home

Cypress Hill: AZ SB 1070 Is Insane In The Brain, Boycott AZ!

By Big Tent Democrat, Section Other Politics
Posted on Thu May 13, 2010 at 04:29:32 PM EST
Tags: (all tags)
Share This: Digg! StumbleUpon del.icio.us reddit reddit

John Amato:

BIG h/t to Cypress Hill for stepping up to the plate[:]

Rap veterans Cypress Hill have cancelled an upcoming concert in Arizona in protest of a new state immigration law. [. . .] Explaining the move in a statement, the California-based Latin group says, "This decision was made in an effort to show support and solidarity with those, undocumented and otherwise, being directly affected by this unconstitutional law. Cypress Hill recognizes those living in the struggle for their basic civil rights."

Please support Cypress Hill, dog.

< Thursday Afternoon Open Thread | When Dems Believed In The Kagan Standard >

  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


    • Display: Sort:
    Cypress Hill: AZ SB 1070 Is Insane In The Brain, Boycott AZ! | 89 comments (89 topical)

    Readers Must Login or Create an Account to Comment

    Way to go... (5.00 / 1) (#5)
    by kdog on Thu May 13, 2010 at 04:49:50 PM EST
    Sen Dog & B-Real...I would think touring is a big chunk of their income too, they haven't blown up the charts since the early 90's, when they were huge. I didn't go to a junior high party where they weren't crankin' the "Kill A Man"...and in high school the "Black Sunday" album was in heavy rotation....still know every rhyme in "Hits from the Bong" by heart...killer "Son of A Preacher Man" sample.

    Pigs is their best track though...

    Hopefully the music scene gets something together as a whole.

    Chuck D... (5.00 / 3) (#7)
    by kdog on Thu May 13, 2010 at 04:58:40 PM EST
    is on it too, of course...Tear Down That Wall.

    Parent
    Chuck is a freak... (5.00 / 1) (#9)
    by kdog on Thu May 13, 2010 at 05:14:28 PM EST
    "...supportin' non-stop sweat shops,
    so you can retail your as* off without fail.
    If some of you get set back
    blaming immigration exploitation
    with your lack of information
    by yelling wetbacks."

    He's nasty.

    Parent

    Oh, an old rap group. (none / 0) (#6)
    by oculus on Thu May 13, 2010 at 04:58:11 PM EST


    Parent
    one of the originals (5.00 / 1) (#8)
    by CST on Thu May 13, 2010 at 05:01:17 PM EST
    back when rap was rap

    Parent
    seriously (none / 0) (#10)
    by Capt Howdy on Thu May 13, 2010 at 05:24:40 PM EST
    I would expect one or more to be using walkers with tennis balls on the legs.

    Parent
    Are the Tres Delinquentes on the case yet? (none / 0) (#11)
    by Ellie on Thu May 13, 2010 at 06:20:48 PM EST
    I remember this hot summer sizzler blaring at every stoplight. I'd love to see a Tres/Cypress battle!

    (IIRC the trumpet sample is from The Lonely Bull, by the brasstastic Herb Alpert in his Tijuana Brass days, before he founded a huuuuuuge music label.)

    Parent

    Excellent (5.00 / 1) (#12)
    by WS on Thu May 13, 2010 at 06:20:57 PM EST
    The entire nation of Mexico should institute a boycott of Arizona.  I hear they get lots of Mexican tourists but probably not so much anymore.  

    isn't that the point? (none / 0) (#17)
    by diogenes on Thu May 13, 2010 at 09:58:08 PM EST
    Isn't the point of this bill to get Mexican illegal immigrants to boycott Arizona?

    Parent
    umm (5.00 / 1) (#27)
    by CST on Fri May 14, 2010 at 09:49:28 AM EST
    do you really not know the difference between tourist and illegal immigrant?

    Parent
    Heh (none / 0) (#1)
    by jimakaPPJ on Thu May 13, 2010 at 04:41:34 PM EST
    I don't mind admitting that I don't even know who Cypress Hill is....so you can guess how taken back I am over some rock group not making a lot of money off the locals.....

    Rap group (5.00 / 1) (#2)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Thu May 13, 2010 at 04:42:31 PM EST


    Parent
    Well, that does it. (5.00 / 1) (#3)
    by jimakaPPJ on Thu May 13, 2010 at 04:46:02 PM EST
    I am sad. I mean really sad....that a Rap won't perform....

    (Sorry for the snark. The Devil made me do it.)

