home

A Conspiracy of Neglect

These are the stories that haunt me.  This one is from the Boston Globe:

Hull parents arrested in girl's poisoning death

The parents of a 4-year-old girl from Hull were arrested yesterday on murder charges after investigators concluded they poisoned their daughter, prosecutors said.

Michael Riley , 34, and his wife, Carolyn, 32, were taken into custody at his mother's house in Weymouth in the death of their daughter Rebecca in December, said officials in the Plymouth district attorney's office.

Just after 6:30 a.m. on Dec. 13, Hull police responded to a call for an unresponsive girl at the family's home on Lynn Avenue, prosecutors said. They found Rebecca dead on her parents' bedroom floor.

An investigation by State Police and Hull police found the girl had been prescribed the drugs clonidine for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and valproic acid and Seroquel for bipolar disorder. A psychiatrist had diagnosed her with both disorders at age 2 1/2, prosecutors said.

The medical examiner's office determined the girl died from "intoxication due to the combined effects" of the drugs clonidine, valproic acid (Depakote), dextromethorphan, and chlorpheniramine, the district attorney's office said in a statement.

"This occurred as a result of the intentional overdose of Rebecca with clonidine," the statement said. "The manner of death was determined to be homicide...."

Denise Monteiro , a spokeswoman for the state Department of Social Services, said the department "found evidence for neglect" of Rebecca.

On Dec. 13, the agency removed the couple's other children, a 6-year-old girl and an 11-year-old boy, from the home, Monteiro said. They remain in foster homes.

In 2005, DSS began investigating allegations that Michael Riley sexually abused a 13-year-old girl,...identified...as Carolyn Riley's daughter from another relationship. The girl had been adopted to another home in 2002.

Also in 2005, DSS launched an investigation into whether Carolyn Riley had neglected her children, Monteiro said.

"We supported the allegations of abuse, and we forwarded that report to the Norfolk district attorney's office," she said. "We also supported the allegations of neglect against the mother."  [full text]

Such tragedies are unspeakable.  Yet speak of them we must, for they are cautionary tales.  In the case of Rebecca Riley, there is no doubt plenty of blame to go around.  Whether or not the parents in fact "poisoned" their daughter (and that is for the justice system to decide), it seems evident from the information presently available that there was much amiss in the child's home environment.  If Rebecca's short life was like that of all too many children here in Massachusetts and throughout the country, she experienced some measure of abuse and neglect from her caregivers, who may additionally have been violent with one another (or other partners) and struggled with substance abuse and/or mental illness.  Thus, instead of being raised in a consistently stable and nurturing environment, Rebecca probably occupied a painful and confusing maelstrom.  It is little wonder that she manifested emotional and behavioral difficulties.

Unfortunately, the mistreatment that seemingly marked her home life was to be coupled with mistreatment of a different sort--by the psychiatric profession.  Despite the environmental and intrafamilial stressors that no doubt caused Rebecca to act out in any number of ways, the psychiatrist who "treated" her somehow saw fit to diagnose this child who was presumably barely out of diapers with a major mental illness, bipolar disorder.  Having established such pathology (at least within the narrow, biologically-biased confines of his or her mind), the doctor then chose to subject Rebecca to a powerful and, in retrospect, dangerous cocktail of psychotropic medications--some or all of which was prescribed off-label.  It is difficult to imagine a more negligent and incompetent level of care.  A suspension, if not an indictment, should be forthcoming.

But what of the psychiatric establishment at large, which increasingly overlooks or minimizes the role of environment in the development of dysfunction and dis-ease in favor of purely biological factors that can ostensibly be treated with medication?  What of the pharmaceutical companies, and their sales representatives, which encourage such points of view and increasingly promote the off-label use of their products, such as the medication that Rebecca was on?  What of the health insurance companies, which generally prefer the cost efficiency of pharmacotherapy versus psychotherapy and support such treatment?  What of Congress and the Food and Drug Administration, which have permitted lobbyists for the pharmaceutical and insurance industry to have undue influence over public policy and to help create a system of care that values the profits of a few to the health of the many?  What of the Bush Administration, which pays lip service to the needs of children and families but fails to adequately fund more essential programs and services (instead spending hundreds of billions of dollars on the war in Iraq)?  What of all these others who, in one way or another, were complicit in the death of Rebecca Riley?  Why don't they have to answer for this tragedy?

