The purpose of TARP was to provide capital to the mega-banks to offset the losses of the crap mortgages & derivatives they held as collateral. But, since the money was given with "no strings attached,"  the greed infected mutants of Wall Street knew a sucker when they saw him, and flipped Obama/Bush/Geithner the bird instead.

They took the money, paid themselves billions in bonuses, bought out weaker, less connected banks, and increased their gambling in these suicidal derivative Ponzi bombs.

They didn't lend money to businesses, they didn't work with the people they had damaged with their irresponsible gambling, and they didn't do anything to help America in return for saving their sorry a$$es.

There are thousands of regional banks that could have stepped in to finance legitimate business activity. And, the Government is always there as the lender of last resort and could have done  many, many things to mitigate the damage Wall Street caused.

You disagree with his policies and positions.  You can think he may be incompetent or just wrong.  But do you have evidence that he has personally enriched himself through his office?  Is there some quid-pro-quo you are aware of that we are not?

I notice this is at least the second time you've used that word in reference to him, and I think as a lawyer, you'd be using this term in a precise manner.