    ;-)

    Parent

    Heh (5.00 / 4) (#4)
    by Big Tent Democrat on Thu May 13, 2010 at 04:47:57 PM EST
    Well, AZ will be crying, it is their party after all.

    In other words, if you think not having events like these in AZ is GOOD for AZ, then you are well, wrong.

    Parent

    I think that no one really cares if a Rap group (none / 0) (#18)
    by jimakaPPJ on Thu May 13, 2010 at 10:06:58 PM EST
    doesn't perform. On a scale of 1-10 for importance it is a minus 48.

    Parent
    Solipsistic Much? (5.00 / 1) (#19)
    by squeaky on Thu May 13, 2010 at 10:15:34 PM EST


    Parent
    No man I ain't "Solipsisticed" today (none / 0) (#22)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri May 14, 2010 at 08:29:59 AM EST
    lol

    Parent
    no one (none / 0) (#28)
    by CST on Fri May 14, 2010 at 09:52:09 AM EST
    except all those who were going to the concert.  And the people who own the venue.  And the vendors.

    I doubt they were gonna go there just to play for themselves.

    It's not about losing a "rap group" (although I think you underestimate the number of people who listen to it - since they probably aren't your peers).  It's about losing the business.

    Parent

    Correct however ask the (none / 0) (#34)
    by BTAL on Fri May 14, 2010 at 12:13:43 PM EST
    San Diego Convention & Visitors Bureau about the loss of AZ revenue they are losing from Arizonian's doing their own boycott efforts.

    The sword has two edges.

    Parent

    Sure it is (none / 0) (#47)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri May 14, 2010 at 03:36:16 PM EST
    If the rap group had a contract to appear, they should honor the contract.

    If they didn't then their decision is just that, a personal decision.

    If it hurts them, the workers,the venue owner and the fans that is between them, not the millions of others who live in Phoenix and who wouldn't have gone.

    And no, among my many bad habits, listening to rap is not one.

    ;-)

    But to each his own, in most matters, I always say.

    Parent

    I thought (none / 0) (#13)
    by Jen M on Thu May 13, 2010 at 06:28:51 PM EST
    They issued a traveler's advisory or something

    I think that's right (none / 0) (#14)
    by WS on Thu May 13, 2010 at 06:37:00 PM EST
    but Mexico should use stronger language than travel advisory.    

    Parent
    plus (none / 0) (#20)
    by Jen M on Fri May 14, 2010 at 05:08:20 AM EST
    It would be in Spanish...

    Parent
    Not to worry (none / 0) (#21)
    by mmc9431 on Fri May 14, 2010 at 08:25:24 AM EST
    With all the money Arizona saves by implementing this law, it will more than offset any loss in revenue from a boycott. (snark)

    After all it isn't like Arizona relies on tourism for it's revenue.

    Could be (none / 0) (#23)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri May 14, 2010 at 08:38:15 AM EST
    The Phoenix area had 316 kidnappings last year. Almost all of them of illegal immigrants and drug related...

    What do you think that cost in police time, etc.???

    Parent

    Time will tell (none / 0) (#24)
    by mmc9431 on Fri May 14, 2010 at 08:43:49 AM EST


    Parent
    Hang on.... (none / 0) (#25)
    by kdog on Fri May 14, 2010 at 09:32:34 AM EST
    Almost all of the kidnap victims had no papers?  Isn't that the point of the new law, to legally kidnap those without papers?

    Parent
    No (none / 0) (#26)
    by nyjets on Fri May 14, 2010 at 09:36:04 AM EST
    THe point of the law is to locate people who do not have a legal right to live in this country.
    If they are living in this country illegally, they should be deported.

    Parent
    I don't know about you... (none / 0) (#29)
    by kdog on Fri May 14, 2010 at 10:00:03 AM EST
    but my version of "right to live" has no "legal" prefix.

    I forget...does our squad play the Cards in AZ this year?  If so, hope the Sanchise don't leave the hotel without his precious papers.

    Parent

    A person does have a right to live (none / 0) (#30)
    by nyjets on Fri May 14, 2010 at 10:05:21 AM EST
    A person does have a right to live. However, a person does not have a right to live in the United States unless
    1. Their parents are born in this country making them a citizen.
    2. They in fact were born in this country making them a citizen.

    In all other situtations they are not a citizen in this country and have no legal right to live in this country.

