home

Sunday Afternoon Open Thread

What's on your mind? Here's an open thread, all topics welcome.

< Time to Target NY Rep. Peter King | Schwarzenegger Grants Commutation on Final Day in Office >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Petition by historians to revise filibuster (none / 0) (#1)
    by hilts on Sun Jan 02, 2011 at 03:41:26 PM EST
    Dear colleague,

    The sorry spectacle of one bill after another being defeated in the Senate despite having a majority of senators voting for it impels us to circulate this petition.  We are asking our senators to change the rules that have empowered a minority of 41 senators and undermined the democratic principle of majority vote. An email message returned to appleby@history.ucla.edu will affirm your support, and your name, with affiliation, will be added to the petition which we intend to present to a group of senators when the new congress convenes in January.  Please forward this message to those you think would support it; we need all the heft we can get!

    We, the undersigned, American historians, political scientists, and legal scholars, call upon our senators to restore majority rule to the United States Senate by revising the rules that now require the concurrence of 60 members before legislation can be brought to the floor for debate and restoring majority vote for the passage of bills.

    h/t http://hnn.us/roundup/entries/134741.html

    First it was the Repubs (none / 0) (#4)
    by jimakaPPJ on Sun Jan 02, 2011 at 04:42:24 PM EST
    now it is the Demos..

    It all depends on whose ox is being gored.

    Parent

    When the ox is most of the U.S. citizenry... (5.00 / 2) (#5)
    by Dadler on Sun Jan 02, 2011 at 04:59:53 PM EST
    ...I'd suggest we might need to do more than bust out a smooth cliche.  The U.S. is a corporate oligarchy, we're ALL getting gored. Except those wealthy enough to float above it. And even they aren't going to be safe much longer. Money is worthless.  The optimistic thoughts and beliefs of the people at large, which had been the only thing holding up that value for decades, are on life support, if not dead already in large part. Thirty years of regressive taxation and enabled corporate thievery will do that, especially when it goes unpunished and unchecked.

    Parent
    Dadler (none / 0) (#32)
    by jimakaPPJ on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 02:23:58 PM EST
    You were dead set against what the Repubs wanted to do so don't think you can make this argument without me noting that fact.

    Parent
    Speaking for myself (none / 0) (#33)
    by sj on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 02:31:38 PM EST
    You were dead set against what the Repubs wanted to do...

    That describes me, as well, but what Dadler says is still true.  Sidebar:  yes I know that the R's used it better than the D's did, but that doesn't matter.

    I don't know how the rules are being changed, but I sure as heck hope that if some one wants to filibuster that they actually have to filibuster instead of merely "signalling".   Get their behinds on the Senate floor and put some "willy into it" as DWTS DANCMSTR is wont to say.

    Parent

    I totally agree that (none / 0) (#40)
    by jimakaPPJ on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 04:25:50 PM EST
    a filibuster should require real people actually filibustering.

    And bipartisan efforts fade away when all the majority needs is 51 votes.

    So if you want to say, "Hey, it's my turn at the trough and to heck with what the minority wants," have at it.

    But stop and consider what that would have meant over the years.

    Parent

    Here's a thought (none / 0) (#58)
    by sj on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 08:23:49 PM EST
    And bipartisan efforts fade away when all the majority needs is 51 votes.

    How about they focus on the Public Good rather than party?

    Parent

    Recommended reading: "Justice Brennan: (none / 0) (#2)
    by oculus on Sun Jan 02, 2011 at 03:46:16 PM EST
    Liberal Champion," by Seth Stern and Stephen Wermiel (2010).  Brennan was appointed by Eisenhower in 1956 and retired from SCOTUS in 1990.  Eisenhower was looking to appoint a younger man, in good health, a Catholic, with experience on the lower courts--either state or federal.  (He didn't want another Warren.) Brennan fit the description.  But such historical influence on the Court.  

