home

The Great Debate

I'll be watching and I hope some of you will join me.

When it's over, we can discuss: Where can we go to find America?

Updates with my comments below. Shorter version: It was a disappointing performance by Biden due to his low energy and weak, very low voice, but Trump was an energizer bunny of lies.

[More...]

The answer, of course, is: She's not there.

This is a pre-debate thread. See you in a few hours.

Update: 9:25 pm: Is this a debate or the Wizard of Oz -- Trump keeps saying "If we only had a leader". As in, if we only had a leader there would be have been no war in Ukraine and no attack on Israel. Trump says he has the biggest heart of anyone in the room. Message to Donald Trump: If you only had a brain.

Trump's second fairy tale: If only I was still the wizard, nothing bad would have happened in the world. He would have prevented all the problems that have arisen, from the war in the Ukraine, to the economy which was great under his watch and is now failing, to the improvement in opportunities for Blacks (he created "Black jobs", whatever those are.) Just another of his off-the-cuff remarks that unintentionally reveal his deeply troubling racial attitudes.

Trump's third fairy tale: On every issue, "We had the best numbers ever". As in our water was the cleanest ever under his watch.

Trump says he talked to Putin about Iran. Trump says Hamas would not have attacked Israel if Trump had been President because Trump had made Iran poor and Iran would have had no money to fund Hamas.

Observation: Trump doesn't answer the questions he is asked. He doesn't know how to move on. He starts each answer with a continuation of his response to the last question. He's Darth the Evader.

Trump says that "what has happened to the United States reputation under this man is terrible". He accuses Biden of ruining the lives of thousands of people.

Trump lives in an alternate universe. One in which our nation is now a failing nation because Joe "has done horrible things." Hes responsible for deaths at the border. He offered a billion dollars to change the prosecutor in his son's case.

Trump said people know his New York conviction is unfair and wrong. We know that because of the hundreds of millions dollars he raised in the days following verdict.

Trump claims Biden's presidency is the worst in the history of our country. He says Biden is not "equipped to be President".

Next is a question on climate change: Trump ignores it and continues to answer the last question. "We had the best numbers ever." Trump says Biden has ruined Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security.

As if on cue, a new question is asked and it is about Social Security running out of money and how each of them would fix it. Biden says he'd raise the tax on the wealthy. Instead of asking Trump for his answer to the question, the debate hosts ask him to respond to what Biden just said, giving Trump another chance to continue his odd stream of consciousness remarks that jump from topic to topic. Whatever his under-developed, low functioning organ of a brain is processing at that exact moment comes right out his mouth. And yes, it's more attacks on Biden. Trump says,"Our veterans are living in the streets" while migrants are living in luxury. He puts the blame on Biden.

They ask a question about education and child care, Trump answers with a response about how Biden is the worst.

They ask Trump again to answer their question about child care and education. He completely ignores them, and continues to attack Biden. Trump claims we are close to WWIII and Biden is driving us there. He says America is now a failing nation and no one respects the U.S. anymore. He claims only he can fix that. (How does this man have such little self-awareness to not believe that any drop in America's standing is due to him, his ignorance, and his under-informed, marginalized, ethnophobic base?)

Donald Trump lives in an alternate reality. Not a single thing that comes out of his mouth is true. In fact, everything he accuses Biden of is true about him. He just repeats himself over and over. Trump still claims there was big fraud in the 2020 election. He has said three times he wouldn't be running but for Biden ruining our country.

Incredibly, the CNN hosts don't interrupt Trump when he starts talking about his golf prowess. Biden, instead of ignoring it, takes the bait and falls prey. He responds with asserting his golf handicap, which Trump promptly calls a lie. Biden then brings up something about Trump lying about his weight loss. (He could have at least asked Trump this year's equivalent of the McCarthy question, "Are you now taking or have you ever taken Ozempic or Wegovy to lose weight?"

Biden says Trump is a whiner. Trump says Biden is a complainer.

10: 30 pm: Thank goodness for a commercial. I can't listen to Donald Trump evade every question and continue answering the last question. Could he not think of the answer the first time it was asked? The CNN hosts continue to give Trump multiple chances to answer the latest question asked.

It's over. The pundits on every network immediately start attacking Joe Biden's mental fitness and physical stamina to remain in office. Biden had an immediate vociferous defender (the best I saw all night)in California Governor Gavin Newsom, who while at a local political event in California, took time out to be questioned about Biden's debate performance vy Alex Wagner on MSNBC. He had what seemed like a dozen reasons as to why Biden should remain the candidate. For an off the cuff interview, he was very sharp. (He also looked really well-groomed and well-rested although his voice was a little raspy probably from talking all night).

Shorter version of Newsome's commentary: Advice to Democrats: worry less, do more. And go home with the one who brought you to the dance.

Here's the 10 minute video, it's well worth a watch if you're depressed about the Democrat's chances after Biden's debate performance.

Donald Trump is lost in his own head and his egotism. As one analyst said, "Trump was "a machine gun of lies". As Newsom has said before, "He's damaged goods".

Unfortunately, none of that helped Biden, whose message was drowned out by his poor delivery.

Update" 11:00 p.m.

The Biden camp said Joe had been sick with a cold which accounted for his low voice. But at the watch party after the debate, Biden somehow got his voice back. A totally revitalized Joe Biden. And the same for his rally Saturday.

Who is calling the shots here (pun intended)? If you ask me, it's Vitamin B-12 for both candidates. If Biden had a cold, maybe he didn't take a shot before the debate. (Trump, it seems to me, got one in his SUV/limo before right before he came on stage.)

Let's be realistic. The only octogenarians in the 21st century with the energy and stamina to "twist and shout" on stage night after night for more than a month at a time are Mick Jagger, Keith Richards and Ronnie Wood. Who just happen to be touring the U.S. this month. Every day, You Tube has new videos of their concerts from the night before, from California, Nevada, Utah, Denver, Chicago Cleveland and more. Millions of viewers see these videos, and millions of these viewers are voters. They defy logic. (Here's an example from their Denver concert last month. It's Jumping Jack Flash, and the first few minutes focus on Keith and Ronnie, while at 5:00 minutes in, you can see Mick dancing and running around the stage and down the runway and back. They talk about their age and how they keep going in this CBS Sunday Morning interview 8 months ago, when their latest album Hackney Diamond was released. Anyone who expects 80 year old politicians to match their stamina, B-12 shots notwithstanding, simply is not being realistic.

So Biden had a night where the public observed him in a semi-comatose state. He's gotten back up. He's the only person standing in the way of Donald Trump getting another four years, and the rest of having to choose to whether to live under his thumb (pun intended) or go on a search for the America we so fondly remember elsewhere. As most readers here know, I've been searching for that perfect place for the last five years and while I I can recite the pros and cons and statistics, from quality of health care to cost of living to the best cities and villages for expats for each, from South and Central America, to Europe, Iceland, Scandinavia, Turkey, Asia, Australia and New Zealand, I still haven't found it.

If I've said it once, I've said it 50 times here over the last 20 years: We get the government we elect. So let's get to work. Call your local Democratic party headquarters, or if you know them personally, your Congresspersons, and ask what you can do. Make the time. Connect with voters where you live. Democracy and justice in this country are on the line. As Lenny Bruce once said, "The only justice in the halls of justice is in the halls". The halls are where the deals are made. The same is true for votes -- you sell your candidate in the streets (either literally going door to door or on social media or creating content and marketing for either).

It's up to us whether Donald Trump, whose Manichean logic has infected millions of voters with a form of right-wing populism that embraces authoritarianism and the politics of polarization and resentment, gets another chance to bring our nation down.

< Hunter Biden Convicted on Gun Charges | Friday Open Thread >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Can't watch... (5.00 / 2) (#6)
    by desertswine on Thu Jun 27, 2024 at 05:31:41 PM EST
    Going to a flamenco show.  Will be interested in the post-shows though.

    I saw the stage earlier (5.00 / 1) (#12)
    by CaptHowdy on Thu Jun 27, 2024 at 06:00:46 PM EST
    They are standing very close together.

    In the demonstration it seemed like they made them just close enough that you can still hear Trump but he can't shout over the speaker.  As easily.

    If they had put the podiums as far apart as last time it would not be an issue.  

    CNN (none / 0) (#13)
    by FlJoe on Thu Jun 27, 2024 at 06:36:13 PM EST
    wants a spectacle, boring old Joe and a "sedate" Trump will sure put me to sleep.

    Parent
    I am undecided ... need advice (5.00 / 2) (#14)
    by Peter G on Thu Jun 27, 2024 at 06:57:56 PM EST
    For the debate, with my bowl of coffee ice cream, should I drink the Puerto Rican dark rum, the rye, or the Irish whiskey?

    Well (5.00 / 2) (#15)
    by FlJoe on Thu Jun 27, 2024 at 07:06:09 PM EST
    Trump would surely disapprove of a "Dark Puerto Rican", so of course the rum.

    Parent
    I'd go (none / 0) (#16)
    by coast on Thu Jun 27, 2024 at 07:26:31 PM EST
    Irish whiskey.  Close to a real Irish coffee, but better your way.

