home

Tuesday Morning Open Thread

The college football bowl season heats up starting today (I had picks last week, including my 5 star bowl lock - Boise (-17) over Utah, Boise won 26-3 and it was not that close.) Here are my picks excluding the New Years Day bowls (which come on New Years Day):

West Virginia (-3) (3 units) over NC States, East Carolina (+8) over Maryland, Baylor (Pick) over Illinois, Oklahoma St. (-4) (2 units) over Arizona, Army (+10) over SMU, Syracuse (PICK) over Kansas St., North Carolina (-2) over Tennessee, Washington (+14) over Nebraska, Clemson (-6)(2 units) over South Florida, Notre Dame (+3) (4 units) over Miami, Georgia (-7) over Central Florida, and South Carolina (-2) (3 units).

Open Thread.

< Obama Supports Second Chance for Michael Vick | Wikileaks And Journalism >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    A Holiday Gift wrapped in (5.00 / 2) (#19)
    by KeysDan on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 01:49:45 PM EST
    good paper and bad paper.  Tom Friedman, in his Dec 23 NYT op-ed, informed readers that he will be taking a four month book leave.  He will be, apparently, very busy until April of next year learning about his topics (energy and environment) and writing about them.  So much for the good.  As for the bad, we will have to endure his book selling blitz for the remainder of the year, although his appearances do bring excited anticipation for the next cream pie thrower.

    Well, David Gregory (MTP) (none / 0) (#25)
    by brodie on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 02:30:56 PM EST
    is still around.  So is Bob Schieffer (FTN).  Wolf Blitzer (CNN).  Andrea Mitchell (MSNBC).  

    Many others too numerous to mention.

    Parent

    Jon Stewart, Stephen Colbert and... (none / 0) (#28)
    by KeysDan on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 02:57:56 PM EST
    Charlie Rose.   Ubiquity is thy mustachioed name.

    Parent
    Charlie Rose, definitely. (5.00 / 1) (#30)
    by brodie on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 03:12:43 PM EST
    What a perfect waste of a PBS opportunity to do a nightly solid program with a sufficiently skeptical, no-holds barred actual journalist who isn't (presumably) partying on the side with the very people he interviews.

    Don't watch enough of Stewart -- is he still sucking up to some of the Villagers like Friedman, the way Rose does every night?

    Parent

    I think Jon Stewart is great. (none / 0) (#35)
    by KeysDan on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 03:48:25 PM EST
    His video clips to tell a story and catch the politicians in their duplicity is masterful.  But, yes, Jon does bring in some unsavory characters from time to time and does fall into high David Broderism on occassion.  Friedman will be a guest, dollar to a donut--the latter being the more valuable, of course.

    Parent
    It really IS a waste (none / 0) (#36)
    by sj on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 03:58:20 PM EST
    And it's particularly irksome when Rose asks a question and then answers it himself, shutting out the comments of his guest[s].  That's one way to ensure you to get the answer that you want.

    Did that get worse after 9/11 or did I just start noticing it then?

    Parent

    I seem to recall that Rose (none / 0) (#65)
    by christinep on Wed Dec 29, 2010 at 05:02:02 PM EST
    moderated a conservative (Republican) conclave in Aspen several years back? Maybe they like him?

    Parent
    For those (none / 0) (#1)
    by jbindc on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 10:55:52 AM EST
    Who think that our court system is evil and only persecutes innocent people.

    This is Street Outreach Court. Created five years ago by Ann Arbor District Judge Elizabeth Hines, the court is held every other month in this setting because homeless people are intimidated by traditional courthouses with their metal detectors and serious-looking bailiffs. They often will avoid such places because many of them have outstanding warrants and fear an arrest.

    In this court, homeless people with unpaid tickets, fines and warrants out for their arrests are referred by social service agencies, such as Catholic Social Services.

    Working with the agency and the court, the defendants put together an action plan to find housing, to get treatment for any substance-abuse problems they have and to obtain job training and employment.

    Hines created the court after realizing that many destitute people appearing before her often were hampered further by fines, court costs and fees that they never would be able to pay.

    "These fees can be enormous barriers," she said. "Sometimes we're talking thousands of dollars. And it is unlikely they would ever be paid."

    Hines and a group of volunteers -- including defense attorneys, prosecutors and social workers -- monitor the person's progress. If the person shows signs of success, Hines drops all the fees and cancels warrants. The program, which handles nearly 300 cases a year, is not open to people who have committed violent crimes.