    This piece on NPR by Nina Totenberg (none / 0) (#3)
    by oculus on Sun Jan 02, 2011 at 03:47:34 PM EST
    got me interested in reading this book:  NPR

    Parent
    Well, (none / 0) (#6)
    by Ga6thDem on Sun Jan 02, 2011 at 06:03:18 PM EST
    that thread on the baby boomers turned particularly nasty.

    it was pretty lively (5.00 / 1) (#31)
    by The Addams Family on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 01:38:39 PM EST
    i actually have to thank those who so candidly gave their views on the Boomer generation

    it's an indication that views like these must be quite widespread

    it also created an opportunity to start having a discussion in a pretty safe context -  among a group of commenters who are intelligent, familiar with and generally respectful of one another

    i personally found the stereotyping hurtful but am very curious about where this whole dynamic is going

    i'm also convinced that the conflict, such as it is, is being ginned up at this precise moment as an introduction of sorts to President GObamaP's state of the union message.

    Parent

    Yes, I thought it was really enlightening in (none / 0) (#34)
    by ruffian on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 03:46:54 PM EST
    that regard. I had no idea.

    Parent
    I was struck... (none / 0) (#37)
    by kdog on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 03:57:08 PM EST
    by the thought that "blaming the old" is something the boomers themselves were doing back in the day.

    Talkin' "Live at Leeds", "Young Man's Blues".  And the catchphrase "Don't trust anyone over 30."

    I'm thinking every generation does it, till they get old:)

    Parent

    except (5.00 / 1) (#38)
    by The Addams Family on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 04:10:21 PM EST
    we (to the extent that "we" were doing this) were "blaming the old" (i.e., distrustful of the over-30 set) because of the war in Vietnam & related imperial policies

    we were not bitching about paying social security taxes to keep our grandparents out of poverty

    big difference

    Parent

    last I checked (none / 0) (#39)
    by CST on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 04:21:22 PM EST
    we're at war again and still implementing imperial policies.  And I'm pretty sure we can't blame this one on your parents/grandparents.

    Just saying.

    Absent all that there might have been more tax $$ to help keep grandma out of poverty.

    Beyond all that, I keep seeing articles written about young people trying to take out social security.  I've yet to meet a single young person who thinks we should eliminate social security.  YMMV.  Just because CNN and MSNBC and FOX news talk about it does not make it so.  I do know that we do not expect to have it around for ourselves, that's not the same thing as trying to starve grandma.  But frankly, I think a lot of this is fabricated by a beltway that is looking for any excuse to cut social security.

    For example

    "90 percent of those ages 18 to 29 deemed Social Security important. In fact, almost half of them agreed with the statement that it is "one of the very most important government programs,"

    More than 80 percent said that even if they believed they could do better investing on their own, they saw their Social Security payments as contributing to "the common good.""

    Parent

    mmm, ok (5.00 / 0) (#44)
    by The Addams Family on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 05:07:06 PM EST
    we're at war again and still implementing imperial policies. And I'm pretty sure we can't blame this one on your parents/grandparents. Just saying. Absent all that there might have been more tax $$ to help keep grandma out of poverty.

    first, you do understand that social security is funded by a separate, dedicated tax?

    second, are you blaming the Baby Boomers for the current wars?

    their existence would seem to demonstrate one or both of two propositions:

    1. that it doesn't much matter how many citizens' heads get busted, the PTB will do what they will

    2. that someone, maybe even someone under the age of 60, has been remiss in their responsibility to get out on the streets & try to stop it again (to the extent that such tactics can still be effective at all)

    i do know that i was out there again myself (& not for the last time) 20 years ago to protest the imminent Persian Gulf War - saw plenty of gray heads on that occasion but it appeared at the time that the younger generation (people now around 40-45, i.e., Gen X) was either having a tail-end Morning In America moment, rushing to shave their heads & join up, or just kicking back w/video games & such in the absence of a military draft (which by the way people my age also marched against back in the day)

    just sayin'

    i hope you are right about the rest of your comment - the people in the age range you mentioned do not seem to carry the same grudge toward the Baby Boomers that some Gen Xers do

    but i do worry when i see younger people of any generation appearing to fall for what i take to be a concerted effort (ABC News, NY Times, etc.) to stir up sh!t about the Baby Boomers & social security just days before Preznit GObamaP's SOTU address

