home

Punishing Paris


(larger and original version here, via TMZ.com.)

Many believe that Paris Hilton deserves the same lousy treatment that a pauper might receive after being sentenced to 45 days in a Los Angeles jail, if only to teach her (and other privileged youth) that society's laws apply to the privileged and poor alike. Others would like to see indigent inmates treated as well as Paris. The salient question is whether Paris has been singled out for particularly harsh treatment because of her celebrity status.

At a news conference on Friday, Sheriff Baca said: “The special treatment appears to be her celebrity status. She got more time in jail.” Under the normal terms of the early release program, he said, Ms. Hilton would not have served “any time in our jail.”

Jonna Spilbor explains how the court could have put Paris' celebrity status to good use.

[T]he judge might have given Paris an equivalent sentence that recognized the reality of her celebrity status - incorporating a few days in jail, but also perhaps an anti-DUI public service announcement, or serious community service contribution. Such efforts might have far longer-lasting effects on both Paris and the rest of the world, than any amount of time she spends languishing in jail. ... Paris, unlike the average defendant is likely to have lived a life of privilege that means she might benefit from learning about the lives of the less fortunate, and doing some good - whether it means donating computers, working with kids, or volunteering for the Red Cross.

Spilbor projects Paris' release date to be between June 22 and June 25.

< This Week's Best Crime Headline Isn't About Paris | Sopranos Final Episode: Fans Have a Right to be Angry >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    When I got a DUI ... (5.00 / 1) (#3)
    by Sailor on Mon Jun 11, 2007 at 11:38:39 PM EST
    ... in LA the judge told me if I got caught driving while suspended I would serve 6 months. It was a 1st (and only) offence. The other terms were 1 year suspended license, 2 days in jail, AA meetings and alcohol classes for 6 weeks, and a fine of $1,500+.

    I volunteered (thru my PD) to have a MADD show hosted at the Troubadour with 4 LA/national bands. The judge declined our offer.

    OTOH:perish hilton

    Sept. 7, 2006: Officers arrest Paris Hilton in Hollywood for investigation of driving under the influence after she was spotted "driving erratically."

    Jan. 15, 2007: Hilton is pulled over by California Highway Patrol and informed that her license is suspended. She signs a document acknowledging she is not to drive.

    Jan. 22, 2007: Hilton pleads no contest to a reduced charge of alcohol-related reckless driving. She is placed on three years' probation, ordered to enroll in alcohol education and pay $1,500 in fines.

    Feb. 27, 2007: Hilton is ticketed for misdemeanor driving with a suspended license. A copy of the document signed Jan. 15 is found in her glove compartment.

    The system didn't go after perish, they gave her every break possible. She f**ked up time and again.

    And unlike almost all of us, SHE has a limo and a driver on call 24/7.


    In (none / 0) (#8)
    by Jen M on Tue Jun 12, 2007 at 06:35:16 AM EST
    23 hour lockup and solitary?

    Parent
    Right on Sailor (none / 0) (#10)
    by Slado on Tue Jun 12, 2007 at 10:06:52 AM EST
    And yes lockup is what she's getting so she isn't put into the population and harmed.

    No way Paris could take care of herself and she'd obviously be a target.

    She had multiple chances to avoid this and she blew them all because she can't think for herself.

    She'll survive and maybe this will teach her and her fellow 20 something bubble heads a lesson.

    Parent

    ah (none / 0) (#27)
    by Jen M on Tue Jun 12, 2007 at 06:45:10 PM EST
    your position is that good intent means no harm
    no matter how traumatic the harm may be?

    Like floridians handcuffing five year olds and saying it wasnt intended to be punitive. (and therefore, supposedly, harmless)

    Parent

    When I got a DUI (none / 0) (#29)
    by 1980Ford on Tue Jun 12, 2007 at 10:44:33 PM EST
    The sentence was a big fine, community service, 6 month suspension, 90 day driving school, and my car in jail for 30 days.

    When I got busted for driving while license still suspended, $250 fine. That's it. I was attending driving school though, so that helped.

    Parent

    Forgot (none / 0) (#30)
    by 1980Ford on Tue Jun 12, 2007 at 10:49:00 PM EST
    The $250 fine was not it. My car did another 30 days in jail, too. $500 to bail it out after 30 days.