    "I want to emphasize this is not a free ride," Hines said. "What we're doing is removing legal barriers so that they can continue to make progress."

    The court saves about 1,500 jail days a year, and frees up dockets for more serious crimes.



    Bout time... (none / 0) (#6)
    by kdog on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 11:12:30 AM EST
    somebody within the criminal justice system started using their brain, thinking outside the box...good stuff jb.

    A shame she has to stress it isn't a "free ride"...as if helping the homeless re-enter society is something to apologize for.

    Parent

    Over 25% of the kids... (none / 0) (#2)
    by kdog on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 10:56:00 AM EST
    are taking prescription drugs regularly.

    Could a quarter of our youth really be this ill?  Scary.  Gotta be some over-medicating going on...

    Oops... (none / 0) (#3)
    by kdog on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 10:56:32 AM EST
    I have a child with (none / 0) (#14)
    by me only on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 01:35:29 PM EST
    asthma.  I have a choice prescriptions or a plastic bubble.  We choose the meds.  Best choice for the child.

    Parent
    Of course... (none / 0) (#32)
    by kdog on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 03:22:07 PM EST
    medication is necessary for some illnesses/diseases, and the best/only course of action...as I'm sure it is for your boy.

    I just find the percentage staggering...and if we're not over-medicating, why so many sick kids?

    Parent

    So many reasons (none / 0) (#33)
    by jbindc on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 03:32:24 PM EST
    Environmental - crap in the air and water.  Broken ozone layer.  Poor eating habits with more processed food and less natural food.  Lack of exercise. Years of underdiagnoses of some diseases and afflictions (ADD comes to mind - kids were always called "bad" and "difficult" when they probably had some kind of actual issue).  More video stimulation and electrodes pounding into kids more hours of the day(tv, computers, phones, video games).

    Just off the top of my head.

    Parent

    I think you may well (5.00 / 1) (#41)
    by Zorba on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 04:39:54 PM EST
    be correct, jb.  Many of the kids with high blood pressure, for instance, are obese.  Asthma- I do wonder about environmental factors.  As for ADHD- yes, many of these were the "difficult" kids in "the old days."  I am a retired Special Education teacher, and what I can tell you from my own experience is that many of these children can be managed with appropriate classroom and behavioral accommodations and, for at least some of them, dietary changes (although I will say that there are certainly ADHD children who do, indeed, need medication, in order to function, and for them, the ADHD drugs are a blessing).  I would also change the classroom environment.  It is not optimal for children to sit in their seats for long periods of time.  They need frequent breaks, they need to be able to get up and move.  Classrooms, especially now when so many schools are so focused on "teaching to the test," are not geared for the way children are built.  (And, may I say, especially little boys.)    

    Parent
    The environment in the US (none / 0) (#49)
    by me only on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 07:31:37 PM EST
    is much cleaner today than it was 50 years ago.

    My uncle has asthma.  My grandfather had asthma.  My great-grandfather had asthma.

    Parent

    Are these general numbers? (none / 0) (#57)
    by EL seattle on Wed Dec 29, 2010 at 01:36:56 AM EST
    The WSJ story says its information is "according to Medco Health Solutions Inc., the biggest U.S. pharmacy-benefit manager with around 65 million members. Nearly 7% are on two or more such drugs, based on the company's database figures for 2009".

    The chart gives large numbers that are associated with the "total number of prescriptions or refills dispensed to children or teens in 2009", but unless these are all 12-month prescriptions, I think that the percentage numbers in the charts might be misleading.

    For instance, if a kid got a 90 day prescription for a medication and it was refilled 3 times that year, the WSJ chart on suggest that 4 kids were being given the treatment.  At least that's how I'm reading the information.  Of course, I could be reading it wrong.

    This is not to say that there isn't a problem with over-prescription in the USA.  But if a doctor prescribes different meds in Jan., Feb., and Mar., before they find the most effective treatment in April, I don't think that that should count as prescriptions for 4 different kids.  

    Parent

    Sorry Capt Howdy (none / 0) (#4)
    by jbindc on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 10:57:22 AM EST
    Wow (none / 0) (#56)
    by Militarytracy on Wed Dec 29, 2010 at 12:56:00 AM EST
    They are very popular I noticed when PT is Ultimate Frisbee around here but I still don't see them on people when they are running.  A lot of us are runners too and as we are aging we are being attacked by plantar fasciitis.  I couldn't understand what the heck to do about it, and not just that but more and more friends are having it crop up and some of them very serious.  They actually recently put one friends foot in a cast after he went on a week long hike that he does every year.