    if they do, it will probably hurt them more than it will hurt me

    just sayin' that too

    Parent

    Valid criticism.... (none / 0) (#47)
    by kdog on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 05:27:11 PM EST
    I often feel my generation was the first utterly housebroken generation...we don't stir up sh*t like we should.  Some do get their heads busted, like the Battle in Seattle, but not in the numbers of past generations.  Partly because we haven't felt enough widespread hardship...no draft, no sweatshops, no dustbowl, etc.  And partly because of the police state...the man is so much more on the ball now.  The laughable "free speech zones", step outta line and you're locked up fast.  Couple that with a feeling of ya can't beat the bastards (Your revolution is over Mr. Lebowski, the bums lost!), and that's a recipe for who gives a sh*t, I gotta watch out for me and mine while the empire crumbles.

    Parent
    you'll be 35 this May, right? (none / 0) (#49)
    by The Addams Family on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 05:48:37 PM EST
    (i remember when those of us on TL "celebrated" your 34th!)

    so i guess that puts you at the tail end of Gen X

    to fall back myself on popular stereotypes, you guys had a helluva dilemma - by the time you personally would have reached the age of meaningfully oppositional consciousness (around the early 90s), most avenues of opposition had long since been co-opted, sandwiched between MTV culture & a huge Boomer cohort still high on the fumes of the 60s (& don't forget that we Boomers will be pawns in the so-called Culture Wars until the day the last one of us dies)

    regarding the MTV half of that particular sandwich, i think chapter 3 ("Repressive Sublimation: The Conquest of the Unhappy Consciousness") of Herbert Marcuse's One-Dimensional Man has continued relevance for all generations alive today but maybe especially for yours

    regarding the Boomer half, there has been a tendency on the part of many people my age to believe, arrogantly, that we invented & trademarked political activism

    so if you were 15-25 or so in the early 90s it was very difficult to find a way into personally meaningful collective protest & activism unless you had a very personal stake in ending apartheid or curing AIDS - without that, it was easy to be, as you say, housebroken

    just my thoughts - thanks for yours

    Parent

    Easy killer... (5.00 / 1) (#50)
    by kdog on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 06:13:11 PM EST
    I'll be 34:)

    All I'd add is don't discount the police state aspect...Times Square didn't go from "You want it, you got it" to Disneyland without breaking some eggs.  Once you've been dragged through the rig-a-ma-roll of the system, the urge to keep a low profile is powerful, especially without that immediate cause/crisis to rally around.  

    The system wasn't quite prepared for the widespread protest of the 60's, the system won't make that mistake again.

    Parent

    Don't get too down on yoursef, kdog (none / 0) (#57)
    by sj on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 08:23:37 PM EST
    Those boomer demonstrations were covered to make them seem more ... sinister and more threatening to society than they were.  Although I don't know how large they were, I suspect they pale in comparison to the size of the demonstrations in opposition to the invasion of Iraq.  The PTB certainly learned an effective lesson in the intervening years:  if it doesn't show up in the newscast It Never Happened.

    Parent
    What CST said... (none / 0) (#43)
    by kdog on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 05:06:41 PM EST
    and I would add...I don't think the beef is paying taxes to feed old ladies, takes a cold hearted s.o.b. to oppose that...the beef is we're already raising plenty of money via taxation, and it is being wasted and/or stolen, and we may be asked for more to feed old ladies who paid plenty all their lives...that ain't right.  Hit me up again when there is no DEA and the prison population is halved, then we'll talk...ya know?  

    I hear Jeralyn's point loud and clear...my dad paid all his life, got checks for a year and died...he saved more himself on modest earnings than he ever got back from social security, I imagine he coulda saved more if he got to manage that money all his life, or at least worried less at times.  I agree with CST that the vast majority, young and old, like social security...I'm not so sure, but I'm weird.  I'd definitely have a regular income tax funded safety net so no one goes hungry or lacks care in old age, as part of the mass reprioritization of spending that will never happen:)

    Parent

    Personally (none / 0) (#51)
    by Raskolnikov on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 06:29:17 PM EST
    I don't know a single person my age who complains about FICA taxes.  However, I also don't know a single person my age who seriously believes they're going to see much in the way of benefits for themselves later in life from SS.  In my generation we have been hammered with the idea that the fund will run dry before we get a pay out from it, I've heard that and was implicitly taught that since the mid 90s.  

