home

Bush's Bubble

The Washington Post reports on President Bush's trip to Asia, the recreational highlight of which was a bike ride:

For the president, it was a rare moment of fun on an otherwise dreary overseas trip. In five years in the presidency, Bush has proved a decidedly unadventurous traveler, an impression undispelled by the weeklong journey through Asia that wraps up Monday. As he barnstormed through Japan, South Korea and China, with a final stop in Mongolia still to come, Bush visited no museums, tried no restaurants, bought no souvenirs and made no effort to meet ordinary local people.

"I live in a bubble," Bush once said, explaining his anti-tourist tendencies by citing the enormous security and logistical considerations involved in arranging any sightseeing. "That's just life."

Atrios has some choice comments on our adventurous President.

< Afghan Opium Solution Proposed | Save Stanley 'Tookie' Williams >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#30)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:15 PM EST
    cpinva - The difference between us is mostly this. I thin the country is full of intelligent people. You think the country is full of stupid people. And you call Bush elitist? (I am guessing you don't consider yourself stupid.) As for Kerry, yes, he went. And I have honored him for that. However, he wasted all that honor when he returned to the country and told lies about what our troops were doing. BTW - Bush made better grades.... ;-) Variable - Sad to see that you are sticking up for sexual harassment by the CEO and CINC...

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#31)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:15 PM EST
    Paul has been banned. If he gets re-admitted, he will be limited to four posts a day and they must not insult other commenters or contain libelous accusations or profanity. Variable, you are limited to four comments a day and may be next to be banned.

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#35)
    by john horse on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:15 PM EST
    PPJ
    The difference between us is mostly this. I thin the country is full of intelligent people. You think the country is full of stupid people.
    Well PPJ, the latest polls show that about 60% of the American people now disapprove of Bush's job performance. I believe this proves your point. Our country is full of intelligent people. They are finally seeing through Bush's act. As Bob Dylan once wrote: "The sky too is foldin' over you An' it's all over now, baby blue."

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#1)
    by john horse on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:18 PM EST
    Not only is Bush shielded from ordinary people overseas, he is also shielded from ordinary people here at home. Here in the States Bush's public appearances are carefully screened and controlled so that nothing will burst his bubble. Reminds me of a few lines from Dylan. "Well, you walk into the room Like a camel and then you frown You put your eyes in your pocket And your nose on the ground... Because something is happening here But you don't know what it is Do you, Mister Jones?"

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#2)
    by cpinva on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:18 PM EST
    i hereby offer to be the president's stand-in tourist. no strings attached, i will be a non-partisan tourist. i'll attend the events, tour the museums, etc. and report back on the high lights to the big guy, so he can at least fake like he was there. granted, as near as i can tell, i'm a lot more articulate than he is, but i promise to use single-syllable words in my briefings, so as not to confuse him or his official entourage. to be fair, i do understand the security concerns, etc. when the president, or any head of state, travels, but geez! go out, sample the local flavor, talk to some real people, not just the official ones. doesn't this guy have any curiousity at all about the big, wide world around him?

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#3)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:18 PM EST
    "Willful ignorance" - Slate wrote about it way back when, but I can never find the link. Bush doesn't give a flying rat's patoutie about different cultures, different views. He never will, he's kinda proud of it, and it's a disgrace to our nation. How can a president be so ignorant?

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#4)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:18 PM EST
    I'll take Figures of Speech for $200. doesn't this guy have any curiousity at all about the big, wide world around him? Uh, what is a rhetorical question? * * * Bush isn't the only one in his administration with a bubble problem. Rumsfield, for example, thinks "very few Democrats or Republicans supported" Rep. Murtha's statement last week.

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#5)
    by Edger on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:18 PM EST
    Zappatero: How can a president be so ignorant? Easy...It comes naturally to him: The Misunderestimated Man:
    ...if "numskull" is an imprecise description of the president, it is not altogether inaccurate. Bush may not have been born stupid, but he has achieved stupidity, and now he wears it as a badge of honor. Richard Perle, foreign policy adviser: "The first time I met Bush 43 … two things became clear. One, he didn't know very much. The other was that he had the confidence to ask questions that revealed he didn't know very much."


