home

Israel Bombs Beirut Airport

The last two days have seen the deadliest attacks in 24 years between Israel and its neighbors with Israel bombing Lebanon two days in a row after the kidnapping of two of its soldiers by Hezbollah. Today it bombed the Beirut airport.

President Bush pledged to work with Israel, criticizing Hezbollah for thwarting efforts for peace in the Middle East.

"My attitude is this: there are a group of terrorists who want to stop the advance of peace," he said at a news conference in Germany. "The soldiers need to be returned."

Reactions from other Arab countries:

Moderate Arab governments reacted with relative restraint, apparently reflecting a sentiment in Egypt, Jordan and Saudi Arabia that Hezbollah - and by implication its top ally, Syria - had started the fight with Israel.

I support Israel in this. I'm sure others will disagree. Have at it, but keep it civil and any anti-semitic comments will be deleted.

< Voter ID: Another Bad Idea From the GOP | Is Bush Pulling a Fast One on NSA Warrantless Surveillance? >
  • Premium Ads

  • Blog Ads

  • Contribute To TalkLeft

    donate to TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#1)
    by BigTex on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 10:15:35 AM EST
    Looks like Israel may finally be taking the kiddie gloves off. This has been a long time coming. They have tried diplimacy and it has failed. Under Clinton Arafat was about to get everyting he wanted, and he rejected the deal and responded with waves of suicide bombers. When Israel started defending herself the complaint they went crying to the UN was The Isralei's shot back. Think about that. They complained that Israel was returning fire when people were shooting at them. That's the mindset they have. That they can do what they want, and do not have to fear reprecussions. This is the same group of people who were targeting civilians with their suicide bombers. Sure civilians get harmed in combat, but they were targeting civilians. Israel never went in and started targeting civilians in response to the suicide bombings. They targeted the command structure and the physical aspects (factories used to produce, trainign grounds, storage facilities, etc), but they never targeted the civilinas. They build a fence to increase security. They tried to let self rule take place. The end result? No change. More of the same keeps continuing. So finally, Israel has had enough and is starting to show what can happen if they keep getting attacked. Even now, they are showing restraint. They easily could have hit the terminal at the airport rather than just the runways. For that matter, they could have wiped the airport off of the map. They have hit some infrastructure, but they aren't targeting civilians. They could have a policy for each rocket that is fired we will cluster bomb a neigborhood. They could go tit for tat and start to make their enemies civilian population feel the same fear they have been feeling for the past 6 years. But they haven't. Theyhave shown restraint, just not as much as in the past. They could knock out all power to the area, and refuse to provide some as they are doing now. They could knock out desal plants, and refuse to release water to Gaza. They could be doing a significant amount more to make the civilinas in Gaza, West Bank, and Lebanon miserable. To cause them to decide that the radical's war isn't worth the misery they are in and to cause the govrnments to fall to see to the end of the fighting. They haven't. Though after the past 6 years of having civilians targeted, they probablly have gained the to do so. Israel could be doing much more. So far they haven't. The question becomes should they. Lebanon could mobalize their army and make an attempt to control her southern border. She hasn't. That alone gives Israel the go ahead to take protective measures. It's harsh, but sometimes you have to hold people to the standard they hold you. That is the only way to get behavior modification. For the record I also posted this elsewhere if someone is digging.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#2)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 10:32:18 AM EST
    I am surprised that egypt et all are keeping quiet. It will get ugly real quick if these POW's show up in Iran.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#3)
    by squeaky on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 10:33:45 AM EST
    TL-It is beyond me how you can call the capture of 2 Israeli soldiers by Hezbolla, kidnapping. Even if you support Israel on this, the language bias you use seems odd, given your incredibly fair take on every other issue I have read about here. Strange. Kidnapping is always pejorative, capture is more neutral in a war context.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#4)
    by theologicus on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 10:34:06 AM EST
    Amnesty International press reease: Israel / Lebanon: End Immediately Attacks Against Civilians Israel/Occupied Territories: Deliberate attacks a war crime TEL AVIV - July 13 - The Israeli and Lebanese governments, and Hizbullah, must take immediate steps to end the ongoing attacks against civilians and civilian objects. Such attacks are a blatant breach of international humanitarian law and amount to war crimes. It is vital at this time of rapidly rising tension that all parties observe the requirements of international humanitarian law, and that other governments take all appropriate steps to insist that they do so. "Israel must put an immediate end to attacks against civilians and against civilian infrastructure in Lebanon, which constitute collective punishment. Israel must also respect the principle of proportionality when targeting any military objectives or civilian objectives that may be used for military purposes," said Malcolm Smart, Director of Amnesty International's Middle East Programme. "Hizbullah must stop launching attacks against Israeli civilians and it must treat humanely the two Israeli soldiers it captured on 12 July and grant them immediate access to the International Committee of the Red Cross," said Malcolm Smart. The organization also called on the Lebanese government to take concrete measures to ensure that Hizbullah complies with these obligations under international law.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#5)
    by Al on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 10:34:43 AM EST
    Israel's attack on Gaza and now Lebanon is completely and utterly out of proportion to the kidnappings that supposedly triggered these attacks. In the end, as usual the people caught in the middle bear the brunt of the destruction. Their homes are destroyed, their farms are destroyed, their infrastructure is destroyed, and the survivors live only to see their families destroyed. For once, TL, I have to disagree strongly. I have no sympathy for the Israeli "defence" forces, for they are clearly out to wipe the Palestinian people off the face of the Earth. It's as simple as that. The Israeli government knows they can do this because the United States, their main source of funding and weapons, will support them instead of leveraging their influence to push for compromise and true peace. The Europeans may protest indignantly, but Israel will ignore them. The Arab countries may show outward restraint and say Hezbollah started it, but this is only a prudent reaction to a devastating offensive by a very powerful army. The Arab countries are probably quite happy to see Israel embroiled in a guerrilla war. I don't think Israel can "win" this, any more than the US can "win" in Iraq. In any case, personally I could not care less who "wins", or who "started it". What I care about are the unarmed people caught in the middle. They are exactly like me, they are my brothers and sisters, and I weep for them.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#6)
    by Al on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 10:35:57 AM EST
    Squeaky, good point about the word "kidnappings". I used the word myself, and I take it back.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#7)
    by theologicus on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 10:39:42 AM EST
    From the International Committee of the Red Cross: ICRC - Bulletin No. 01/06 - Gaza GAZA - July 13 - General situation The humanitarian situation in Gaza remains precarious as its 1.4 million inhabitants suffer the effects of the Israeli operation "Summer Rain." The number of casualties is increasing daily. As at 10 July 55 Palestinians had been killed and over 180 injured since the beginning of the operation, according to the Palestinian Ministry of Health. These numbers include both civilians and militants. On the Israeli side, one soldier had been killed in action. Infrastructure was the main target during the first days of the Israeli military operation. The destruction of the power plant in Nusseirat resulted in the loss of half the power supply in the Gaza Strip. Water pumps and hospitals are now relying on fuel-driven generators and electricity partly provided by Israel. Rotating outages are occurring in Gaza City, where power is supplied from 6 to 12 hours per day in each area. The Gaza Strip has been sealed off to a large extent by the Israeli authorities since 25 June. Karni, the main crossing point into Gaza for imported goods and humanitarian aid, has remained closed most of the time. It was opened briefly on 2 July to allow UN convoys to bring humanitarian supplies into Gaza and on 4 and 6 July to allow ICRC-provided supplies to enter (see details below). Erez crossing point has been used twice by the ICRC - on 10 and 11 July - to transport goods into Gaza. For 10 days Beit Hanoun and Beit Lahiya, in the northern part of the Gaza Strip, were severely affected by military operations and remained inaccessible for two days each. The power and water supply networks in both towns reportedly suffered extensive damage. Two Palestinian rockets hit the town of Ashqelon, Israel, on 5 and 6 July. Although there were no victims, the range of these rockets, believed to be around 12 kilometres, has alarmed the Israeli population. On 8 and 9 July, rockets hit the Israeli town of Sderot, wounding four Israeli civilians. Maintaining an adequate water supply a major concern The ICRC has assessed the water and sanitation situation in the Gaza Strip. Although no acute shortages of water or of fuel to run pumps and power the supply systems have as yet been reported, the situation remains precarious. Since only a few humanitarian organizations are permitted to take fuel and other goods into Gaza, stocks could quickly dwindle or vanish altogether. The situation is aggravated by widespread dependence on generators, which are at risk of breaking down owing to excessive use.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#8)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 10:40:07 AM EST
    Well I guess the price of gas is going to increase. Is kidnapping a soldier a recognized "act of war"? I don't know.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#9)
    by squeaky on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 10:43:27 AM EST
    robodruid-
    Is kidnapping a soldier a recognized "act of war"?
    this conflict is so heated up that sneezing is tantamount to an act of war.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#10)
    by Dadler on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 10:45:48 AM EST
    Chris Allbritton of Back-to-Iraq has been in Lebanon for some time now and has a few interesting posts on the current madness. "Marines die, that's what we're here for." Lee Ermey from FULL METAL JACKET Today it's civilians die first, that's what they're there for.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#11)
    by cmpnwtr on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 10:47:12 AM EST
    Opposed as I am to the Israeli appropriation of Palestinian land, this deliberate escalation by Hamas and Hezbollah is an attempt to sabotage any kind of peace process and provoke an all out war. The government of Lebanon is fully responsible if it allows a private army and terrorist organization to operate on its soil.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#12)
    by soccerdad on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 10:50:17 AM EST
    Israel has legitimate self-defense issues. However, that being said their actions have been completely inappropiate. The Israelis kill people on the beach and thats ok. The Palestinians grab 1 soldier and that some how allows Israel to arrest the government, bomb the infrastructure, and impose collective punishement on the entire Gaza strip is hypocritical at best. The response has been completely out of proportion. The failure to see both sides of this issue is what has caused and will continue to cause proplems. Meanwhile, while one soldier is held 9000 Palestinians rot in Israeli jails in a process that closely resembles Gitmo, without charges, access to defense. It is ludicrious to oppress an entire area and people while unilaterally doing waht ever you want and then get angry when a few retaliate. They had free elections so when the US and Israel dont like the result they arrest the government. Well so much for Democracy in the ME. Israeli has refused to negotiate. Given that many of the neocons have close ties with the Likud party and given some of ther rhetoric coming from them blaming Iran and Syria for all the problems one has to wonder whether the second reason for Israel's actions are to force Bush's hand against Iran. The neocons and Israeli have been very vocal in the last couple of weeks concerning Bush's lack of action. To let Israeli completely off the hook for their actions over the last couple of weeks demonstrates an amazing lack of understanding of what is going on. Israel deserves to be safe, they however should not be allowed to commit blatent war crimes which collective punishment is. But the war mongers will be happy for Israel pouring gasoling on the ME fire. What to you do if they force Bush's hand and he attacks Iran using baby nukes? Then what? There will be further escalation. The US needs to resume its role as an unbiased negotiator, but that seems completely unlikly. So keep up with the blind support of Israel and watch the whole ME go up in flames.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#13)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 10:53:42 AM EST
    For once, TL, I have to disagree strongly. I have no sympathy for the Israeli "defence" forces, for they are clearly out to wipe the Palestinian people off the face of the Earth. It's as simple as that.
    That is absolutely ridiculous- it is exactly the other way around. If the Palestinians followed a truce there would never be another Israeli attack, but the Palestinians will never stop the violence. "Peace will come when the Arabs will love their children more than they hate us." -Golda Meir The Arab world clearly wants Israel gone- how can you be so blind to this?

