home

Prosecutorial Misconduct Bars Second Trial

by TChris

During her 2001 murder trial in Fort Worth, Texas, a prosecutor cross-examining Swanda Marie Lewis asked whether she had declined a police detective's invitation to discuss her husband's death. Judge Sharen Wilson granted a mistrial to remedy the improper reference to Lewis' exercise of her Fifth Amendment right to silence. Lewis' lawyer, Danny Burns, later moved to dismiss the case.

Burns ... argued that the mistrial was prompted by prosecutorial misconduct and that the constitutional prohibition against double jeopardy barred Lewis from being tried again [for] the same crime.

When the government deliberately provokes a mistrial, double jeopardy generally protects an accused from a second trial. Judge Wilson denied the dismissal motion, but the state court of appeals ruled last week (for the second time) that the prosecutor's flagrant misconduct provoked the mistrial, saving Lewis from a second prosecution.

The court had little sympathy for the prosecutor's claim that he asked the question in good faith.

In their most recent opinion, issued this month and written by Justice Anne Gardner, the justices said Meyer twice asked Lewis direct questions about her failure or refusal to speak to law enforcement officers.

"As the prosecutor himself admitted, he was well aware that the use of post-arrest silence is impermissible and yet he chose to disregard a prior sustained objection and instruction to disregard in pursuing this impermissible line of questioning," Gardner wrote. "Therefore, we hold that the prosecutor flagrantly and persistently pursued this improper line of questioning."

< Michael Schiavo Announces Plans for Autopsy | 87 Year OId Sentenced to 20 Years for Planned Molestation >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort: