don't know anything about it, and I'd bet $1 you don't even really know anything about her plan other than that it's hers and that makes it better. Oh, and someone, somewhere said hers was better.
Oh, and Robert Reich - what does he know?
Okay, we get it: you're voting for Hillary. Good for you. You'd think with all the time you have to be online, the least you could do is a little research now and then. I promise, the additional information won't kill you. Parent
But there is this;
Bernie Sanders Has Edge in Iowa and Widens New Hampshire Lead, Polls Find
LINK
People with varying agendas can cite whatever polls they wish to influence the behavior of others.
But I am more than ever convinced that HRC is extremely vulnerable in the general election. Parent
"The Green Inferno" is accordingly at its best when it's a horror film that thinks it's a satire, and not a satire that acts like a horror film. There are a couple of notable missteps, particularly in the scene where blonde vegan Amy (Kirby Bliss Blanton) has diarrhea. The scene is presented as an unnerving, even surreal moment in an already unbelievable, intolerable situation. But the sound effects guy was clearly instructed to go to town, and he winds up giving short shrift to one of the film's most believably pathetic characters. Thankfully, while one might wonder what value a horror film that uses savage tribesmen stereotypes, Roth's film does represent anti-heroic Justine and her peers through a lens that is both critical and human enough. "The Green Inferno" is not exactly a feel-good film, but it gets a very particular job done.
Might pass on the movie
Don't do horror well anymore
At least not when viewing alone. Parent
Definitely. It's only value is mentioned in Eberts review. But it's well done beautifully shot (unfortunately, makes you wish for grainy B/W) and interesting. Only to a film, and especially horror, nut. I am both. Parent
Still living at home, must have been in community college at the time, Just back from a night out at the bars, Had a bite to eat and turned on the tube, B&W movie, flesh eating zombies, Scared the Be Jesus out of me, Exorcist did a pretty good job on me as well Have been considering taking a look at Crimson Peak, Excellent actors for a horror movie Parent
It is an often offensively dumb story of a bunch of obnoxious liberals who go to the Peruvian rain forest to protest and are eaten by cannibals.
I don't want to see this. But I secretly want to see this. Parent
Thanks for the heads up. Parent
Meanwhile in Oregon, all the money we spent arming the National Guard with APCs and automatic weapons turns out to be useless against a bunch of losers with AR-15s.
Like to see a Guardsman with a mini-gun (3000 7.62mm rounds a minute) turn those fools into Alpo on live TV.
I think that might possibly yield better, more long-lasting results.. Parent
That said, I respect and appreciate your perspective as a defense counsel, because were I to have to defend any of these militia clowns in court, I probably wouldn't appreciate such public comments, either. If anything, they reflect a probable hardening of our attitudes toward these guys.
And I'll freely admit, my own patience with the right-wing's d*ck-swinging is also at an end. I say, bring the hammer down on these yahoos hard. Fix them firmly in place and under siege, cut them off from all power, water and contact with the outside world, and starve them out. Then when they surrender, throw the entire damned law book at them and make a very public spectacle of their fate.
Sic semper stultus. (Thus always to the stupid.) Parent
Posse Comitatus isn't as tight as everyone wants to think though. My husband taught a course on Posse Comitatus, and that was before the Bush Administration created the Northern Command. Federal troops were called in for the LA riots though. And you know Northcom has already generated the legal arguments plus paperwork for the future.
After being around the military, I have come to believe Posse Comitatus is only as good as our arguments to observe it and our sitting President's willingness to observe it.
The Bush Administration really did a have a bird flu plan in the military databases too that involved the military taking control, they really did...until it was ratted out :) Parent
Once you take arms against duly constituted authority, and the muzzle comes up to horizontal, you have surrendered a right to a trial. If you live through the appropriate response, you can have a trial
When did treason become an accepted political statement? Parent
The notion that people should die because other law enforcement went in a-guns-a-blazing is very weak.
In most situations, law enforcement should be the ones trying to deescalate the situation, not escalate into a situation in which people die who did not need to.
There will plenty of time for arrests after everyone is out of harms way. Violence should be the last resort, not the first.
That being said, at some point the authorities are going to have to deal with armed men. Even if they pull up leave, someone has to arrest men with guns who probably don't want to be arrested. Parent
Heck a regular C130 circling at night would spook these clowns.. Bloodshed should be avoided at all cost but a I think a little Psy-ops is fair play. Parent
Just having that wicked bird of prey circling in the dark would surely stress their TP supply and undoubtedly ruin their beauty sleep. Parent
I also caught some of Hillary Clinton.
I remain more convinced than ever that Sanders is the one who could defeat Trump - or any of the Republican candidates... whereas I see only disaster for the Party and the country if HRC is the nominee.
It would be truly ironic if HRC gets the nomination due to progressives working against Sanders...