    Parent
    I know what the law books say... (none / 0) (#32)
    by kdog on Fri May 14, 2010 at 10:44:59 AM EST
    I just don't put much stock in them...obviously:)

    Parent
    According to federal law, not AZ law (none / 0) (#35)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri May 14, 2010 at 01:32:30 PM EST
    everyone here on a Visa must have proof of that and be prepared to show that to any law enforcement official at any time.

    Parent
    The Sanchise... (none / 0) (#36)
    by kdog on Fri May 14, 2010 at 01:36:42 PM EST
    is California born and bred...I just hope he has a passport...if not the Jets should insist on a nuetral, less tyrannical, site.

    Parent
    Yeah (none / 0) (#38)
    by squeaky on Fri May 14, 2010 at 02:58:07 PM EST
    But people who are either naturalized citizens or are citizens whose families have been here for generations do not need to carry ID, or "papers", your favorite fascist term of late.

    And under the AZ law everyone who looks remotely hispanic, will have to produce "papers" and if they do not have them, they will be carted off to jail, regardless of their citizenship status.

    Parent

    Pure and utter poppycock (none / 0) (#39)
    by BTAL on Fri May 14, 2010 at 03:06:37 PM EST
    And under the AZ law everyone who looks remotely hispanic, will have to produce "papers" and if they do not have them, they will be carted off to jail, regardless of their citizenship status.

    Quote the section of the AZ law that supports that bogus claim.

    I trust you are not like out "esteemed" AG who has not read the 10 page bill?

    Parent

    lol (none / 0) (#40)
    by squeaky on Fri May 14, 2010 at 03:14:38 PM EST
    Oh, I see, they do not need the bill because they can do that anyway....

    Your apologist support of the Bill obviously secures your lifelong spot in that fantasy world called wingnuttia.

    Parent

    Deflect much? (none / 0) (#42)
    by BTAL on Fri May 14, 2010 at 03:26:47 PM EST
    Back up your claim.

    Parent
    Reasonable? lol (none / 0) (#55)
    by squeaky on Fri May 14, 2010 at 04:00:02 PM EST
          Requires officials and agencies to reasonably attempt to determine the immigration status of a person involved in a lawful contact where reasonable suspicion exists regarding the immigration status of the person, except if the determination may hinder or obstruct an investigation.
    ·          Stipulates that if the person is arrested, the person's immigration status must be determined before the person is released and must be verified with the federal government.
    ·          Stipulates that a law enforcement official or agency cannot solely consider race, color or national origin when implementing these provisions, except as permitted by the U.S. or Arizona Constitution.

    Defendant: But Magistrate, I was just standing on the corner and this policeman asked me for my identity papers. There was no reasonable cause, the officer picked me out because I have a handlebar moustache, dark skin and black hair.

    Officer: I did not base my questioning of the defendant on any notion of race, color or national origin, I will swear to that.

    Judge: Well why did you choose to ask the defendant for identity papers?

    Officer: Because he looked just like one of the bad guys in a Antonio Banderas film.

    Judge: Well clearly you have complied with the law, thank you officer.

    Parent

    Pure fantasy (none / 0) (#56)
    by BTAL on Fri May 14, 2010 at 04:11:32 PM EST
    bordering (pun intended) on bipolar.

    Parent
    Riiight (none / 0) (#59)
    by squeaky on Fri May 14, 2010 at 04:16:15 PM EST
    Those AZ police have been known to show restraint... lol

    Just ask Sheriff Arpaio..  

    And it is no fantasy for those who look hispanic.

    Parent

    Where's the link? (none / 0) (#66)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri May 14, 2010 at 06:25:26 PM EST


    Parent
    Link? (none / 0) (#70)
    by squeaky on Fri May 14, 2010 at 08:03:22 PM EST
    This is from the first paragraph of the AZ bill. I would have thought that you had it memorized by now, but then again, you never read primary material. All your propaganda is straight from the wingnut echo chamber.

    Parent
    I had a copy (none / 0) (#71)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat May 15, 2010 at 07:45:40 AM EST
    but I sent it to Holder.

    And that was just my way that if you are going to quote something you should provide a link to the source so we can see if you are taking things out of context, etc.

    Parent

    BTW - None of your quotes can be found (none / 0) (#73)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat May 15, 2010 at 08:21:15 AM EST
    in the bill using a std PDF search.

    AZ 1070 in PDF

    Parent

    Google Is Your Friend (none / 0) (#74)
    by squeaky on Sat May 15, 2010 at 12:30:59 PM EST
    Obviously PDF searches are not interested in helping you, not your friend.

    But maybe for you Google will fall flat, I could see search engines conspiring against you.

