home

Wilkerson: Aides May Have Kept War Memo From Bush

Colin Powell's former Chief of Staff, Lawrence Wilkerson, is back in the news suggesting that a National Security Memo (first reported in USA Today in 2003) outlining the number of troops necessary to fight a war in Iraq may never have reached Bush.

Wilkerson suggests, but acknowledges he cannot prove, that Stephen Hadley who was Condi Rice's NSC deputy, blocked the memo:

A former top official in the Bush administration is suggesting that a White House memo outlining the need for hundreds of thousands of troops for the Iraq invasion was kept from the president. Lawrence Wilkerson, who served as chief of staff to then-secretary of state Colin Powell during President Bush's first term, said in a November 7 speech that the National Security Council had prepared a pre-war memo recommending that hundreds of thousands of troops and other security personnel were needed. “I don't know if the president saw it,”

Wilkerson told the audience of military officers and international lawyers, who had gathered at the military for a conference on on international humanitarian law. In response to a follow-up question after his speech, Wilkerson, a retired U.S. army colonel, said he believed that then-national security advisor Condoleezza Rice or her deputy, Stephen Hadley, had blocked the memo, but he acknowledged that he had no clear evidence. In the end, about 135,000 U.S. troops were sent - a decision that critics said has hurt America's ability to defeat the insurgency in Iraq and has led to increased American casualties.

USA Today suggested the same thing in its reporting:

USA Today raised doubts as to whether the president saw the memo. However, Wilkerson's assertion seemed to take the matter a step further, suggesting that aides who supported the war intentionally kept the president in the dark.

[Via Raw Story.]

< Fitzgerald for Governor? Hardly | Education Student Complains About Diversity Training >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    While it's certainly plausible that Bush never saw the memo (his complete lack of interest in anything that doesn't support his wacky world view lends credence to the notion), it seems more likely to me that this is the beginning of an attempt to shield the Monkey King from responsibility for the debacle.

    Re: Wilkerson: Aides May Have Kept War Memo From B (none / 0) (#2)
    by scarshapedstar on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:01 PM EST
    So what? If Bush had no idea how many troops this would take, he isn't fit for the job. This is ridiculous. Aren't bosses supposed to exercise judgment, or something? If Bush makes decisions based on pieces of paper his flunkies slip him, he is not a leader, he is a mimeograph.

    Out with the old and in with the new: Baby Bush isn't your run of the mill despot, he's a benevolent despot who was trecherously deceived by wicked underlings. Those dastardly evil-doers are everywhere!

    Re: Wilkerson: Aides May Have Kept War Memo From B (none / 0) (#4)
    by Edger on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:02 PM EST
    There aren't many possibilities here: 1) Bush is either so stupid that he really is just a puppet, and the memo was in fact kept from him... 2) or, which would be worse, he was verbally informed of it and it's contents, and made sure that he never saw it... [like Cheney re Joe Wilson: "He never submitted a report that I ever saw when he came back"] 3) or, he saw it... with all that implies....

    Re: Wilkerson: Aides May Have Kept War Memo From B (none / 0) (#5)
    by squeaky on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:02 PM EST
    he hired his own personal lawyer the day before Tenet 'resigned'. He must be getting some good advise on how to deceive the American People or, better put, protect himself.

    Re: Wilkerson: Aides May Have Kept War Memo From B (none / 0) (#6)
    by Sailor on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:02 PM EST
    The shocking thing to me is that 135k troops won the war, we have over 160k there now. We've had 'free' elections, a 'constitution', and yet more troops are there now. Can you say 'escalation'? I thought you could. And bushco still wants to attack syria and iran.

    Re: Wilkerson: Aides May Have Kept War Memo From B (none / 0) (#7)
    by squeaky on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:02 PM EST
    For Iran and Syria we don't need troops, small nuclear devices dropped from the air, 'precision bombing'. Just make them evil enough and no one cares about collateral damage.

    Like he could read anyhow.

    Re: Wilkerson: Aides May Have Kept War Memo From B (none / 0) (#9)
    by desertswine on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:02 PM EST
    Bush is either so stupid that he really is just a puppet, and the memo was in fact kept from him...
    BINGO!! (He don't read memos anyway.)

    Re: Wilkerson: Aides May Have Kept War Memo From B (none / 0) (#10)
    by cpinva on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:03 PM EST
    so what? aside from the fact that this bozo hasn't a clue, what difference does it make? none, that's what. bush and rumsfeld were told by the JCS that 500K troops would be needed, to do the job effectively. they chose to ignore that advice, and wage war on the cheap. as my mom says, "you get what you pay for."

    Remember those plastic and masking tape survival tents The Bush League would have us all build way back when, when they were selling us this hoo-hah about Saddam having massive chemical abilities? Well, it seems that they are now building their own such tents, out of similarly assinine materials. Good luck with that! Now, where are the Dems with the impending gas attack!?

    This morning National Security Advisor Stephen Hadley (on CNN with Wolfie) repeatedly hit on the Republican talking point that it was 'unfair' (boo hoo) to question whether the Prez (both of them) lied the American people, and troops, into war. If they had nothing to worry about, if they were confident this never happened, they should be happy the press, dems and critics are off chasing ghosts, if indeed these criticisms amount to nothing. If they have nothing to fear, they should welcome the inquiries. They should throw open the files, the (non-classified & declassified) materials and BEG for transparency in order to get this behind them. But transparency, much less honesty, has never been a strength of this administration. In fact, quite the opposite as the other half of America is finally starting to realize.

    Also: I think it is completely feasible that shrub never SAW the memo (remember he only reads comics & sports), it is HIGHLY LIKELY he received the gist of the information verbally from staff who did read it. He's the imperial ADHD prez, I doubt he has the patience, much less intellectual capacity to comprehend anything he does read that's not about baseball. OR equally as feasible: "Don't tell me what I don't want to hear, tell me what supports going to war."