here's to hoping there isn't a 36th!

A man can dream, can't he?

by kdog on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 03:17:45 PM EST

...that one can go to the DEA gift shop and get just about everything needed to impersonate an agent--except for the firearms.  And the jackboot mentality.

by MileHi Hawkeye on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 03:33:08 PM EST

75 million in 1973 dollars?

by DFLer on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 03:37:02 PM EST

I actually think of the DEA as really starting with the enactment of marijuana prohibition in 1937, although the fun definitely started for real during the Nixon years. I've been active in anti-drug-war advocacy for well over a decade, but it gets more and more depressing every year. Yes, the medical cannabis movement seems to be making some headway (even if it sometimes seems like one step forward, two back), but the persistently high and appalling incarceration figures (overwhelmingly black and hispanic, of course) and the continuing and enormous social damage that prohibition inflicts just seems to persist no matter which party gets into power. The drug war truly is the REAL third rail of American politics, at least on the federal level (where it seems to matter most). Politicians at least TALK about changing how social security works, for better or worse, or give lip service to a better health care system. When was the last time you heard anyone on the federal level talk about changing national drug policy, even if just to give it lip service?

by cardcarryingmember on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 03:40:08 PM EST

It's time to do away with the DEA.  What does it do that the FBI can't?  And while we're at it, let's take drug investigators out of the IRS. I know that going after wealthy tax cheats isn't as much fun as the wasted effort to collect taxes on unreported income earned by drug dealers, but it would likely return many more dollars to the Treasury.

by TChris on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:00:27 PM EST

to some of the early DEA folks when I was in the Army.

I thought they were cowboys then.

the more things stay the same...

by jeffinalabama on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:00:24 PM EST

What are they doing, quality control?  Talk about a boondoggle.

by ruffian on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 04:10:02 PM EST

Marujuana compared to alcohol is a much safer drug. The number of deaths due to auto accidents from drunk drivers is huge but very accidents are due to pot use.
The DEA should focus on heroin and cocaine coming into this country if they should do anything at all. Shutting down the DEA is worth considering.
The costs of prosecuting drug users is enormous. First you have the law enforcement costs, then you have the legal costs and finally you have the costs of maintaining the prisons, not to mention the hidden costs of the lost potential productivity of prisoners, many of which could and should be productive members of society.

by Tim V on Thu Jul 03, 2008 at 08:19:10 PM EST

I know I'm preaching to the choir,but how is a bogus drug agent a more pertinent story for "60 Minutes", that the self-perpetuating and bloated bureaucracy that is the DEA($31 billion and counting), and the misuse of public moneys by the drug tsar, for the purpose of influencing voters in a referendum on cannabis?

by akadannyboy on Sun Nov 02, 2008 at 10:00:18 PM EST