home

Three Wrongful Conviction Bills Introduced in California

Three important wrongful convictions bills has passed the state Senate and now been cleared by the Assembly Public Safety Committee in California:

One bill, aimed at reducing the number of false confessions, would mandate electronic recording of interrogations of suspects in homicides and violent felonies who are in police custody. Another would require corroborating evidence for the testimony of jailhouse informants, who have been shown to lie sometimes to receive reduced sentences or other benefits. A third bill calls on the California attorney general, in consultation with other key stakeholders in the criminal justice system, to develop new guidelines for lineups presented to eyewitnesses to see if they can identify suspects.

All three are desperately needed. Releasing the innocent imprisoned makes it easier to find the guilty perpetrator. So, will Gov. Schwarzenegger come up with some new excuse to veto the bills if they pass, or will he finally see the light of day and sign them into law?

Similar measures passed both houses last year, but were vetoed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. Since then, the legislation has been modified to address the governor's concerns, said Gerald Uelmen, a Santa Clara University law professor who is executive director of the justice reform commission.

< Poll: Young Americans Are Leaning Left | Wednesday Open Thread >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    What were the Governor's concerns? (none / 0) (#1)
    by HK on Wed Jun 27, 2007 at 08:06:38 AM EST
    That true justice may prevail?  Or maybe that those already imprisoned may cite this bill as reason why their conviction is unsafe?  Sometimes it seems to me that politicians (or other elected officials) are afraid of judicial reform because it is like admitting that there is something wrong with the system right now.  And yet the justice system should always be a work in progress, something that is constantly reviewed due to - among other reasons - scientific advances in the collation and interpretation of evidence and an evolving society and understanding of crime within it.