    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#6)
    by pigwiggle on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:18 PM EST
    I’m pleased we’re not paying to send the President sightseeing. I would be surprised if a single day of sightseeing in Beijing would cost the American taxpayer any less than my mortgage.
    “doesn't this guy have any curiousity at all about the big, wide world around him?”
    I think it’s a fair bet the President has traveled to many more exotic places than most on this board. Come on, rich man, rich family, means and ability. I’m certainly not familiar with the places the president traveled to before he was elected, and I doubt I’m alone here. Christ, you folks are digging at the bottom of the barrel with this one. Anyone want to comment on the substance of the Presidents visit? I’ll help you out; so, what did you all think of him holding up Taiwan as an exemplar for a Chinese democracy; wild stuff. This defines the administrations stand on the One China policy in a very unexpected way; almost antagonistic.

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#36)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:18 PM EST
    John H - Well, they were smart enough to elect him, eh? cpinva - Kerry now claims that he was not talking about the troops. But his words don't bear that out.
    There are all kinds of atrocities, and I would have to say that, yes, yes, I committed the same kind of atrocities as thousands of other soldiers have committed in that I took part in shootings in free fire zones. I conducted harassment and interdiction fire. I used 50 calibre machine guns, which we were granted and ordered to use, which were our only weapon against people. I took part in search and destroy missions, in the burning of villages. All of this is contrary to the laws of warfare, all of this is contrary to the Geneva Conventions and all of this is ordered as a matter of written established policy by the government of the United States from the top down. And I believe that the men who designed these, the men who designed the free fire zone, the men who ordered us, the men who signed off the air raid strike areas, I think these men, by the letter of the law, the same letter of the law that tried Lieutenant Calley, are war criminals. -- John Kerry, on NBC's "Meet the Press" April 18, 1971
    Link

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#8)
    by Edger on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:19 PM EST
    pigwiggle: ...defines the administrations stand on the One China policy in a very unexpected way; almost antagonistic. Not unexpected at all. In fact Iraq and the ME is just preparatory, and all the misleading justifications for it just smokescreening: Revving Up the China Threat

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#10)
    by The Heretik on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:19 PM EST
    A flying rat's patoutie? Where are these rats? Are they related to flying monkeys? And what exactly is a patoutie? Perhaps I misunderestimate the downsides of the discourse here. What are the upsides of the upshot of Bush hitting the Great Wall in China? More on this at Slime Time News

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#11)
    by cpinva on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:19 PM EST
    molly, time to go for "double jeopardy"! for $400, and the right to return tomorrow to defend your title: no known prior foreign travel, considered going outside texas to be visiting another country. remember molly, your answer must be in the form of a question. pig, this is the nature of this particular thread. the president's seeming complete, total, unadulturated disinterest in the world and people around him. it shows, to the natives, that you, and by extension, us, have a real interest in those people and their lives. it may be all bs and for show, but clinton used it to his and our advantage. people loved him all over the world, even if they disagreed with his policies. they were willing to give him, and by extension, us, the benefit of the doubt. sometimes, that benefit may be all that stands between war and peace.

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#12)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:20 PM EST
    edgar - you made my day. (Yeah, I'm a news geek.) God, I love those internets: patootie. It's less profane than I thought it was. Who knew?

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#13)
    by Quaker in a Basement on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:20 PM EST
    pig:
    I would be surprised if a single day of sightseeing in Beijing would cost the American taxpayer any less than my mortgage.
    I'd be surprised if a couple of hours of meeting ordinary people costs the American taxpayer any more or any less than a couple of hours on his bike. The point is: the man seems to have no interest, no curiosity about actual Chinese people. He's satisfied to go tell 'em what they ought to think and how they ought to set up their government, but no interest in speaking to the very people who have the most at stake if his notions are put to the test.

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#14)
    by scarshapedstar on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:20 PM EST
    Come on, rich man, rich family, means and ability. I’m certainly not familiar with the places the president traveled to before he was elected, and I doubt I’m alone here.
    Um... wow, you're really reaching now. (I won't say where you're reaching...) First off, everyone knows Bush is a man of the people. This child of privilege you're describing must be John Kerry or something. Secondly, it's common knowledge that he fought tooth and nail to avoid a years-long all-expense-paid trip to Vietnam.