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#14)
    by BigTex on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 10:59:03 AM EST
    I have no sympathy for the Israeli "defence" forces, for they are clearly out to wipe the Palestinian people off the face of the Earth. It's as simple as that.
    If that's what they wanted to do, nothing would be left in the West Bank and Gaza now. It is Hamas that uses that type of rhetoric, not Israel. They use the rhetoric of a two state solution, without the right of return. Think about it. The Palestinians have no fixed wing aircraft. Nether does Lebanon. What's to stop Israel from firebombing the population centers like we did to Japan at the end of WWII? Noting. If they wanted to do so they could be right now. Eventually international pressure may force a halt, but in the mean time they could have eliminated large tracts of areas where their enemies reside. Also, Israel could cut off the power and water supply to the Palestininas. Think of how quickly the situation would deteoriate then. No power, no water, and no way to bring in any fuel to run emergency generators or emergency pumps because of the blockaid. If they wanted to harm the masses, they easily could do so. They haven't done so at this point, but have earned the right to do so after 6 years of their civilinas being targeted.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#15)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 11:01:34 AM EST
    Great comments everyone. Keep them coming. I'm learning from all of you.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#16)
    by soccerdad on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 11:05:39 AM EST
    BigTex where the hell have you been Israel is doing those things. They have cut power, water, made it difficult for food to get it. Hamas kidnaps 1 soldier and the world goes nuts. Israel bombs a house kill 9 people in one family 7 of whom where children and no one says anything. Given this unbalanced attitude, what do you expect. Yeah Israel talks about 2 states and then does everything it can to sabotage it and/or make the geography so it cant work. My Israel friend who was a much decorated tank commander in the 6 day war got so fed up with the hypocrisy that he gave up his Israel citizenship as a moral protest.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#17)
    by soccerdad on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 11:08:50 AM EST
    but have earned the right to do so after 6 years of their civilinas being targeted
    And what right have the Palestinians got when the IDS forces buldoze houses and kill innocent women and children? I supposed they are not allowed to respond to the collective punishment.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#18)
    by fafnir on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 11:09:10 AM EST
    The Reuters UK article CHRONOLOGY - Six months of rising Mideast tensions offers some prospective leading up to today's event:
    (Reuters) - Hizbollah guerrillas captured two Israeli soldiers and killed up to seven Israelis in Lebanese border violence on Wednesday, inflaming Middle East tensions.
    Here is a short chronology of the Middle East conflict since the beginning of the year.
    January 25 - Islamic militant group Hamas defeats Fatah movement of moderate President Mahmoud Abbas in first Palestinian parliamentary election in a decade.
    March 29 - Abbas swears in Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh and his government.
    June 9 - Hamas armed wing calls off 16-month-old truce after seven family members are killed on a Gaza beach during a day of Israeli shelling. Israel denies responsibility for the deaths.
    June 13 - Israel kills 11 Palestinians, nine of them civilians, in a missile strike on a van carrying militants and rockets in Gaza.
    June 25 - Gaza militants launch deadly raid into Israel, killing two soldiers and capturing Corporal Gilad Shalit. Three days later Israel pushes into Gaza.
    June 29 - Israeli troops in the West Bank detain one third of the Palestinian cabinet and nearly two dozen Hamas lawmakers.
    July 3 - Israeli forces move into northern Gaza. Three days later the offensive is expanded after a rocket fired by Hamas hits the Israeli city of Ashkelon for the first time.
    July 8 - Haniyeh calls for a cease-fire with Israel. Jewish state says militants must first free the captured soldier and halt rocket attacks.
    July 12 - Hizbollah guerrillas capture two Israeli soldiers and kill up to seven around the Lebanese border. Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert calls it an "act of war" by Lebanon.
    -- Israel broadens Gaza offensive and cuts the strip in two. Attacks, including an air raid that kills nine family members, take the Palestinian toll from the offensive to well over 70.