    Parent
    yep (5.00 / 1) (#52)
    by The Addams Family on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 07:01:11 PM EST
    In my generation we have been hammered with the idea that the fund will run dry before we get a pay out from it, I've heard that and was implicitly taught that since the mid 90s.

    the mid-1990s - Contract On America time

    & the same bad actors are up to it again

    this time they're attempting to embed the lies in the Culture Wars

    Look, younguns! Over there! Selfish boomer freeloaders lining up for a handout! All their fault!

    & while the younguns are looking over there the plutocrats are handing social security over to Wall Street

    we must not let this happen

    Bush II wanted to try it & we slapped him down

    so now the chosen instrument/tool is Preznit GObamaP

    he must be strongly & vocally opposed from the LEFT

    but as i look at the Gen X leftie bloggers, & as i both note & recall how truly hateful some of them sound when speaking of older/working class people (especially women), i do not have high hopes that they will bring the same pressure to bear on the current administration that they did on Bush/Cheney

    Parent

    Being a member of (none / 0) (#41)
    by jimakaPPJ on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 04:35:56 PM EST
    the Silent Generation (I was born in '38)I believe I was born old. We grew up being told that we had to be responsible, do the right thing, etc., etc.

    It never dawned on us that you couldn't trust the government.

    Then the Boomers came along acting like the Grasshopper to the Ant and proved that the government would lie... but no one cared as long as their rice bowl was kept full.

    The following generations merely added to what was in process.

    Parent

    really? (5.00 / 0) (#42)
    by The Addams Family on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 04:44:12 PM EST
    It never dawned on us that you couldn't trust the government.

    people didn't study American history in those days?

    Parent

    Though the federal government... (none / 0) (#45)
    by kdog on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 05:15:25 PM EST
    was a lot smaller back then...just starting to blossom into the utterly untrustable monolith of today. Back then you didn't see and feel so much of the federal government, maybe that's it...out of sight, out of mind.

    Parent
    Palmer Raids, kdog? (none / 0) (#46)
    by The Addams Family on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 05:20:26 PM EST
    November 1919 & January 1920

    Matewan Massacre? May 1920

    not exactly ancient history by the time the first members of the Silent Generation started coming on the scene

    Parent

    No doubt... (none / 0) (#48)
    by kdog on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 05:36:51 PM EST
    sh*t, freakin' prohibition!  You're right, the seeds were already bearing fruit.

    I was just thinking the bigger the government, the more to distrust. Nowadays the fed hands are in everything.

    Parent

    The government started to get attention (none / 0) (#55)
    by jimakaPPJ on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 07:42:04 PM EST
    in the late 60's by a lot more people. While most people didn't like the hippies and their life style, most people didn't want to see them beaten and didn't want the government to lie. However, Carter, who was elected as an outsider, proved to be totally ineffective and all I saw was a Democratic party that couldn't run the country and a Democratic party who didn't want to defend the country.

    I voted for Carter. Four years later I voted for Reagan.

    Parent

    I learned about this by hearing (none / 0) (#62)
    by oculus on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 11:21:37 PM EST
    Barbara Kingsolver read her latest novel "La Lacuna":  Bonus Army

    Hoover, MacArthur, and Eisenhower involved.

    Parent

    I was a child during WWII (none / 0) (#53)
    by jimakaPPJ on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 07:26:36 PM EST
    My father was in the Marines in the S. Pacific. I had other uncles who were in the Marines and Army. To us the war was very real. Everyone knew someone who had lost a friend or family member so it was personal and not "history." At home we saw TVA bringing electrify and the Health Department protecting us from disease. Hot school lunches replaced the cold sandwich and our parents remembered the jobs they had had in the CCC camp before the war.

    So we saw the government as benevolent. That made us patriotic and very anti-communism and sympathetic to McCarthy and the HOUA. Then, as now, it was those who considered themselves the "elite" who didn't seem communist party membership as a bad thing.