    So I was talking to that really crazy guy last month who makes Joshua's braces and who isn't so crazy when it comes to feet, and he has to deal with it too.  He told me that the single most important thing I must do is to wear shoes that respect a high arch and even put some inserts in my shoes that build it up.  I've always had a high arch and apparently that is the problem, I'm getting old...I'm getting old, my feet are giving way to gravity and those tendons aren't stretching anymore as my feet fall down....they are tearing now.  So it looks like old people must have good shoes too now :)

    Parent

    i had a nasty time of it with plantar (none / 0) (#59)
    by caseyOR on Wed Dec 29, 2010 at 02:14:07 AM EST
    fasciitis  a few years ago. It was dreadful. The physical therapist told me to always wear good shoes that fit properly and support my flattening arches. She also told me to get a golf ball, place it on the floor, under my stockinged foot,  right under the arch and roll the golf ball around with my foot. It massages those tendons.

    While I still get occasional cramping-like tightness in my foot, nothing like the agony of plantar fasciitis has returned.

    Parent

    Your post makes me shudder (none / 0) (#60)
    by Militarytracy on Wed Dec 29, 2010 at 06:12:07 AM EST
    It is an evil thing :)

    Parent
    I think you may have just... (none / 0) (#61)
    by sj on Wed Dec 29, 2010 at 10:25:29 AM EST
    ... saved my feet.

    wear shoes that respect a high arch and even put some inserts in my shoes that build it up.  

    I, too, have naturally high arches, and my feet (and some of my shoes) have been giving me a bit of trouble of late.  Imagining arch support, I can almost feel the difference already.

    Parent

    I hate losing to gravity :) (none / 0) (#63)
    by Militarytracy on Wed Dec 29, 2010 at 03:40:55 PM EST
    But little by little I am.

    Parent
    Amen. (5.00 / 1) (#64)
    by sj on Wed Dec 29, 2010 at 04:06:16 PM EST
    I have decided that youth is completely wasted on the young.

    Parent
    This will not help (none / 0) (#5)
    by jbindc on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 11:10:01 AM EST
    when Republicans try to defund part or all of H"C"R -

    An early feature of the new health-care law that allows people who are already sick to get insurance to cover their medical costs isn't attracting as many customers as expected.

    In the meantime, in at least a few states, claims for medical care covered by the "high-risk pools" are proving very costly, and it is an open question whether the $5 billion allotted by Congress to start up the plans will be sufficient.

    Federal health officials contend the new insurance plans, designed solely for people who already are sick, are merely experiencing growing pains. It will take time to spread the word that they exist and to adjust prices and benefits so that the plans are as attractive as possible, the officials say.

    State-level directors of the plans agree, in part. But in interviews, they also said that the insurance premiums are unaffordable for some who need the coverage - and that some would-be customers are skittish about the plans because federal lawsuits and congressional Republicans are trying to overturn the entire law.

    The Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan, the program's official name, is an early test of President Obama's argument that people will embrace the politically divisive health-care overhaul once they see its advantages firsthand. According to some health-policy researchers, the success or failure of the pools also could foreshadow the complexities of making broader changes in health insurance by 2014, when states are to open new marketplaces - or exchanges - for Americans to buy coverage individually or in small groups.



    In related news (5.00 / 1) (#7)
    by jbindc on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 11:33:35 AM EST
    Incoming Tea Party Rep- elect Joe Walsh, who watned to have his Congressional health insurance immediately, has a wife with a pre-existing condition, and is now "forced to hunt for a plan."

    Parent
    Good catch (5.00 / 1) (#11)
    by Zorba on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 01:20:42 PM EST
    Oh, the irony in this situation.

    Parent
    The confessional is open (none / 0) (#8)
    by Dadler on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 11:43:10 AM EST
    The memoir blog is back with THE EARLY DAZE, PART 19. Forgive the sloppy self-indulgence, but the therapy is so much cheaper this way.  Ahem.