    Parent
    This May Be The First Time Is Paris' Life (5.00 / 1) (#6)
    by MO Blue on Tue Jun 12, 2007 at 02:25:17 AM EST
    that she had to face the consequences of her actions. This experience while definitely not pleasant, might actually be beneficial to her if she can learn that actions do have consequences. Might make her think twice before she drives around drunk and could save her life or someone else's in the future.

    again, show me empirical data (4.00 / 1) (#4)
    by cpinva on Tue Jun 12, 2007 at 01:17:15 AM EST
    to support the assertion that ms. hilton was treated more harshly, solely because of her celebrity status, than anyone else similarly situated.

    i keep reading this claim being made, by jeralyn and other attorneys commenting here, and now the LA sheriff has chimed in. i've yet to see any hard data to support it.

    again, i have no dog in this fight, other than the truth. if you can't support an assertion of fact with confirmable evidence, then don't make it. so far as i can tell, it's a strongly held opinion, not a statement of fact.

    i do hope ms. hilton hasn't been harmed, as a consequence of the tug of war between the sheriff, DA and judge. that would be unfair, since she in no way contributed to it.

    even more so (4.00 / 1) (#7)
    by skippybkroo on Tue Jun 12, 2007 at 02:32:27 AM EST
    paris didn't even bother to sign up for her mandatory alcohol counseling, and showed up to her original probation hearing late (as well as late to this most recent hearing).

    her blatant disdain, as well as disregard, for the entire justice process is what is being punished here, and i challenge anyone who thinks she is being treated too harshly to find and produce a case where a non-celebrity defendant violated probattion twice, refused to register for alcohol education, showed up late for her hearing, and wasn't sentenced to jail.

    With special status comes special responsibility (none / 0) (#1)
    by Aaron on Mon Jun 11, 2007 at 10:49:28 PM EST
    I think the idea for a DUI public service announcement is excellent.  Perhaps a walking tour of the jail conducted by Paris, from the initial holding area, to the body cavity search room, to the cell where she was housed.

    It may be a sad commentary on the state of our society, but millions of little blonde girls genuinely look up to and want to emulate Paris, and I'm sure they would pay attention to her in such a TV spot. It would likely help discourage many of these girls from drinking and driving.

    But I don't think Paris should be relieved of her jail time in order to do this, I think she should do it in addition to the jail time.  It lends credibility to her experience, and says to all those little girls that no matter how famous you get, you will never be above the law.  That is the message we need to send, that no one is so special that they get pass from the rules of society.

    Far too many celebrities have gotten nailed for drunk driving, and this is a part of the celebrity mindset, that I am so special I don't need to follow the rules that other people must.  That's not good for anyone, not for them, not for their fans, or for society in general. People who attain such celebrities status and all the perks that go along with it, need to realize that they also have a greater responsibility to the society which imparts such status upon them.


    who cares (none / 0) (#5)
    by Domino on Tue Jun 12, 2007 at 02:22:26 AM EST
    Paris Hilton is a spoiled rich kid, who will get her inheritance tax free if Republicans get their wish.  

    She is a drunk driver who had her license revoked.  She continued to drive.  

    Whether this person goes to jail or not does not concern me.  But, do not use her as a vanguard of prison or sentencing reform.  

    I care...you should too.... (5.00 / 1) (#9)
    by kdog on Tue Jun 12, 2007 at 09:39:35 AM EST
    We should all care about who gets caged in our name, and why.  

    I believe we lose a little bit of our collective soul when we cage human beings without it being absolutely necessary.

    While there is a lower class, I am in it; while there is a criminal element, I am of it; and while there is a soul in prison, I am not free.

    - Eugene Victor Debs
     

    Parent
    Take her money (none / 0) (#12)
    by Dadler on Tue Jun 12, 2007 at 12:32:23 PM EST
    A person of her wealth should be fined multiple millions for this type of violation, along with serving time in a live-in community service program.  Punishment should require sacrifice and discomfort.  

    Parent
    Dadler (5.00 / 1) (#14)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Tue Jun 12, 2007 at 12:50:34 PM EST
    Which do you think would "punish" her more, a big fine or 23 days in prison? I think prison.

    Anyway, in some of her recent statements she's claimed to come to the realization that, essentially, so far, her life has been a complete waste, and that going forward she plans to use her money and influence to do good works.

    Let's hope she follows through.

    Parent

    Maybe (5.00 / 1) (#16)
    by squeaky on Tue Jun 12, 2007 at 01:31:38 PM EST
    This will change her life. She is different than most of us in that she has enough power (celebrity status) and money to do some really good things in the world.

    Hopefully this will be a wake up call for her. It would be great to have her on board for causes like prison reform, AIDS eradication, childhood poverty and malnutrition, etc.

    Fingers crossed, hope she is capeable of change.

    Parent

    Hey, squeaky and I agree on something! (5.00 / 1) (#17)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Tue Jun 12, 2007 at 01:43:36 PM EST
    btw, she's mentioned breast cancer, MS and disadvantaged kids as her interests...

    Parent
    Um (none / 0) (#18)
    by squeaky on Tue Jun 12, 2007 at 01:52:12 PM EST
    I hate to rub it in but it is not the first time, and I am sure it won't be the last.

    As Bill Clinton put it, in his recent speech to grads at Harvard, we  all have 99.9%  in common (genome project) and most of the time it is better to focus on that rather than the .1% difference.

    (His part starts at 1:36:40 and runs until 2:05:25)

    Parent

    All good. (none / 0) (#20)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Tue Jun 12, 2007 at 02:07:35 PM EST
    Lets not get carried (none / 0) (#24)
    by Slado on Tue Jun 12, 2007 at 03:26:20 PM EST
    away with the love fest you two.  At this rate you'll be sponsoring legislation together.