    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#19)
    by Sailor on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 11:11:57 AM EST
    running over peaceful protestors with bulldozers and shooting children for throwing rocks, firing missiles in crowded cities to take out an individual is not what I call 'keeping the gloves on." They were well on the way to peace via the Oslo accords until Ariel Sharon ignited the current problems by taking 1000 troops and occupying the Temple Mount in a move he knew would trigger Arab resentment. Then he used the resulting violence to get his hardline gov't elected and the violence has worsened to this day. Many, many more innocent palestininians have died than israelis. and if it wasn't for the US enabling them the israelis would have had to make peace years ago. This isn't anti-semitic, it's anti-israeli, or anyone who wages war against a civilian population.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#20)
    by Slado on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 11:16:31 AM EST
    Big Tex has hit it right on the head. Isreal is a soverign nation. It is not Isreals fault that the Arab nations want to see them banished from the face of the earth. Isreal has been under constant attack from it's neighbors since its creation. One can make a legitimate argument that it isn't fair to Palestinians that they had to be moved to create a jewish state but that argument is long over. When one criticizes Isreal one should remember that this is not Iraq. Isreal did not invade it's territory it is simply defending its boarders. Is it a fair fight between Isreal and its neighbors? No. Isreal has one of the greatest armies in the world. Probably only second to the U.S. Just because you have bigger guns doesn't mean you shouldn't be allowed to use them. Please save us the Palestinian propoganda when arguing against Isreal. Hezbollah ambushed an Isreali boarder patrol killing 5 or 7 soldiers and then kept two. That's called kidnapping. The bomb that blew up on a Palestianian beach was most likely from a Palestianian bomb that went off too early. Not an Isreali shell. You have to believe terrorist propoganda over the isreali government to believe that allegation. When criticizing Isreal one should ask themself what would our any reasonable country do if it suffered car bombings etc... on a daily basis and knew who was commiting these crimes, where they lived and that they won't stop util they are dead. Would England, France, Russis the USA be as restrained and patient when dealing with an unreasonable foe who is determined do see you destroyed. You can play the moral equivalency card all you want. Isreal is a democratic nation fighting terrorist orginizations. Who are we to judge?

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#21)
    by BigTex on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 11:19:08 AM EST
    BigTex where the hell have you been Israel is doing those things. They have cut power, water, made it difficult for food to get it.
    Soc, with all due respect, you don't know what you are takling about. Israel has hit power facilities, but also is sending power to run emergency services. The desal plants are co-operated, but it would be easy for the Israeli army to move in and divert the water supply away from the palestinian areas. Israel could refuse to provide any power and water. Then you would see a major humanitarian crisis. Israel could refuse to let fuel shipments go in to hospitals to run the generators. They haven't done so. They are striking a balance between making the population uncomfortable, and eliminating essential services. They have allowed food to go in. Not freely, but enough to keep starvation at bay. How long do you think the palestinains could hold out if Israel decided to have a total blockaid? Esssential services would fail in a week, if not less. Food would run out in that time. Water would run out in far less. You say that Israel is overreacting, but what about all the suicide bombers that target the civilin population in Israel? The civialinas Israel has killed are in the proximity to those who are planning, working towards, or carrying out attacks on Israel. Israel hasn't targeted civilians. Don't think that Israel is attempting to eliminate the civialian population. All they want to do is make them uncomfortable. Make them realise that there are consiquences for their government not acting to stop the attacks on Israel. Compare that to what the other side is doing. They are firing rockets into civilian populations with the goal of inflicting casualties on the civilians. It's night and day. And, even more importantly, this is the normal pattern of behavior for those attacking Israel. It's just that Israel finally has had enough and is taking off the kiddie gloves and fighting back in earnest. Re the collective punishment, the punishment is for attacks on Israel. The root of all of this is that Arafat refused a deal that would have given him 99% of what he wanted, and he responded by unleashing suicide bombers. That was the opening salvo. Israel has attempted other measures, but they have failed. When you build a security fence and pull back behind the fence, that's a good sign that you want to live in peace. Once rockets start flying over the fence, that's a good sign that the other side wants the fight to continue. At this point let the battle take place, it is what Hamas and Hezbolla want, they just are stunned that they are going to actually have to fight this time.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#22)
    by soccerdad on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 11:26:19 AM EST
    Slado is the perfect example of an Israeli apologist. A few terroris condem an entire people, Israeli does no wrong blah blah blah. The Palestinians shouild be happy they are oppressed, malnourished, killed indiscriminately. After all they are just dark skin Muslims. In October of 2004 I posted an article on the killing of Palestinian children by the IDS. This was prompted by an article in an Israeli newspaper also condeming the IDS actions. Its here A quote from Mr Levy from the Haaretz
    The plain fact, which must be stated clearly, is that the blood of hundreds of Palestinian children is on our hands. No tortuous explanation by the IDF Spokesman's Office or by the military correspondents about the dangers posed to soldiers by the children, and no dubious excuse by the public relations people in the Foreign Ministry about how the Palestinians are making use of children will change that fact. An army that kills so many children is an army with no restraints, an army that has lost its moral code.
    My conclusion was:
    We see quite clearly that the actions of the Israelis against the Palestinians mirror our actions against Iraqis. We have dehumanized them to the point where the indiscriminate killing of civilans is of no concern to the soldiers, this administration, the press, and a great many of our citizens. So there you have it. Two of the supposedly great, well educated, self-proclaimed moral democracies of the world engaging in inhuman, indiscriminate killing of innocent people including children without much protest. We have lost our souls and our moral bearings. If this is what democracy is about, why would anyone want to adopt it? For us, we need to ask ourselves is this really the kind of country we want? One that murders during elective wars and doesn't care.


