home

The GOP Bright Spot: Lieberman

As I predicted, the lone GOP bright spot this election was Lieberman's win in Connecticut. It strikes me as funny as (1) Lieberman is voting for Reid for Senate Majority Leader and (2) Rumsfeld got canned the day after. But the GOP needs its bright spots - and it is either the Dems are conservatives (I think they may have figured out that was not too bright. Have not read that much today) or Joementum. They choose both sometimes:

Jonah, . . . [T]here has been precious little said about who won on the left. In as much as you can say it was a failure of politics instead of policy for the Republicans, doesn't the failure of Lamont to take out Lieberman also point to a failure of policy over politics for the Kos crowd? They purged their ranks in the primary only to have their head handed to them in the actual election. I know this was expected, but I think seeing it actually occur bodes well overall for the general direction of the political discourse in the US. the Democrats won in places where they looked and sounded like conservatives, and where the Kos crown had influence, they were trounced.

Of course, Webb, Tester, most of the Dem candidates, including the two NH House winners, etc., were also Kos candidates. The funny thing is the GOP worked harder and cared more about Lieberman than their own GOP candidates. And they still do. And they wonder why they lost.

< Moving Forward After the Election | Germany and the Rumsfeld War Crimes Lawsuit >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Nice spin, but... (none / 0) (#1)
    by Ernesto Del Mundo on Fri Nov 10, 2006 at 02:30:30 PM EST
    They should note that Ford lost, doing the best impression of a Republican that he could. And there wasn't much love from the netroots for Harold's pandering to the "Creationism in Schools" crowd.

    If they want to face facts they should also note that both Webb and Tester won not because they acted like Republicans, but because they were consistent and comfortable with themselves and the voters sensed that and trusted them. No, they were not flaming leftists, but they NEVER WERE...an important distinction to make.

    Well of course (none / 0) (#2)
    by Che's Lounge on Fri Nov 10, 2006 at 03:29:59 PM EST
    the Republicans are glad he won. They elected him.

    you know what? (none / 0) (#3)
    by cpinva on Fri Nov 10, 2006 at 04:24:26 PM EST
    lieberman has become irrelevant. sure, it's nice he wants to caucus with the dems, but who really cares what he wants? if he expects to accomplish anything, in his time in office, he'll jump however high, and for however long he's told.

    the only reason he won was because of name recognition; people knew who he was, they never heard of lamont before. once they see how truly useless and unrepresentative of the state he is, he'll be bounced out on his ass the next election.

    really? (none / 0) (#4)
    by Gabriel Malor on Fri Nov 10, 2006 at 04:37:27 PM EST
    You don't think that it'll be the other way around? Especially given the fact that he can give the GOP back the leadership any time the Democrats try to frustrate his program?

    Parent
    What program? (5.00 / 1) (#6)
    by Ernesto Del Mundo on Fri Nov 10, 2006 at 05:59:38 PM EST
    He's no more important than any other Dem senator...or Republican for that matter. And if he still wants to push the Neocon course in Iraq or Iran he's pretty much outta luck since that plan took a huge hit in all quarters on November 7-8th.

    The Bolton nomination will be the first test to see if Joe learned anything from his primary experience.

    Parent

    Even better (none / 0) (#7)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Fri Nov 10, 2006 at 06:23:18 PM EST
    He actually has no actual proposals for anything.

    Parent
    Will they get their money's worth? (none / 0) (#5)
    by RocksRock on Fri Nov 10, 2006 at 05:55:14 PM EST
    I doubt that the Republican party would go to so much trouble to help Lieberman if they didn't want something in return. He's the difference between a Democratic and a Republican majority in the Senate and I find it hard to believe that Republicans would give their  majority without a fight. I think they'll either try to get him to switch sides, or offer him a job in the administration so he can be replaced by a Republican appointee.

    let me repeat this................. (none / 0) (#8)
    by cpinva on Sat Nov 11, 2006 at 05:55:59 AM EST
    for those of you still sipping the republican kookaid: lieberman is irrelevant, period.

    the house controls the budget, not the senate.  that's where the real power lies, in the purse strings. all the old farts that voted for lieberman will be dead in 6 years, as will his political career. he's a "never was", looking to be a "has been". this was his last gasp, and i suspect he knows it.

    last time i checked, the white house doesn't get to decide who replaces anyone in congress, the state does. guess what? CT is democrat, and that's who'd replace sen. lieberman.

    he'll jump, or be disappeared.