The Louisville police say that they fired inside Ms. Taylor's home only after they were first fired upon by Mr. Walker, Ms. Taylor's boyfriend. They said that Mr. Walker wounded one of the officers, who was hit in the leg but was expected to make a full recovery. Mr. Walker was subsequently charged with attempted murder of a police officer, though the charge was dismissed in May.
The police also assert that they knocked several times and identified themselves as police officers with a warrant before entering the apartment. Mr. Walker has said he and Ms. Taylor heard aggressive banging at the door and asked who it was, but they did not hear an announcement that it was the police.

Imagine being black in America and realizing sheet rock gets more justice than you ever will. In the eyes of the law you're worth less than f*ckin' dry wall. This is somehow more insulting than no indictment at all.

Glover previously dated Taylor on and off for several years and     used her residence as his current address. The apparent suspicion that Glover was also using her residence as a drug depot seems to constitute a weak argument for probable cause.  Maybe, starting with a sit-down interview with Ms. Taylor would have been prudent.

The claim that it was a no knock entry is a falsehood.

The claim that the cops fired first is a falsehood.

I don't know if everything Abdul said is true but I tend to agree with his last point.  All the high profile police related cases I can remember start off with misleading or false information that gets treated as fact.  Then there's unrealistic expectations of quick murder charges.  When more information comes out that contradicts the early narrative, damage has already been done.

Kentucky Rules of Criminal Procedure (RCr) Rule 5.24
RCr 5.24 Secrecy of proceedings; disclosure

(1) Subject to the right of a person indicted to procure a transcript or recording as provided by Rule 5.16(3), and subject to the authority of the court at any time to direct otherwise, all persons present during any part of the proceedings of a grand jury shall keep its proceedings and the testimony given before it secret, except that counsel may divulge such information as may be necessary in preparing the case for trial or other disposition.

(2) The court may direct that an indictment be kept secret until the defendant is in custody or has given bail, in which event the clerk shall seal the indictment and no person shall disclose the finding of the indictment except when necessary for the issuance and execution of a warrant or summons.

(3) A violation of this Rule 5.24 shall be punishable as a contempt of court.
e 5.24, KY ST RCRP Rule 5.24
Current with amendments received through August 1, 2020.

The prosecutor initiates a grand jury investigation upon evidence of wrongdoing, no matter how slight.   The grand jury subsequently must assess whether probable cause exists to believe that a crime has been committed.   The prosecutor assists the grand jury investigation and in determining which witnesses the grand jury will subpoena, selecting the documents or evidence presented and criminal charges pursued, as well as explaining the law and instructing the grand jury on burden of proof.   The grand jury is unable to conduct independent investigations inside the grand jury room.   If sufficient evidence of commission of a crime is found, a grand jury may return an indictment but is not constitutionally required to do so.   If no indictment is returned, constituting a "no true bill," the prosecutor may resubmit the case to another grand jury.   Double jeopardy or collateral estoppel defenses do not apply to multiple grand jury proceedings.   Grand jury proceedings are conducted in secret, with only the jurors, prosecutor, witnesses, stenographer, recording device operator or interpreter present.

 The indictment is the formal written accusation of a crime, made by a grand jury, and presented to the court for prosecution against the accused person.   An indictment issued by a grand jury is merely a charge of commission of a crime and is not any evidence of guilt.   Before an individual may be convicted, the charge must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt.   The purpose for an indictment is merely to inform an accused individual of the essential facts of the charge against him so he will be able to prepare a defense.

In the incident one of the cops was shot through the leg. The cop said that initial shot is what compelled him and the rest of the cops to return fire.

It has been asserted by LE that the cop was struck by a 9mm bullet. Walker had a 9mm and, apparently, has said that he shot first.

According to LE all of the cops had 40 caliber weapons, so the cop must have been shot by Walker.

However, now, according to one of Walker's attorneys, Hankison, the cop who fired blindly into the apartment from the balcony outside the apartment, and was the only cop charged in the incident, was issued a 9mm in addition to at least one 40 cal.

So, if he was using the 9mm, he could then possibly be the person who shot the cop, and, possibly, started all the shooting.