    BTW, saw most of I LOVE YOU, PHILLIP MORRIS in LA last week, before the film burned up and melted with about twenty minutes to go. Couldn't tell for a moment if the burn-up was real or part of the movie.  Nope, real, and the first time I'd had it happen in a movie since a matinee of HERBIE THE LOVE BUG and THE WORLD'S GREATEST ATHLETE back when I was about 8 or 9.  Reassuring to me for some reason that there still is film, and not just digital files, to burn up.  I feel the same way about E-readers, just can't stand them, I need pages to turn, paper to smell, a binding to tweak a little. And I hate thinking I must have battery power to read.  But I digress.  The movie, to get back to my original digression, was much funnier than I expected. Gotta check out the rest at some point this week.

    Whaaat? (none / 0) (#9)
    by TeresaInSnow2 on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 12:41:17 PM EST
    Washington by 14?  Nebraska kicked their hiney in September.  I guess it will be interesting, but I have no confidence that they'll win, especially by THAT much.

    Sigh (5.00 / 1) (#34)
    by TeresaInSnow2 on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 03:45:24 PM EST
    You'll have to forgive me for knowing nothing about betting.

    My knowledge of betting consists of:

    1.  The notion that a coin is best for scratching off the scratch ticket.

    If I win,

    2.  I'll take one random mega millions pick with my one-dollar winnings, please.

    As for the rest, I'm clueless, and proudly so.

    Parent

    No Iowa-Missouri pick? (none / 0) (#10)
    by Natal on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 12:44:16 PM EST


    The line currently (4.00 / 1) (#12)
    by Zorba on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 01:27:58 PM EST
    is Mizzou (-2.5) (and one site has it -1).  As a native St. Louisan, state pride insists I say Mizzou (-7).  

    Parent
    Although a Hawk fan (none / 0) (#16)
    by Natal on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 01:41:50 PM EST
    I have to agree with you.  Today RB Robinson on drug charge, two weeks ago WR DJK drug charge.  The Hawks are in freefall and tonight I'm afraid will seal it.

    Parent
    While I feel bad for you, Natal, (5.00 / 1) (#37)
    by Zorba on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 04:18:43 PM EST
    I must remain faithful to Mizzou.  Go, Tigers!  ;-)

    Parent
    Proud moments... (none / 0) (#50)
    by MileHi Hawkeye on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 07:31:41 PM EST
    ...in Mizzou history.

    In 1894, an on-field skirmish enveloped the entire "male audience" at Rollins Field, and according to a first-hand account in Iowa's alumni magazine, resulted in "players being struck with canes and fists." And two years later, Missouri fans shouted "kill the Negro" at tailback Frank "Kinney" Holbrook, the Hawkeyes' first black player.

    One of the reasons a potential border rivalry never developed.  Also see:  the Honey War.

    Go Hawks!

    Parent

    Very sad. (none / 0) (#51)
    by MileHi Hawkeye on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 07:34:21 PM EST
    Adam went to my High School.  Lots of alumni are feeling let down and disappointed in him today.  

    Tonight will be a good test of the Hawk's "next man in" philosophy.  

    Parent

    Too tough to bet on that game (none / 0) (#39)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 04:24:17 PM EST
    Missouri! (none / 0) (#42)
    by Zorba on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 04:41:19 PM EST
    Missouri, Missouri, Missouri!   ;-)

    Parent
    By a touchdown (none / 0) (#43)
    by Zorba on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 04:42:36 PM EST
    You heard it here.

    Parent
    Hawkeyes win. (none / 0) (#58)
    by caseyOR on Wed Dec 29, 2010 at 02:08:01 AM EST
    Iowa holds on to defeat Mizzou 27-24. Too bad, Tigers. I was pulling for you. :(

    Parent
    *sigh* (none / 0) (#62)
    by Zorba on Wed Dec 29, 2010 at 12:22:46 PM EST
    Not happy today.  :-(  There's always next year......

    Parent
    In that case... (none / 0) (#66)
    by MileHi Hawkeye on Wed Dec 29, 2010 at 06:20:59 PM EST
    ...all I can say is--War Eagle!  (Did I get that right MT and Jeff?)

    Parent
    As an Iowan (none / 0) (#48)
    by Raskolnikov on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 06:45:29 PM EST
    and an Iowa Citian at that, I predict a bloodbath.  Most everyone I've talked to feels the same way, certainly a loss.  I'm not looking forward to the next few years of Hawkeye football, this wasn't a good year for a litany of reasons, in-game decision making being the primary one.

    Parent
    Hmmmm. No links to ignore. But, (none / 0) (#13)
    by oculus on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 01:35:26 PM EST
    why no "pick" re Gator Bowl?  Yes, it IS today.