He has consistently espoused progressive ideas. He seems not well grounded in actually accomplishing things or fighting against conservatives.....Trump would eviscerate him. Parent
He does not speak well on foreign policy. He makes good intellectual points....But he cannot brawl, cannot cajole, cannot win. Parent
A real tell could be the Des Moines Register Poll (Ann Seltzer) scheduled for release this Thursday. That poll, in the past, matches "likely voters" via tracing to the real registration status. It may be that Bernie Sanders really has moved even or ahead ... Iowa has a way of doing its thing. Or it may be that the handful of most recent polls--inadvertently or otherwise--are being used to drive the narrative that can create the desired reality. Parent
The only time that party affiliation is important in terms of voting is in the case of a political party caucus or a primary election. In those cases, voters must be registered with the political party whose caucus or primary they wish to participate in. Voters have the right to change their affiliation and then participate in the caucus or primary election on the day those events are being held. (Ex. Someone who is registered as a Republican may participate in the Democratic primary election by changing his or her political affiliation to Democratic on the day the primary election is held and vice versa.)
October 30, 2015 Last day to change your party affiliation prior to the Presidential Primary Election. May 31, 2016 Last day to change your party affiliation prior to State Primary Election Day. September 6, 2016 Last day to register to vote before Primary Election Day. September 13, 2016 Parent
The surveys also found Mr. Sanders, buoyed by the support of independent voters, outperforms Mrs. Clinton in hypothetical general-election matchups in both states among registered voters. In New Hampshire, Mr. Sanders, who is from neighboring Vermont, beats all three, while in Iowa he tops Mr. Trump and Mr. Cruz and is tied with Mr. Rubio.
In New Hampshire, Mr. Sanders, who is from neighboring Vermont, beats all three, while in Iowa he tops Mr. Trump and Mr. Cruz and is tied with Mr. Rubio.
Gaius Publius weighs in over at Digby's on the NYT article:
This especially should not be ignored (my emphasis): "The surveys also found Mr. Sanders, buoyed by the support of independent voters, outperforms Mrs. Clinton in hypothetical general-election matchups in both states among registered voters." That, I would think, might make an interesting head-turning addition to the "head-turning addition" to the campaign speech. Significantly greater support from independents sounds like victory to me. And lack of support from independents sounds, well, risky. If I were a Democratic insider who actually wanted to win, I'd give that some thought.
That, I would think, might make an interesting head-turning addition to the "head-turning addition" to the campaign speech. Significantly greater support from independents sounds like victory to me. And lack of support from independents sounds, well, risky. If I were a Democratic insider who actually wanted to win, I'd give that some thought.
Trump v Sanders
Rubio v Sanders
Cruz v Sanders
You can ignore it, but I think you do so at some peril. Parent
And, as for the primries, while it may be close in Iowa and NH, so far it's not in the next primaries - Nevada, South Carolina, and then the "SEC" states. If he can't win a few of those, it's game over. How appealing is he in Arkansas, do you think against HRC? Parent
I am saying that I think he would have a much better chance against Trump - or one of the other heavies on the Republican side.
Sanders is too straightforward to be Trumped.
I also think, rightly or wrongly, that there is major fatigue with regards to HRC.
Even here, while I read that people think she would win, I see little or nothing of praise for her positions regarding war.
And if we stay in these wars, the rest is just soup. Parent
I have seen numbers before.
All I can tell you is what I sense.
About voting for the least worse: there is not a day that goes by, when I read of the carnage that we inflict daily in the ME, of the state of our inner cities, of the fierce deportations, of the exponential increase in income inequality... that I am not relieved I did not vote for Obama.
You can argue that McCain would have been worse. But, nevertheless, I don't have to have it on my conscience that I enabled so much of what I despise by voting for Mr. Obama. Parent
Seems like a setup for disappointment if you are a liberal supporting Bernie. Parent
If Independents are supporting Bernie, whose message has been decidedly liberal, I have to think it's because that's the message that resonates with them.
Perhaps the bigger question is, if independents are so centrist, why isn't Clinton doing better with them? Shouldn't her views line up better with them? Parent
"Independent" equals conservative is just more propaganda promulgated by those who'd prefer to limit the spectrum of acceptable ideas in this country. Parent
A set up for disappointment for a liberal voter would be to vote for a candidate beholden to Wall Street and the financial sector due to the sizable campaign contributions she has received from them over the years.
A set up for disappointment for would be to vote for a candidate who supports a muscular military policy in the Middle East.