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#15)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:20 PM EST
    Off topic, but did anyone notice Libby's legal defense fund is being run by Melvin Sembler, of STRAIGHT fame. The chair: Melvin Sembler, a wealthy Florida real-estate developer and ex GOP finance chief who, ironically, was President George W. Bush's ambassador to Italy when the embassy in Rome first got the forged yellowcake documents that helped trigger the affair Ahh the smell of dishonesty in the morning. Leak Investigation: For Libby and Rove, Legal Woes—And Bills

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#16)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:20 PM EST
    Ah, I see that you are back to stupid ole Bush... Yes indeed. So stupid he was Governor of Texas twice, President twice... Doesn't know a thing. cpinva writes:
    no known prior foreign travel, considered going outside texas to be visiting another country.
    So, your point is? Molly - If many Demos supported Murtha, why didn't they vote against the resolution? Surely you're not saying they are hypocrites. Zap - There is a difference between being interested in other culures, enjoying the differences, etc., and thinking that we should be letting them tell us what to do, worrying about their opinion, etc. John Kerry, for example, posited that he would not go to war to defend this country unless his actions were approved by "the world." That is one of the key reasons he lost the election.

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#17)
    by pigwiggle on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:20 PM EST
    QinB-
    “I'd be surprised if a couple of hours of meeting ordinary people costs the American taxpayer any more or any less than a couple of hours on his bike”
    Yah, probably not. But I think the criticism is that he is insular in general. So again, fine with me, I prefer he sightsee on his own dime.
    “…but no interest in speaking to the very people who have the most at stake if his notions are put to the test.”
    I doubt the President would have an opportunity to talk to the folks who, as you put it, have the most at stake. As if Hu would drag from his prisons the Falun practitioners or political dissidents who would benefit from a democratic China. We could have a nice photo op with a displaced rice farmer scraping at the Presidents feet; how much better his life is now that the Party moved him off his land by the Yangtze. SCS-
    “Um... wow, you're really reaching now. (I won't say where you're reaching...)”
    Did you have a point?

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#18)
    by cpinva on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:20 PM EST
    So, your point is?
    that he is an unlettered bore, in spite of his elitest, private school/harvard/yale pedigree. he exhibits zero interest in the world, and the people who inhabit it, around him. that he was elected gov. of texas and the u.s. twice merely proves that a not to bright person, backed by lots o' money, and telling the rubes what they want to hear, regardless of how ridiculous it is, can be elected. it further tells us, as if most of needed to be told, that the country is full of stupid people. although, it does inspire us: a child of wealthy parents and privilege, though exhibiting utter failure at everything he's ever done, can, with the support of that wealthy family, and its equally wealthy friends, aspire to the heights of failure, as the highest elected official in the land. i feel certain there are rich boys/girls everywhere taking note of this. a possible future president paris hilton perhaps? and jim, spare me the repug talking points on kerry, a guy who actually did go to war to defend his country, or at least he thought so at the time. unlike our current oval office occupant, who fought like, um, heck, to stay as far away as possible from vietnam.

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#19)
    by Che's Lounge on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:20 PM EST
    Pigwiggle, Attending social functions is part and parcel with all of the other diplomacy that is practiced during a trip like this. Bush only leaves the country if he has to. Prior to his election in 2000, I personally had traveled out of the country twice as much as he had, and that was only four times (not counting Mexico). Yeah he really took advantage of his wealth and his father's international standing. To go nowhere. He likes his bubble. And needless to say, with 90% of the world population demanding his butt on a plate, traveling the countryside with hundreds of security personnel and their armor plated limos is just...Hard work!

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#20)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:20 PM EST
    molly, time to go for "double jeopardy"! for $400, and the right to return tomorrow to defend your title: no known prior foreign travel, considered going outside texas to be visiting another country. remember molly, your answer must be in the form of a question. [tick . . . tick . . . tick . . . ] What does Pigwiggle not know about Bush's travel experiences, despite it being pretty common knowledge for the rest of us?

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#21)
    by glanton on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:20 PM EST
    "I think it’s a fair bet the President has traveled to many more exotic places than most on this board." Then be glad nobody took you up on the bet. He has stated that before becoming President the only foreign nation he ever visited was Mexico. I don't hold this against him. Personally, whenever I have means and time to travel, there are too many places in this country I want to see, too many things to do (I've still never been to Wrigley Field dammit!), for me to expend the extra money and time to fly overseas. But what I do hold against him is his intellectual isolationism. I do not think him stupid at all, but I do see him for the self-righteous, sheltered snob that he is. Forget other nations for a moment. I'd just like to see him open himself to some other perspectives within this nation, to see him escape the echo chamber that dominates him. But then I'd like to see the Cubbies get a world championship befroe I die. One's about as likely to occur as the other.