    Parent
    I vote for all three. (none / 0) (#29)
    by vml68 on Thu Jun 27, 2024 at 09:32:32 PM EST
    n/t

    Parent
    Biden is not having a good night (5.00 / 1) (#23)
    by CaptHowdy on Thu Jun 27, 2024 at 08:24:56 PM EST
    the good news is Trump is nuts

    I Turned it Off (5.00 / 1) (#24)
    by RickyJim on Thu Jun 27, 2024 at 08:26:45 PM EST
    Laryngitis versus Lies.  I have better stuff to do.

    Biden looking and sounding (5.00 / 1) (#25)
    by Peter G on Thu Jun 27, 2024 at 08:27:01 PM EST
    Bad. He needs to perk up.

    He needs to lighten up (none / 0) (#26)
    by CaptHowdy on Thu Jun 27, 2024 at 08:33:49 PM EST
    Have a little fun

    Parent
    I watched the first 5 minutes and (none / 0) (#31)
    by vml68 on Thu Jun 27, 2024 at 09:42:44 PM EST
    turned it off. Can't stand watching Tr*mp and Biden has me all stressed out.  This is me.

    Parent
    Biden (none / 0) (#33)
    by FlJoe on Thu Jun 27, 2024 at 09:57:21 PM EST
    got trounced, had some awkward glitches while Trump performed his greatest hits flawlessly.

    We are doomed.

    Parent

    There (none / 0) (#35)
    by Ga6thDem on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 07:27:05 AM EST
    needs to be a serious discussion about Biden stepping down. He had one job to do last night and he couldn't manage that.

    Parent
    IMO (5.00 / 1) (#38)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 07:50:03 AM EST
    we are not doomed.  

    Parent
    He had a bad night (none / 0) (#37)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 07:48:46 AM EST
    It's very early.  There's a bunch of things coming down the pike that will change things again.

    Sentencing, immunity.....

    In a couple of months this will be forgotten just as it would have if Biden had the best night ever.

    Anyway it's the same question as before.  Who?
    Not Kamala.

    I think we should all put on a fresh pair of pants and see what happens.

    For the record I don't think its an absolute certainty this will help Trump at all.  IMO Biden clearly won the debate on substance
    Trump was non stop insane.  More towards the end when Joe woke up.

    A lot of this chatter is because they see an opportunity to suck viewers in with drama.  

    They clearly had the Biden obits ready to go.

    Parent

    Obviously (none / 0) (#43)
    by Ga6thDem on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 08:33:15 AM EST
    they had the Biden obits ready to go. They have been saying he's senile for quite a while now. The press wants Trump to win. It's obvious. We're at 2016 again. My issue is Biden needed to hold it together and couldn't.

    I get the "who" issue. It's a big one.

    I hope you are right and I am wrong.

    Parent

    Whoever (none / 0) (#59)
    by FlJoe on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 09:44:22 AM EST
    was in charge of debate prep should be shot.

    What genius thought he should give long winded wonky answers?

    All he needed was 2 or 3 talking points for each possible question, repeat as needed. Instead he seemed to get into the weeds on many issues and predictably he got lost. Stupid.


    Parent

    I agree with that (5.00 / 1) (#61)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 09:57:46 AM EST
    He was over prepped or under prepped or something.

    Watching I was thinking how could they let him talk until he lost his voice.   Learning he had a cold helped with that.

    But I won't argue it was botched.  It was a pig fvck.

    I just don't think it's the end of the world.
    It might have been with anyone other than Trump standing next to him.

    But I said last night and I say again, against all odds Trump managed to make Biden look - if not good at least preferable

    Parent

    I don't think any debate prep sculptor... (none / 0) (#62)
    by kdog on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 10:13:45 AM EST
    could work with such old dry deteriorating clay.

    The time to prep was last year and beg Joe to bow out gracefully having done enough winning 2020 and securing a legacy of saving us from evil.

    Now there's a risk of the legacy being delivering us back to evil not knowing or caring of his obvious limitations. The man is no longer fit to be a babysitter, never mind a country sitter. The opponent was never fit for either, but that didn't stop this dumbass country from electing once. We are certainly dumb enough to do it again.

    Parent

    But you never wanted Bifen (none / 0) (#64)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 10:17:20 AM EST
    In spite of how happy this might make you he's not going to step aside.

    I betcha

    Parent

    Happy? (none / 0) (#66)
    by kdog on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 10:22:57 AM EST
    There's no joy in Mudville. It's just sad and bordering on elder abuse to watch this poor man do this.

    I'll never get a president I genuinely like. That's irrelevant.

    Parent

    STFU (none / 0) (#67)
    by FlJoe on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 10:24:31 AM EST
    arguably best president of my lifeline.

    I agree that he is too old so is Trump, however the modern Presidency is way more than one man, Biden has   and will continue to surround himself with decent competent so the country will be fine, let him spend 4 more years as a figurehead.

    Parent

    Its funny (none / 0) (#68)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 10:29:54 AM EST
    I was hanging out over at Political Wire last night and this morning.  That place - the comments I mean - is the best barometer of progressive thought.

    The mood has turned.  Last night it's was all hand wringing and pi$$ing and moaning.  Still is a bit but it's turning pretty solidly to the move on and get to work part.

    Its encouraging.


    Parent

    I don't dislike Joe! (none / 0) (#70)
    by kdog on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 10:45:41 AM EST
    I'd put him number 2 behind Carter. Obama gets bronze.

    And I'm fine with handlers/staffers running sh+t, I'm sure they are already to at least some extent.

    But he's gotta win...I don't like how much optics matter, but I'm afraid they do. And he looks/soundsterrible, that can't be denied.

    Parent

    On just the optics thing (none / 0) (#72)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 10:49:56 AM EST
    its better for the party to have total chaos and an open convention.

    Its not.

    Parent

    Even that chaos... (none / 0) (#76)
    by kdog on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 11:02:52 AM EST
    would pale in comparison to the other teams chaos. Thank god we got that going for us Dudes.

    Parent
    kdog!! (none / 0) (#118)
    by Chuck0 on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 08:39:19 PM EST
    Where ya been man?

    Parent
    Obama Bros (none / 0) (#83)
    by Ga6thDem on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 12:21:39 PM EST
    were in charge of prep. Obama bros causing Dems to lose since 2010.

    Parent
    President Biden (5.00 / 2) (#28)
    by KeysDan on Thu Jun 27, 2024 at 09:04:23 PM EST
    is letting his disdain for Trump get the better of him---being too defensive, taking a liar too seriously. .   Trump sounds stronger but is talking lies and nonsense.

    He (5.00 / 3) (#30)
    by FlJoe on Thu Jun 27, 2024 at 09:34:32 PM EST
    perked up a bit, that "you're a whiner" shot at the buzzer was nice.

    Parent
    Biden is tearing it up in Raleigh (5.00 / 2) (#84)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 12:27:50 PM EST
    right now.  I don't know where that guy was last night.  But he is.

    He's all better now. (none / 0) (#86)
    by desertswine on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 12:29:48 PM EST
    It was everywhere (none / 0) (#88)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 12:38:41 PM EST
    even FOX carried the whole thing.

    Parent
    He (none / 0) (#92)
    by FlJoe on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 12:43:32 PM EST
    was bringing the heat, if he can keep this up last night's face plant might eventually.

    Parent
    I watched (5.00 / 1) (#135)
    by Ga6thDem on Sun Jun 30, 2024 at 07:56:59 AM EST
    a podcast on this issue regarding the debate and Biden running again. I have to say it was interesting in the least. Most of the push to get rid of Biden is coming from Obamaworld who never liked Biden. No wonder this reminds me of 2016. The same group would rather lose than than win. Now this is not the Obamas but the bros like Jon Favreau and the like who think nobody is as good as the sainted Obama. These people need to grow up and quit being perpetual children and so damn arrogant. Outside of the ACA Obama accomplished very little and it's probably because he was taking advice from these guys.

    But Ordering the FBI to Murder a SC Justice (5.00 / 1) (#164)
    by RickyJim on Mon Jul 01, 2024 at 06:50:51 PM EST
    seems like an official act.  Did they give any guidance on how to tell official from non official acts?

    All hail King Joe the First (5.00 / 2) (#166)
    by Chuck0 on Mon Jul 01, 2024 at 07:12:57 PM EST
    We are no longer living in a republic. We are now the subjects of a king.

    There is no "originalism" in today's decision. The right wing Supremes are all frauds. Pure bullsh!t artists.


    Did you see Bidens response (5.00 / 3) (#167)
    by CaptHowdy on Mon Jul 01, 2024 at 07:48:09 PM EST
    He basically said this is wrong.  I don't want this power.

    It was tonally perfect IMO

    Parent

    America (none / 0) (#1)
    by FlJoe on Thu Jun 27, 2024 at 04:53:50 PM EST
    is a reality show.

    Trump (none / 0) (#2)
    by FlJoe on Thu Jun 27, 2024 at 05:07:31 PM EST
    arrived alone, sad.

    Apparently (5.00 / 1) (#8)
    by Ga6thDem on Thu Jun 27, 2024 at 05:46:09 PM EST
    Melania has said she will not be going to the white house if he wins and I guess she isn't going to campaign for him. I heard Barron is going to NYU and she is moving to NY.

    Parent
    Tv bobbleheads (none / 0) (#3)
    by CaptHowdy on Thu Jun 27, 2024 at 05:12:17 PM EST
    seem very excited.  Giddy.