    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#23)
    by Sailor on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 11:27:01 AM EST
    You have to go back not 6 months but 6 years to see how this started, and I don't think the PLO instigated it.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#24)
    by Al on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 11:28:28 AM EST
    Granola, I recommend Juan Cole's excellent piece in Salon on Israel's failed-state strategy. One of the most poignant images I have ever seen from Palestine wasn't even bloody, but it spoke volumes. Israel had occupied a Palestinian city, I forget which, and the streets were deserted except for Israeli tanks. The TV image showed a tank driving up a street, where to one side and out of the way of the tank was a car. The tank actually swerved out of its way to roll over the parked car, destroying it, and then swerved back to its original path. To me, that said everything about what Israel was really up to there. Israel systematically bulldozes homes and burns olive groves. This has nothing to do with terrorist attacks, and everything to do with decimating the population. Fully half the population of Palestine are children. Big Tex, Israel actually is cutting off the power and water supply to the Palestinians. They really are. And please, stop and think about what you are saying:
    If they wanted to harm the masses, they easily could do so. They haven't done so at this point, but have earned the right to do so after 6 years of their civilians being targeted.
    Earned the right? Do you really think "harming the masses", as you put it, is a right, that you earn somehow? Big Tex, I'm sure you are more civilized than that. Calm down, and remember that those masses are victims, half of them children.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#25)
    by Sailor on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 11:29:14 AM EST
    Israel wouldn't be a 'soverign nation' for 2 minutes if we didn't support them.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#26)
    by soccerdad on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 11:29:21 AM EST
    Big Tex so your argument boils down to Israel could be meaner. How pathetic can you get. Israel has clear interfered with and harmed basic services in the last 2 weeks. Sorry it doesn make your threshold for being significant. You guys will get what what youve always wanted all out war in the ME. Have a nice time in hell.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#27)
    by Deconstructionist on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 11:38:22 AM EST
    An ahistorical approach that ignores the entire history of a several generation conflict and frames the issue as: this response is out of proportion to the kidnap/capture/apprehension (whatever you want to call it) is absurd. Israel doesn't want to "wipe Palestininians" off the map-- it recognizes and has fairly good relations with Jordan which is a Palestininian state by any historical context. It has also returned much of the post-1948 land it conquered AFTER BEING ATTACKED in subsequent wars. It is simply false to claim Israel is the aggressor. In the absence of Arab aggression Israel would bever have controlled anything beyond its 1948 borders and it would have no need to use force now if people would just stop attacking it. the argument that we get to attack you on our terms but you can only respond on our terms is nonsensical. If you want to fight then the other side gets to determine the response. Let's suppose the United States one day was to use San Diego as a base of operations to attack Tijuana and the Mexicans not only repelled the attack but took control of San Diego. Then let's assume Americans continued to use San Diego to launch attacks on Mexico. How many of you would argue that the solution would be for Mexico to withdraw from San Diego? Then assuming Mexico did withdraw and the only result was more attacks from San Diego on mexican civilians would argue that the Mexico had no right to defend itself by attacking San Diego? Somehow, I doubt the outrage from the Far Left over "Mexican aggression" would be the same.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#28)
    by roger on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 11:39:51 AM EST
    911 is just a drop in the bucket compared to what we go through. We invaded two countries afterwards. If Israel rteacted like America, we would have one world government, with everyone speaking hebrew. Israel's history is a series of arab or palestinian attacks, followed by an Israeli victory. Just because the palestinians continually lose does not give them the moral highground. "Capture" is what happens when soldiers dont kill an enemy in battle. "Kidnap" or "abduct" would be the correct terms here. When a market is bombed, or a pizza parlor, is that not "collective" punishment? Or is it just wrong when Israel hits someone near a legitimate target?

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#29)
    by jimakaPPJ on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 11:41:42 AM EST
    SD - You fail to grasp the base fact that Lebanon cannot, and does not, control the terrorists. Until it does, it will reap not what it has sowed, but what it has allowed to grow. Al writes:
    The tank actually swerved out of its way to roll over the parked car, destroying it, and then swerved back to its original path. To me, that said everything about what Israel was really up to there.
    Al, you note that the tank was within an occupied city. Cars are weapons when loaded with high explosives, as we have seen demostrated all over the world. Destroying one makes perfect sense when you stop to think.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#30)
    by Deconstructionist on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 11:46:05 AM EST
    "SD - You fail to grasp the base fact that Lebanon cannot, and does not, control the terrorists. Until it does, it will reap not what it has sowed, but what it has allowed to grow." I agree with that. The Lebanese are not entirely without fault but simply have no real ability to control ther "refugees" within their borders. To a large degree Lebabon has a sovereign government in name only and militarily it is essentially powerless. It's a shame because not so long ago Lebanon was socially and culturally an advanced society by regional standards.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#31)
    by squeaky on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 11:48:42 AM EST
    Juan Cole gives a sober and fair assessment of the latest imbroglio.
    Rejectionists on both sides are to blame. The Oslo Peace Process could have forestalled all this violence, as Israeli PM Yitzhak Rabin understood. But on the Israeli side, the then Likud Party of Bibi Netanyahu and Ariel Sharon and Ehud Olmert derailed it. On the Palestinian side, Hamas rejected it. Had there been a peace process, prisoners would have been released in return for a cessation of hostilities, and there would have been no motivation to capture Israeli soldiers.
    Worth reading the rest. Implications for Iraq, but no answers though (shortish.)

