Every one of them were horrible in pushing the 'Gore is a liar' theme before the 2000 election and are at least complicit in the last 7 years of Bush.

Or ripping Judy Dean, calling her a "hippie" (yeah, she really did) for not wearing make-up and fashionable jeans.

The substance of the article was an array of instances where she has tried to have it two ways, and where she has been calculated and done things that are morally wrong for political benefit.

Come on girlfriend, at least find an issue to attack Hillary on.

If some man called Hillary "girlfriend," we would never hear then of how insulting that is towards women. There is some truth to it, its like calling a man "boy," it is a bit degrading.   But you know all fair when defending the supreme leader.

To my knowledge, HRC has never used her gender to shrink from a challenge from other candidates or media critics. Nor has she "called attention" to her gender so much as not paraded in public wearing a burka so her evident Lady Parts don't cause personal and political critics like Tucker Carlson to cross his legs -- tee hee! -- or Tweety Matthews to feel angrily deprived because there's no Fred Thompson pants folds to snoot for man smells nor Bushian locker room jock ass to worshipfully snap a towel at.

Frankly, until she does a million dollar photo op parading her girls down an aircraft carrier in an underwired balconette as shamelessly as war-ho GW Bush displayed his nuts for media horndogs in a push-up junk bra -- the vaunted Codpiece of Justice!! -- punditstan doesn't get use their own mental limitations as a complaint against her.

Jeez, they're rolling around like a grade school geography class snorting and squealing at slides of Lake Titicaca.

Recall that the "logic" behind Swift Boating is that if a candidate "calls attention" to a personal attribute or accomplishment, it's open season from the flying monkey squadrons to fling any amount of slime at that area, including sheer invention under their rubric of "politics".

Calling attention does not mean invitation to degrade, slime and invent as the sad episode of the degradation (by the Rovian smearbots) of actual war vets like Kerry and Cleland have shown, this alleged fair game is a one way street. Factual revelations of George AWOL Bush's ACTUAL disgraceful military record were off limits or the tantrum went into overdrive and people were literally persecuted out of employment by sheer thuggery.

The witch hunters (and dirt-digging fabulists like MoDo, who hope to ressurect their gossipy glory days of being able to attack the Clintons without account, are calling their own inability to get past their adolescent obsession with HRC's Lady Parts as "her" problem.

This is much the same "logic" they used to vapidly attribute inventions about John Edwards' hair as "his" problem, or their moronic invented shortcoming of Obama's questionable blackness as "his" problem. (It's the same thing they did to exaggerate the Dean scream, or paint him as crazy for saying there were no WMDs, no Saddam - 911 connection, and that his capture wouldn't end the insurgency nor make us safer.)

The Rethuggernaut's media wing and flying monkey squadrons are shallow. They're stupid. They're witless. They're @ssholes.

They are in the thrall of a smear machine that gives the lowest, meanest and most bereft of integrity the illusion of being above the common people they hold in utter contempt. It's the signature of this collapsing era. Bush, Rove and the other Dirty Tricksters cut their viper teeth in 1972 by formulating the kind of slimy discourse that is commonplace today and was the only way for the Republicult to compete.

That includes Black Baby Push Polling (against McCain), releasing anti Bush crap and claiming that an opponent did it (Bush/Rove), dropping edited tape of what an opponent "said" -- but didn't actually -- at a radio station on election eve (as Bush did as an operative), attributing anti-troop statements to Kerry that he didn't say but quoted in sworn testimony before a Senate committee, etc.

That includes twits like MoDo being able to invent crap out of whole cloth that would be megaphoned if vicious enough with guarantees that she'd be protected by shrieking flying monkeys if challenged under conventional standards of factual integrity.

oh, wait, you're serious? geez. ok, i'll bite, this is a trick question, right?

ms. dowd is brain dead, has been since at least 1991, about the same time the entire MSM lost its collective minds, and went on a tear against the clintons, then gore, and now clinton again. substance doesn't matter for this crowd, nor does truth; all democrats are fakes, all republicans are stout hearted men.