For those who dont remember, LWW is to the right of Himmler. Racist, sexist, you name it.

Posted by Roger at September 8, 2005 11:22 AM For those who dont remember, LWW is to the right of Himmler. Racist, sexist, you name it. Best to ignore him completely.

What are the Governors and Mayors jobs if not to take care of local problems? Aren't they supposed to be doing SOMETHING? Is it ALL the federal Gov'ts responsiblity?

I don't hear anyone from MS or AL bellyaching about the situation the way LA is bellyaching.

Also, the unsubstantiated racial claims I supposedly made? What is unsubstantiated? Please enlighten me on where I was wrong.

You held your collective breaths hoping for a war, so you could have your war and protest too.

Posted by desertswine at September 8, 2005 02:10 PM Just someone off-camera. You couldn't see who it was. There were sounds of his being hustled away and he said it again.

Posted by Roger at September 8, 2005 01:00 PM L13, I asked JM why LWW was allowed here some time back, after he made a bunch of anti-semetic comments.

I think it is a shame that ,George Bush is taking vacation's while our boys and girls are dying in that God forsaken place called .iraq. I wish,the Bush had to go replace just one of our sons.

HOW MUCH HAS THIS WAR COST THE AMERICAN PUBLIC and the others so far??? DON'T YOU THINK THAT MONEY WOULD BE BETTER SPENT ON HELPING OTHERS IN YOUR COUNTRY or the world.

Operation Enhance Bush's Manhood must be go forward at all costs.

The WaPo being the media whores they are for bush and this war edited out the most damning remarks from the story: ""If that means there will be a lot of casualties, then there will be a lot of casualties," said the official, who spoke on condition that he not be named.

Hahaha... Cheney was bsing his way thru an press op on CNN and someone told him to go f*** himself. Justice.

Katrina has nothing to do with global warming. Nothing. It has everything to do with the immense forces of nature that have been unleashed many, many times before and the inability of humans, even the most brilliant engineers, to tame these forces. Giant hurricanes are rare, but they are not new. And they are not increasing. To the contrary. Just go to the website of the National Hurricane Center and check out a table that lists hurricanes by category and decade. The peak for major hurricanes (categories 3,4,5) came in the decades of the 1930s, 1940s and 1950s, when such storms averaged 9 per decade. In the 1960s, there were 6 such storms; in the 1970s, 4; in the 1980s, 5; in the 1990s, 5; and for 2001-04, there were 3. Category 4 and 5 storms were also more prevalent in the past than they are now. As for Category 5 storms, there have been only three since the 1850s: in the decades of the 1930s, 1960s and 1990s.

James K. Glassman is a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and host of TechCentralStation

As for Category 5 storms, there have been only three since the 1850s: in the decades of the 1930s, 1960s and 1990s.

Ivan then moved into the eastern Gulf of Mexico and weakened to a strong Category 3 storm. It continued on a track towards the north-northwest, making landfall in the U.S. near Gulf Shores, Alabama. After landfall, Ivan dropped heavy rains on the Southeastern United States, turned east, and then later looped south and through Florida

“Everyone not paid by the oil industry or bushco payroll accepts global warming was a fact and more frequent and stronger hurricanes are inherent in the model.”

"increase in hurricane intensity of less than 5% over the next 80 years under the direst warming model."

The strongest hurricanes in the present climate may be upstaged by even more intense hurricanes over the next century as the earth's climate is warmed by increasing levels of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Although we cannot say at present whether more or fewer hurricane will occur in the future with global warming, the hurricanes that do occur near the end of the 21st century are expected to be stronger and have significantly more intense rainfall than under present day climate conditions.

“pw, you aren't a libertarian, you are just a bushshill, did you not see the sidebar of your link!?”

“The above terms were couched in the most innocuous terms possible, and they are still damning!”

“pig-great argument to f**k conservation.”

“pigwiggle.. 1. What was the most active ten year …2. What was the warmest 10 year period … it's the last ten years!”

“With the suggestive nature of the evidence, wouldnt you agree that conservation is more prudent?”

“The trends are occuring at an accelrated rate due to global waming and the current short term models are no longer accurate.”

Price if we're wrong = $$ Price if we're right = death

“There has to be a happy medium in there somewhere, one that moderately lowers pollution at a moderate cost.”