    CNN (none / 0) (#4)
    by FlJoe on Thu Jun 27, 2024 at 05:20:40 PM EST
    has been that way all day.

    Parent
    This is big for CNN (none / 0) (#5)
    by CaptHowdy on Thu Jun 27, 2024 at 05:30:03 PM EST
    They have been in the toilet ratings wise.  Tonight the world is CNN.  

    It's on HBO/MAX

    Parent

    Yeah (none / 0) (#9)
    by FlJoe on Thu Jun 27, 2024 at 05:48:13 PM EST
    they have been treating this like the Super Bowl, can't say that I blame them. The pregame blather is an order of magnitude worse, however.


    Parent
    I wouldn't be surprised (none / 0) (#11)
    by CaptHowdy on Thu Jun 27, 2024 at 05:53:55 PM EST
    it this get record numbers.   The way CNN is giving it to anyone X actual interest

    Parent
    The pre debate (none / 0) (#7)
    by Ga6thDem on Thu Jun 27, 2024 at 05:41:20 PM EST
    jabbering is giving me PTSD already. At first it was this format is bad for Trump but now it's good for Trump. I don't know that I can watch it.

    It's been building (none / 0) (#10)
    by CaptHowdy on Thu Jun 27, 2024 at 05:52:29 PM EST
    since the weekend

    Parent
    Have we gotten so petty (none / 0) (#17)
    by coast on Thu Jun 27, 2024 at 07:29:50 PM EST
    or have these bobbleheads just run out of material where they are actually asking whether Biden and Trump should shack hands?  I can't believe this is even a question.  If they don't shakehands at the opening I'm turning this thing off.

    The (none / 0) (#18)
    by Ga6thDem on Thu Jun 27, 2024 at 07:34:19 PM EST
    bobbleheads will literally drive you nuts.

    Parent
    I think they did not (none / 0) (#19)
    by CaptHowdy on Thu Jun 27, 2024 at 07:37:33 PM EST
    the last time.

    Parent
    No (none / 0) (#20)
    by CaptHowdy on Thu Jun 27, 2024 at 08:04:08 PM EST
    Handshake

    Parent
    Well, consider (5.00 / 4) (#21)
    by Towanda on Thu Jun 27, 2024 at 08:10:18 PM EST
    where those tiny hands have been. . . .

    Parent
    Yep (5.00 / 1) (#22)
    by coast on Thu Jun 27, 2024 at 08:20:01 PM EST
    Turned it off.

    I don't agree with many here on many subjects, but I do respect you and your opinions.  If we were ever to meet, I'd immediately shake your hand.  Its simple respect.

    Parent

    The orange moron (5.00 / 3) (#32)
    by Chuck0 on Thu Jun 27, 2024 at 09:57:03 PM EST
    deserves no respect. He deserves nothing but disdain for the repugnant subhuman that he is.

    Parent
    Biden is acting like a multiple stroke (none / 0) (#27)
    by jondee on Thu Jun 27, 2024 at 08:37:05 PM EST
    victim. Even the facial expressions.

    Meanwhile, I'm fantasizing about Bernie slicing and dicing Trump and serving him up at Sea World.

    He didn't cover himself (5.00 / 3) (#112)
    by Zorba on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 06:05:29 PM EST
    With glory at all. But he didn't act like a "multiple stroke victim," either.
    You've obviously not been around stroke victims. I have.

    Parent
    Two (none / 0) (#36)
    by Ga6thDem on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 07:28:26 AM EST
    crazy old men screaming at each other might be entertaining but nothing beyond that. Bernie hunched over the podium screaming wouldn't do much to bring in votes.

    Parent
    Speculation on my part... (none / 0) (#127)
    by vml68 on Sat Jun 29, 2024 at 01:24:09 PM EST
    To me, he seems to be in the early stages of dementia. Hence, the good days when he seems to have his wits about him and the bad days, when he seems lost. Add to that the fact that he looks so fragile. When I see clips of him walking, it does not inspire confidence.

    Biden is an old 81. One of my neighbors is 81, has had multiple heart attacks and he looks way younger and more robust than Biden. I speak to him and his wife almost every day and he has yet to show any signs of having the kind of mental fog Biden displays.
    Another neighbor is 93 and she walks so fast, she would probably put most people 20 years younger to shame. I know these are anecdotes, but I don't think it is a stretch to say that there are 80 something year olds who might still be able to do this job. I don't think Biden is one of them.

    I think Biden needs to bow out and let someoneelse run. Obviously, a lot of you on here don't think that is the right answer.
    All I know is that Tr*mp needs to be defeated. I don't care how.

    This bit by Jill Biden made me cringe.
    "Joe, you did such a great job. You answered every question. You knew all the facts."
    Seriously! Is she talking to a child or the POTUS, the most powerful man in the world?

    Parent

    The flamenco sucked... (none / 0) (#34)
    by desertswine on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 12:17:06 AM EST
    My eyes still hurt from having to watch it.

    I bet (5.00 / 2) (#39)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 08:10:35 AM EST
    it didn't suck as much as that debate

    Parent
    Bad night all round. (none / 0) (#56)
    by desertswine on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 09:30:29 AM EST
    If the president... (none / 0) (#40)
    by kdog on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 08:19:20 AM EST
    truly cares about the future of American democracy, he needs to withdraw from the race right the f*ck now. Anyone who has cared for an elderly person knows that mouth agape blank stare and word mumble fumble..it's all downhill from there. I mean Jesus H Christ that was sad and painful to watch.

    GA is right...time to go to the bench before it's too late, if it isn't already too late to save us from satan's sequel.

    Good to see you kdog (5.00 / 4) (#46)
    by fishcamp on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 08:42:29 AM EST
    your presence has been missed,

    Parent
    Long time Fish! (5.00 / 3) (#49)
    by kdog on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 08:56:08 AM EST
    Good to see y'all too. Politics is no longer a hobby...but I had to see what y'all were saying about this sh*tshow.

    Parent
    Yes, very good to see you kdog! (5.00 / 1) (#131)
    by Jeralyn on Sat Jun 29, 2024 at 10:05:58 PM EST
    And Congrats on your marriage!


    Parent
    Glad to see you back KDog (5.00 / 2) (#50)
    by jmacWA on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 09:02:25 AM EST
    nothing else to say

    Parent
    Thanks jmac... (5.00 / 1) (#104)
    by kdog on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 02:49:01 PM EST
    Not much to say except ....how the f"ck did we end up here?

    Parent
    The question (none / 0) (#44)
    by Ga6thDem on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 08:39:46 AM EST
    is who. Kamala would be the obvious first choice.

    Parent
    Harris works I guess... (none / 0) (#48)
    by kdog on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 08:54:24 AM EST
    Literally anybody under 65-70 who can boisterously call a spade a spade. I mean this is stupid on both sides of the aisle. Trump too old too, but he can still carnival bark his bile even if there is poop in his Depends.

    Thank god Haley didn't get the nom...or I'd put my live savings on her winning this thing right now vs Biden. Which is only twenty bucks due to the fleecing we are experiencing on near every product/service we are buying right now lol, except reefer.

    Parent

    Haley (none / 0) (#51)
    by Ga6thDem on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 09:07:54 AM EST
    would have had a different set of problems. I watched a podcast about GOP voters and Haley. These voters do not believe a woman should be president even a conservative one. Then there's Trump taking potshots from the sidelines the entire time.

    Parent
    Those conservatives (none / 0) (#53)
    by kdog on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 09:16:32 AM EST
    would still vote for her though, who they kidding.

    And the never Trump conservatives would too, that's enough with the razor thin margin in our hopelessly divided nation especially considering the electoral college abomination we are saddled with.

    Parent

    You underestimate (5.00 / 3) (#57)
    by Ga6thDem on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 09:32:37 AM EST
    the level of misogyny in this country. All of us who supported Hillary saw it during 2 election cycles. You also estimate how much the GOP hates anyone who is not a white Christian and Haley is Sikh. And the never Trumpers would not support her because she said she would pardon Trump which is disqualifying. The Never Trumpers are on a mission to eliminate Trumpism from the GOP and won't vote for a pale imitation.

    Parent
    OK (none / 0) (#69)
    by FlJoe on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 10:36:56 AM EST
    here's the plan, get  Sotomayor and/or Kagan to resign, give Kamala the job, then Joe could step aside and let some of the young guys and gals fight it out at a made for TV contested convention.

    Parent
    This is growing (none / 0) (#71)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 10:47:12 AM EST
    last time I saw this it was just about Kamala replacing Sotomayor

    Parent
    I thought... (none / 0) (#74)
    by kdog on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 10:58:35 AM EST
    Democrats weren't allowed to appoint SC justices in an election year.

    Or did that die with walking corpse Moscow Mitch?

    Parent

    Agreed... (5.00 / 1) (#106)
    by jmacWA on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 03:31:59 PM EST
    This will never fly with or without Moscow Mitch it is a foolhardy idea IMO.  At this point we have to stick with the Supremes we have.

    Parent
    Josh Shapiro or JB Pritzker (none / 0) (#119)
    by Chuck0 on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 08:42:52 PM EST
    in Illinois. I like'em both. Pritzker gave a graduation speech that rang my bell.