    And yes, we studied history and it was, in my opinion, devoid of the hate America content that has been included in later history books.

    Parent

    Interesting (none / 0) (#56)
    by sj on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 08:23:28 PM EST
    At home we saw TVA bringing electrify and the Health Department protecting us from disease. Hot school lunches replaced the cold sandwich and our parents remembered the jobs they had had in the CCC camp before the war.

    Those are liberal policies.  Just saying.

    And we have different views of the "elite".  To my way of thinking, it's the "elite" who ginned up the threat in the differences between communism and capitalism.  Most people are like the people you know:  just trying to get along, and maybe a little ahead in the world, keeping their home and their family safe.

    Parent

    As you may have forgotten (none / 0) (#59)
    by jimakaPPJ on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 09:55:34 PM EST
    I am a Social Liberal and have no problems with such programs.

    The problems start when the liberal policies turn into Left aka Progressive policies and program.

    Like so many things in life it is a matter of degree.

    As for "elite" I would say one man's elite is often another's radical.

    Parent

    I shouldn't have forgotten (5.00 / 1) (#60)
    by sj on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 10:31:44 PM EST
    Because every now and then I find myself agreeing with you and it freaks me out :)

    And I know that we have different interpretations of what constitutes the "elite".

    But I have no idea what this means:

    The problems start when the liberal policies turn into Left aka Progressive policies and program

    I know what all those words are but ...


    Parent

    PPJese (3.50 / 2) (#61)
    by Harry Saxon on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 10:42:32 PM EST
    can be understood by following two simple rules:

    1:  He doesn't believe there are any moderate Democrats.

    There are no moderate Democrats.
    A few are less radical than the others.

    Click Me.

    2:  See rule #1

    Parent

    I see that Saxon (none / 0) (#63)
    by jimakaPPJ on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 11:37:58 PM EST
    has noted my take on the current crop of Democrats....

    I guess I was supposed to fall down dead when he quoted one of my beliefs.

    It is obviously a bit of an overstatement, but certainly not enough to buy supper at Denny's.

    Without burning too much of the midnight oil, I think the current positions of the EPA re man made global warming, which is driven by the Obama administration, is a prime example of good liberal policies gone mad.

    And then we have the FCC deciding to correct a problem that doesn't exist, even after being told by a Federal Judge to butt out because Congress hasn't given them power over the Internet. Again obviously driven by the Obama administration.

    I could go on but I think you need no others to see where I'm at.

    Parent

    Re Current crop (none / 0) (#64)
    by Harry Saxon on Tue Jan 04, 2011 at 12:09:33 AM EST
    I see that Saxon (none / 0) (#63)
    by jimakaPPJ on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 11:37:58 PM EST
    has noted my take on the current crop of Democrats..

    Funny, your statement simply stated "Democrats".

    Nothing about 'current crop'.

    Just Democrats.

    I guess I was supposed to fall down dead when he quoted one of my beliefs.

    Actually, it was for sj, whose comment I responded to, in order to inform him, not remind you of what you already know.

    If you did fall down dead, it would merely being your body catching up with your political beliefs.

    It is obviously a bit of an overstatement, but certainly not enough to buy supper at Denny's.

    Cliche city again.

    Without burning too much of the midnight oil, I think the current positions of the EPA re man made global warming, which is driven by the Obama administration, is a prime example of good liberal policies gone mad.

    Yes, it's all that evilllllllllll Al Gore's fault, along with all those climate scientist in on the conspiracy, and they've got Obamie(as PPJ likes to term him) in on it too.

    And then we have the FCC deciding to correct a problem that doesn't exist, even after being told by a Federal Judge to butt out because Congress hasn't given them power over the Internet. Again obviously driven by the Obama administration.

    Yes, because the FCC made the ruling in 2008, knowing full well that Obama would be elected President later on that year and that he would support their position when he came into office.

    They hit the ground running when they took power(I'm sorry, seized control) 2 years ago, and this is the natural, logical result.

    I could go on but I think you need no others to see where I'm at.

    Nor would any psychiatrist, but we'll have that discussion for another day.