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#32)
    by John Mann on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 11:50:57 AM EST
    You have to go back not 6 months but 6 years to see how this started, and I don't think the PLO instigated it.
    With all due respect, Sailor, you have to go back considerably more than 6 years to when Zionism and British guilt about the Holocaust resulted in the creation of the state of Israel. It was started by terrorists, and continues to terrorize. Zionists destroyed more than 700 Palestinian villages in 1948 and 1949, and slaughtered countless thousands of people as ethnic cleansing was taken to a new level. Today, in the spirit of Nazi occupation, they revel in bloody reprisals that are out of all proportion to the acts they are so enthusiastically avenging. Zionist Christians will be happy about what's happening right now, since they believe that the battle of Armageddon will take place in Lebanon, and this battle will result in the end of the world and the return of Jesus Christ. Oh Happy Day.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#33)
    by squeaky on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 11:53:43 AM EST
    Al, you note that the tank was within an occupied city. Cars are weapons when loaded with high explosives, as we have seen demostrated all over the world. Destroying one makes perfect sense when you stop to think.
    Right ppj, a tank will roll over a car because it may have a carbomb. Right. Please, if this is what you come up with when you "stop to think" it is best that you start jogging. Only you could come up with such a lazy response/excuse.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#34)
    by Punchy on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 11:54:25 AM EST
    Ah...the vicious cycle Israel just keeps rerunning...they really are just sewing their own discontent. They bomb water plants, electricity, and civilian homes. That leaves Palestinians without food, shelter, etc. Conditions which BREED resentment, revenge....terror. They go and bomb Israel as payback until Israel pulls back a little. A year or two later, Israel does it all over again. They're breeding the very terrorists that bomb them by setting up the conditions that incubate such hatred. Israel, right now, is trying to kill a fly with a stick of TNT. And they'll see the results of it not today or tomorrow, but months down the road. Just after all the Palestinians have had buried their mothers.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#35)
    by roger on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 11:55:05 AM EST
    Squeaky, As usual, Juan Cole nailed it. The Israeli right wing feeds off the frustration of constant attack, and fuels the worst instincts. Part of the problem is also that (with the partial exception of Jordan), no Arab country will let the Palestinians in, nor will they grant citizenship. The living conditions for Palestinians end up as "temporary" camps that have been operating since the '40s. It will take a regional solution to solve this. The participation of arab countries would be crucial. Sadly, rhetoric aside, the arab countries dont care what happens to the palestinians.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#36)
    by Dadler on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 11:56:15 AM EST
    Decon, Many societies were evolved as Lebanon was, Iran, Iraq, even Afghanistan for heaven's sake, but were sacrificed by the East and West on the alter of the Cold War, which, in retrospect, seems like the most quaint waste of resources and potential in history. Who wouldn't rather deal with the Kremlin or the DDR than AQ or the like? That we're sacrificing them again in the great Terrorist Wars is more wretched food to force down and then hurl up.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#37)
    by Deconstructionist on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 11:57:14 AM EST
    "Juan Cole gives a sober and fair assessment of the latest imbroglio. Rejectionists on both sides are to blame. The Oslo Peace Process could have forestalled all this violence, as Israeli PM Yitzhak Rabin understood. But on the Israeli side, the then Likud Party of Bibi Netanyahu and Ariel Sharon and Ehud Olmert derailed it. On the Palestinian side, Hamas rejected it. Had there been a peace process, prisoners would have been released in return for a cessation of hostilities, and there would have been no motivation to capture Israeli soldiers." That's essentially a tautology. Sure, if both sides agreed to and abided by truce there would be one. If they don't agree then there isn't one. No insight there. Meaningful analysis requires considering WHY the parties can't agree and what, if anything, the parties might be willing to do to achieve it.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#38)
    by roxtar on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 11:58:59 AM EST
    There's no war like a religious war.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#39)
    by roger on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 12:01:06 PM EST
    D- Sadat was killed for making peace. No other Arab leader has tried to make peace since then. Governments in the region try to make peace, and the local palestinian population has fits. The Israelis have tried, Egypt tried, Jordan pretty much pulls it off, as long as the rhetoric is loud enough. The Iranians use the Palestinians to their own ends. There will be peace when the palestinians desire peace

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#40)
    by Bill Arnett on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 12:02:22 PM EST
    We decry genocide when it takes place in Rwanda or Darfur, and yet we stand by cheerleading the Israelis (or at least make excuse after excuse for them when they respond with horrific violence and openly advocate the assassination of lawfully and democratically elected leaders). They have openly stated the desire to destroy an elected government and seem to relish wreaking as much harm as possible upon innocents with their indiscriminate bombing in densely populated areas. No matter what their beef is with the government Palestinians chose, the murder of innocents is never called for, and simply serves as a reminder that there is still not yet, and maybe never will be, any truly "civilized" societies in the Middle East, other than those that inhabited that region of the world for thousands of years, and that has been the case since, oh, sometime in the 40's. Jesus' Seventh of Eight Beatitudes: Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called children of God. There is, apparently, no danger that anyone in the Middle East will be called a child of god, even amongst those who claim religious superiority over others. I am not anti-Semetic, but I do recognize that Israel is not an agent of peace and prosperity for all.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#41)
    by Steven Sanderson on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 12:02:33 PM EST
    Israel's vastly disproportionate response to Hezbollah's hostage taking, combined with Bush's failure to restrain Israel, is guaranteed to ignite massive blow-back against us throughout the region. We'd better be willing to pay a high price for Bush's unwillingness to act evenhandedly in the dispute.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#42)
    by Punchy on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 12:06:56 PM EST
    Steve--
    We'd better be willing to pay a high price for Bush's unwillingness to act evenhandedly in the dispute.
    Unwillingness, or inability? I'm willing to say the latter. Or, knowing the clown who occupies our WH, perhaps both. I bet he's reading My Pet Goat as we speak (and Israel slices and dices the Lebanese)....

