The media "fails to point out several signs of illness by her; all you gotta do is go online," Giuliani said, before being interrupted by host Shannon Bream, who pointed out that Clinton's campaign has said there is no factual evidence to support those claims.
"Go online and put down 'Hillary Clinton illness,' take a look at the videos yourself," Giuliani continued.

Trump nearly quintupled the monthly rent his presidential campaign pays for its headquarters at Trump Tower to $169,758 in July, when he was raising funds from donors, compared with March, when he was self-funding his campaign, according to a Huffington Post review of Federal Election Commission filings. The rent jumped even though he was paying fewer staff in July than he did in March.

Show me a man with no failures and I'll show you a man with no successes.

Looking at Trump's failures with a real estate eye. Chicago and Atlantic City are cities with quite a few troubles. Many businessmen have failed in those two cities.  I read about the unleased commercial place in Chicago.  My take: No developer builds a building where the profit is contingent on one unit. In fact, I think Trump us having a similar issue with the building he's building in DC.

The implications -- short- and long-term -- are serious. Interviews with more than a dozen senior GOP operatives suggest growing panic that Trump's descent down this alt-right rabbit hole and, beyond that, his efforts to delegitimize the very institutions that undergird American democracy -- the media and the electoral process itself -- threaten not just their congressional majorities or the party's survival but, potentially, the stability of the country's political system.

The reason for that is simple; they contain information that would be embarrassing to him i.e. he's not as rich as he claims to be, he paid little tax, and his charitable contributions are lower than he's led on to believe.

Having said that, let's be honest; Knowledgeable people "know" that to be the reason, yet they insist on a public flailing for only one disingenuous, even hypocritical, reason: to humiliate him personally, and, politically. Now, that's certainly their right, just as it's Trump's right not to, voluntarily, assist in his own political incineration.

Insofar as there's no law requiring a candidate to release his/her returns (though recent precedence has made it, pretty much, protocol) Trump has made the decision that not releasing his returns would be less damaging politically than releasing them.

And, FWIW, it's also the reason Hillary doesn't want to release transcripts of her Goldman speeches. She did what's best for her, he's doing what's best for him. Given the alternatives, both made the right, at least, smart, decisions.

And, I don't know where you got the idea, "The press has let Trump off the hook on this account." What do you expect them to do? They pound him on it almost daily as it is. Plus, since Hillary has evolved into the Presumptive President-Elect I don't hear any more "release Goldman Docs" either.

Donald Trump is drawing attention to the death of a professional basketball player's cousin to make the argument for why he thinks African-Americans will vote for him in November.

Chicago Bulls basketball star Dwyane Wade's cousin, Nykea Aldridge, was shot and killed in Chicago on Friday afternoon while pushing a stroller in the Parkway Gardens neighborhood. Trump commented on her death on Twitter.

Dwayne Wade's cousin was just shot and killed walking her baby in Chicago. Just what I have been saying. African-Americans will VOTE TRUMP!-- Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) August 27, 2016

Scientific American is not in the business of endorsing political candidates. But we do take a stand for science--the most reliable path to objective knowledge the world has seen--and the Enlightenment values that gave rise to it. For more than 170 years we have documented, for better and for worse, the rise of science and technology and their impact on the nation and the world. We have strived to assert in our reporting, writing and editing the principle that decision making in the sphere of public policy should accept the conclusions that evidence, gathered in the spirit and with the methods of science, tells us to be true.

The current presidential race, however, is something special. It takes antiscience to previously unexplored terrain. When the major Republican candidate for president has tweeted that global warming is a Chinese plot, threatens to dismantle a climate agreement 20 years in the making and to eliminate an agency that enforces clean air and water regulations, and speaks passionately about a link between vaccines and autism that was utterly discredited years ago, we can only hope that there is nowhere to go but up.