    Parent
    Funny (none / 0) (#42)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 08:32:29 AM EST
    I don't remember CNN mentioning this last night.

    Curious.

    Frank Luntz (none / 0) (#45)
    by Ga6thDem on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 08:40:56 AM EST
    said in his focus group that Trump was turning off his undecided voters. I guess polling may show whether this ends up being the immediate disaster or a forgotten incident.

    Adrienne Elrod (none / 0) (#54)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 09:21:44 AM EST
    said they have other data supporting this about independents.

    They will be releasing it.

    I don't doubt it at all.  


    Parent

    Tim Miller (none / 0) (#47)
    by Ga6thDem on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 08:47:23 AM EST
    put up the following:
    But here's the thing. What comes next? This choice. It isn't about any of our feelings. It isn't about me. It isn't about you. It isn't even about Joe Biden.

    It's about the stakes.

    And given these stakes everyone in the pro democracy coalition needs to do everything in their power to stop Donald Trump.

    That begins with the person charged with carrying out the duty that is in front of us.

    Joe Biden needs to talk with his family.

    And he needs to come out of that conversation either with a plan to pass the torch to a new generation or an unwavering commitment to change course.

    Here's what changing course looks like. He must summon an energy and a spirit and a forward-looking message that was absent in Atlanta. He must be committed to never letting what happened on Thursday night happen again--never putting on the kind of mumbling, robotic, incoherent performance that the whole world witnessed.

    He must show that he is willing to do everything in his power to win this election. Go out and campaign among real Americans. Demonstrate that he has the vigor and will to earn their trust. He must take the fight to Donald Trump clearly and directly in interviews and on the stump. And he's going to have to do so in the belly of the beast--on Fox News and in MAGA America to show that he is up for it.

    Only he and Jill know whether he is capable of doing that.

    Obama (5.00 / 1) (#52)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 09:09:31 AM EST
    terrible first debate.  He won.  Reagan, terrible first debate.  He won.

    Now you might say Biden is not Obama or Reagan.  And that might be true, but neither of them was running against a literal crazy person.

    Trump was insane last night.  Insane.  From start to finish.

    Biden will do what he needs to do.  He knows better than anyone what's at stake.

    As for the rest of us, stop peeing and start working.


    Parent

    I have (5.00 / 1) (#55)
    by Ga6thDem on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 09:27:35 AM EST
    never been this panicked about an election before. 2004 is the only one that comes close to this. So much is on the line and we are literally depending on an 81 year old to deliver.

    Parent
    Take a deep cleansing breath (5.00 / 1) (#58)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 09:36:01 AM EST
    and try to remember all the obituaries you have read for Joe Biden over the years.  Including around this time in 2020.

    And he keeps delivering.

    Parent

    Willie Mays always delivered too... (none / 0) (#63)
    by kdog on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 10:16:02 AM EST
    till the 1973 World Series and father time rendered the best centerfielder the world has ever known into a guy who couldn't catch a routine fly ball. That's what time does.

    Parent
    I hate (none / 0) (#65)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 10:18:15 AM EST
    Baseball

    Parent
    The president (none / 0) (#73)
    by KeysDan on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 10:53:03 AM EST
    only needs to know the game. He does not need to personally catch every ball.   President Biden is a master of the game and has expert  fielders.

    Parent
    KD my man... (none / 0) (#78)
    by kdog on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 11:16:07 AM EST
    I'm cool with that, I really am.

    But governing and silly season are different things. He's no master of debating anymore...or even speaking coherently for that matter.

    No knock on the guy, he's 81 and an ollllddddd 81.

    Trump looked 10-15 years younger...he must be on the drugs they were pre-whining Biden would be on. They even toned down the orange paint.

    It shouldn't matter, hopefully it doesn't matter...

    Parent

    Ken, (5.00 / 3) (#105)
    by KeysDan on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 02:49:20 PM EST
    Congratulations on your marriage. My wishes for happiness and all things good.

    Parent
    After speaking (none / 0) (#82)
    by KeysDan on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 12:04:50 PM EST
    this morning to five unvaccinated Trump supporters at Thelma's diner, it seems clear to me that Trump won the vibes.  That new face paint job was no small part of it.

    Parent
    Trump pulled like a 180 (none / 0) (#90)
    by kdog on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 12:41:00 PM EST
    from his recent rally nanosecond attention span gibberish about dishwashers and sharks and whatever else. Last night his total and utter bullsh+t was delivered forcefully. As close to coherent as he's been in recent memory. A most unpleasant surprise.

    Magaland has a spring in their step today, no doubt.

    I was all set to not watch that disaster and watch the Litte Steven doc on HBO but my wife wanted to tune in. I shoulda put my foot down lol

    Parent

    He (5.00 / 2) (#97)
    by FlJoe on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 01:35:28 PM EST
    just kept repeating his same greatest hits over and over. He came back to "migrants crossing the border" time after time no matter what the question was.

    When he didn't have a particular  lie or fable to  spit out, he would revert to I'm the greatest you are the worst mode.

    It's a sad state of affairs that a man can "win" a debate by merely repeating the same delusional talk in a "forceful"

    Parent

    The New York (none / 0) (#101)
    by leap2 on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 02:02:09 PM EST
    f'ing Times said Trump's delivery was bluster.

    If by bluster, they mean lies. But they won't write that.

    Parent

    It's good to hear you're (5.00 / 1) (#98)
    by jondee on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 01:37:45 PM EST
    still kickin', Dog.

    You're married now? Good for you. Congratulations!

    Parent

    Good to see you kickin' too... (5.00 / 5) (#103)
    by kdog on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 02:46:48 PM EST
    Thanks Brother

    I did tie the knot, no one more shocked than I. Be two years in September. With a 10 year old step daughter. I'm all domesticated now, ghetto suburb life. Coaching softball and everything...crazy where life takes you.

    Parent

    Isn't though (none / 0) (#107)
    by jondee on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 03:37:45 PM EST
    despite all our plans, we're being carried by great winds across the sky, as our NA brothers say.

    I'm glad to hear everything's working out.
    One day at a time.

    Parent

    Isn't it though.. (none / 0) (#108)
    by jondee on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 03:38:16 PM EST
    Trump had (5.00 / 1) (#60)
    by KeysDan on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 09:57:08 AM EST
    the supreme confidence of a fool.  His message was that of lies, trickery and deceit.   He never answered the simplest of questions in an honest, straightforward  manner---clearly something that he is constitutionally incapable.

    The "debate" underscored Trump as liar and called attention to President  Biden's age.  Both factors were already well known.  No accommodation  can be made for Trump's infirmity, it is a plague upon the nation.  In consideration of  aging., it needs to be recognized as a  natural course of humankind  capable of attenuation .

      For example, voters may need to accept some physical limitations as a trade off for the benefit of wisdom to decision and policy making. Ceremonial foreign travel may need to be rationed with delegation to the vice President  and Cabinet members. If the President is unwell, events should be re-scheduled. Adequate sleep needs to be alllotted to adjust for jet lag.

    The stakes are too high to over-react.  A town hall  and interviews with media  may be arranged over the next weeks. However, the staff can not schedule an older president as if he were a 21-year old.  

    Parent

    Thank you. (5.00 / 3) (#133)
    by Donald from Hawaii on Sun Jun 30, 2024 at 01:56:16 AM EST
    CaptHowdy: "Trump was insane last night. Insane. From start to finish. Biden will do what he needs to do.  He knows better than anyone what's at stake. As for the rest of us, stop peeing and start working."

    Exactly. Speaking as someone who had my doubts about Joe Biden four years ago, I freely admit that I was mistaken. He rose to the occasion and became one of our best presidents in my lifetime.

    That old man has had our back for four years. Now it's our turn to step up and have his.

    Aloha.

    Parent

    I'm kind of pi$$ed that Bash and Tapper (none / 0) (#120)
    by Chuck0 on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 08:49:44 PM EST
    let orange moron spew unchallenged. That whole bunch of cr@p about killing babies after their born is so ridiculous, how can any journalist let that go unchallenged? He will end the Ukraine war before taking office? How? No single detail on ANYTHING. He seem to believe he can just wave his hand and stuff happens. We saw how that went with COVID. And come, everything within his realm is "the best" and he does everything "perfect." Give me an effing break.

    Parent
    The (baseless) pledge to end the war (5.00 / 2) (#121)
    by Peter G on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 09:10:09 PM EST
    against Ukraine, or otherwise to take over U.S. foreign relations "after the election but before being sworn in," is a promise to commit a felony under the Logan Act.

    Parent
    Real (none / 0) (#75)
    by KeysDan on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 11:00:00 AM EST
    Americans?

    Parent
    From a repiblican (none / 0) (#79)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 11:16:59 AM EST
    who wears pearls 🙂

    Parent
    The (none / 0) (#81)
    by KeysDan on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 11:55:22 AM EST
    Pearls are fine, it is the Republican part that I find objectionable🙂

    Parent
    Missed (none / 0) (#89)
    by Ga6thDem on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 12:38:53 PM EST
    that part of his tirade.

    Parent
    Top Replacement Candidates (none / 0) (#77)
    by RickyJim on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 11:11:02 AM EST
    This article names Kamala Harris, Pete Buttigieg, Gretchen Whitmer, Gavin Newsom and Wes Moore.  The last is in his first term as governor of Maryland. I would add Josh Shapiro and Andy Beshear, governors of Pennsylvania and Kentucky, respectively.

