home

U.S. Holds 8,900 Detainees in Iraq

The U.S. has increased the number of prisoners it is holding in Iraq. Right now it stands at 8,900. And the jails are overcrowded.

Abu Ghraib's capacity is said to be "ideal" at 2,500. It now houses 3,160 detainees. Camp Bucca has 5,600.

The military must hire enough effective interrogators and military intelligence officers to process detainees quickly, said Bruce Hoffman, an analyst at the RAND Corporation who has worked in Iraq with American policy makers. Otherwise, innocent people will languish in the prisons, a fertile recruiting ground for the insurgents, and could take up arms when they are freed.

A day in the life:

On a recent morning here, military policemen marched 50 handcuffed men off a convoy that had just arrived from Tikrit, Mr. Hussein's hometown. Old and young, the detainees wore thin shirts or robes. Some were barefoot.

A sign on a concrete blast wall read, "No Parking: Detainee Drop Off Zone." Guards stood watch in towers along walls laced with razor wire. The detainees huddled quietly on the ground outside a squat building where they would be processed. Soon they would be asked to put on orange jumpsuits.

Death happens:

It was an incident at Camp Bucca on Jan. 31 that most recently exposed the potential hazards of the detainee system: Four detainees were killed and six wounded when guards fired shots to quell a well-organized uprising. The guards had replaced their nonlethal weapons with lethal ones after realizing that detainees had armed themselves with slingshots that could hurl stones for long distances. Since then, the military has bought guns that fire "plasticized projectiles" at a greater range, Colonel Johnson said.

Members of the military police say they are overworked.

Of the company's three platoons, one was guarding the 42nd Infantry Division's prison in Tikrit, another was assigned to protect the division's generals, and the third transported detainees.

In the three weeks after company arrived in Iraq on Feb. 1, the Third Platoon made 25 convoy runs all across the hostile Sunni Triangle, with a dozen of those to Abu Ghraib.

"We've got just enough people to do this" said Specialist Chris DiModica, 23, the driver of the command Humvee. "If anyone gets sick, that's it."

< Cable Discovers Blogs | Empowering Cops With a Needle >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Re: U.S. Holds 8,900 Detainees in Iraq (none / 0) (#1)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Fri Mar 04, 2005 at 09:31:58 AM EST
    Our nation's illegal occupation of Iraq is causing a rise in violence and a rise in arrests among the Iraqi populace. We must end the occupation. Bringing our troops home is the best solution.

    Re: U.S. Holds 8,900 Detainees in Iraq (none / 0) (#2)
    by john horse on Fri Mar 04, 2005 at 03:21:19 PM EST
    Tony, Couldn't agree with you more. Not only are there 8,900 detainees being held in Iraq but Iraq has recently been added by our Department of State to the list of countries committing human rights abuses. By the way, good to hear from you again.

    Re: U.S. Holds 8,900 Detainees in Iraq (none / 0) (#3)
    by rMatey on Fri Mar 04, 2005 at 06:31:12 PM EST
    I guess that's why our administration decided not to sign on the dotted line subjecting our troops to international court jurisdiction, maybe because they would be convicted?

    Re: U.S. Holds 8,900 Detainees in Iraq (none / 0) (#4)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Fri Mar 04, 2005 at 11:42:14 PM EST
    "Our occupation is causing violence." If I follow this logic, we should pull all of the cops out of New York City and put an end to all of the violence there. It's a bit like saying fleas attract dogs. In case no one's noticed, the people dying lately aren't dying at the hands of US troops. They're dying at the hands of militants intent on derailing the democratic process because they think it's evil. It's not US troops setting off those car bombs. I have unbelievable respect for the Iraqis who are volunteering for police or military duty, knowing that they're the number one target. Do you think it was easy for that Judge to step up to the plate and preside over Saddam's hearing? Look what it got him. Iraqis are trying to regain control of their country, and we're helping them. If you'd read the news, you'd see that the enemy's interest in attacking us has dropped -- February had the fewest US deaths since last July. The enemy is focusing more effort at Iraqis who are trying to stabilize the country so the Americans can leave. Do you think we should pull out immediately and set the thugs free? I for one feel we need to continue providing security and helping develop Iraqi police and military forces so they can own their country again and we can leave.

    Re: U.S. Holds 8,900 Detainees in Iraq (none / 0) (#5)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sat Mar 05, 2005 at 03:18:23 PM EST
    "Posted by trueblue: "In case no one's noticed, the people dying lately aren't dying at the hands of US troops." The Rape of Fallujah was last November. Do you really have that short an attention span?

    Re: U.S. Holds 8,900 Detainees in Iraq (none / 0) (#6)
    by Talkleft Visitor on Sat Mar 05, 2005 at 06:05:35 PM EST
    Paul, my intellectually flatulent friend: The fish in your barrel are breeding faster than I can pull the trigger, and frankly, the callouses are starting to make it difficult to type. I said my piece on the Iraq casualty thread -- apologies to the rest of the folks here for wasting so much time with you. I've spent enormous amounts of time attempting to engage you on an intellectual level to no avail. You're apparently unable to form your own opinion of something as simple as what you consider a just war or when you would apply military force. What you are capable of, apparently, is swallowing every paranoid, conspiracy laden, unsubstantiated extremist piece of garbage you can find on the internet and shooting it out of your a$$ at anyone that passes by. I've made great efforts to be civil and avoid getting personal, but I can't do it with you anymore -- goodness knows I've tried. Sorry folks, you know how I feel about labeling and ad hominem attacks; but I think there's a point where Ghandi would take a swing. Oh, and by the way, Paul -- I forgot to mention earlier that the NTSB investigates ACCIDENTS. If it's determined to be criminal it falls under the jurisdiction of the FBI. No conspiracy or cover up there. Say Hi to Oliver Stone and Ross Perot for me.