home

NJ School Randomly Screens For Alcohol Consumption

A public school that wants to search a student's urine for evidence of alcohol consumption should seek a warrant based on probable cause. The shortcut taken by Pequannock Township (NJ) High School is offensive: random urinalysis using a dubious screening test.

Urine screenings look for ethyl glucuronide, produced by the body after it metabolizes alcohol. School officials acknowledge the test is sensitive, and false positive readings can be the result of using products containing ethanol, including mouthwash and Balsamic vinegar.

The test claims to detect alcohol consumption up to 80 hours before the urine is collected. Accuracy issues notwithstanding, whether students consume alcohol when they aren't at school, perhaps with a parent's permission, should be addressed by parents, not schools.

"Medical care and treatment are issues between parents and children," said Deborah Jacobs, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of New Jersey.

< Much (Unnecessary) Ado to Execute a Warrant | Rape Victim Jailed >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Jeez.... (none / 0) (#1)
    by kdog on Tue Jan 30, 2007 at 03:48:45 PM EST
    Way to make high school kids feel like parolees New Jersey!

    So...if a New Jersey high school kid goes to Mass on Sunday, gives a urine sample on Monday...he gets suspended Tuesday?

     

    Don't many (none / 0) (#2)
    by Che's Lounge on Tue Jan 30, 2007 at 03:59:13 PM EST
    European families serve wine and the children are allowed?

    Outrageous (none / 0) (#3)
    by Jlvngstn on Tue Jan 30, 2007 at 04:11:15 PM EST
    I guess we should start getting them used to a lack of privacy, after all our mail can be read and our calls listened to.

    China and the old Soviet Union loved to do stuff like this.  It is almost as if our politicians are starting to see the many benefits of control.

    I have an idea.  Let's test every politician weekly for illegal drugs, prescription drugs and any politician that has a drinking problem should be tested as well, daily.  

    I love that idea J..... (none / 0) (#4)
    by kdog on Tue Jan 30, 2007 at 04:51:04 PM EST
    but some animals are more equal than others.  Our so-called leaders would never stand for such an invasion of privacy...but it's fine for the kids.

    Parent
    this test (none / 0) (#5)
    by diogenes on Tue Jan 30, 2007 at 05:09:35 PM EST
    New York's program for impaired physicians uses this test but has had to climb down due to the false positives, basically saying that it would have to confirm the positive with clinical evidence (e.g. work problems) before declaring a person in relapse.  
    Every kid in that school should use alcohol wipes every day to make the false positive rate so high that the program collapses under its own weight.

    I agree.... (none / 0) (#9)
    by kdog on Tue Jan 30, 2007 at 05:25:00 PM EST
    a first time for everything, eh diogenes?

    Parent
    G*d*mn (none / 0) (#6)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Tue Jan 30, 2007 at 05:13:27 PM EST
    fascist rethug...

    Oops, this is NJ.

    PS: (none / 0) (#7)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Tue Jan 30, 2007 at 05:16:10 PM EST
    Always wanted to write a post like that - and it feels good!

    Parent
    Supposed "liberals".... (none / 0) (#8)
    by kdog on Tue Jan 30, 2007 at 05:24:01 PM EST
    can get quite tyrannical when it comes to drugs, foods, smoking, gambling, social engineering....for our "own good" of course...lol

    Parent
    Purpose of the Program (none / 0) (#10)
    by Gabriel Malor on Tue Jan 30, 2007 at 07:28:30 PM EST
    I want to know how the idea got started in the first place. From the article, it seems like the folks running the school district were sitting around looking for things to do.

    Which leads me to wonder: "So the test scores in New Jersey are so good that they're giving teaching a rest and giving counselling instead?"

    Legal rights? (none / 0) (#11)
    by kipling on Wed Jan 31, 2007 at 01:50:46 AM EST
    I'm curious: don't the students have any legal rights to refuse this urine test? What right does the school have to just decide to do this? Didn't any of the students who were approached about this tell the school authorities to go take a flying ** at a rolling donut, and if not, why the hell not? I thought yours was the "land of the free"? OK, that was a rhetorical question, but I really would like to know by what authority the school conducted this test, and surely the students have the right to refuse? Can legal minds enlighten me here?

    i'm a tad confused (none / 0) (#12)
    by cpinva on Wed Jan 31, 2007 at 09:58:13 AM EST
    by this man's "logic".

    "This is a major issue for America," School Superintendent Larrie Reynolds said Tuesday. "There are more kids that die each year in alcohol-related traffic deaths than there are soldiers who have died in Iraq. The numbers are staggering."

    if i drink on friday night, and get in an accident going home, how is being tested on monday morning, and getting suspended from school, going to help me?

    not to mention, what does what i do on my own time have to do with school, unless it results in my being arrested? are they going to test for tobacco use (also prohibited in schools) as well?

    i notice the cost is being funded by a $120K grant from the federal gov't. i suspect, absent this grant, they wouldn't be doing this with their own cash.