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#22)
    by Patrick on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:20 PM EST
    that he was elected gov. of texas and the u.s. twice merely proves that a not to bright person, backed by lots o' money, and telling the rubes what they want to hear, regardless of how ridiculous it is, can be elected.
    From the thread about the California Special Election from a poster supporting the defeat of the propositions.
    When the outcome doesn't fit their warped outlook on life they chalk it up to the masses being "fooled" by politicians. Which is another way of saying "The citizenry is too stupid to decide for themselves so we should decide for them". Kind of sounds like the characterizations of Democrats that the Right(Wrong) Wing loves to spew. My, my who are the elitists now, PnBB?
    It seems to me the intelligence level of the voters is determined by whether or not the outcome of the election agrees with the commentator's ideology.

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#23)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:20 PM EST
    deleted

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#24)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:20 PM EST
    deleted

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#25)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:20 PM EST
    Something else real telling in that article: it describes how he raced through earlier tours of the Wall in China and the Hermitage in St. Petersburg while his wife attempted to slow him down. He had no interest in seeing them at all, but went at the behest of his wife.Laura on this trip went to see the terra cotta soldiers archaeological site but he didn't accompany her. No curiousity about the outside world or history. And he's our president. pretty frightening.

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#26)
    by Slado on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:20 PM EST
    Let me get this straight? Lou thinks the Pres. should stop and buy cheap trinkets at the great wall. cpniva thinks he shouldn't even be there. Everyone thinks he's in idiot. Wow, you guys sure are good at one thing. Hating Bush no matter what he does. Variable you're right on when it comes to 400-3. The Dems are only good at one thing. Telling you why you're stupid or wrong. They are terrible at coming up with ideas of their own. When called on it they folded like cheap suits. If I was an angry pinko leftist I'd be pissed that when given the chance to stand up for what they pretend to believe they could only call foul because the proposel wasn't "serious" enough or "nuanced" enough. The Dems are good at only one thing. Backseat driving. give them the wheel and they immediate put it in Neutral.

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#27)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:20 PM EST
    deleted

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#28)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:20 PM EST
    deleted This commenter is warned for the final time that if he continues to insult other commenters he will be banned from Talkleft

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#29)
    by Patrick on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:20 PM EST
    Paul the spinner. You should get a job with Howard Dean.

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#32)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:20 PM EST
    Glanton - You make a reasonable argument in one respect. I would say that he has seen the other side before he found religion and was saved. I would also say that his values are mostly middle class American, folks who work all day and come home to dinner and a nap in front of the TV before bedtime.

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#33)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:20 PM EST
    TL.... Paul has been banned. If he gets re-admitted, he will be limited to four posts a day and they must not insult other commenters or contain libelous accusations or profanity. Thank you...thank you..thank you. Not sure if you were aware of this, but that's about all Paul ever did.

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#34)
    by cpinva on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:20 PM EST
    jim, can you possibly post to a thread without lying through your teeth? is that an event likely to occur in my lifetime? i think not. when did kerry "lie" about what our troops were doing in vietnam? post the direct quote and the link to the entire statement please. you can't, as usual. thank you for playing, please come again. yes, as a matter of fact, not only do i believe that the u.s. is filled with millions of not particularly smart people, they prove me right on a daily basis. for example, that over 40% of the adult population of the country believes the universe was formed in 7 days, by an invisible guy, in an invisible place, and made humans, fully formed, out of clay is, i think, proof positive right there. oh, he made a woman out of a spare rib of the man. another: in spite of all tangible evidence to the contrary, there are still millions who believe saddam was involved in 9/11, and that he had nuclear weapons, mounted on icbms, pointed at us. i rest my case.

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#37)
    by glanton on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:20 PM EST
    Jim, that "Middle Class" Bush that you see, don't you ever entertain even the possibility that it's an act? I mean, when you look at his life, he doesn't appear to have ever been around anyone other than rich bluebloods like himself. Just because he "talks country," what does that mean? He gives lip service to the value of "hard work," but so what? Look. I don't begrudge the man for being wealthy. I'm not a socialist by any means. But one can be part of the power class and still make a genuine effort (and even succeed at it!) to empathize with and understand where others are coming from. The 45 million with no health care is an example of what I'm saying, and one you'll probably appreciate. Nor is what I'm saying about Bush's religion: Christianity and utter closed mindedness are not analogues.

