home

If

BarbinMD likes this from Eugene Robinson:

The problem for the addlebrained Obama-rejectionists is that the president, as far as they are concerned, couldn't possibly do anything right, and thus is unworthy of any conceivable recognition. If Obama ended world hunger, they'd accuse him of promoting obesity. If he solved global warming, they'd complain it was getting chilly. If he got Mahmoud Abbas and Binyamin Netanyahu to join him around the campfire in a chorus of "Kumbaya," the rejectionists would claim that his singing was out of tune.

(Emphasis supplied.) Perhaps they would. But reasonable people question THE NOBEL COMMITTEE (NOT Obama who had nothing to do with this) in its decision to award an IF. This simple proposition seems impossible for some to understand.

Speaking for me only

< Trigger > Federalist Public Option? | Leave President Obama Alone! >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    I don't (5.00 / 1) (#1)
    by Ga6thDem on Tue Oct 13, 2009 at 07:35:22 AM EST
    understand why people have such knee jerk reactions to Obama. Geez, if he had done all those things he would deserve the Nobel Peace prize but he hasn't and in fact had barely been in office when he nominations were closed.

    Frankly, it's too bad that Obama didn't listen to your advice BTD and turn it down. You were right when you said this actually hurts him more than helps him.

    It is puzzling (5.00 / 1) (#32)
    by Socraticsilence on Tue Oct 13, 2009 at 02:26:39 PM EST
    some people are just against him reflexively.

    Parent
    For one thing, (5.00 / 1) (#2)
    by andgarden on Tue Oct 13, 2009 at 07:39:13 AM EST
    the "Idea of Obama is powerful.

    Eugene Robinson (5.00 / 1) (#3)
    by jbindc on Tue Oct 13, 2009 at 07:51:53 AM EST
    is ridiculous.  His whole premise is ridiculous, and BarbinMd is just as ridiculous for agreeing with it. You can reject Obama's policies, or lack thereof, or his lack of taking leadership on issues, or lack of a spine, and still see those statements as silly.

    Or you can think he had a great 9 months (5.00 / 1) (#4)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Tue Oct 13, 2009 at 07:53:33 AM EST
    in working for peace and STILL think awarding an IF is ridiculous.

    My point is different than yours.

    Parent

    That too (none / 0) (#5)
    by jbindc on Tue Oct 13, 2009 at 07:55:40 AM EST
    But that isn't Robinson's or Barb's point.

    Parent
    Their point (5.00 / 1) (#6)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Tue Oct 13, 2009 at 07:57:44 AM EST
    is to support Obama is what I think.

    The funny part is with this type of stuff, they are doing a piss poor job in the self assigned roles.

    Parent

    Robinson loses me with his (5.00 / 3) (#7)
    by Anne on Tue Oct 13, 2009 at 08:14:45 AM EST
    "addlebrained Obama rejectionists" label; it tells me that he's too in love with his own opionions to objectively assess Obama's performance.

    Actually, it isn't so much that Robinson loses me, but that Robinson is so deeply in love with Obama as to be a lost cause.

    This:

    Obama has taken on the rescue of the U.S. financial system and the long-term restructuring of the economy. He has launched historic initiatives to revolutionize health care, energy policy and the way we educate our children. He said flatly during the campaign that he wants to be remembered as a transformational president.

    is another example of just how blind that love is.  He's entitled to be as head-over-heels as he wants to be, of course, but the stuff that he writes is just so absurd as to be laughable.  If Obama had said he wanted to be remembered as a mighty oak tree, Robinson would be telling us that Obama's working on producing acorns, for heaven's sake.

    What kind of amuses me is that Robinson seems to think he's only denigrating those loony, siding-with-the-Taliban conservatives; he seems to have missed that there are many Democrats, liberals, progressives who happen to think that the Nobel Committee made a mistake.

    As for Obama having nothing to do with the award, I would love to know how many degrees of separation there were between Obama and the person who nominated him.  No, I'm sure he did not nominate himself, but knowing who did would perhaps shed more light on whether this might not have been more of a political calculation than a humanitarian one.

    Speaking of "addle-brained," I see Richard Cohen has an op-ed this morning, too; let me take a Zantac before you serve him up for us this morning.

    Obama did not want this (5.00 / 1) (#10)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Tue Oct 13, 2009 at 08:32:03 AM EST
    I assure you.

    Some may think this is good for him, but given what he will do in Afghanistan (I agree with the course he will take), this award will look ridiculous.

    Parent

    BTD, cynical you may be (none / 0) (#12)
    by vml68 on Tue Oct 13, 2009 at 09:03:48 AM EST
    but I think some of us have you beat in that department.

    Obama did not want this

    I do not think he lobbied for the NPP but I believe he is pleased as punch to be accepting it.