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#43)
    by cmpnwtr on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 12:21:21 PM EST
    Things would not have deteriorated this far had a Gore administration been in place. That said... there can never be any credible peace process anywhere in the Middle East as long as violent militias have the run of the place and governments look the other way or covertly support them. Is there a government in Lebanon, or in the Palestinian territories.. nope.. just militias who do what they please and hide behind civilian populations.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#44)
    by John Mann on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 12:26:45 PM EST
    Israel's vastly disproportionate response to Hezbollah's hostage taking, combined with Bush's failure to restrain Israel, is guaranteed to ignite massive blow-back against us throughout the region.
    Bush is doing far worse than failing to restrain Israel. He is actively encouraging Israel, and makes no bones about it with his "Israel has the right to defend herself" remarks. Why in God's name is the government of the U.S. placing its own citizens in jeopardy because of its unqualified support for a foreign government? It's helpful to remember that before Israel, the U.S. had no enemies in the Middle East; now it has no friends. (Yes, Jim, and I'll say it again, too.)

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#45)
    by Che's Lounge on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 12:29:16 PM EST
    When Isreal cut off the Palestinians, it's only logical where the next line of access would come from. Lebanon has been quiet for 20 years. There will never be peace without the right of return. That's the only issue that stopped real peace on several occaisons. Nice road map, Monkey Boy.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#46)
    by Dadler on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 12:41:19 PM EST
    And the right of return will never be recognized by Israel, and the cycle will continue unabated. But it's simply everyday people, as Sly and the Family Stone said, that get screwed. When will Arab governments welcome Palestinians with generosity? Where is Europe welcoming Jews back with open arms and restitution? Where is the simple concern for greater humanity here? Nowhere, as I see it. God isn't merely dead, he's cremated and scattered, and no autopsy can be performed.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#47)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 12:53:38 PM EST
    Before I start my rant, I don't support either side in this. They are fools of equal magnitude. I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that in this, like any other conflict, it doesn't really matter any more "who started it". The situation as it currently stands is that the Israelis and Palestinians live in close proximity and they have to come to some sort of agreement as to how to do that without either side killing off the other. How? Good faith negotiation. It seems that both sides have negotiated with less than "good faith" in the past, and it may require the assistance of Big Brother to help them find a reasonable compromise. But this, as with any other territorial or philosophical dispute, will never be solved by blowing each other up.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#48)
    by theologicus on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 12:54:13 PM EST
    An excerpt from The Gaza/Lebanon Crises: Escalating Occupation & Danger of New Border Fighting By Phyllis Bennis Institute for Policy Studies July 12, 2006 • The Israeli attacks constitute collective punishment of the entire Gazan population, and have created a humanitarian crisis of unprecedented proportions in Gaza. • All these attacks violate the Fourth Geneva Convention, which sets out the obligations of occupying powers and specifically prohibits collective punishments, "targeted" assassinations, and destruction of the infrastructure of an occupied territory. 
 • Israel's assault on Gaza does not constitute a re-occupation, because Israel's occupation of Gaza never ended. • The expansion of the military escalation to Lebanon represents a potentially serious threat of escalation, especially if there is involvement from Syria. 
 • The ongoing crisis is political, not just humanitarian. It reflects the failure of Israeli unilateralism, the failure of the "Roadmap," the failure of the U.S.-orchestrated exclusion of the UN, and failure of the international community and the UN to intervene. • The Gaza escalation demonstrates once again the need for an entirely new, international (not U.S.-sponsored) diplomatic process based on international law and human rights, aimed at ending the occupation and establishing equal rights for all, the only basis for a just, lasting and comprehensive peace in the region.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#49)
    by squeaky on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 12:54:19 PM EST
    That's essentially a tautology. Sure, if both sides agreed to and abided by truce there would be one. If they don't agree then there isn't one. No insight there. Meaningful analysis requires considering WHY the parties can't agree and what, if anything, the parties might be willing to do to achieve it.
    Tautology?? No it is a quote and a link. Deconstructionist, ha ha ha. You have shown your hand.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#50)
    by Andreas on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 12:59:00 PM EST
    The WSWS writes:
    The characterisation of the Hezbollah action as "unprovoked" is both grotesque and absurd. The cross-border raid by the Lebanese Shiite group comes after two weeks of escalating Israeli aggression in Gaza that has left more than 60 Palestinians dead. Moreover, Israel has never abandoned its territorial ambitions in Lebanon and Syria. To this day it has retained the Shebaa Farms, a 25 square-kilometre area of Lebanese agricultural land. It was captured by Israel in the 1967 war and again in 1973 and has been occupied ever since. The fate of Shebaa Farms is bound up with that of the much larger Golan Heights, which it is adjacent to. Formerly known as the Syrian Heights, the Golan Heights is a strategic plateau on the border of Israel, Lebanon, Jordan and Syria. It was captured by Israel in the 1967 war and again in 1973 and has been occupied ever since.
    Israel launches military assault on Lebanon By Chris Marsden, 13 July 2006

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#51)
    by Deconstructionist on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 01:02:53 PM EST
    Squeaky: Quoting a tautology and providing the link to where you find it makes it no less a banal tautology.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#52)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 01:04:42 PM EST
    soccerdad: "The Palestinians grab 1 soldier and that some how allows Israel to arrest the government, bomb the infrastructure, and impose collective punishement on the entire Gaza strip..." Yes, sd, collective punishment is unacceptable.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#53)
    by roger on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 01:08:09 PM EST
    Andreas, You may remember that Syria attacked Israel using the Golan heights for their artillery. You make it sound like they moved there for the view Theo, When a suicide bomber hits a pizza parlor in Jerusalum, is that a military target?

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#54)
    by theologicus on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 01:15:18 PM EST
    When a suicide bomber hits a pizza parlor in Jerusalem, does that justify committing war crimes in retaliation?

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#55)
    by Dadler on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 01:16:24 PM EST
    Roger, It's a target designed to inflict death, mutilation and fear, obviously. No one would argue that. But both sides do this. Everyone's sh*t stinks. Claiming otherwise is prolonging the agony. Remember, part of what won the Revolutionary War for the American colonists, our political and social ancestors, was irregular warfare of the geurilla type, which the British condemned as barbaric. You know what happened to many British sympathizers? They were butchered. I'll repeat: everyone's sh*t smells. Always has and always will. Dealing with the communal stink is just that, a communal problem.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#56)
    by soccerdad on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 01:19:15 PM EST
    Helping to Create a failed state and criticizing that failed state for not doing what you want is hypocritical and a useless exercise. It is becoming clearer by the day that neocons want all out war in the region. Will Bush follow the neocons? Is anyone advocating a saner approach? For those not familiar with the link between the neocons and the Likud party google look at what it says and who helped write it. I would reccommend that people read Kinzer's new book Overthrow : America's Century of Regime Change from Hawaii to Iraq It demonstrates a number of lessons. The most important maybe that the US government regardless of the party in office, is unable or unwilling to try and determine what the long term consequences of their foreign policy decisions might be. Its always looked at in terms of immediate consequences and then slogans are substituted for the long range outcome. Its been going on for 100 years. However, with the possible use of nuclear bunker busters against Iran we may be marching right up to the edge of the abyss. If we use them, then everyone else will think ok, its fair game to use nukes. The neocons obsession with raw power and brutality combined with a disdain for negotiation and a real foreign policy may put this country and even under the worse case scenario the world in a very precarious situation. So is Israel pouring on the gasoline and the neocons pushing Bush to light the match?

