home

NYC Grants Cut By Homeland Security

by TChris

Criticism of Homeland Security spending that enriched smaller communities at the expense of dense urban areas led to assurances that spending would be allocated according to need. Did Omaha and Louisville deserve 40 percent increases while New York City and Washington D.C. had their antiterrorism grants slashed?

Some urban areas received needed increases.

Money for Newark and Jersey City, which received a combined grant, rose 44 percent, to $34 million. Chicago, Atlanta and the Los Angeles area each received smaller, but still sizable increases, an action that drew praise.

Still, cutting New York to help Omaha is, in the words of Rep. Peter King, chair of the House Committee on Homeland Security, "indefensible." And he might not have been somebody Homeland Security wanted to rile up. Says King:

"It's a knife in the back to New York, and I'm going to do everything I can to make them very sorry they made this decision."

< U.S. Troops Kill Iraqi Pregnant Woman | Today's Duke Lacrosse Opinions >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Re: NYC Grants Cut By Homeland Security (none / 0) (#1)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Wed May 31, 2006 at 07:19:17 PM EST
    Not to flog the obvious but are they ensuring security or buying votes?

    Re: NYC Grants Cut By Homeland Security (none / 0) (#2)
    by aw on Wed May 31, 2006 at 09:59:19 PM EST
    New York officials were given a one-page tally that explained, in part, how the region's risk-based standing was calculated. The document said the region had no "national monuments or icons,"
    That's our Homeland Security Department!

    Re: NYC Grants Cut By Homeland Security (none / 0) (#3)
    by scribe on Thu Jun 01, 2006 at 07:44:32 AM EST
    I think the NY Daily News addresses this latest HomeSec fiasco really, really well, in that inimitable tabloid fashion. The front page: "Shove off, Chertoff" The lead article:
    "We're quite frankly getting highly sophisticated in our ability to analyze threat," said Russ Knocke [homeland security spokesman]. Knocke would not address specifically why a threat-based assessment cut funds for a city that has been attacked twice and targeted repeatedly by Islamic terrorists. "It's not so much fighting the last war, it's taking in the threat picture today," he said. "We've got to apply dollars where they will have the greatest impact." But a document obtained by the Daily News that explains what Homeland Security reviewers were looking at in their analysis suggests key data were missing. For instance, in the category "national monuments and icons," the feds list none. For banking and finance businesses, they could find only four worth more than $8 billion, when the Bloomberg administration estimates there are at least 20. "How do you leave every single landmark in the most famous city in the world off of that list?" said Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.), who along with King was demanding a meeting with Chertoff.
    Then, the lead editorial:
    Michael Chertoff must be fired Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff told New York to drop dead yesterday as he slashed the city's federal anti-terror funding in a traitorous action that endangers the lives of 8 million people and demands his immediate firing. Chertoff's decision to cut the flow of U.S. money by 40% was at the least gross incompetence and at the worst vengeful payback by a petty bureaucrat who tangled last year with the NYPD and wound up humiliated. Either way, President Bush must give Chertoff the boot with a hearty, "Heck of a job, Mikey."
    The whole editorial is worth reading, for it brilliantly skewers Chertoff, in that hilarious way of the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette's "Santorum doesn't live here anymore" editorial the other day. And then, there's this conclusion to a columnist's piece:
    Whatever the motivation, the department has issued a bizarre document that cuts our funding by 40%, says there are no icons to protect and slams the Police Department that has taken the lead in the fight against terrorism. The top of the document might as well read Homeland Security to New York: Drop Dead. This is all the more shameful when you consider that Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff once worked in New York. His tenure in his present position is finite and he should forget ever coming back here. His department's sophisticated formula says there isn't much to see here, anyway.
    It takes a lot to get yourself kicked out of New York City, but it looks like Chertoff has managed to find a way.

    Re: NYC Grants Cut By Homeland Security (none / 0) (#4)
    by soccerdad on Thu Jun 01, 2006 at 07:50:22 AM EST
    The document said the region had no "national monuments or icons,"
    who got the scrap metal contract on the Statue of Liberty? It will probably be melted down for all the crosses to be installed in public buildings

    Re: NYC Grants Cut By Homeland Security (none / 0) (#5)
    by squeaky on Thu Jun 01, 2006 at 07:54:03 AM EST
    Looks like NYC is the new NOLA. Just too many dems. They hate us. Funnny, once again is seems like OBL and GWB are on the same side.

    Re: NYC Grants Cut By Homeland Security (none / 0) (#6)
    by squeaky on Thu Jun 01, 2006 at 08:07:50 AM EST
    From scribes link to the Daily News:
    The lowball dollar amount puts at risk the NYPD's plan to build a "ring of steel" of security measures around lower Manhattan -- surveillance cameras, computerized license plate readers and vehicle barriers.
    Delay turning my neighborhood into a 24/7 panopticon? Well that is not so bad. I do not believe that that kind of a think will make us more safe. It will be used as a device to generate more non terror related arrests though. Apart from the pure partisan politics here, which is an utterly transparent indicator showing how much of a joke the WOT is, I am not unhappy that the police state funded by homeland security is getting underfunded.