    P.S.  Yesterday, my brother was wearing an orange fleece w/a green crocodile on it.  Or maybe it was an alligator.

    I think it got called off due to weather (none / 0) (#52)
    by ruffian on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 08:44:31 PM EST
    The team could not get there.

    Parent
    Actually (mea culpa), the Gator (none / 0) (#54)
    by oculus on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 10:39:57 PM EST
    Bowl isn't until Jan. 1, 2011.  

    Parent
    I've been very sick the past two days (none / 0) (#55)
    by Militarytracy on Wed Dec 29, 2010 at 12:48:05 AM EST
    and unable to get anything new to read.  So miserable that I needed to find some way to dissolve into something I did finish reading the 'The White Queen' and then also read 'The Red Queen'.  She does do a lot of research though before she writes doesn't she?  I'm committed to the next book now.

    Parent
    More evidence (none / 0) (#17)
    by jbindc on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 01:43:42 PM EST
    That Sarah Palin will not win the Republican nomination.

    Link 1

    Link 2

    Says a lot when the WSJ criticizes a Republican and the voters in your own state don't like you.

    MIdterm dump strategy (5.00 / 1) (#27)
    by waldenpond on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 02:33:49 PM EST
    It was the strategy to dump her after the mid-terms.  She was useful for 2010 to rile up the base.  She'll be a negative in 2012 and repel indies (whatever those are) that all the cool kids will target.

    Looks like the Repubs are sticking to their plan.

    Parent

    Would be smart on their part (none / 0) (#29)
    by jbindc on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 03:01:34 PM EST
    She cannot possibly win.

    They want the WH back.  She isn't the way to do it.

    Parent

    An unwieldy name: (none / 0) (#18)
    by oculus on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 01:45:23 PM EST
    Bridgepoint Education Holiday Bowl.

    Others (none / 0) (#23)
    by jbindc on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 02:06:24 PM EST
    One that is proposed is the Cure Bowl.

    I love the Little Caeser's Pizza Bowl (yay Detroit!), the Krat Fight Hunger Bowl, and the Beef 'O' Brady's Bowl

    Parent

    Kraft Fight Hunger Bowl (none / 0) (#24)
    by jbindc on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 02:06:39 PM EST
    Coming up in 2011 (none / 0) (#26)
    by jbindc on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 02:31:08 PM EST
    Re Btd's list of upcoming (none / 0) (#31)
    by brodie on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 03:18:20 PM EST
    gridiron bowl games -- not one of those matchups gets my juices flowing.  Not a single one.  

    Blah.

    Maybe ND vs Miami -- but only to reflect nostalgically upon the good old days of Convicts vs Catholics, Jimmy Johnson vs Lou Holtz, playing for the championship usually.

    Best game so far -- best team by far to play until the major bowls start -- was the Boisé State game vs Utah.  A shame that Boisé -- clearly a Top 5 team though ranked stupidly only #11 or so -- had its season effectively end with that one narrow loss to a good NV team on the road on a freezing night in Reno when their FG kicker missed a couple of easy ones.

    Caution: don't read your wife's (none / 0) (#38)
    by oculus on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 04:22:46 PM EST
    e-mail if you are in Michigan.  Could be a felony. See LAT.  Looks like the suspect may have used her password to access the e-mail.  

    LAT link: (none / 0) (#40)
    by oculus on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 04:24:40 PM EST
    Whoa... (none / 0) (#44)
    by kdog on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 05:13:37 PM EST
    5 years?  Damn...reading another's email ain't cool, to be sure...but a felony?  Is the NSA aware of this?  

    Parent
    Ha. (none / 0) (#45)
    by oculus on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 05:26:39 PM EST
    NSA (none / 0) (#46)
    by jbindc on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 05:29:31 PM EST
    Is just worried about the competition.

    Parent
    It's weird, too (none / 0) (#47)
    by jbindc on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 05:35:39 PM EST
    Because the county prosecutor, Jessica Cooper, was a judge for 28 years - this seems like something a novice prosecutor would do to make a name for himself or herself.

    Parent
    John Cole gets nominated (none / 0) (#53)
    by waldenpond on Tue Dec 28, 2010 at 09:17:40 PM EST
    From the Dept of Not too Bright.....

    JC makes a comment to mock those making false equivalency awards and the Not Too Brights nominate him for the comment mocking them.  Priceless.

    John asks: [Do you think there is even the slightest chance they understand we're making fun of them?]

    Vote here for Tbogg for joyful use of profanity.