home

Accountability for Torture

Elizabeth Holtzman has a new article in the Nation, Torture and Accountability. It blows the cover off the "few bad apples" meme and makes a case for a war crimes prosecution of higher-ups.

The key question is not whether detainees in Iraq were subjected to inhuman treatment in violation of the War Crimes Act, but how high up the responsibility goes for those abhorrent acts. Under well-established principles of international law, officials in the chain of command who order inhuman treatment or who, knowing about it, fail to stop it are responsible. The "chain of command" doctrine is undoubtedly applicable to War Crimes Act prosecutions. But even if it weren't, higher-ups could be held responsible under the principles of conspiracy or aiding and abetting the crime under normal federal criminal law. This was surely the reason that Gonzales wanted to block future prosecutions of higher-ups by "prosecutors and independent counsels."

It's a long but powerful article, and well worth reading.

< Time Magazine to Turn Over Matthew Cooper's Notes | MSM and Durbin vs. Rove >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Re: Accountability for Torture (none / 0) (#1)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:00:45 PM EST
    War Crimes Act of 1996. We need a federal prosecutor somewhere to step up and indict the higherups.

    Re: Accountability for Torture (none / 0) (#2)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:00:46 PM EST
    "The "chain of command" doctrine is undoubtedly applicable to War Crimes Act prosecutions. But even if it weren't, higher-ups could be held responsible under the principles of conspiracy" WCA makes the chain of command very much liable for capital prosecution. Removing the US from the Geneva Conventions is Gonzales' idea of how to avoid prosecution, by undercutting WCA justification. For that alone, Gonzales should be Boltoned when it comes to the SCOTUS. He seeks to clear the path for war crimes, but also for the enemy of democracy: IMPUNITY.