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#38)
    by Quaker in a Basement on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:20 PM EST
    Piggle wrote:
    I doubt the President would have an opportunity to talk to the folks who, as you put it, have the most at stake.
    For comparison, Google up news articles describing Clinton's Africa trip in 1998. While local officials may have exercised tight control over who he saw or spoke to, he did manage to get out of his room to see the people.

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#39)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:20 PM EST
    Glanton - Could be, who knows? As for his speech, that is pure west Texas. Rich, poor or in-between.

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#40)
    by glanton on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:20 PM EST
    Could be, who knows?
    That's a pretty flippant attitude. But I'd say the answer to your question lies in the policies the man promotes. West Texas drawl is one thing. Defending the current autocratic health care system is quite another. As is the defense of outsourcing, as is the continual assault on public education, as is the utter love of corporate subsidies in all its many forms. None of this bespeaks a man concerned with the middle class, let alone the huge underclass which he simply writes off to die because they're lazy. For the middle class, Bush's economic policies are anathema, but because of his drawl and his exploitation of certain bourgeoise fears (boys kissing, Janet Jackson's breast, commie flag burners, etc), he retains their support.

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#41)
    by scarshapedstar on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:20 PM EST
    Pop quiz: Who, by virtue of what we liberal elitists call "being there", knows more about the Vietnam war: PPJ or John Kerry?

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#42)
    by scarshapedstar on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:20 PM EST
    My point, by the way, was this: Bush is a pansy. Growing up in Louisiana, I learned to distrust people who simply don't like good food. Preferences, schmeferences, Bush is the kind of guy who will ask for a roast beef sandwich at the Four Seasons. This isn't surprising, given that he grew up in Kennebunkport, but when people so studiously avoid interesting local cuisine it strongly hints that there simply isn't much going on upstairs. I, for example, would love nothing more than to walk into an open-air Korean fish market, find someone eating a raw, freshly beheaded unidentifiable eel-like creature, and try to procure the same thing. I guarantee you that would make a much better impression with roughly a billion people than forcing a Prime Minister to stomach a Quarter Pounder with me. Yet that's precisely what Bush would do. Why? Because he's a whiny little b*tch. Won't eat anything more adventurous than meatloaf, won't ride a horse, has to be dragged off the goddamn plane whenever he leaves his fake ranch. In other words, he's every rotten little spoiled brat you've ever known, writ large.

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#43)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:20 PM EST
    Glanton - I would remind you that Bush passed a Medicare RX bill. Over the objections of the Demos. It will save me about $3K next year. I would agree that more needs to be done towards a National Health Care System. It is the pity the Demos choose to NOT do something helpful, instead of trying to play politics. There is litle he can do about outsourcing, as for writing people off, I see no evidence of that. scar - Since you have absolutely no knowledge of what I do or don't know, I find your snarky comment funny. Now, do you have something to add to the discussion?

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#44)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:20 PM EST
    scar - I think that someone ordering a roast beef sandwich at the 4 seasons demonstrates an amazing amount of presence and confidence. They obviously do not feel they must impress the others around them by kowtowing to the herd. Leaders lead, others ask the waiter to select their wine. And if you think eating Chinese food will do anything about changing the PRC's policies, you are naive to the max.

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#45)
    by Sailor on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:20 PM EST
    As for his speech, that is pure west Texas
    Golly, born in Connecticut, grew up in Houston, graduated from Andover (that's in Massachusetts, ya'll) went to Yale, owns a 'ranch' he bought 2 months before the 2k prez election started. that is pure West Texas!? Sheeeit, All hat an no cattle is what we say!

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#46)
    by scarshapedstar on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:20 PM EST
    It's one thing to order the only roast beef sandwich of your life at the Four Seasons. It's another to eat nothing but roast beef sandwiches. I've known people like that, Jim. My high school roommate, every restauraunt he went to, he'd order a club sandwich with nothing but roast beef on it. It wasn't about leading, it was about being a boring schmuck. Ditto for Bush. He's a boring schmuck. Good attempt at writing a paean to boring schmuckitude, though. A+

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#47)
    by Al on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:20 PM EST
    I'd like to offer a different take on this topic. Bush probably does not decide personally what social functions to attend. It's all protocol, and handled by the diplomats. Bush disdaining social appearances is a deliberate snub. You can be sure that if Bush travels to Britain, for example, he's not going to turn down any social appearances, saying that he lives in a bubble. The inability to open a door, on the other hand, is pure Bush. It's a wonder he didn't fall off that bike.