< What Did Cpl Langarica Die For? | "Like something green that comes up..." >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Hallucination (4.00 / 1) (#1)
    by Edger on Wed Feb 07, 2007 at 02:42:18 PM EST
    Why don't they have to answer for this tragedy?
    Sickening avoidance of responsibility, just plain ignorance, or unwillingness to get involved (same as avoidance)?

    It would seem that the psychiatrist who "treated" Rebecca was at least as much culpable as the parents, but there is something more here. That psychiatrist lives and practices in a society driven by instant gratification (give the little girl some pills and avoid the effort of digging into the real causes of her behavior problems) that is created and encouraged by an economy that values people less than comforts and cash and convenience (and avoidance of inconvenience) and acquisition of things.

    He could easily have picked up the telephone or dashed off a note to the state DSS after first seeing Rebecca, but did not. In that sense he may be and probably is culpable, but it is the value system that has developed over so many years and our seeming disconnection and illusions of separateness that is the real culprit here, I think. As Alan Watts described:

    It is said that humanity has evolved one-sidedly, growing in technical power without any comparable growth in moral integrity, or, as some would prefer to say, without comparable progress in education and rational thinking. Yet the problem is more basic. The root of the matter is the way in which we feel and conceive ourselves as human beings, our sensation of being alive, of individual existence and identity. We suffer from a hallucination, from a false and distorted sensation of our own existence as living organisms- Most of us have the sensation that "I myself" is a separate center of feeling and action, living inside and bounded by the physical body--a center which "confronts an "external" world of people and things...
    In that hallucination there is nothing more important than "I" and "I"'s needs, or rather wants that we convince ourselves are needs. Everything else is simply an obstacle, something in the way, to be ignored and dismissed as unimportant. We can't feel the pain and confusion and misery of the little girl, so she is not only not important, she is utterly irrelevant.

    Our justice systems demand that someone be held accountable - only because our consensual reality denies the obvious. And her death is as much a symptom as it is a result.

    WE are ALL responsible for Rebecca's misery and death.

    I thought I'd heard and seen it all.... (none / 0) (#2)
    by kdog on Wed Feb 07, 2007 at 03:15:32 PM EST
    then I read this.  Diagnosing toddlers (Toddlers!)with mental disorders and doping them up....it's beyond shocking, it's insanity.  It troubles me when 8, 9, 10 year olds are doped up to mask behavior problems....now toddlers?  

    I hope a certain psychiatrist loses their license, at the very least.

    And as the saying goes, you need a license to drive a car (or practice psyhchiatry), but any moron can be a parent.

    Any moron can be a parent (none / 0) (#3)
    by Edger on Wed Feb 07, 2007 at 03:19:15 PM EST
    Lot's are. Too many. And the other way round, too.

    Parent
    It seems.... (none / 0) (#4)
    by kdog on Wed Feb 07, 2007 at 05:29:28 PM EST
    diagnosing children with these controversial mental "disorders" is even more controversial when done under age 6.

    Yes (none / 0) (#5)
    by Edger on Wed Feb 07, 2007 at 05:40:48 PM EST
    And even after age 6 I wouldn't be surprised to find in most cases it's done for the convenience of the parents, not for the kids. To shut normal kids up and make them docile, because just dealing with normal kids is just too much work.

    Invent a disease and put them in mental straitjackets.