    Re: NYC Grants Cut By Homeland Security (none / 0) (#7)
    by squeaky on Thu Jun 01, 2006 at 08:25:27 AM EST
    I hope HS sticks to its guns. This may be a blessing in disguise for dems. It once again shows the incompetence and corruption of the WH and republican party. New Yorkers are not bedwetters. We do not need your WOT diversionary tactic whose function is not least, to strip us of out civil liberties. We will be fine without your funds. And yes the police counterterror activities are a joke. That is OK. We do not need a paramilitary force here. If enemy forces land on NYC shores the army can take over. Truly a blessing in disguise.

    Re: NYC Grants Cut By Homeland Security (none / 0) (#8)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Jun 01, 2006 at 08:45:52 AM EST
    Isn't the war on terror just a "false war" anyways?

    Re: NYC Grants Cut By Homeland Security (none / 0) (#9)
    by Dadler on Thu Jun 01, 2006 at 09:43:26 AM EST
    And we here in So-Cal are getting cut, as well, and seriously. Funny considering we're AT THE INTERNATIONAL BORDER.

    Re: NYC Grants Cut By Homeland Security (none / 0) (#10)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Jun 01, 2006 at 11:09:05 AM EST
    et al.. As JRT points out...there is no terrorist threat....right? What are you all worried about? It's all a big joke anyway...right?

    Re: NYC Grants Cut By Homeland Security (none / 0) (#11)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Jun 01, 2006 at 11:13:54 AM EST
    Dadler- How would you have HS funds used "AT THE INTEERNATIONAL BORDER"? You have repeatedly come out against stricter border enforcement. Would old white ladies from San Diego returning from prescription buying trips be subjected to the same scrutiny that fence jumpers would? We must avoid "racial profiling" right?

    Re: NYC Grants Cut By Homeland Security (none / 0) (#12)
    by squeaky on Thu Jun 01, 2006 at 11:17:30 AM EST
    BB-
    It's all a big joke anyway...right?
    there will always be a terrorist threat. Does that mean that we will always be at war? You are evading the question. What war and how long until it is over? Easy rhetoric, tough question.

    Re: NYC Grants Cut By Homeland Security (none / 0) (#13)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Jun 01, 2006 at 11:27:30 AM EST
    Boy Squeaky, it sounds like you are starting to understand that this is a different kind of war. The Emperor will never surrender and the enemy is hiding amongst us and amongst innocent civilians the world over. How do you suggest that we fight this mercurial enemy? For the sake of argument let's discuss appeasment. How would we appease the terrorists? Get out of Iraq? certainly Abandon Israel? definitely What else? Cover up our women and take away their rights? Jail homosexuals? Execute common criminals?

    Re: NYC Grants Cut By Homeland Security (none / 0) (#14)
    by squeaky on Thu Jun 01, 2006 at 11:32:31 AM EST
    JRT- How long? How many are we going to kill? It seems like we are more in the business of creating what you call terrorists than defeating them. Are you afraid that the Moslems are going to conquor America and make you wear a burka? Bedwetter nation?

    Re: NYC Grants Cut By Homeland Security (none / 0) (#15)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Jun 01, 2006 at 11:47:19 AM EST
    I don't know how long- I guess for as long as they are trying to kill us. What do you suggest? That is what I am failing to get from you.

    Re: NYC Grants Cut By Homeland Security (none / 0) (#16)
    by soccerdad on Thu Jun 01, 2006 at 11:52:30 AM EST
    Any WOT or what ever you want to call it should as a basic principle not create many more potential terrorist. So while Bush creates more and more terrorists he cuts funding in those areas in which they are likely to strike here in the US.

    Re: NYC Grants Cut By Homeland Security (none / 0) (#17)
    by aw on Thu Jun 01, 2006 at 12:18:32 PM EST
    As JRT points out...there is no terrorist threat....right? What are you all worried about? It's all a big joke anyway...right?
    Well it's real money. Including yours.

    Re: NYC Grants Cut By Homeland Security (none / 0) (#18)
    by Sailor on Fri Jun 02, 2006 at 09:10:37 AM EST
    so bush is so serious about the WOT he cuts the funds in half to protect the 2 cities that were targets the first time.

    Re: NYC Grants Cut By Homeland Security (none / 0) (#19)
    by squeaky on Sat Jun 03, 2006 at 10:04:35 PM EST
    Sadly, No has a post about the gal who helped. Her name: hekuva job Henke.
    The Homeland Security official who signed off on funding cuts for New York and extra cash for the heartland is a small-town gal whose back-door appointment to the job was mired in controversy.