    Newsome is a killer debater (5.00 / 1) (#96)
    by jondee on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 01:31:56 PM EST
    from what I've seen.

    He also has the cajones to not deflect and pivot away from BS talking points, but forcefully drill down on whatever BS is being served-up.

    He gets that the low information, limbic brained types crave charismatic displays of 'dominance.'

    Parent

    I agree (none / 0) (#99)
    by Ga6thDem on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 01:52:22 PM EST
    on Newsome. I watched him debate the hapless DeSantis and chew him up. Of course that is an easy kill shot.

    He also is a great surrogate for Biden.

    Parent

    As the (none / 0) (#80)
    by KeysDan on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 11:50:30 AM EST
    linked article underscores, a change would be messy.  And, that is an understatement.  

    Parent
    If Biden Refuses to Drop Out (none / 0) (#100)
    by RickyJim on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 01:54:37 PM EST
    the key to nominating somebody else is the present interpretation of the "Robot Rule":
    The key mechanism in the party rules that allows for replacing the nominee resulted from a change approved decades ago after the bitter 1980 primary fight, when Senator Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts challenged a weakened President Jimmy Carter for the nomination. After a convention battle, which Carter won, Democrats agreed to eliminate the so-called robot rule, which required convention delegates to vote on the first ballot, at least, for the candidate they were chosen to support, says Elaine Kamarck, a senior fellow in governance studies at the Brookings Institution, who played a central role in the change.

    Instead, she told me last night, the rules now say that delegates to the convention "shall `in all good conscience' vote for the person they were elected to represent." This means, she added, that "there is a presumption you will vote for Biden, but the `all good conscience' could cover a lot of things."



    Parent
    Ted Kennedy's (5.00 / 1) (#102)
    by KeysDan on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 02:35:01 PM EST
    challenge to the incumbent President Jimmy Carter should be a primer for the day.   Not only did Carter lose, but Reagan won....setting in motion the right wing juggernaut.

    Parent
    I would (none / 0) (#87)
    by Ga6thDem on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 12:32:32 PM EST
    take Moore out of that list simply because he was just elected. Pete? Maybe as VP but not nominee.

    Parent
    All of them (none / 0) (#95)
    by KeysDan on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 01:18:38 PM EST
    make good surrogates.  They all need to help the Biden campaign.

    Parent
    The debate was (none / 0) (#93)
    by KeysDan on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 01:01:59 PM EST
    a setback, but I do not know that it will be fatal. What I do know is that Democrats beating themselves up and jettisoning the incumbent president over a bad, first debate will be fatal---a debate that was not as bad in the second half as the first, and, apparently,  the evil presence of Trump let Biden's stutter get the better of him.

    And, it can be true that, at the same time that Biden had a bad performance, Trump did not have a good one.  At least not a win. Trump got worse as the debate proceeded.

     While Trump spoke in a strong voice, his words were that of a loon. My favorite was his claim that Democrats "abort babies after birth." A runner-up has to be Trump's denial that he had sex with a porn star.  Biden landed a hit with "his morals are that of an alley cat," although that is really alley cat libel.

    Parent

    The insulin lie (5.00 / 1) (#94)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 01:07:43 PM EST
    was pretty good

    Parent
    Skipped the debate (none / 0) (#85)
    by coast on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 12:28:55 PM EST
    But from reading artilces and seeing some clips, what I've gleaned is that Trump told a lot of lies and Biden showed his age.

    In a word, shocking!

    Based on the commentary I kind of wish I had watched.  But I was already upset over USA's loss to Panama, so I just wanted to read and go to bed.

    At the end of the day, hopefully more people can see that neither one of these candidates should be the leader of our country.  Simply put, we can do better.

    Anecdotally (5.00 / 1) (#91)
    by Ga6thDem on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 12:41:16 PM EST
    I found interesting is friends from growing up in SC didn't really attach to Trump from the debate. They were like you basically giving up and saying no thanks. I think that is something that the GOP appears to be missing--there are number of former Trump voters that are not coming back. They are done and they are probably sitting home in November.

    Parent
    I guess (none / 0) (#109)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 04:33:47 PM EST
    Immunity is coming Monday

    So they say.   At least it will change the subject.   I won't be watching much TV news this weekend.

    yeah (none / 0) (#110)
    by FlJoe on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 05:38:37 PM EST
    they dropped some stinkers today but they delay the big one until the very last minute.

    Probably the only reason they didn't wait until Wednesday is their harpy wives wouldn't stand for it.

    Parent

    After that (none / 0) (#111)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 05:46:55 PM EST
    2 weeks later......sentencing.

    Then the republican convention streaming Trump live from jail.

    It's downhill from here

    Parent

    The (none / 0) (#113)
    by FlJoe on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 06:17:27 PM EST
    media will just push down harder on Biden to keep the horse race close.


    Parent
    Downhill (none / 0) (#114)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 06:26:13 PM EST
    Not always fun

    Parent
    Well (none / 0) (#115)
    by Ga6thDem on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 06:29:26 PM EST
    the NYT has now called for him to drop out. So there's the drill down.

    The press wants the orange clown because he's good for their business.

    Parent

    Fair (5.00 / 2) (#124)
    by FlJoe on Sat Jun 29, 2024 at 07:30:04 AM EST
    enough, but where are the calls for Trump to drop out?

    There is no doubt any more that there are legitimate reasons to doubt that Biden can continue to to perform at the high level that he has been.

    Despite the senior moment melt down on Thursday there was only one candidate who remained tethered to reality and it wasn't Trump.

    From what I have seen the media only mentions that fact in passing if at all.

    Parent

    The dude (none / 0) (#125)
    by Ga6thDem on Sat Jun 29, 2024 at 10:09:56 AM EST
    is a convicted felon. That alone should be calls for the GOP to replace Trump. The chance of having a convicted felon as president even if the chance was slim should be a case for repeated calls for replacement.

    Parent
    I know quite a few convicted felons (5.00 / 1) (#126)
    by Peter G on Sat Jun 29, 2024 at 11:42:06 AM EST
    who are far better qualified to be President than Tr*mp. A past felony conviction, per se, is not disqualifying legally, nor should it be factually or practically (imho). Tr*mp's convictions, in and of themselves, are the least of the reasons he cannot be President again. Which is not to say that if it works with (somehow) undecided voters I have a problem deploying that line of attack; I don't.

    Parent
    In my opinion (5.00 / 1) (#128)
    by Ga6thDem on Sat Jun 29, 2024 at 02:16:15 PM EST
    a felony conviction shouldn't keep someone from a job if they have realized their mistake and moved on. Plenty of people screw up in this world and shouldn't have to pay for it the rest of their life. Trump to this day will not even admit that he had sex with a porn star which is not even a crime. Plus he wants to commit more crimes. He just seems like a psychopath to me who the law has finally caught up to.

    Parent
    Well, I agree with all that. I was just (none / 0) (#129)
    by Peter G on Sat Jun 29, 2024 at 03:27:47 PM EST
    reacting to your statement (which is commonly made) that being a felon "alone" should require him to withdraw as a candidate. That, I do not agree with.

    Parent
    They hate the Biden campaign (none / 0) (#116)
    by CaptHowdy on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 06:36:15 PM EST
    that's been laughably obvious for a long time.

    This changes nothing.

    Might encourage some elder support

    Parent

    Yeah (none / 0) (#123)
    by Ga6thDem on Sat Jun 29, 2024 at 06:48:53 AM EST
    he's getting the full Hillary treatment.

    Speaking of which I saw people bring up that time Hillary fainted and all the drama the press had about that.

    Parent

    And, (none / 0) (#117)
    by KeysDan on Fri Jun 28, 2024 at 07:01:09 PM EST
    some of their columnists , even Paul Krugman!  

    Parent
    Even Krugman? (none / 0) (#122)
    by Ga6thDem on Sat Jun 29, 2024 at 06:46:29 AM EST
    Now that is disappointing.

    Parent
    Biden's Delusion (none / 0) (#130)
    by RickyJim on Sat Jun 29, 2024 at 09:30:09 PM EST
    From David Ignatius' column today in the Washington Post.
    Biden's main reason for running again was that he felt, in his gut, that he could win. He loathes Trump -- you could see the contempt animating that otherwise-frail demeanor Thursday -- and it's been his political mission to stop Trump and his MAGA rebellion. He did it twice, in the 2020 election and the 2022 midterms, and he thought he could do it again. Most important, he believed there was no one who could do it better.
    As far as I can tell he still thinks that.  Right now this belief reminds me of Trump's  evidence free assertion the he won the 2020 election in a landslide. Maybe the next results from a reliable poll like NY Times/Sienna will get him to face reality.

    I recall it differently (5.00 / 1) (#132)
    by Jeralyn on Sat Jun 29, 2024 at 10:07:14 PM EST
    Both he and Jill said he was running again because he wanted to finish implementing his agenda and he wasn't done.

    Parent
    Polls are not elections. (5.00 / 3) (#134)
    by Donald from Hawaii on Sun Jun 30, 2024 at 02:17:57 AM EST
    The big takeaway for me on Thursday night was Donald Trump spewing 90 minutes of lies unimpeded like a broken sewer line, not Joe Biden stumbling to an off night.