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#57)
    by soccerdad on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 01:21:18 PM EST
    somehow the following was omitted google Israel "clean break"

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#58)
    by Edger on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 01:23:13 PM EST
    Given bushco's narrow focus and past I don't hold out much hope for their ability to do it, but it would be good if the bush administration can show that it is able to learn from history and past actions of the US gov't rather than bumbling around and inflaming the situation when backing up Israel in this:
    "The events that affected my soul in a direct way started in 1982 when America permitted the Israelis to invade Lebanon and the American Sixth Fleet helped them in that. This bombardment began and many were killed and injured and others were terrorised and displaced." "I couldn't forget those moving scenes, blood and severed limbs, women and children sprawled everywhere. Houses destroyed along with their occupants and high rises demolished over their residents, rockets raining down on our home without mercy." "The situation was like a crocodile meeting a helpless child, powerless except for his screams. Does the crocodile understand a conversation that doesn't include a weapon? And the whole world saw and heard but it didn't respond." "And as I looked at those demolished towers in Lebanon, it entered my mind that we should punish the oppressor in kind and that we should destroy towers in America in order that they taste some of what we tasted and so that they be deterred from killing our women and children." Osama Bin Ladin, 2004


    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#59)
    by squeaky on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 01:32:26 PM EST
    Squeaky: Quoting a tautology and providing the link to where you find it makes it no less a banal tautology.
    What a crock. If you are too lazy to follow the link of a quote before dismissing it you are clearly a puffed up fake. Jumbo sized with no content. Pretentious moniker as well, that is unless you have modeled yourself after the Catipillar tractors the Israelies use to crush Palistinian homes. Deconstruction at its worst.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#60)
    by baked potato on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 01:42:18 PM EST
    Ooookaaay. Any negative comment we make about the rogue nuclear state that practices apartheid within its own borders and (permanent) military occupation of its neighbors must be stifled, lest it seem "anti-semitic." If only Apartheid South Africa had had such a great knee-jerk response with which to threaten its critics, that terrorist Nelson Mandela would still be in jail!

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#61)
    by roger on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 01:43:39 PM EST
    Dadler, Likud is a disaster for everyone involved

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#62)
    by Deconstructionist on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 01:48:24 PM EST
    Squeaky: i did follow it and read the entire post. I think the excerpt you saw fir to quote adequately represents the piece. If there is something else in cole's post you think provides any insight, post and say why because i don't think it states anything not simplistically obvious.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#63)
    by Patriot Daily on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 02:00:05 PM EST
    imho, the US needs to remain objective and fair in order to be credible peace broker. My memory is that before israel was a state, israel "freedom fighter" blew up the King George hotel filled with British civilians. Now, when palestinians do the same they are called terrorists rather than freedom fighters. And, why does Israel have the right to bomb in retaliation when palestinians capture israeli soldiers but palestinans don't have the right to retaliate for the hundreds imprisoned in israeli jails after capture. seems there needs to be some balance and fairness and uniformity in laws of war or no peace can be achieved.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#64)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 02:07:13 PM EST
    July 2000 The Camp David Summit between Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak and Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat collapses after Arafat turns down a peace offer made by Barak without giving a counter-offer. Barak was prepared to offer the entire Gaza Strip, a Palestinian capitol in East Jerusalem, over 95% of the West Bank and financial reparations for Palestinian refugees for peace. This was,of course, rejected without any counteroffer unless you consider this a counteroffer They don't want peace they want Israel to go away!

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#65)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 02:18:17 PM EST
    Having been raised a jew, I grew up thinking -indeed assured, that Israel held moral authority in their ongoing battles in the middle east. I don't think so any more. This is all a struggle about occupation. As a real estate attorney, my opinion is that the Palestinians have superior title at least to the occupied teritories. Israel derives its title by the power of a gun, not by the power of the law and principles of justice and equity. Take off those rose colored glasses and see that there is a two thousand pound Israeli guerilla (sic) with its foot on the throat of the Palestinians. Then you'll know why they act with such desperation sometimes.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#66)
    by Edger on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 02:19:28 PM EST
    3 minutes ago:
    UNITED NATIONS - The United States cast the first U.N. Security Council veto in nearly two years Thursday, blocking an Arab-backed resolution that would have demanded Israel halt its military offensive in the Gaza Strip The draft, sponsored by Qatar, accused Israel of a "disproportionate use of force" that endangered Palestinian civilians, and it demanded Israel withdraw its troops from Gaza.


    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#67)
    by roger on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 02:19:39 PM EST
    The US has tried to broker peace. Camp David, and actual intervention. Remember the Beirut embassy bombing? Peace is impossible if only one side (and not all of them either) want it. Baked- You probably havent noticed that there are many anti-Israel posts here that have not been deleted. It is possible to discuss this topice without hatred. As to NM, most people forget that SA offered to release him if he renounced violence. He never did.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#68)
    by John Mann on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 02:29:11 PM EST
    Roger mentioned:
    You probably havent noticed that there are many anti-Israel posts here that have not been deleted. It is possible to discuss this topice without hatred.
    And you probably haven't noticed that being anti-Zionist is not the same as being anti-semitic. Try googling "Jews against Zionism"; it might help you understand the current situation a little better.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#69)
    by roger on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 02:34:43 PM EST
    JM, Sadly, in many people, the two overlap completely

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#70)
    by roger on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 02:38:56 PM EST
    ..... and that was kind of my point

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#71)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 02:45:24 PM EST
    What would make the Palestinians happy short of the anihilation of Israel?

