home

"Reality-Based" Broder

Funniest headline of the day considering the columnist - Candidates Lacking A Real World Clue. David Broder claims the mantle of "reality based." And he writes this:

The dynamic on both sides is trending toward extreme positions that would open the door to an independent or third-party challenge in 2008 aimed at the millions of voters in the center.

Heh. As for Broder's discussion of issues like Iraq, etc., well, we know how silly he is on that. But the headline was good for a chuckle.

< Fairness and Commutations | Rough Days Ahead for Scooter Libby >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Broder's centrism fetish (5.00 / 2) (#6)
    by daveb99 on Thu Jun 07, 2007 at 03:26:31 PM EST
    After I read David Broder's column this morning, I posted this comment on the WaPo Comments section. If I may quote myself, here it is:

    "I have been reading David Broder's columns for many years. He has always been consistent in his approval of "centrism" as the best approach to good governance.

    "What is centrism? According to Broder, it appears that centrism is a mathematical splitting of the difference between the two parties. This requires an assumption that both parties are equally extreme. One must also assume that the American people are mathematically right there in the middle between the two parties. To Broder, centrist politicians are those who really try to govern from the middle.

    "That sounds sensible. Unfortunately, while centrism might have made sense in the 50s and 60s when politicians on both sides of the aisle tried to work together and the mood of the American people truly encompassed the left-wing of the Republican Party and the right-wing of the Democratic Party, centrism began to erode with the rise of the conservative movement in the 70s. It completely disappeared in the post-1994 era of Newt Gingrich and his ilk.

    "If you mathematically split the difference between the two parties today, the American people are nowhere to be found. Clearly, the American people lean heavily toward the Democratic Party. We now have a right-wing party (Republican) and a centrist party (Democratic). If Broder disputes this, he should check the polls in his own Washington Post.

    "On issue after issue, the majority of the American people disagree with conservative values, once these values are fully explained without the obfuscation of Republican talking points. Go down the list: Social Security, public education, fairness in the workplace, environmental protection, consumer protection, etc. You do not need a Ph.D to see that the Democrats have more support on the issues.

    "Of course, the biggest issue of all is the Iraq War. With the exception of Ron Paul, each Republican candidate for president affirms that an unprovoked invasion of Iraq was the right thing to do. That position is far from centrist.

    "Between 2001 to the beginning of this year, conservatives were unchecked altogether. In a way, this has been a good thing. The American people have seen the full flower of conservative government. Now the reviews are in. The American people really do not like what they see.

    "It is time Broder discarded his antiquated theory of centrism, which, it seems to me, is Dick Morris triangulation by another name. He wishes for a return of the good old days. But time moves on. Broder should get with the changing times or find a new line of work."

    David Broder represents a unique form of lazy thinking. His definition of centrism is almost like a mathematical algorithm. He finds the middle point between the liberal vs. conservative poles, which he characterizes as equally extreme. How else would he conclude that John McCain and Joe Lieberman are "Moderates"?

    Thanks for the example, talex. (none / 0) (#2)
    by Edger on Thu Jun 07, 2007 at 10:09:17 AM EST
    It was good for a chuckle.

    Ha ha. Anybody ever mention (none / 0) (#3)
    by Edger on Thu Jun 07, 2007 at 10:37:15 AM EST
    you have a good sense of humor, Big Tent?

    Funny, (none / 0) (#4)
    by HeadScratcher on Thu Jun 07, 2007 at 11:19:13 AM EST
    Maybe. But then again, he's right! They do lack a real world view.

    BTD, how hard is it for you to get through the day knowing you are so much smarter than everyone else? The burden must be overwhelming, no?

    Watch It (1.00 / 1) (#5)
    by talex on Thu Jun 07, 2007 at 12:16:33 PM EST
    You could get brought before the tribunal for comments like that. And with no right to representation.

    Parent