As a liberal, I'm already disappointed in many of Hillary's stated policies. A set up for disappointment would be for a liberal to vote for a candidate that already disappoints on the off chance that the candidate that most alligns with your positions might disappoint you occasionally. Parent
The GOP will hit him hard...that has not happened yet.....Socialist, wants to raise middle class taxes....not sure of himself.....weak, indecisive, befuddled professor.....You can see the attacks coming.... Parent
They are wildly inconsistent, even from the same polling organization! Clinton vs Trump
Fox: mid Nov Trump +5, Mid Dec Clinton +11, Early Jan. Trump +3 kind of makes your head spin. Parent
Did you watch? Parent
She's also been engaged to Roxy Music's lead singer, Bryan Ferry. Parent
Hall, like many of Ferry's girlfriends made a cover of an album, Siren. Both have written songs about her.
I can't think any two more polar opposites than Jagger and Murdoch. Parent
Though, only one of the two is an avaricious old right-wing goat scrotum of longstanding, and it aint Mick. Parent
I shall have to give them a serious second look. Or third, fourth, fifth...?? Parent
More Than This, Avalon, and Slave To Love
Those are probably songs you know, or at least I had heard them before, just never knew who it was. XM-33 plays him and them all the time, I downloaded a greatest hits album, there are like 3 of them, but that is basically a double album that has as much as I can take in for a while.
There must be 50 albums between the two. Parent
I love and have them all but that one is special
Also love Bete Noir Parent
"Cruz lays down an atmosphere of apocalyptic fear.." "as is the wont of inauthentic speakers, everything is described as a maximum existential threat. " ..."the diagnosis is ridiculous, The Obama administration has done things that people like me strongly disagree with. But America is in better economic shape than any other major nation on earth, Crime is down, Abortion rates are down. Fourteen million jobs have been created in five years."
"The approach works because in the wake of Obergefell on same sex marrige, many evangelicals feel they are being turned into pariahs..." "Cruz exploits and exaggerates that fear. He sows bitterness, influences his followers to lose all sense of proportion and teaches them to answer hate with hate. This Trump-Cruz conservatism looks more like tribal, blood and soil European conservatism than the pluralistic American kind."
David Brooks seems to overlook the fertile ground some of the Evangelicals offer. Cruz (and Trump) just may have recognized it and now, are tilling it,successfully. And, David Brooks may have overestimated the Evangelical"s Christian virtues of humility, mercy, compassion, and grace. And, Cruz really is their guy.
overestimated the Evangelical"s Christian virtues of humility, mercy, compassion, and grace.
What I learned in Sunday school does not exist in any form in the the south, and if you include slavery and post-civil war, I don't think it would it would be hard to make the case that those values have never existed in the south.
They are christian in name only(CINO), but in practice they are exactly as described above by Brooks:
"There is not a hint of compassion, gentleness and mercy. Instead, his speeches are marked by a long list of enemies, and vows to crush, shred, destroy, bomb them, he continues."
Not sure where brooks has been, but it's certainly not been anywhere near reality. Trump and Cruz aren't changing the way evangelics, and many others, think, they are just giving them an option that in recent history has not been available, unfiltered hatred. Parent
The establishment Republicans, like Brooks, do not like to see the mask pulled away. Reagan, for example, spoke in such a grandfatherly way--a grandfather right out of central casting. But, he did open his general election campaign in Philadelphia, MS, no doubt a happenstance. However, the message got across.
Brooks does not seem to like Cruz. Just not nice like Canadians should be. But, is there much daylight between any of the Republican candidates? Trump? Rubio? Huckabee?
Brooks wants a polite, nicely spoken Cruz who couches his words, and policies, such as they are--but that is not what the Republican primary voters appear to want. That would be the abhorrent "political correctness." They want to say it the old-fashioned way--like they do over the kitchen table or in the locker rooms. Brooks does not, or does not want, to get it. Parent
But he did not.
Fk Brooks. Parent
And no one here wants to spend any tax money on the NFL. Parent
And that durn Ernie Nevers could run like the dickens too -- don't let anyone tell you different, young fella. Parent
People that like to watch football in LA are perfectly happy being able to watch the best games from around the country and not be stuck watching the Rams because of blackout rules. Parent
Is there a possibility of two teams sharing a stadium, that is not what I have been reading, but building two stadiums is the greater LA area seems far fetched at best.
What I don't get is the Chargers played their last game, where are they going ? Even if it's LA, a stadium won't be ready next season, where are they going to play, college stadium, but why not wait to move until another stadium is ready and it's actually been approved.
What happens if the owners say 'no' to any moves, they go back home ? From what I can tell that is not an option either. But neither the Chargers or the Raiders have any sort of real plan beyond moving. Parent
The Rams and Chargers will probably share a stadium in Inglewood. The owners won't say no. It will get approved. Parent
Link.
The times do change, don't they? Parent
Of course, if I had my way, the Raiders, Chargers and Rams would all be allowed to relocate to Stockton, Fresno and Bakersfield, respectively.