    She's been in her cell for all of 2 days.   I'm sorry but you can't find spiratual balance, re-organize your life and become a different person in two days.

    At this rate she'll be a Muslim, Budhist and Mormon and then convert to Scientology in the days she has left.

    I will celebrate her transfomation at years end when she starts doing somethign with all her advantages.   Till then we'll see.

    Parent

    I disagree (none / 0) (#25)
    by squeaky on Tue Jun 12, 2007 at 03:38:12 PM EST
    I'm sorry but you can't find spiratual balance, re-organize your life and become a different person in two days.

    An event that lasts a few seconds can transform someones life forever. Yes, the rest is work, but work done with a very different state of mind and perspective.

    Parent

    Hope springs eternal, my friend. (none / 0) (#26)
    by sarcastic unnamed one on Tue Jun 12, 2007 at 04:55:49 PM EST
    Hope springs eternal.

    Parent
    And unfortunately for Paris... (none / 0) (#13)
    by Dadler on Tue Jun 12, 2007 at 12:45:12 PM EST
    ...what constitutes sacrifice and discomfort for her is far, far different than it is for the average person living in the real world.  When you choose to live an isolated, segregated, ignorant, immature, selfish, greedy existence, there will be unpleasant consequences.  The first one will be that you will be unable to deal with those consequences.  


    Parent
    Driving while rich? (none / 0) (#21)
    by JSN on Tue Jun 12, 2007 at 02:23:05 PM EST
    Would that be state sanctioned highway robbery?
    Never underestimate the power of greed.

    Parent
    What gall (none / 0) (#15)
    by Domino on Tue Jun 12, 2007 at 01:29:06 PM EST
    To compare Paris Hilton to Eugene V. Debs sickens me.

    Parent
    What sickens me..... (1.00 / 1) (#23)
    by kdog on Tue Jun 12, 2007 at 03:16:10 PM EST
    is the cheers from the crowd as we lock up another person in a cage for a non-violent, victimless crime.

    Listen to Debs Domino, feel his words...as long as there is a soul in prison, we are not free.  He did not say only poor souls, or only innocent souls...just souls.

    Parent

    I don't think he was comparing her to Debs (none / 0) (#19)
    by nolo on Tue Jun 12, 2007 at 01:53:30 PM EST
    i do care kdog (none / 0) (#11)
    by cpinva on Tue Jun 12, 2007 at 11:44:15 AM EST
    hence, my continued search for actual hard data, rather than mere opinion. i don't believe ms. hilton should be punished for being a celebrity, any more than i believe she should be treated leniently for the same. i believe she should be treated equitably; like anyone else similarly situated.

    as noted above, and elsewhere, i have yet to be presented with actual valid statistical data to show that she's being treated more or less harshly than anyone else who's committed the same acts.

    absolutely, i agree, we should care about who's getting caged in our names, and why. however, before anyone takes umbrage, either way, they should have facts to support their position.

    they are glaringly absent, in this particular case.

    Maybe this will help (none / 0) (#28)
    by 1980Ford on Tue Jun 12, 2007 at 10:26:45 PM EST
    i fail to see what (none / 0) (#31)
    by cpinva on Wed Jun 13, 2007 at 12:58:35 AM EST
    relationship that article has to the issue at hand, which is whether or not ms. hilton is being treated differently, because of her wealth/celebrity, than others in the exact same situation.

    Parent
    She (none / 0) (#22)
    by jondee on Tue Jun 12, 2007 at 02:57:04 PM EST
    sounds like the Miss Universe contestants who all seem to "want to work with children."

    Btw, I thought the Right/Libertarian meme was that selfishness benefits all of us? If only we had eyes to see.

    as long as there is a soul in prison, we are . . . (none / 0) (#32)
    by Domino on Wed Jun 13, 2007 at 03:50:24 AM EST
    not free

    Debs.

    As long as there is a soul in prison, let that soul be Paris Hilton.  

    I feel for the nameless, railroaded for a long sentence.  I care not a whit for Paris Hilton, or the Kennedy kid, a Heisman trophy winner, Baretta, the inventor of the wall of sound, etc. who have bought their way out of hard time that is impossible for the poor soul who steals for food or to feed an treatable drug habit.

    Paris and her class are just a way to not talk about Katrina, the war, corruption in the Bush administration and so on and so forth, etc, wow!

    You miss my point.... (none / 0) (#33)
    by kdog on Wed Jun 13, 2007 at 06:03:40 AM EST
    The case of Paris Hilton is another example of our society going "lock 'em up crazy", just as much of a problem as hurricane response, government corruption, poverty and so on and so forth.  Can't you see that?  It's not about Paris Hilton, it's about prison nation, it's about authoritarianism, it's about dehumanization.  It's about how and when we use the drastic measure of caging a human being.

    We shouldn't level the playing field of the justice system by locking up more rich people, we should level it by freeing more poor people.  At least thats my preference.

    Parent