    Now were you a bit more honest... lol

    Parent

    The pdf search (none / 0) (#77)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat May 15, 2010 at 07:10:59 PM EST
    is within the document itself.

    I repeat. I find none of your claims within the PDF ver5sion of the state of AZ released bill. (See link)

    Parent

    Whatever You Say (none / 0) (#78)
    by squeaky on Sat May 15, 2010 at 07:19:26 PM EST
    You need to do your homework, not me, as I am satisfied with my search. You on the other hand are disputing, yet refuse to do a google search on the text I provided.

    Fine by me.

    Considering that Los Angeles; San Francisco; Boulder, Colorado and St. Paul, Minnesota. Other groups: the Service Employees International Union, the National Urban League, the National Association of Black Accountants and the American Immigration Lawyers Association are boycotting the state, I believe that the unconstitutional green light for racial profiling, and unconstitutional arrests which are in the bill are problematic to some.

    Evidentially you think that the bill is AOK. Take a trip to Arizona, they could probably use your cash.

    Parent

    So you don't know what is in the (none / 0) (#86)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sun May 16, 2010 at 11:53:24 AM EST
    bill and you posted stuff that is not.

    Hey, that's what you do. No surprise!

    Parent

    Huh? (none / 0) (#87)
    by squeaky on Sun May 16, 2010 at 12:12:03 PM EST
    Read the bill and quoted the profiling bit, in my comment.

    Because you are either physically or mentally handicapped to the extent that you cannot copy a quote and paste it into a google search window, does not have any bearing on what I have read or not read.

    But anyone who would hold your wingnut views, supporting McCarthy for instance, must have some serious mental deficiencies. Your inability to use a search engine, is a not a surprising manifestation of your condition, as I am sure it helps keep your blinders firmly in place.

    Parent

    That doesn't take you to the (none / 0) (#88)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sun May 16, 2010 at 01:48:50 PM EST
    bill....

    Parent
    Huh? (none / 0) (#89)
    by squeaky on Sun May 16, 2010 at 02:07:17 PM EST
    If it were true, and you had some sort of ability to see my computer screen, you would be outright lying.

    But considering that you are imagining my computer screen, I am not surprised by your fantasy statement.

    Parent

    What they take you to is a summary (none / 0) (#91)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sun May 16, 2010 at 06:17:20 PM EST
    and/or comments.

    I gave you a link to the bill. It is in PDF. You can download a free program from Adobe if you can't open it.

    Parent

    Worried About Costs? (none / 0) (#33)
    by squeaky on Fri May 14, 2010 at 11:11:39 AM EST
    F'ing hypocrite... considering your support of building fences, drones OK, border malitia (minuitemen), increased budget for police and military, and every dime spent on eradicating furriners, like the Arizona bill.

    but then again you are consistent when it comes to saving money by starving prisoners, like Sheriff Arpaio has done, saving on trials by shooting looters and suspected undocumented drug dealers, etc...

    Parent

    I grow weary of you smearing me (none / 0) (#37)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri May 14, 2010 at 01:37:57 PM EST
    So let us examine what you said.

    Posted by Squeaky at September 19, 2005 11:19 PM
    Rove never needed proof for his smear machine, why should I.

    BTW - Nice potty mouth and personal attack. That defines you quite well.

    Parent

    lol (none / 0) (#41)
    by squeaky on Fri May 14, 2010 at 03:20:18 PM EST
    When your outrageous wingnut positions are exposed you call forth your mentor Herr Rove.

    At least you have tried to conceal your bigotry toward Muslims by not referring to the group as Moslems, and Obama as Hussain.

    Let's hear some more about your love affair with the man who resurrected Nazi Propaganda: Herr Karl Rove.

    Parent

    No matter who I call for (none / 0) (#43)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri May 14, 2010 at 03:29:56 PM EST
    You wrote what you wrote, which is a plain admission that you don't need facts to smear someone.

    You just do it.

    On a personal or business basis such an admission should be condemned by all reasonable people. \

    Parent

    Your Point of View (none / 0) (#49)
    by squeaky on Fri May 14, 2010 at 03:41:24 PM EST
    Is of course a lie. But what else is new.

    Parent
    Youi wrote what you wrote. (none / 0) (#63)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri May 14, 2010 at 06:21:59 PM EST


    Parent
    True (none / 0) (#69)
    by squeaky on Fri May 14, 2010 at 08:01:21 PM EST
    But your lie is to provide a selective quote from a narrative. It is fine by me, as you need no help, to repeatedly smear yourself with effluvial grease spawned in wingnuttia.