    Parent

    Yawn (none / 0) (#65)
    by jimakaPPJ on Tue Jan 04, 2011 at 09:10:32 AM EST
    You bore me.

    Parent
    Thanks as always for the feedback :-) (none / 0) (#66)
    by Harry Saxon on Tue Jan 04, 2011 at 09:26:39 AM EST
    I've been off the net for several days (none / 0) (#20)
    by republicratitarian on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 12:13:33 PM EST
    That boomer thread did take off didn't it?

    Parent
    The Spanish newspaper El Pais (none / 0) (#7)
    by Harry Saxon on Sun Jan 02, 2011 at 07:45:23 PM EST
    on publishing material from Wikileaks, from the Hullabaloo blog:

    The incompetence of Western governments, and their inability to deal with the economic crisis, climate change, corruption, or the illegal war in Iraq and other countries has been eloquently exposed in recent years. Now, thanks to WikiLeaks, we also know that our leaders are all too aware of their shameful fallibility, and that it is only thanks to the inertia of the machinery of power that they have been able to fulfill their democratic responsibility and answer to the electorate.

    The powerful machinery of state is designed to suppress the flow of truth and to keep secrets secret. We have seen in recent weeks how that machine has been put into action to try to limit the damage caused by the WikiLeaks revelations.

    Given the damage they have suffered at the hands of WikiLeaks, it is not hard to see why the United States and other Western governments have been unable to resist the temptation of focusing attention on Julian Assange. He seems an easy enough target, and so they have sought to question his motivation and the way that WikiLeaks works. They have also sought to question why five major news organizations with prestigious international reputations agreed to collaborate with Assange and his organization. These are reasonable questions, and they have all been answered satisfactorily over the last four weeks, despite the pressure put on us by government, and worse still, by many of our colleagues in the media.

    "When the gap between ideal and real becomes too wide, the system breaks down."

    -- Barbara W. Tuchman (A Distant Mirror: The Calamitous 14th Century)

    Click Me

    New governors and legislators (none / 0) (#8)
    by andgarden on Sun Jan 02, 2011 at 10:15:49 PM EST
    enter office promising to cut and freeze everything in sight.

    As Krugman says:

    [W]hat we're looking at over the next few years, even with pretty good growth, are unemployment rates that not long ago would have been considered catastrophic -- because they are. Behind those dry statistics lies a vast landscape of suffering and broken dreams. And the arithmetic says that the suffering will continue as far as the eye can see.


    I trust (none / 0) (#9)
    by Capt Howdy on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 10:49:09 AM EST
    everyone got everything they wanted from santa?

    my lamborghini (none / 0) (#10)
    by CST on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 10:55:57 AM EST
    must've gotten lost in the mail.

    Parent
    damn (none / 0) (#11)
    by Capt Howdy on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 10:58:57 AM EST
    post office

    Parent
    I did... (none / 0) (#13)
    by kdog on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 11:27:33 AM EST
    lots of time with the fam and friends...lots of food, drink, smoke, and assorted sweet tidings...life's true riches.

    Well all except one thing...but I'm hoping for a belated gift of romance by March:)

    The stuff that came in wrapping paper is but an afterthought.

    Parent

    I got ten days (none / 0) (#14)
    by Capt Howdy on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 11:38:28 AM EST
    on the sofa with the dogs.

    just what I wanted.

    Parent

    Nice... (none / 0) (#15)
    by kdog on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 11:40:47 AM EST
    may 2011 be fruitful with the leisure time my good man.

     

    Parent

    and to you (none / 0) (#16)
    by Capt Howdy on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 11:41:24 AM EST
    too

    Parent
    you know (none / 0) (#18)
    by Capt Howdy on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 12:02:12 PM EST
    That does sounds nice (none / 0) (#22)
    by republicratitarian on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 12:19:39 PM EST
    I've been considering adopting a Greyhound for some time. I may have mentioned it some time before, I can never remember. But I'm gone too much to do it properly, so I just enjoy everyone else's dogs when I can. :)

    Have a Happy New Year!

