Supreme Court Limits Automatic Deportation for Drug Crimes
Via Scotus Blog, the Supreme Court ruled for a drug defendant today, blocking his deportation. The case is Lopez v. Gonzales, opinion (html) here.
Shorter version: If the crime of conviction is a felony under state law but only a misdemeanor under federal law, it's not an aggravated drug felony and therefore doesn't trigger automatic removal.
The decision came in the case of Jose Antonio Lopez, a native of Mexico. He entereed the U.S. illegally in 1985 or 1986, but became a lawful permanent resident in 1990. In 1997, he was charged in state court in South Dakota with one count of possessing cocaine and one count of a conspiracy to distribute the drug. He ultimately pleaded guilty to aiding and abetting possession by another person.
Under state law, his crime was a felony, leading to a potential prison sentence of up to five years. He was sentenced to the maximum, but actually served only 15 months. Federal officials moved to deport him to Mexico, based upon the conviction for what they considered to be an "aggravated felony." Under federal law, however, the crime could only be punished as a misdemeanor.
Put another way, removal is still possible for drug crimes that are misdeanors under federal law, but not mandatory. This is important because with automatic removal, one cannot request asylum or cancellation of removal.
< Tom Edsall: Not a Wanker Today, In Fact Pretty Darn Good | Passenger Flatulence Ends in Emergency Landing > |