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#48)
    by cpinva on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:20 PM EST
    west texas drawl my butt. the guy was born, raised and went to school in..............new england. any "drawl" he exhibits is an affectation, and a poor one at that. his boorish behaviour doesn't square with his pedigree. scar's right, the guy's utterly dull. ppj, still no dice. kerry never accused our troops, in general, or specifically, of committing "atrocities" in vietnam. his view of atrocities, in that discussion, doesn't actually square with the geneva convention. he did, in an appearance before congress, relate stories he had been told, by other people, of things they had done, or seen, in vietnam, that they considered atrocities, but he never accused anyone himself. that said, there were atrocities committed in vietnam, as there are in all wars. to deny that is to exhibit pathetic blindness to reality. actually, war itself is an atrocity. sometimes necessary, but an atrocity nonetheless. if you take it from that viewpoint, any act of violence in a war could be considered an atrocity.

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#49)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:21 PM EST
    scar - I love the Left's attempts to always use psycho babble... And BTW - Is your high school friend running for Pres next time? Sailor - Don't tell me you are from Texas... please, please... And I think Bush spent some time west of Hill Country.. cpinva - Show me the link. My understanding is that he told tales that he hadn't seen, as if they were personal.
    if you take it from that viewpoint, any act of violence in a war could be considered an atrocity.
    Nice strawman, but as they say in west Texas, that dog won't hun't.

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#50)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:21 PM EST
    Zap:
    "Willful ignorance" - Slate wrote about it way back when, but I can never find the link. Bush doesn't give a flying rat's patoutie about different cultures, different views. He never will, he's kinda proud of it, and it's a disgrace to our nation.
    ppj:
    There is a difference between being interested in other culures, enjoying the differences, etc., and thinking that we should be letting them tell us what to do, worrying about their opinion, etc.
    In my view, a president who was both interested in orther cultures and influenced by them would be an enormous improvement, and much better for the US in the short and long run. But I'm sure you will not agree with that idea. Even so, given that (as you say) there is a difference, then what is your point? I'm having a hard time figuring it out. Is it: (a) Even though Bush doesn't care what other nations think about him or the US, he doesn't need to appear interested in them, because the two are so obviously unrelated? (b) Bush knows that other people know he doesn't care what they think, so he doesn't have to pretend to be interested, because it won't affect their attitudes toward the US anyway, because the two are unconnected? (c) We shouldn't care if Bush shows his lack of interest, because it is better for him to let them know their opinion will have no effect on him, in case they mistakenly think there is a connection? (d) They should be smart enough (like you) not to read anything into his lack of interest, and assume that they might still be able to influence him? Help me out here, I'm struggling to understand your thought process.

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#51)
    by BigTex on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:21 PM EST
    oh, he made a woman out of a spare rib of the man.
    Well, males do have one less floating rib than females. If there is a biological reason, I'd be interested in hearing it. But to the main question, what difference does it make if the President goes and mingles with the masses while overseas? Rather than mingle with the masses, isn't sustained conversation with those from other nations a better way to learn about other cultures? Seems that inviting foreign leaders to Camp David for a week like was done with Tony Balir is a far better way to learn about other cultures. To answer the unasked question y'all may be thinking I've been to the Bahamas and Canada. They both seemed largly similar to the US, Canada more so than the Bahamas. Then again the personal experiance may be biasing my opinion because of the similarities of the two areas to the US.

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#52)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:21 PM EST
    Big Tex: On the rib question, the only difference between men and women's ribs is the size, the 'floating rib theory' is about as scientific as 'air cancer'.
    It is the pity the Demos choose to NOT do something helpful, instead of trying to play politics.
    The Republicans have the majority in both Houses, so why the Democrats "playing politics" with the issue of health care keeps a bill from getting passed and signed on this issue is something that you'll have to explain on an open thread sometime. It would be helpful if you could include a concrete example instead of your abstract attacks that are sophisticated versions of the old line "Who are you going to believe, me or your lying eyes?" Hmm, let's take a look at what Kerry said in his own defense when Chimpy tried to smear him in the 3rd debate:
    I have never suggested a test where we turn over our security to any nation. In fact, I've said the opposite: I will never turn the security of the United States over to any nation. No nation will ever have a veto over us. But I think it makes sense, I think most Americans in their guts know, that we ought to pass a sort of truth standard. That's how you gain legitimacy with your own country people, and that's how you gain legitimacy in the world. But I'll never fail to protect the United States of America.
    From the first debate:
    I believe America is safest and strongest when we are leading the world and we are leading strong alliances. I'll never give a veto to any country over our security. But I also know how to lead those alliances. This president has left them in shatters across the globe, and we're now 90 percent of the casualties in Iraq and 90 percent of the costs. I think that's wrong, and I think we can do better.
    First Debate Third Debate Of course, there were some social liberals who weren't so blind to Bushco's habitual disregard for the truth, albiet in a different context:
    MARSHALL ON TORA BORA: Josh, I think, nails the administration's current attempt to rewrite history on what really happened in Tora Bora. It's stuff like this that has undermined what confidence I had in the veracity of this administration. The gaps between what we know to be true and what they insist isn't just keep multiplying. I used to give them the benefit of the doubt. No reasonable person can any more.
    Link TTFN, Whizzy