;-D Parent
NFL owners voted today to support Rams owner Stan Kroenke's plans for the 298-acre site of the former Hollywood Park in Inglewood, and have further given the Chargers the option to join them.
Until their new stadium is complete, the Rams will likely play in the L.A. Coliseum -- pending, of course, upon reaching an agreement with USC, which now owns that facility.
Aloha. Parent
And that there are many - many different branches of Islam. I don't think Trump really seems to care though. And more to my point, I don't think the voters think that Trump really seems to care. They can see that rhetoric for what it is. Parent
The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday declared Florida's death penalty law unconstitutional because it requires the trial judge and not the jury to make the critical findings necessary to impose capital punishment.
"The Sixth Amendment requires a jury, not a judge, to find each fact necessary to impose a sentence of death. A jury's mere recommendation is not enough," wrote Sonia Sotomayor for the court's 8-1 majority.
It's not yet clear how many other cases -- including the 400 inmates on the state's death row -- could be affected, experts said. "The substance of the ruling would affect the vast majority of Florida's death row inmates," said Robert Dunham, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center, which opposes capital punishment.
"The substance of the ruling would affect the vast majority of Florida's death row inmates," said Robert Dunham, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center, which opposes capital punishment.
I wonder how many other states a judge makes the call rather than a jury.
It is not known if Kim's husband will accompany this duo. This should make for a good SNL sketch.
President Obama has invited Jim Obergefell. Hope the president does not include in his address the fact that this is his last SOTU. Would not like to see the Republicans embarrass the country by applauding that comment. Alito may have something to snicker about, but, perhaps, he will follow his colleague, Scalia, and play hooky.
Link to Tribe
White House spokesman says Obama will not address it in SOU speech tonight, but Obama will talk about the deal he cut with Iran. Even CNN is kinda griping about that.
I still say some peeps have cards they are not showing.
WASHINGTON (AP) -- Iran was holding 10 U.S. Navy sailors and their two small Navy boats after the boats had mechanical problems and drifted into Iranian waters, but American officials have received assurances from Tehran that they will be returned safely and promptly. ... U.S. officials said that the incident happened near Farsi Island, situated in the Persian Gulf. They said that some type of mechanical trouble with one of the boats caused them to run aground and they were picked up by Iran. The sailors were in Iranian custody on Farsi Island at least for some time, but it's not certain where they are now. link
link
No, we don't ever want Republicans in Congress ever to have a say in those decisions. {Shudder}.
We dodged a bullet on that one.
The militiamen occupying the Malheur national wildlife refuge in eastern Oregon said on Tuesday that they intended to tell the public soon "when we will be leaving", signalling that the takeover could be heading toward a resolution.
The announcement is significant given that, if they follow through with the plan, the 7pm Friday event will mark the first time the occupiers enter Burns and formally communicate with local residents, who have increasingly called on the militia to end the siege and leave Oregon.
I didn't realize the guys who want 'the federal government to give local ranchers control of public land in rural Oregon', we not from Oregon.
Jerry DeLemus, a 61-year-old New Hampshire resident who was at the refuge until Monday and has helped Bundy coordinate meetings with nearby ranchers, said the occupation has made significant progress in recent days and could soon be ready to leave.
And the guy who's in charge of it is a real winner.
Fry didn't say when he arrived, but he's set up shop in a building the militants want to turn into a media center, according to Finicum. Fry said he knows "a little bit" about computers. Fry's Google+ account shows the Ohio man regularly posts anti-Semitic, homophobic, and pro-Nazi propaganda on social media. Fry also posts in support of ISIS. "ALL I WANT FOR CHRISTMAS IS FOR ISIS TO NUKE ISRAELHELL!" he wrote on the site Nov. 30. When asked to explain his feelings about Israel and ISIS, Fry spoke at length of government conspiracies, plots against multiple countries, Sept. 11, court records, computer viruses on Japanese computers, Fukushima and a Jewish conspiracy against the free world that involves causing nuclear meltdowns. "One week before Fukushima happened, an Israeli security team installing security equipment was there at Fukushima," Fry said.
Fry's Google+ account shows the Ohio man regularly posts anti-Semitic, homophobic, and pro-Nazi propaganda on social media.
Fry also posts in support of ISIS.
"ALL I WANT FOR CHRISTMAS IS FOR ISIS TO NUKE ISRAELHELL!" he wrote on the site Nov. 30.
When asked to explain his feelings about Israel and ISIS, Fry spoke at length of government conspiracies, plots against multiple countries, Sept. 11, court records, computer viruses on Japanese computers, Fukushima and a Jewish conspiracy against the free world that involves causing nuclear meltdowns.
"One week before Fukushima happened, an Israeli security team installing security equipment was there at Fukushima," Fry said.
This guy is the perfect case study of who joins the white militias.