    If the polls have shown anything, it that they have consistently underestimated that actual Democratic turnout by fairly wide margins. As for the New York Times editorial board, f*ck 'em. I notice they've never called for the convicted felon and adjudicated rapist and fraudster to end HIS campaign. That's the guy who has no business being president again, not Biden.

    Aloha.

    Parent

    It bad but it could be worse (none / 0) (#136)
    by CaptHowdy on Mon Jul 01, 2024 at 10:22:46 AM EST
    The immunity decision has dropped.  Like a tvrd in a punchbowl

    Andrew Weissman put it this way (paraphrase)
    there is a big picture and a small picture the big picture of justice this is bad. The small picture of this election this might not be bad at all.

    There are going to be evidentiary hearings to determine which of his J6 acts are "official". Weissman says they will call Pence and many others to present lots of evidence no one has seen.
    soon. Judge Chutkan has said she will cancel her vacation.

    I hate that (none / 0) (#137)
    by Ga6thDem on Mon Jul 01, 2024 at 10:53:35 AM EST
    all of this is on the shoulders of Judge Chutkhan but I have faith she understands what is at risk here.

    We still have sentencing to come for the 34 felony convictions. I hope Merchan gives him jail time.

    Parent

    Well, Judge Merchan has now postponed (5.00 / 1) (#170)
    by Peter G on Tue Jul 02, 2024 at 03:28:16 PM EST
    the sentencing for two months, in order to consider the defense argument that evidence used at trial of actions Tr*mp took and statement he made (such as Tweets) while in office were within his "official" duties, rather than personal and unofficial, and thus inadmissible under the new Supreme Court decision. And if so, whether erroneous admission of that evidence was prejudicial or harmless. Seems like a far-fetched argument to me, but nevertheless one that must be considered and decided now.

    Parent
    As I understand (none / 0) (#140)
    by CaptHowdy on Mon Jul 01, 2024 at 11:00:21 AM EST
    There is no need for a delay like starting the trail.  
    Looking forward to what she says.

    Parent
    Supreme Court orders are enforceable (5.00 / 1) (#145)
    by Peter G on Mon Jul 01, 2024 at 03:05:46 PM EST
    after 25 days, unless the Court says otherwise in a particular case.

    Parent
    Good (none / 0) (#149)
    by CaptHowdy on Mon Jul 01, 2024 at 04:07:36 PM EST
    She had promised a much longer delay before the state of an actual trial.  

    Parent
    Arguably, the savvy move by Spec.Pros. Smith (5.00 / 1) (#162)
    by Peter G on Mon Jul 01, 2024 at 06:40:40 PM EST
    would be to move in J. Chutkan's case for the hearing called for by the Supreme Court ASAP, where he presents his evidence (all of it) that none of the J6 indictment charges are based on "official" acts (after withdrawing the Jeffrey Clark allegation, highlighted by Roberts as official, but not constituting a separate crime), because they were all done by Tr*mp in his capacity as Republican Party candidate for re-election (i.e., "unofficial"), not in his capacity as President (i.e., "official"). That hearing, detailing Tr*mp role in the January 6 insurrection, would be the top news story every day for weeks, beginning in September. And tie Tr*mp up in court, even putting him to the dilemma of wanting/having to testify (and be cross-examined).

    Parent
    Mike Pence (5.00 / 1) (#163)
    by CaptHowdy on Mon Jul 01, 2024 at 06:47:06 PM EST
    will testify against him.  And others.

    Late summer.

    Parent

    Even Better (none / 0) (#165)
    by RickyJim on Mon Jul 01, 2024 at 06:54:59 PM EST
    Judge Merchan put him in jail for that period and he shows up for the Washington sessions in prison garb.

    Parent
    And people (none / 0) (#138)
    by Ga6thDem on Mon Jul 01, 2024 at 10:55:56 AM EST
    need to get off their duffs (myself included here) and start donating and working for Biden. We definitely need to expand the supreme court among other things. The court just gave Project 2025 the go ahead.

    Parent
    There is going to be massive pressure (none / 0) (#139)
    by CaptHowdy on Mon Jul 01, 2024 at 10:58:25 AM EST
    To address the mess of the SC if democrats do well this fall.

    Parent
    as there (5.00 / 1) (#143)
    by Ga6thDem on Mon Jul 01, 2024 at 02:41:57 PM EST
    well should be. We have got to do something about this disastrous supreme court. Fortunately there are even conservatives concerned about this thinking that one day there will be a Dem with all these powers.

    Parent
    While the Court's (none / 0) (#144)
    by KeysDan on Mon Jul 01, 2024 at 02:55:19 PM EST
    opinion could have been worse, it is difficult to see how.  There are three categories crafted by the Court for consideration of immunity: core--absolute immunity; official--presumptive immunity (can be rebutted) and non-official immunity or private.  And, there are restrictions on the use of official actions in non-official prosecutions.  And, motive does not count...as long as official, even for evil or corrupt reasons.

    Essentially, the start out of the gate is a former president is presumed to have immunity. Whether or not he does-- depends on the courts, This extreme Court has determined that it is cumbersome for a President to have to follow the law while carrying out his duty to enforce it.  Presidents may  need to act unlawfully and need to be protected, unless manifestly or palpably beyond their authority---which is undefined, but looks expansive.

    A former president will not, in practical terms, be subject to criminal liability for criminal conduct he engages in while on duty.  They bailed Trump out.

    Parent

    The three buckets (call them (5.00 / 1) (#146)
    by Peter G on Mon Jul 01, 2024 at 03:12:11 PM EST
    "trimesters"?) are totally made up, with no actual basis in the Constitution, just like these same characters used to say about Roe v Wade. When the authority of the Republican Party to exercise power notwithstanding a lack of popular support or legal justification is threatened, Roberts will always ride to the rescue, actual judge-craft be damned.

    Parent
    Yes, (5.00 / 1) (#147)
    by KeysDan on Mon Jul 01, 2024 at 03:49:52 PM EST
    made up of whole cloth, per the dissent. I am not optimistic for any of the J6/Jack Smith prosecutions.  Whatever the District Court and Circuit Court hold (and they will have a tough job trying to figure out the applicability of the Supreme Court's opinion), the Supreme Court is likely to find immunity regardless of which bucket Trump kicks.

    The Court sure is arrogant.  It knows it is sitting in the cat-birds seat.  For now.

    Parent

    Let me ask a devils advocate question (none / 0) (#148)
    by CaptHowdy on Mon Jul 01, 2024 at 04:02:45 PM EST
    Is there really nothing good about limiting future prosecutions of presidents considering how open the threats by Trump and others to go after, for example, Biden?

    News outlets are of course screaming we are doomed.  This is politico.

    Constitutional experts digesting the breathtaking scope of the opinion, authored by Chief Justice John Roberts over a vociferous dissent by the court's liberal justices, said there's still a narrow window for Trump to face trial, but it almost certainly can't happen before the 2024 election. And if Trump wins that election, he's expected to immediately unravel the case by ordering the Justice Department to drop the charges -- or perhaps even by attempting to pardon himself.

    Ok, but there's nothing much we did not know in there.  There is a window.  There will be trials.  They will be after the election.  And if Trump wins it won't happen
    We knew this.

    Is this really the end of everything?

    Asking for a friend.

    Parent

    You have figured it out. The real explanation (5.00 / 2) (#157)
    by Peter G on Mon Jul 01, 2024 at 06:17:39 PM EST
    for this morning's opinion is that the Supreme Court knows (1) that if Tr*mp wins re-election, Biden will need immunity to protect him from bogus and retaliatory prosecutions; and (2) the existing J6, Georgia and Mar-a-Lago indictments can all be readily amended (slightly narrowed) by the prosecutors to comply with the new decision, thus ensuring that Tr*mp gets no protection from it. (snark? or not?)

    Parent
    I go (5.00 / 1) (#168)
    by KeysDan on Mon Jul 01, 2024 at 08:19:51 PM EST
    with snark.  Right?

    Parent
    Thank you (none / 0) (#158)
    by CaptHowdy on Mon Jul 01, 2024 at 06:21:24 PM EST
    I wish more of the news (none / 0) (#161)
    by CaptHowdy on Mon Jul 01, 2024 at 06:26:25 PM EST
    was focused on this

    Parent
    Cap and Peter (none / 0) (#169)
    by coast on Tue Jul 02, 2024 at 02:33:59 PM EST
    That's what my first take away was given my limited legal knowledge - there was no way Trump could come after Biden if Trump were to win.

    I also feel like this is yet another gift to the Democrats.  I know y'all wring your hands about the current court, but the SC basically hand delivered the mid-terms to the Democrats with the Dobbs desicion.  This may work similary with November's contests.  Don't squander it.

    Parent

    I wish people would take a breath (5.00 / 2) (#171)
    by CaptHowdy on Tue Jul 02, 2024 at 03:34:09 PM EST
    The hysteria about the debate seems to have merged with the SC decision.  
    Dry sheets are running low in blue america.

    Do something Do something Do something Do something

    These people live in a 10 minute news cycle.

    There is time to recover.  Biden has scheduled a big sit down with George on ABC the first part to air of July 5th.

    About the court decision, let's see which acts Trump is prosecuted for.  We are told.
    Illegal unofficial acts are still a thing.