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#53)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:21 PM EST
    cymro - My comment, as I think you know, is simple. The President is elected. He should be paying attention to the culture of the US, not France. He definitely shouldn't let Germany tell us what to do. And for that matter, based on France's response to the riots, he should pretty well just ignore the whole bunch of them. Darkly quotes Kerry:
    But I also know how to lead those alliances.
    And how would he do that? Again from Kerry.
    But I think it makes sense, I think most Americans in their guts know, that we ought to pass a sort of truth standard.
    Kerry disproves his own statements. He says, "no veto," yet after claiming he "knows how to lead alliances, he clearly states that there is a test, a "truth standard." Who writes the test? Who decides if we pass? More importantly, how long will this process take? What standards do the "testers" adhere to? The American people understood what he said, what he meant, and what he would do. In the end they knew that couldn't trust a man who threw his country's medals back at them. And you deliberately misunderstand my healthcare comments. Let me explain it to you at middle school level, The Demos could be talking about health care 100 times a day. Instead the play politics and try to rewrite history 100 times a day. Shame on the Party of FDR, Truman, Kennedy... How far they have fallen.

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#54)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:21 PM EST
    Slade, where did I say he should be buying cheap trinkets at the Great Wall. My point was he visited the Wall but apparently was totally bored by one of the seven man-made wonders of the world, you know, the only man-made object that can been seen in space. No interest in history or culture I think is a really telling personality attribute. Someone who has no interest in history is doomed to repeat it. And Bush proves that axiom so right.

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#55)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:21 PM EST
    Lou writes: My point was he visited the Wall but apparently was totally bored.
    Apparent: manifest to the senses or mind as real or true on the basis of evidence that may or may not be factually valid
    So what you have is an opinion. Well, we all have'em.

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#56)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:21 PM EST
    JimakaPPJ, aka Willfully Ignorant II™: There's an old saying in Tennessee. Well, it's an old saying in Texas, I believe also in Tennessee: "Ignorance is bliss." Think about it for a sec. The point to being aware, even interested, in other cultures is to first realize we are all alike and all humans have basic needs and goals in common. This allows us to work together and achieve those goals, preferably without killing each other. To remain ignorant of other cultures (purposefully in GWB's case, questionable in yours) makes it easier to turn them into a demon, torture them, maybe start a war to kick their ass and show them who's boss. We've done the latter, we should have done the former. I know which one you think works best. It doesn't. Most of the rest of us learned this in first grade. We are not in bliss about the state of our nation. You are.

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#57)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:21 PM EST
    Zap - I wrote:
    There is a difference between being interested in other cultures, enjoying the differences, etc., and thinking that we should be letting them tell us what to do, worrying about their opinion, etc.
    . Your problem is a typical of the Left. You can't get away from politics. Everything is politics, so if someone says there is a difference between enjoying French culture, food, literature, etc., and worrying about what the French think about US foreign policy, you call them ignorant. Now, since I have proven that I never said we shouldn’t be interested in other cultures, your warranted attack on me places you in this position: You either can not read, or you are ignorant. Your choice. As for “expressions…” Here's some other expressions you should remember. "Keep your powder dry." "Stupid is as stupid does."

    Re: Bush's Bubble (none / 0) (#59)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat Dec 17, 2005 at 01:06:22 PM EST
    Darkly - The subject was John Kerry and his vows. What does whatever Bush did have to do with that? Get another strawman. That one is on fire. And your excuse of why the Demos have done nothing about health care is telling. They lost a battle and they quit. Fits in nicely with their national defense strategy.