home

Film from South Africa About Toll of Executions: Shepherds and Butchers

Shepherds and Butchers premiered this month at the Berlin Film Festival. It's about the death penalty in South Africa, and the country's notorious Pretoria Prison, which houses its Death Row. The film is adapted from the book by a former South African defense lawyer, Chris Marnewick, who moved to New Zealand. Marnewick says the film's message isn't the same as the one he wanted to portray. He may not want to see it. The book earned several awards. You can get it here or read the first chapter here. [More...]

Marnewick says the film, which stars Steve Coogan and Andrea Riseborough, and for which Barry Gibb wrote the song "Angels" (which plays at the end), focuses more on apartheid, rather than on the point Marnewick wanted to make, which is that state-sponsored killing is wrong and takes it toll not just on the convicted criminals, but on the guards who participate in their eventual killing.

The theme is that killing is wrong, killing human beings is wrong. That's my theme and, alongside it, that making people kill on our behalf is wrong because the killing of a human being changes the killer."

The film is about a white guard of the inmates, almost all of whom are black inmates, who goes beserk one day and kills 7 black soccer players following a road rage incident. He is then charged with murder.

The book, Marnewick says, is about life and death and what it means to take someone's life. It is set in apartheid-era South Africa but that is only the backdrop.

Some reviews suggest the life and death issues are a dual theme with that of apartheid.
"It's not an apartheid story, although they are now making a movie as if it is," says Marnewick.

Marnewick's character in the film is barrister Johann (John) Weber.

In 1987, 164 people were executed in South Africa, the highest annual toll in the country's history.

"And I started wondering about what that would do," Marnewick says. "How killing on that scale would affect the people who were doing the killing on behalf of the state. "I know the trauma that a lawyer goes through defending someone for his life - where you stand on your feet in court, cross-examining the witness, and a wrong question can see your client being taken away and hanged. "That's the pressure, that's the stress. And of course it tells."

Marnewick defended between 40 and 60 murder cases (none of his clients got the death penalty.) One high profile case he won, using a temporary insanity defense (called "sane automatism") resulted in death threats which led him to move to New Zealand. He began writing the book in 2002.

His book recounts the story of prison guard Johan, who began working at the maximum security unit at age 18 in 1986. Marnewick reviewed the case files of 32 inmates who were hanged in a five day period in 1987. Johan was present for all 32 of them.

Marnewick interviewed Johan, whose job it was to guard prisoners sentenced to death - to feed them, take them for haircuts, sit with them when they had visitors.

He was the shepherd.But on the day of the execution, he became the butcher. From 6am, Johan would escort a prisoner during the last hour of his or her life. He would take them to get their fingerprints recorded, sit next to them during a chapel service, and stay with them when the clock struck 7am. He watched as they took their final breath.

"And then when they had finished the execution - he didn't do that, that was the hangman's job - he had to go downstairs, take the bodies off the rope, go for another service with the deceased's family then go and bury the bodies and register their deaths," Marnewick says.

Marnewick' book focuses on how the system traumatized the guards and turn them into killing addicts:

What was unique and "utterly unthinkable" about this system, was that the warders were on first-name terms with the people they were helping execute.

They were both shepherds and butchers and, as Marnewick believed, the role exacted a terrible toll. "They became traumatised and, eventually, Johan told me, addicted to the process of killing those prisoners, although they weren't physically doing the killings."

Johan told Marnewick it became an adrenaline rush that he and others began to look forward to.
Marnewick says some wardens took their own lives and alcohol abuse was rife. There were brushes with the law, bar fights, road rage incidents. It's clear now they were suffering post-traumatic stress, Marnewick says. After witnessing other people suffer at such a scale, they started suffering themselves.

In the film,

Shepherds and Butchers follows the fictional story of a young prison warder named Leon Labuschagne, who at 19 and after a two-week stint of 32 executions, loses control and kills seven men.

He faces the death penalty and barrister Johann Weber defends him using the temporary insanity defence and, in doing so, investigates the life of those working on Death Row and the effects that the killing has on them.

Marnewick's point on the difference between the film and his book:

"It's got to be wrong in principle to take away life. "But when it comes to the book, I didn't want my views to influence the reader. I wanted the reader to see the abhorrent crimes that the 32 men had committed and were hanged for. "And then see at the same time the abhorrent methodology and process adopted in killing those very same people."

South Africa suspended the death penalty in 1989, under F.W. de Klerk. Marnewick teaches trial skills, and in addition to his creative writing, is the author of Litigation Skills for South African Lawyers, published by LEXISNEXIS.

A review of the film is here.

I guess I'm not sure about the difference between the film and the book's message. The actor Steve Coogan says in an interview:

No one is demonized in this film, apart from the system itself," Coogan said over the phone from New York...."It's about the brutalizing effect on those who carry out executions and the dehumanizing effect on all those involved."