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#72)
    by soccerdad on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 03:00:37 PM EST
    What would make the Palestinians happy short of the anihilation of Israel?
    probably you could start with a homeland, jobs, access to food water, medical services, not being constantly oppressed and having their children killed. Plenty of Israeli politicians have called for the elimination of the Palestinian people. There are extremist on both sides. The collective punishment and oppression of an entire people for a few will not lead to peace. Lets not forget that the US and Israel refused to identify the new government after the elections. The obvious hypocrisy involved is bad enough, but that leaves a power vacuum and a further sense of hopelessness. Israel's invasion of Lebanon in 1982 helped the formation of Hezbollah. Much like the US actions in Iraq are feuling more extremists, Israel's over reaction will again do the same now as it did in 1982. Unfortunetly, now extremists on both sides are firmly in charge and there seems to no hope for a good outcome. The spiral has been set in motion. The circle of violence is escalating with absoluttely no one willing to but an end to it in a way in which both sides can survive. The world will reap what has been sown in the ME. I have yet to read about an case in history in which one side oppressed the other and it ended well. It would have been one thing to go after Hams and at the same time help Palestinians who were not violent but to lump them all together and do collective punishment will not work in the long run.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#73)
    by John Mann on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 03:07:56 PM EST
    Sadly, in many people, the two overlap completely
    That may be, but it's also totally irrelevant. Many people believe that if you're anti-Zionist, you're also anti-semitic. On the other hand, many Jews are anti-Zionist. Does that make them anti-semitic? And that was kind of my point. Roger, how do you answer the question I posed?

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#74)
    by Edger on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 03:11:27 PM EST
    John Mann - It's the same thinking that makes you anti-america if you are critical of bushco.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#75)
    by roger on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 03:24:33 PM EST
    JM, I am pro Israel, but anti Likud. Kind of like I'm pro American, but I despise Bush. That being said, Camp David was a good deal for everyone. Israel should probably offer the same deal again, and the Palestinians should jump at the opportunity.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#76)
    by Lww on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 03:29:27 PM EST
    Nice post sd. Growing up in NY you had to be aware of the Israeli influence on the coverage of this conflict. The Palestinians would kill 4 Israelis, the media blared the headline. Next day the Israeli AF bombed and strafed refugee camps killing 2 or 3 hundred, it was on the 20th page..... "Collective punishment" has been going on for decades, why the big fuss now?

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#77)
    by John Mann on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 03:32:27 PM EST
    A few Zionist thoughts:
    "We should prepare to go over to the offensive. Our aim is to smash Lebanon, Trans-Jordan, and Syria. The weak point is Lebanon, for the Moslem regime is artificial and easy for us to undermine. We shall establish a Christian state there, and then we will smash the Arab Legion, eliminate Trans-Jordan; Syria will fall to us.. We then bomb and move on and take Port Said, Alexandria and Sinai." David Ben-Gurion, May 1948, to the General Staff. From Ben-Gurion, A Biography, by Michael Ben-Zohar, Delacorte, New York 1978.
    "There was no such thing as Palestinians, they never existed." Golda Maier Israeli Prime Minister June 15, 1969
    "We have to kill all the Palestinians unless they are resigned to live here as slaves." Chairman Heilbrun of the Committee for the Re-election of General Shlomo Lahat, the mayor of Tel Aviv, October 1983.
    "We declare openly that the Arabs have no right to settle on even one centimeter of Eretz Israel... Force is all they do or ever will understand. We shall use the ultimate force until the Palestinians come crawling to us on all fours." Rafael Eitan, Chief of Staff of the Israeli Defense Forces - Gad Becker, Yediot Ahronot 13 April 1983, New York Times 14 April 1983.
    "We must use terror, assassination, intimidation, land confiscation, and the cutting of all social services to rid the Galilee of its Arab population." Israel Koenig, "The Koenig Memorandum"
    "One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail." -- Rabbi Yaacov Perrin, Feb. 27, 1994 [Source: N.Y. Times, Feb. 28, 1994p. 1]


    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#78)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 03:37:41 PM EST
    "Posted by roxtar July 13, 2006 12:58 PM There's no war like a religious war." It is a religious war between factions who worship the same god-damn god, for gods sake. and I agree that Isreal would be another backwater without the massive aid they receive from the US, both formally and through "religious" organizations. Without such aid, I suggest there would be little conflict.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#79)
    by roger on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 03:37:45 PM EST
    The Likudnik strain has always existed in Israel, just as some ultraorthodox believe that Israel should not exist until the messiah arrives. One could string quotes together from prominent americans to paint the whole country as KKK. That would be about as true as the above post.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#80)
    by John Mann on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 03:43:38 PM EST
    One could string quotes together from prominent americans to paint the whole country as KKK. That would be about as true as the above post.
    Nice try.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#81)
    by roger on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 03:44:37 PM EST
    John Mann, I guess that we know where you stand

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#82)
    by roger on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 03:47:25 PM EST
    I am also guessing that if I linked together quotes from prominent Palestinians, you would have a fit.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#83)
    by John Mann on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 03:53:26 PM EST
    John Mann, I guess that we know where you stand
    I think anyone who's been participating in this blog for the past 3/4 years, Roger, knows exactly where I stand.
    I am also guessing that if I linked together quotes from prominent Palestinians, you would have a fit.
    Post them and find out.


    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#84)
    by roger on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 03:54:09 PM EST
    You could start here or you could try this

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#85)
    by Lww on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 03:54:37 PM EST
    Roger, the Palestinians aren't angels. We know that. Shouldn't we, as the leading light of capitalism and western "values"(lmao) be on the side of people who have undeniably been living in the most inhumane conditions for 40+ years? Instead of advocating for them we've been financing their mysery.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#86)
    by roger on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 03:55:40 PM EST
    Yet you ask me the question and I've been posting here long before you. Afraid to answer your own question?

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#87)
    by roger on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 03:57:46 PM EST
    LWW, I think that Jimmy Carter had the right idea. US policy now is too one sided. We need to take into account the situation, needs, and politics of both sides. Both sides have their extremists, as well as valid claims

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#88)
    by Lww on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 04:05:56 PM EST
    Roger that is weak. That kind of talk is what we've been hearing for 40 yrs. Do you have a weekend house in the Gaza Strip? Do you think Carter was a one-termer because of his tepid support for Israel? Or Bush Sr? It had something to do with it, you can't convince me it didn't.

    Re: Israel Bombs Beirut Airport (none / 0) (#89)
    by Lww on Thu Jul 13, 2006 at 04:49:55 PM EST
    Can anyone discuss this without fear of being labeled a hater? It's the big chill. The inhumanity of Israeli and US policy has been biting both of us in the ass for years. Remember when Peres was poised to win the PM spot in the early 80's? Didn't happen. Who did we get? Some terrorist and killer(Shamir or Begin)who acted like it was 1947. If we gave some real money to the Palestinians instead of just paying their bills...who knows? And I know Arafat has a fat bank account.