    Parent

    Early Intervention (none / 0) (#8)
    by Peaches on Thu Feb 08, 2007 at 10:46:14 AM EST
    Its become institutionalized in the public school system, medical system and our society. Teachers are constantly on the look out in our schools for the kids who need Intervention and the earlier the better - is what the professionals are all told and trained to do.

    Professional, competent and very rational people truly believe they have the child's best interests at heart and they have the support of the system behind them. When Parents are told by professionals that their child has been diagnosed with some acronym describing an "abnormal" condition, they are put in very uncomfortable position of deciding with professionals how this condition should be treated and what drugs or treatment plan would be best. Doing nothing is not an option in the minds of the professionals. The worse possible scenario woulld be to leave the child alone to develop into an adult that is not normal.

    Jeesus, Kdog & Edger, wtf, Aren't we the perfect example of what abnormal is. I feel pretty flippin' blessed to have grown up in a generation where boys who couldn't sit still for hours at a time were given the paddle, instead of cocktails of experimental drugs. I'd prefer an education system that didn't require boys and girls to sit in sterile environments for long periods of time, but still, a little slap on the butt was better than what they are doing to kids today.

    Parent

    examples of abnormality? (none / 0) (#9)
    by Edger on Thu Feb 08, 2007 at 11:07:05 AM EST
    Jeeze - I hope so! For as long as I can remember I never wanted to be 'normal' or 'average', I just never placed any value on it. I always thought that it was the 'abnormal' people who were, by virtue of their 'abnormality', the pathbreakers, the people who discover new things and new knowledge and new methods. Why would anyone want to iron out all the differences and creativity in children? What the hell kind of boring repetitive pointless samesness of a brave new world would you end up with if successful?

    a little slap on the butt was better than what they are doing to kids today ? Definitely!

    What is the alternative?

    "In order to form an immaculate member of a flock of sheep one must, above all, be a sheep."

    --Albert Einstein



    Parent
    Abnormality..... (none / 0) (#10)
    by kdog on Thu Feb 08, 2007 at 12:58:44 PM EST
    If I only had a nickel for everytime somebody told me I was weird.

    Lucky for us they didn't dope you up for being weird in our day.  

    Actually, people did start doping kids up for that in my day.  I have a good friend who was on ADD drugs during childhood and he swears they f*cked him up.  He definitely is scatter-brained today as an adult, though I guess it is impossible to prove that the dope is the reason, definitively.

    Parent

    UPDATE (none / 0) (#6)
    by David at Kmareka on Wed Feb 07, 2007 at 09:35:05 PM EST
    More details of the tragic death of Rebecca Riley have emerged, as reported in this Boston Globe story.  The Globe is also reporting that the child's psychiatrist has "agreed today to immediately stop seeing patients while the state investigates her role in the case."

    This case makes me sick.

    That's one dope pusher.... (none / 0) (#7)
    by kdog on Thu Feb 08, 2007 at 09:48:00 AM EST
    I wouldn't mind seeing locked up.

    Even Pablo Escobar wouldn't sell dope to a toddler.

    Parent

    Overdosing toddlers? (none / 0) (#11)
    by drchelo on Sat Feb 10, 2007 at 01:22:31 PM EST
     My God - those are powerful drugs to use in adults!  I cannot imagine any reasonable pediatrician - psychiatrist or not - dosing a toddler with those medicines.  I don't even think that Seroquel is formulated in toddler-size dosages.  Clonidine is for treating hypertension (and in some cases, for treating narcotic dependency) and valproic acid is for seizures..
      I think the psychiatrist should be charged as well as the parents.

    I agree... (none / 0) (#12)
    by David at Kmareka on Sat Feb 10, 2007 at 05:33:06 PM EST
    It is, indeed, unimaginable that any physician would prescribe such a cocktail of medications to a child that young.  But such off-label [mis]treatment is happening with increasing frequency, and the pharmaceutical companies are no doubt pleased as punch.  As regards the specific medications that Rebecca Riley was fed, the Boston Globe had a follow-up article discussing such further:

    Drug doses called threat

    Parent