home

Rulings in Lynndie England's Trial

by TChris

At a hearing before the presentation of evidence begins in PFC Lynndie England's trial, Judge Col. James Pohl cast doubt on the primary defense advanced by her lawyers: that England's mental incapacity made her "overly compliant toward authority figures and [that she] could not always make reasoned judgments for herself."

"You are painting a picture of a woman who cannot think for herself in almost all circumstances," Pohl told lead defense lawyer Capt. Jonathan Crisp.

The judge also reversed an earlier ruling, and will now permit prosecutors to use a statement England gave to investigators implicating herself in prisoner abuse at Abu Ghraib.

[T]he judge said he now thinks England knew what she was doing when she signed a waiver before making the second statement. Her first statement remains inadmissible.

You've undoubtedly seen the pictures of England variously holding a leash attached to an Abu Ghraib prisoner, pointing at the genitals of a naked prisoner, and posing near a pyramid of naked prisoners. Judge Pohl ruled that the offensive photos won't be shown to the public during England's trial, but will be displayed on computer screens to the officers on the jury.

That order may prevent us from seeing photos that will be used as evidence against England but that haven't yet been made public.

For example, one charge since dropped against England alleged she had been photographed engaging in fellatio with [then boyfriend Charles] Graner, the abuse ringleader who is serving a ten-year prison sentence and who has since married a woman who pled guilty in the Abu Ghraib scandal.

That photo may not be one that anyone wants to see, but it is apparently one of several in which England performs sex acts in front of prisoners. However disgusting, prisoner abuse photos are of substantial public importance. The judge's order prohibiting public disclosure of the photographic evidence at England's trial makes more urgent an ACLU lawsuit demanding the release of prisoner abuse photographs.

England's military jury will be selected today.

< War on Terror Apparently Over: FBI to Restart Porn Investigations | Protests in Basra >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Re: Rulings in Lynndie England's Trial (none / 0) (#1)
    by cpinva on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:04:10 PM EST
    the defense is painting a picture of someone who clearly had no business in the military, or anywhere near weapons, military or civilian. this raises the obvious question: if she is that damaged, however did she pass the psychological battery that's part of the standard induction physical? those records should be readily available. these tests, as it was explained to me, are designed to keep people such as ms. england out of the military. since her attorney is opening that door, the prosecution would seem to have every right to walk in, and discredit it with her own records. as i stated on an earlier thread, aside from graner, who wasn't even in her direct chain of command, what superior officer ordered her to commit these acts, as she has previously claimed?

    Re: Rulings in Lynndie England's Trial (none / 0) (#2)
    by Aaron on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:04:12 PM EST
    So her defense in this whole sorry sadomasochistic episode is that she's a submissive? Apparently she was just doing what her master told her to do.