His lawyers had argued the guideline range was either 108-135 months or 8-14 months (depending on how the Court ruled on a hyper-technical "grouping" of offense issue and their argument that there was no loss to Nike because Nike would have had to pay a similar amount to other lawyers to conduct an internal investigation of Nike if it didn't hire Avenatti and lawyer Mark Geragos to do it. Avenatti's lawyers asked for a sentence of 6 months in prison and 12 on home confinement.
Geragos cooperated with the U.S. Attorney's office and was not charged. In this press release by DOJ today, he is referred to as "another individual".
Why Avenatti got such a light sentence compared to his guideline range:
But Gardephe added that Avenatti deserved a lighter sentence than the range recommended by federal guidelines — from nine years to 11-years and three months — because, the judge said that for the first time in the case, “Mr. Avenatti has expressed what I believe to be severe remorse today.”
The judge also cited the brutal conditions in which Avenatti was kept for several months in a Manhattan federal prison after his 2019 arrest.
And Gardephe sharply noted, in justifying the lower-than-recommended sentence, how federal prosecutors did not criminally charge Geragos in spite of what they have said was his active participation with Avenatti in the shakedown.
Avenatti has been out on a furlough (temporary release) due to COVID since April of 2020. He faces two more federal criminal trials, one in New York where he is charged with defrauding Stormy Daniels (United States v. Avenatti, 19 Cr. 374) and one in Santa Ana, CA where he is charged with:
...ten counts of wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343, arising out of his alleged embezzlement and misappropriation of settlement funds relating to five clients he had represented;
eight counts of tax evasion in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7202; obstruction of federal tax laws arising out of transfers among bank accounts to hide income; ten counts of willful failure to
file tax returns, in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7203; two counts of bank fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1344(1); identity fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028A(a)(1) arising out of his
providing false and fraudulent information to obtain loans from Peoples Bank; and four counts of filing a false declaration or making a false oath in a 2017 bankruptcy action relating to his
law firm.
Avenatti is still free, as he was not remanded into custody after his sentencing. But he must now make his way back to California for the start of jury selection on July 13 in his California trial. His lawyer in that case, who was originally retained by Avenatti but is now paid by the court since Avenatti is now indigent, asked for a continuance in May because he's in his 70's with medical issues and the volume of material is just too staggering to be prepared for trial by July 13, especially since he just finished a health care fraud trial (the first in the District since COVID restrictions were eased). He does have court-appointed paralegals assisting him, and so far, it looks like the California court is sticking to its schedule.
Avenatti's second New York trial (regarding his alleged fraud regarding Stormy Daniels) is not set until January, 2022. He's represented by the Federal Defender's office in that case.