    Parent
    The quote is complete and in context. (none / 0) (#72)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat May 15, 2010 at 07:54:35 AM EST
    Here is the exchange on 9/19 followed by reply one day later.

    Posted by Squeaky at September 19, 2005 11:19 PM
    Rove never needed proof for his smear machine, why should I.
    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Posted by JimakaPPJ at September 20, 2005 06:59 AM
    Squeak writes:
    "Rove never needed proof for his smear machine, why should I"

    Glad to have you admit to what you are doing.

    Then  18 months later you wrote.

    ppj does as ppj does (none / 0) (#30)
    by squeaky on Sat Mar 03, 2007 at 09:58:35 PM EST
    So because Rove is doing wrong, it is okay for you to do wrong?

    I have no problem with alleging that Rove's grandparents were Nazi's. Even if they were not, he uses Goebbels' propaganda techniques as a bible and may as well be a born and bred Nazi.

    You can't deny that.

    Squeaky, if you will quit making things up about me I will quit reminding us all about what you wrote.


    Parent

    Nice Lie (none / 0) (#75)
    by squeaky on Sat May 15, 2010 at 12:33:00 PM EST
    But what else is new.  You could cut and past the bill of rights, and make it look it was from 1941 Germany...

    Parent
    Oh (none / 0) (#76)
    by squeaky on Sat May 15, 2010 at 12:35:31 PM EST
    I have no problem with your ad nauseum quotes. They say much more about you and your mancrush on Herr Rover, than they do anything about me. Knock yourself out.

    Parent
    The quotes are complete. (none / 0) (#79)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat May 15, 2010 at 07:20:29 PM EST
    And as we both know, there is no cut and paste.

    Face it. You have been caught.

    Parent

    Caught threatening (5.00 / 1) (#81)
    by jondee on Sat May 15, 2010 at 07:34:31 PM EST
    the ppj - Miss Rove love bond.

    Parent
    let no hater of social liberals (none / 0) (#82)
    by jondee on Sat May 15, 2010 at 09:01:50 PM EST
    rend asunder what the intelligent designer hath conjoined.

    Parent
    Jondee and Squeaky (none / 0) (#83)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sat May 15, 2010 at 10:31:04 PM EST
    Smear and slur and claim to be proud when exposed.

    You two deserve each other.

    Parent

    So unlike the dignified, (none / 0) (#84)
    by jondee on Sat May 15, 2010 at 11:10:03 PM EST
    evenhanded tone over at Tall Cotton..Where dissent and debate is tolerated at least as well, if not better, than it is in North Korea and Myanmar..

    Parent
    Nice (none / 0) (#85)
    by squeaky on Sun May 16, 2010 at 12:48:34 AM EST
    Love the creative touch. Myanmar, North Korea, are wet dream's for ppj. That is as long as he belongs to the ruling class..  

    Parent
    Any repressive (none / 0) (#90)
    by jondee on Sun May 16, 2010 at 02:33:37 PM EST
    totalitarian regime not on the neocon hit list will do..

    As long they're hyper-nationalistic, non-Muslims, they're probably doing it for the people's own good, anyway.

    Parent

    Caught? (none / 0) (#80)
    by squeaky on Sat May 15, 2010 at 07:31:15 PM EST
    In your mind only... but enjoy your fantasy.

    I have no problem calling Herr Rove a Nazi. I could care less where his mysterious blood line comes from, although I am leaning towards someone in the SS. Certainly that killer instinct and a talent at propaganda did not just spring up from nowhere. I am sure it is generational, in his genes.

    His family ties more than likely go back to Freicorps.

    Parent

    And if Karl told people (none / 0) (#52)
    by jondee on Fri May 14, 2010 at 03:50:10 PM EST
    McCain fathered a mixed race baby out-of-wedlock, Jim's got as perfectly good, super patriotic reason for why Miss Piggy would do a thing like that..

    Parent
    And you write what you write. (none / 0) (#64)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri May 14, 2010 at 06:22:46 PM EST
    And you can prove any of your claims.

    Parent
    that's you CAN NOT prove (none / 0) (#65)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri May 14, 2010 at 06:23:14 PM EST


    Parent
    She did it for (none / 0) (#67)
    by jondee on Fri May 14, 2010 at 06:26:37 PM EST
    the good of the country any way..McCain would've taken us down the road of European socialism..