    Parent

    No (none / 0) (#174)
    by FlJoe on Tue Jul 02, 2024 at 04:31:35 PM EST
    we are doomed, everything fails at worst possible time, in ways both major (the debate) and minor (remember the butterfly ballot) that fks Dems up. If there is nothing the media will create one(see Clinton scandals...all of them).

    Meanwhile judgement on Trump keeps sleeping ever just out of reach and the bad news always seems to come in worse than expected


    Parent

    I don't (5.00 / 1) (#182)
    by Ga6thDem on Wed Jul 03, 2024 at 09:27:15 AM EST
    know if it is the "worst time possible". I think after Labor Day would be way worse than now.

    But you are right about Trump getting off scot-free. Part of the problem is Dems expect the media to do the investigative work for them. They are little more than gossip columnists these days. We have to get the message out ourselves. Keep telling people that Trump is an adjudicated rapist, fraudster and felon. It won't work on the maga cult but there are others it will work on.

    Parent

    The possibility of Biden stepping aside (5.00 / 1) (#183)
    by CaptHowdy on Wed Jul 03, 2024 at 10:17:43 AM EST
    has become real I think.  Not certain at all but very real.

    This interview on the 5th just replaced the debate as the most important campaign event so far.

    He can't F up again.  Not even a little.

    I think Biden will do what he thinks is best for the country. I don't (yet) think he should step aside but I have a question.

    if he decides to withdraw from the race wouldn't it be better (for everyone but him) if instead of withdrawing from the race he resigned the office. So she runs as an incumbent.
    can this happen? Should this happen?

    Parent

    The nation (5.00 / 1) (#194)
    by KeysDan on Wed Jul 03, 2024 at 01:52:41 PM EST
    will be enormously better off with President Biden in an iron lung than with Trump, even when he is relatively less unhinged and all his lab and imaging tests are "positive".

    Having laid that caveat out, I fear that the election will become a referendum on President Biden's health rather than on Trump, the scumbag. My feelings after the debate were to wait a bit, the seriousness and risks to any change argued against not only a rush to judgment, but also, for a rush to having such a discussion. Part of that wait period is for time and opportunity to see if the debate was an episode or a condition.  However, that wait period can't be much longer.

    As sad as it makes me to write this, I am not sure that the damage can be repaired, given the long age-related lead-in.  Accordingly, the Democratic Party leaders need to discuss the situation with the President this weekend. From my perspective, the only viable change would be for Kamala Harris to replace Joe at the top of the ticket--that is the fundamental role of the vice president. And, she probably is the best choice practically and politically--being able to access the$ quarter-billion Biden/Harris Campaign Fund.  

    Kamala would need every resource that could be mustered, especially Democratic Party unity.  An open convention would be a disaster.  This is not time for a quicky re-do of the primary season, it would be a replacement because of potential health issues of Biden in a future term of office.

      Certainly, the resource of campaigning as the first woman president would be awesome. But,  President Biden should remain in office at  least until after Labor Day, if that is  determined  to be  the right course to take.  Just having Speaker Johnson as next in line (the House would never permit designation of a replacement vice President) is just too scary.  
    The  new running mate to be strongly considered, in my view,  should be the Governor of Kentucky, Andy Beshear--a young, effective governor , elected twice in a red state.

    Parent

    Well TBH (none / 0) (#184)
    by Ga6thDem on Wed Jul 03, 2024 at 10:51:36 AM EST
    what has happened since the debate has not been reassuring from Biden & his campaign.

    I am warming to the idea of a Harris/midwest white guy ticket pitting a former prosecutor against a felon.

    Parent

    I (none / 0) (#188)
    by FlJoe on Wed Jul 03, 2024 at 12:37:13 PM EST
    am open to a Harris Beshear ticket, for some reason he gets a portion of the hillbilly vote, might help with Pennsyltucky and parts of other purple states.

    On the other hand throwing it to the delegates might turn the convention into a mildly interesting reality TV show.

    I cringe to think what the GOP shtshow is going to be like, but I am guessing a mash up of a Leni Riefenstahl film and a royal coronation only worse.

    Parent

    I'm not sure (none / 0) (#186)
    by coast on Wed Jul 03, 2024 at 11:48:34 AM EST
    how a taped/edited interview is supposed to assuage people's concerns of Biden after the debate performance.  That doesn't seem to address the issue IMO.

    Parent
    Could (none / 0) (#190)
    by CaptHowdy on Wed Jul 03, 2024 at 01:34:13 PM EST
    be so.

    Parent
    I think (none / 0) (#201)
    by Ga6thDem on Wed Jul 03, 2024 at 04:50:31 PM EST
    it helps some but probably not enough.

    Parent
    The nation (none / 0) (#195)
    by KeysDan on Wed Jul 03, 2024 at 01:53:07 PM EST
    will be enormously better off with President Biden in an iron lung than with Trump, even when he is relatively less unhinged and all his lab and imaging tests are "positive".

    Having laid that caveat out, I fear that the election will become a referendum on President Biden's health rather than on Trump, the scumbag. My feelings after the debate were to wait a bit, the seriousness and risks to any change argued against not only a rush to judgment, but also, for a rush to having such a discussion. Part of that wait period is for time and opportunity to see if the debate was an episode or a condition.  However, that wait period can't be much longer.

    As sad as it makes me to write this, I am not sure that the damage can be repaired, given the long age-related lead-in.  Accordingly, the Democratic Party leaders need to discuss the situation with the President this weekend. From my perspective, the only viable change would be for Kamala Harris to replace Joe at the top of the ticket--that is the fundamental role of the vice president. And, she probably is the best choice practically and politically--being able to access the$ quarter-billion Biden/Harris Campaign Fund.  

    Kamala would need every resource that could be mustered, especially Democratic Party unity.  An open convention would be a disaster.  This is not time for a quicky re-do of the primary season, it would be a replacement because of potential health issues of Biden in a future term of office.

      Certainly, the resource of campaigning as the first woman president would be awesome. But,  President Biden should remain in office at  least until after Labor Day, if that is  determined  to be  the right course to take.  Just having Speaker Johnson as next in line (the House would never permit designation of a replacement vice President) is just too scary.  
    The  new running mate to be strongly considered, in my view,  should be the Governor of Kentucky, Andy Beshear--a young, effective governor , elected twice in a red state.

    Parent

    I agree (5.00 / 1) (#172)
    by Ga6thDem on Tue Jul 02, 2024 at 03:42:53 PM EST
    about it hand delivering the election to the Dems. Even some conservatives don't want a king and are mad about the decision.

    And I hate to tell maga but delaying his sentencing until September does nothing but hurt the GOP because now a lot are not paying attention but they will be in September.

    Parent

    At the start of early voting (none / 0) (#173)
    by CaptHowdy on Tue Jul 02, 2024 at 03:58:31 PM EST

    Donald Trump's sentencing in his hush-money case has been delayed until Sept. 18 while the judge weighs whether the Supreme Court's immunity ruling affects his conviction,

    Not a bad deal IMO

    Parent

    This (none / 0) (#150)
    by CaptHowdy on Mon Jul 01, 2024 at 04:11:33 PM EST

    Sen. J.D. Vance said Sunday a president must have immunity from prosecution for his actions in office while also saying that it would be up to a future "Attorney General" to determine whether to prosecute President Joe Biden for unspecified criminal activity.



    Parent
    As noted (none / 0) (#151)
    by KeysDan on Mon Jul 01, 2024 at 05:05:43 PM EST
    below in your comment about JD Vance, the fascists will find a way to prosecute a former Democratic president. Trump needs to do so in keeping with his retribution plans.

    The worry I have is the license now given for a lawless administration.  There is absolute or presumptive immunity for core and official actions that are lawless. And, the Court did not even give an example of an unofficial act not subject to immunity in the case before it(e.g., Trump hiring a private attorney on state cases).  

    What is more "core" than Commander-in-Chief?  What is to prevent a military take-over?  And, use of the military to put down protests.

    It will be surprising if there will be any trials---they are likely to be dismissed. Just spinning wheels, now.

    Parent

    I think you are wrong (5.00 / 1) (#153)
    by CaptHowdy on Mon Jul 01, 2024 at 05:09:47 PM EST
    about the trials

    Parent
    I hope (none / 0) (#155)
    by KeysDan on Mon Jul 01, 2024 at 05:44:00 PM EST
    I am.

    Parent
    Believe me (none / 0) (#154)
    by CaptHowdy on Mon Jul 01, 2024 at 05:18:53 PM EST
    I have fully absorbed how bad virtually everyone says this is.

    I'm just saying, Trump could win.  Now it would be a lot harder to prosecute Biden for border crossings or other nonsense that has already been discussed openly many times.

    Parent

    I am telling (none / 0) (#156)
    by Ga6thDem on Mon Jul 01, 2024 at 06:06:24 PM EST
    conservatives to shut down the judiciary committee because Biden is immune from everything.

    I don't think Judge Chutkhan will shut the case down. The one in Florida has been looking for a reason. She might try. Of course he committed crimes after office.

    Parent

    Today's decision hardly affects the Mar-a-Lago (5.00 / 2) (#160)
    by Peter G on Mon Jul 01, 2024 at 06:25:59 PM EST
    documents case at all. The special prosecutor could withdraw about five paragraphs of background information, and amend the allegation that the offenses began on January 20 to say "January 21," and all the charges would stand without question.