    Parent

    Greyhounds (none / 0) (#23)
    by CoralGables on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 12:38:15 PM EST
    are the best 70 pound lap dog you will ever have.

    Parent
    they are great dogs (none / 0) (#24)
    by Capt Howdy on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 12:45:40 PM EST
    I have a friend who has one.

    Parent
    I gambled in Biloxi for three days (none / 0) (#21)
    by republicratitarian on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 12:17:26 PM EST
    and watched the Saints lose in New Orleans in a game that was ultimately meaningless.

    Watching the weather up there with much interest as I'm flying into Westchester County next Sunday. I'm hoping you guys have thawed out by then.

    Happy New Year to you.

    Parent

    Seahawks in Round 1... (none / 0) (#26)
    by kdog on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 12:47:40 PM EST
    Talk about a Christmas present for the Saints!

    Holiday Gambling Binge...my kinda party R-crat.  And which joy of gambling did you receive, the joy of winning or the joy of losing? :)

    Parent

    Both, ended on a no limit table with lot's of (none / 0) (#27)
    by republicratitarian on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 12:56:59 PM EST
    action. Tripled my money and called it a day. I probably could have done more damage but we went with 12 people for three days, all comped. Talk about a great weekend.

    Parent
    know nothing about this (none / 0) (#28)
    by Capt Howdy on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 01:01:41 PM EST
    but I like this headline:

    The 2010 Seattle Seahawks: Worst. Playoff. Team. Ever?

    By NATE SILVER

    Parent
    Santa did fine (none / 0) (#19)
    by ruffian on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 12:12:54 PM EST
    Gave me the cutest niece and nephew ever! And the 'Slings and Arrows' DVD set I asked for. Have you seen that show? Wonderful!

    But the birthday fairie is slacking off- made me go back to work today!

    Parent

    have not (none / 0) (#25)
    by Capt Howdy on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 12:47:05 PM EST
    but its on the list.  and santa brought me a big ole plasma.
    the ancient crank model I had died recently.  so tv is fun again.

    Parent
    Oh very nice! (none / 0) (#29)
    by ruffian on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 01:03:04 PM EST
    I'm sure you will love the plasma, especially with the special effects movies.

    'Slings and Arrows' is short on effects, but the writing and acting are off the charts. Enjoy!

    Parent

    heh (none / 0) (#30)
    by Capt Howdy on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 01:14:39 PM EST
    I had a plasma so old that it had no HDMI inputs.  the only HD input was DVI.  which they dont even have any more.

    and it was a LOT of money.  the one I got is basically the same tv as far as function and it was literally one tenth the price I paid back then.

    Parent

    that makes more sense! (none / 0) (#35)
    by ruffian on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 03:52:31 PM EST
    I was surprised you did not have one already!

    Yeah, the price drops are amazing. I've had mine 5 years and it was a major purchase back then.

    Parent

    and people say (none / 0) (#36)
    by CST on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 03:54:10 PM EST
    things haven't gotten better :)

    Parent
    Ha! Hey, I need the anesthetic! (none / 0) (#54)
    by ruffian on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 07:32:49 PM EST
    I'm too healthy on the one hand and scared on the other to do drugs!

    Parent
    new engine of economic productivity (none / 0) (#12)
    by Capt Howdy on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 11:00:38 AM EST
    video games!

    How Videogames Are Changing the Economy

    From Silicon Valley to China to media, they are leading the next productivity revolution. So hug a geek today.

    This fall, the Chinese National University of Defense Technology announced that it had created the world's fastest supercomputer, Tianhe-1A, which clocks in at 2.5 petaflops (or 2,500 trillion operations) per second. This is the shape of the world to come--but not in the way you might think.

    Powering the Tianhe-1A are some three million processing cores from Nvidia, the Silicon Valley company that has sold hundreds of millions of graphics chips for videogames. That's right--every time someone fires up a videogame like Call of Duty or World of Warcraft, the state of the art in technology advances. Hug a geek today.



    Be careful with that hugging (none / 0) (#17)
    by ruffian on Mon Jan 03, 2011 at 11:44:23 AM EST
    One hug takes a week off of geek productivity.

    Parent