Proof, 3/4ths of your posts are sexual misconduct of some sort, of them, like this one, you blatantly suggest the man is getting set-up with some seriously dumb comment like, "Maybe Duke Redux ?" or "Same Old Non-Sense" when you don't know a GD thing about the case.  

The inference is obvious.

Ditto with your cops and dead black dude posts.

You have some odd issues with women and black men, not sure what it is, but it's so obvious that I believe you are not confused about anything.

I agree about false allegations, but just because it was done at Duke doesn't mean every sexual allegation should be compared when you don't know anything about it.  Plus of course this is nothing like Duke in that the school did the punishing, not the media, not the cops, and not the prosecutor.

McBain: "Not having details didn't stop someone from putting up posters on the Yale campus that read 'YALE MEN'S BASKETBALL | STOP SUPPORTING A RAPIST[.]'"

... dissuade the men's basketball team from wearing t-shirts during pre-game warm-ups that explicitly expressed the players' support for their now-expelled captain, which is what prompted those posters to be put up across the Yale campus in the first place. (The players and coaches have since apologized.) If you're going to continue to bring that up as your rationale for your posts on this subject, then you really ought to also put it in proper context.

And again, as I said to you several times the other day (apparently without any noticeable effect), Jack Montague has not been arrested and arraigned in a criminal case. Your repeated attempts to somehow link his case to the now-infamous Duke Lacrosse scandal are a nonsensical exercise in self-induced hysteria. Those young men at Duke were wrongfully charged by the legal authorities with felony rape, whereas Montague was expelled for violating the university's student code of conduct.

Further, that violation may have absolutely nothing to do with Montague's sex life. Perhaps he wasn't nearly as forthcoming and truthful about what actually happened as he probably should have been, when called before the University-Wide Committee on Sexual Misconduct (UWC), which was investigating the allegation. Per the UWC rules (Section 3, Paragraph 3):

"Parties and witnesses are expected to cooperate in the investigation of matters brought to the UWC. Parties and witnesses must provide truthful information in all phases of a UWC proceeding. Failure to provide truthful information or any attempt to impede the UWC process may result in a recommendation for a more severe penalty or a referral for discipline." (Emphasis is mine.)

Now, if that's indeed the case, did the UWC properly inform Montague of his right to legal counsel during such a proceeding and further make sure that he fully understood all potential outcomes and consequences, before the UWC actually moved forward with its investigation?

One would hope it did so, but we shouldn't just assume that as a given. Nor should we assume that Montague -- who, after all, is only 21 years old -- truly grasped the seriousness of the allegation being leveled against him. It should be noted that per Section 7 of its own rules, the UWC has a responsibility to the respondent, and well as to the complainant. Given the public statement of Montague's attorney taking issue with the committee's due process, my immediate question is whether or not the UWC properly discharged that responsibility as it pertained to the respondent.

Absent any disclosure from university officials themselves regarding their reason for expelling Montague, which they are unlikely to ever divulge publicly outside of formal litigation, we simply don't know the actual details of the incident(s) which first prompted the formal complaint filed against Montague. It's therefore ridiculous to presume that we now do, based solely upon the respective insistence of both his father and his attorney, who obviously have their own agenda here.

That said, I've no opinion about Jack Montague, good or ill. If he truly feels aggrieved about what happened to him at Yale, then by all means  he should exercise his right to seek redress in a court of law by suing the university. I certainly don't want to see anyone's personal reputation and character recklessly impugned, simply because the UWC felt pressured to make an example of the next available Title IX case that came before its panel. At this point, court is the proper place to adjudicate and resolve this matter.

But at the same time, given Yale University's own venerable history and reputation, it doesn't necessarily strike me as the sort of institution that would so blithely ignore due process, so the burden here is actually on Jack Montague to prove that's exactly what happened here when he was expelled. And in that regard, while I think I've made clear that I'm not inclined to accept the public statements of his father and his attorney at face value, I'll nevertheless strive to keep an open mind.

As for you, if you want to continue to discuss this issue, then please do so rationally and without the incendiary references to the Duke Lacrosse case. If you persist in doing otherwise, then you shouldn't be at all surprised to see your arguments consequently dismissed for the emotional tripe and folderol that they are.

Until then, as I said above, while I'm willing to keep an open mind about what actually happened here, I'm not going to accept at face value anything Montague's father or attorney says. The burden of proof is upon Montague himself. If he really and truly feels that he was wronged by Yale, then he needs to man up and file suit, and not have Daddy and the family lawyer whine about his plight to the media. They're likely not going to bluff Yale with spin, and win by conducting a public relations campaign.

So
Who can you think of that's close to Glenn who also happens to be pregnant at the moment.  

It would be one of the most devastating fan moments in the history of television.

Last nights episode was incredible.  Carol and Maggie both pushed to the limit of sanity.   Which lends itself to my theory.  
And there are other things I can share if you want.

Jessica Jones was a thumbs up,
Have Season 3 of Homeland to start,
And have True Detective Season 1 warming up.