    Parent
    And remember Rudy,. (none / 0) (#141)
    by desertswine on Mon Jul 01, 2024 at 12:10:57 PM EST
    it's all official.

    Nixon (none / 0) (#142)
    by CaptHowdy on Mon Jul 01, 2024 at 12:50:13 PM EST
    was just ahead of his time

    Parent
    Anybody Know? (none / 0) (#152)
    by RickyJim on Mon Jul 01, 2024 at 05:09:47 PM EST
    Can an "Official Act", while being immune from prosecution itself, be used as evidence in the prosecution of the POTUS for some crime? If so, than the charges of
    Seditious conspiracy
    18 U.S. Code § 2384 - Seditious conspiracy

    If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

    and Rebellion or insurrection
    18 U.S. Code § 2383 - Rebellion or insurrection

    Whoever incites, sets on foot, assists, or engages in any rebellion or insurrection against the authority of the United States or the laws thereof, or gives aid or comfort thereto, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.

    both look appropriate.

    The majority opinion expressly holds (none / 0) (#159)
    by Peter G on Mon Jul 01, 2024 at 06:23:37 PM EST
    that not only can "official acts" of a former President committed while in office not be prosecuted at all, but evidence of "official acts" also cannot be used to prove a criminal charge predicated on a former President's unofficial acts committed while in office. Justice Barrett issued a separate opinion disavowing that particular aspect of the Roberts decision, but since it was otherwise 6-3, that still leaves a 5-justice majority behind the evidence aspect, making it binding precedent.

    Parent
    The glaringly (5.00 / 1) (#176)
    by KeysDan on Tue Jul 02, 2024 at 05:16:38 PM EST
    apparent conflict of interest should have required both Alito and Thomas to recuse---if they did, this particularly odious holding would have lost 4/3.  

    Parent
    I think this is correct (5.00 / 2) (#177)
    by CaptHowdy on Tue Jul 02, 2024 at 05:27:34 PM EST

    Harvard constitutional law professor Laurence Tribe expects the U.S. Supreme Court will likely overturn its own decision in Donald Trump's case.

    But in reading lawyer Robert B. Hubbell, Tribe quoted that the ruling is "destined to be remembered as a mark of shame for the Roberts Court just as Dred Scott tarnishes Chief Justice Taney's legacy to this day."

    link


    Parent

    Sure (5.00 / 1) (#178)
    by FlJoe on Tue Jul 02, 2024 at 05:47:22 PM EST
    it will be overturned when it's too late and it's Biden's turn in the barrel.

    We are hurtling towards a dictatorships at warp speed.

    Parent

    The infamous (none / 0) (#179)
    by KeysDan on Tue Jul 02, 2024 at 06:33:42 PM EST
    Robert's Court.    

    Parent
    So (none / 0) (#175)
    by FlJoe on Tue Jul 02, 2024 at 04:41:13 PM EST
    he could sell Ambassadorships or pardons to the highest bidder without any sanction.

    Parent
    Well, no. Not without any sanction. (5.00 / 1) (#180)
    by Peter G on Tue Jul 02, 2024 at 09:15:44 PM EST
    The President can be impeached and removed (or, after leaving, barred) from office. And if impeached and convicted, according to the opinion, he can then be prosecuted, per U.S. Const., Art. I, s.3, cl.7, although perhaps not -- according to a particularly obtuse passage in the majority opinion -- for what they call an "official" act.

    Parent
    The likelihood (none / 0) (#181)
    by BGinCA on Tue Jul 02, 2024 at 10:35:55 PM EST
    Of the president being removed from office  with less than 25 members of his own party voting to throw him out approaches zero. Look at the outrageous behavior of the previous occupant of the White House and the overwhelming support he has.

    Parent
    "So he could sell"... (none / 0) (#187)
    by desertswine on Wed Jul 03, 2024 at 12:24:41 PM EST
    I believe that has always been the case.

    Parent
    The Rosiest Possible Scenario to Aug. 19 (none / 0) (#185)
    by RickyJim on Wed Jul 03, 2024 at 11:46:29 AM EST
    1. Biden ASAP withdraws from the race and releases all his delegates to vote their conscience at the convention

    2. Half of the time, the media is focused on policy debates on TV between Harris, Buttigieg, Newsom, Beshear, Shapiro, Pritzker, etc.

    3. The other half of the time, the media reports on the battle between Trump and the legal system.

    Now what is not to like about that?

    I can almost guarantee you (none / 0) (#193)
    by CaptHowdy on Wed Jul 03, 2024 at 01:40:30 PM EST
    There will not be an open convention.

    For one thing the money they have raised can ONLY legally go to Kamala.

    Parent

    The (none / 0) (#189)
    by FlJoe on Wed Jul 03, 2024 at 01:08:23 PM EST
    cannot afford to snub Harris, Black female voters are arguably the most important voting bloc.

    Aside from the press hating on her (sigh) misogamy (double sigh) and racism (choking sounds) what's the downside?

    Still those things can be overcome, she is more or less a blank slate and all parties will have to create a narrative on the fly.

    She is a good speaker and would sure stand out against the raving lunacy of Trump and the mumbled meandering that Biden can slip into at any moment.  

    Not sure how real this is (none / 0) (#191)
    by CaptHowdy on Wed Jul 03, 2024 at 01:35:30 PM EST

    Republicans Move to Make Sure Biden Is on the Ballot
    July 3, 2024 at 2:21 pm EDT By Taegan Goddard 17 Comments

    NOTUS: "Led by conservative think tank The Heritage Foundation, Republicans are currently looking to guarantee that Biden will be the Democratic nominee -- and to make it so that, if Biden withdraws, it won't be easy to replace him on ballots. While Biden's campaign insists he has no plans to drop out, Republicans are gearing up for any and all possibilities. They've been preparing for this moment for quite some time."

    "About four months ago, after special counsel Robert Hur's report raised more concerns about Biden's health, staffers at Heritage's Oversight Project started researching laws in states across the country for replacing a nominee... The memo identifies Wisconsin, Nevada and Georgia as attractive states for litigation to keep a new Democrat from replacing Biden on the ballot



    Parent
    Here's my fear (none / 0) (#192)
    by CaptHowdy on Wed Jul 03, 2024 at 01:38:37 PM EST
    If you believe polls - big if - old people are whats keeping Biden in the race.

    Kamala will do better with the "genocide Joe" demo but I can't see old people voting for her.

    Parent

    I (none / 0) (#196)
    by FlJoe on Wed Jul 03, 2024 at 02:10:27 PM EST
    would trust the polling on the elders more than any, but there is no evidence that they would move over to Trump or stay home if Biden gracefully bows out.

    Realistically, IMO, it's either Biden or Harris ,
     a open convention is a pipe dream, and it is dangerous stuff that is in the bowl.

    My suggestion is for Biden take a full body of very public medical tests, if he "aces" them he should stay if not he should just hand the reins to Kamala.

    Meanwhile the Dems need to get Kamala out front and center and start building a positive narrative around her.

    Parent

    It could be said I think (5.00 / 1) (#198)
    by CaptHowdy on Wed Jul 03, 2024 at 02:30:47 PM EST
    That if THIS year, the year of DOBBS, is not the year to run a woman it will probably never come.

    I would very much like to see a Trump/Harris debate

    So there's that.

    Parent

    Debating Trump (none / 0) (#199)
    by KeysDan on Wed Jul 03, 2024 at 03:14:13 PM EST
    is not easy.  If the tactic is to correct the firehose of lies, you spend all your time on that and none on your accomplishments and plans.  The moderators, of course, will be of no help. And, the media will say you offered no plans and did not herald your achievements.  All you did was attack poor Trump.

    Hillary was terrific, cleaning his plate and "won" by any measure.  But, Trump was entertaining, ugh!  Kamala was great at questioning, as we saw during Senate hearings---but, like Hillary, she will be called shrill.  But, that will be just fine. Shrill is good with this felon.

    Parent

    Debating (5.00 / 2) (#200)
    by FlJoe on Wed Jul 03, 2024 at 04:07:58 PM EST
    Trump should be easy, imagine every debate with the crazy uncle that you couldn't have at Thanksgiving.

    BTW: we should stop calling them lies and more accurately call them delusions.

    To expand on the Costanza theorem on truthiness; it's not a lie if you believe it, if you believe it it's a delusion.

    Parent

    There's this (none / 0) (#197)
    by CaptHowdy on Wed Jul 03, 2024 at 02:14:06 PM EST

    `No One's Pushing Me Out'
    July 3, 2024 at 3:01 pm EDT By Taegan Goddard 47 Comments

    "President Joe Biden unexpectedly joined a Zoom call with campaign and Democratic National Committee staff on Wednesday, mounting a new push to preserve the viability of his embattled candidacy," Politico reports.

    "Amid reports that Biden is privately acknowledging to allies that his candidacy is hanging in the balance, the president stated that he's in the race for the long haul, though he conceded that the days since last week's debate with former President Donald Trump have been damaging."

    Said Biden: "Let me say this as clearly as I possibly can -- as simply and straightforward as I can: I am running... no one's pushing me out. I'm not leaving. I'm in this race to the end and we're going to win."



    Parent