< Dem Primary South Carolina | Oscar Nominees in List Format >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    While I understand what ... (none / 0) (#1)
    by Donald from Hawaii on Sat Feb 27, 2016 at 07:03:02 PM EST
    ... Chris Marnewick is saying, it's still very hard for many of us to discuss various perspectives of modern South Africa from a position of knowledge, without first seeking to understand that country's Apartheid era, which was as brutal and murderous a regime as has even been imposed upon indigenous peoples by a colonialist government or occupying power.

    Capital punishment was a political weapon that the white Afrikaaner government wielded very liberally in its ultimately futile efforts to suppress black nationalism, as did their Dutch and British colonial forebears in prior generations. Yes, capital punishment itself is terribly dehumanizing, but it's equally important to realize that its wanton imposition as a penal sentence by the Afrikaaner regime didn't occur in a socio-political vacuum.

    Our trip there in November 2010 was a real eye-opener for me, particularly our visits to Soweto, Johnnesburg's Apartheid Museum, and Robben Island off of Cape Town, where future South African President Nelson Mandela was imprisoned by the white Afrikaaner government for over two decades. Apartheid's lingering effects still echo and resonate very loudly throughout South Africa, and the memories hang over its people like a dark cloud. In many ways, the collective attempt to move forward has only just begun.

    That's likely what director Oliver Schmitz and the producers determined when deciding exactly how to put this story to celluloid. While most South African citizens such as Marnewick already know their own country's sad and often sordid history by heart, two decades after Apartheid's end much of the rest of the world does not, particularly younger people.

    Jeralyn, you and I are both painfully aware of the crime against humanity that was Apartheid, because we remember how our own government's support for South Africa's white-minority regime was a very contentious sore point with many Americans. Both of us likely opposed it as well. I remember taking part in several demonstrations as a student at the University of Washington in the early 1980s, urging the school president and Board of Trustees to divest the university's financial holdings in companies doing business with South Africa.

    But let's also remember that your own son was only nine years old and my children were yet to be born when Nelson Mandela was at last released from prison by President F.W. de Klerk in the summer of 1990, and the country's long-awaited transition to black majority rule finally commenced. We should not therefore assume that our children know of any of the particulars about that sad and sorry era, just as so many young women are unfamiliar with the struggle feminists of earlier generations endured to secure the rights which so many now take for granted.

    Perhaps "Shepherds and Butchers" might've been better told on the small screen in mini-series format, because the story sounds like it could've been constrained by the studio's probable desire to keep the film's running time under 150 minutes. Nevertheless, Variety gave it a good review.

    I look forward to both seeing the film and also reading Mr. Marnewick's memoir of his own experiences as an attorney in South Africa. Thank you for bringing both to our attention.

    Aloha.

    My husband was born in apartheid SA (none / 0) (#2)
    by Suisser1 on Sat Feb 27, 2016 at 11:54:04 PM EST
    and as it happens, is there now doing a series of talks on SA/US relations during the pre-post Apartheid years. His most challenging audience? The kids and young adults they call the, "Born Frees" who have no personal experience with the brutality of Apartheid and do not see the US as an ally. Things are tough in SA right now. The rand is tumbling and people, black, white, mixed are all feeling, he reports, rather without hope.

    A true opposition party in South Africa ... (none / 0) (#3)
    by Donald from Hawaii on Sun Feb 28, 2016 at 02:16:49 AM EST
    ... needs to be organized, because the majority ANC appears to have lost its way since former President Mandela's death in December 2013, and is almost hopelessly corrupt. But as along as the opposition is just as hopelessly splintered and fails to coalesce, Jacob Zuma & Co. are going to get a virtual pass. And that's really a shame, because South Africa is actually a wealthy country with tremendous potential. It simply lacks real leadership right now.

    Parent
    "take the bodies off the rope" (none / 0) (#4)
    by Mr Natural on Sun Feb 28, 2016 at 05:39:29 AM EST
    Almost impossible to imagine.


    Thanks (none / 0) (#5)
    by Towanda on Sun Feb 28, 2016 at 04:38:00 PM EST
    for the recommendation; it's now on my reading list.

    The African author (none / 0) (#7)
    by fishcamp on Tue Mar 01, 2016 at 09:26:39 AM EST
    Wilber Smith has more than thirty six novels about Africa and it's beginnings.  They are wonderfully powerful and he is my very favorite author.  

    Parent
    I Have Posted Several Times... (none / 0) (#6)
    by ScottW714 on Mon Feb 29, 2016 at 11:16:36 AM EST
    ... that while I have no problem with the death penalty in itself, it is not good for society to spend so much energy and resources trying to kill it's own citizens.

    Sound like SA hangs them, but here every state is different and the hoops we jump through to trying a kill someone, humanely, spreads far further than the prison walls.  From the jailers, to the doctors, to the people tasked with deciding on the chemical make-up of execution drugs, to the people put in charge of deciding if the the guilty is so void of humanity they should die.  It leaks into every crevice of society.

    Neither is even addressing the most devastating and real horror of murdering your own citizens, the very real possibility that the state could execute an innocent person.