    Parent
    Guilt by association (none / 0) (#31)
    by mmc9431 on Fri May 14, 2010 at 10:42:14 AM EST
    My main objection to the law is that it is blanket intimidation and harassment of an entire sector of the population. Every Hispanic in Arizona isn't illegal. Yet every Hispanic that lives or visits Arizona is now subject to the whim of any local police officer.

    There's many a time I've left home without any identification. (I don't even shop at my local supermarket because they want me to carry a "preferred customer" card).

    I certainly wouldn't want me, or any member of my family to have to live in an environment of constant fear of intimidation.

    This law is no different than the emperor who had six suspects and executes them all to be sure he got the one.

    Read the law. It does not do that. (none / 0) (#44)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri May 14, 2010 at 03:30:29 PM EST


    Parent
    Im just wondering (5.00 / 1) (#46)
    by jondee on Fri May 14, 2010 at 03:36:05 PM EST
    where this sudden concern for the plight of the average American working man came from..?

    Parent
    A few years ago, (5.00 / 1) (#48)
    by jondee on Fri May 14, 2010 at 03:40:09 PM EST
    the masters of deregulation's every word and deed was infallible..now it's "the Left wants to hurt the American worker.."

    lol

    Parent

    heh (none / 0) (#51)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri May 14, 2010 at 03:47:09 PM EST
    What matters is that you have no problems with an unlimited supply of cheap labor.

    My position remains unchanged.

    Close the border....issue green cards to all that are currently here who can pass a background check on criminal activity or wants/warrants...

    And that will create a situation in which labor prices can rise and working conditions can improve..

    At the same time we can have a national debate on who and how many new immigrants we want.

    Parent

    Rise.. (5.00 / 1) (#57)
    by jondee on Fri May 14, 2010 at 04:11:58 PM EST
    sure. Wal-Mart will be starting people at 8.50 instead of 7.25.

    And all those American workers will be fighting each other to get out there to pick those apples and butternut squash.

    And the skies the limit for how high those wages will rise..

    Why is it that you never thought of any of these so-obvious magic bullet solutions to the plight of American workers during those 8 years the Bush Corp was in power, Jim?  

    Parent

    Your position remains (5.00 / 2) (#58)
    by jondee on Fri May 14, 2010 at 04:14:54 PM EST
    unchanged: there isnt a right wing wedge issue you wont parrot and attempt to convince people you thought of first..(even if you never mentioned it before)

    Parent
    And you can't prove what you say. (none / 0) (#62)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri May 14, 2010 at 06:19:46 PM EST
    Just attack.

    Be my guest. We all know you.

    Parent

    "We" (5.00 / 1) (#68)
    by jondee on Fri May 14, 2010 at 06:29:32 PM EST
    is that the royal we, or the Golom we?

    Parent
    But, bbbuttt (none / 0) (#54)
    by BTAL on Fri May 14, 2010 at 03:55:22 PM EST
    closing the borders would be discriminatory.  ;-)

    Parent
    I like the bit (5.00 / 1) (#60)
    by jondee on Fri May 14, 2010 at 05:08:14 PM EST
    about how we're going to "close the border", increase military spending, increase security measures, go to war with any country that harbors extremists AND "cut taxes" (the only way to stimulate the economy) all at the same time..

    No wonder these people believe so fervently in loaves and fishes..

    Parent

    fyi (none / 0) (#45)
    by CST on Fri May 14, 2010 at 03:34:13 PM EST
    I responded to you in the other thread about out of state IDs.  It is a real problem.

    Parent
    When AZ refuses to accept the out of state (none / 0) (#50)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri May 14, 2010 at 03:42:50 PM EST
    licenses or when they refuse to change their law, it will then be a problem.

    Now all you have is a claim that it will be a problem.

    Which is the same answer I previously gave.

    Parent

    it's written in the law (none / 0) (#53)
    by CST on Fri May 14, 2010 at 03:51:15 PM EST
    the part I put in bold that they will not accept government issued IDs that do not establish legal residency.

    So it's not just a "claim", it's the law as it is written.

    Parent

    No, your claim is that it will cause a (none / 0) (#61)
    by jimakaPPJ on Fri May 14, 2010 at 06:18:04 PM EST
    problem.

    It will not cause a problem unless they enforce it or don't change the law.

    BTW - Got a link?

    Parent

    Cypress Hill: AZ SB 1070 Is Insane In The Brain, Boycott AZ! | 89 comments (89 topical)

    Readers Must Login or Create an Account to Comment