home

Show Us the Proof

It's not smart to taunt or to march toward police officers who are wearing riot gear and armed with tear gas, shock grenades, and pepper spray. The police are likely to overreact, as this video (taken by a citizen journalist who got caught in the middle of the police and protesters) demonstrates.


Law enforcement agencies are justifying their heavy-handed tactics in St. Paul by telling the press of ominous threats to delegate safety: [more ...]

Search warrants and other police documents told of plans to throw Molotov cocktails, sabotage the Xcel Energy Center — the convention venue — or the St. Paul Downtown Airport, stretch metal chains across freeways and kidnap delegates.

Search warrants authorize searches. By their nature, they are prepared before the search occurs. A search warrant application may well claim (based on information provided by informants who may or may not be reliable) that plans to kidnap or to blow up delegates were being formed, but that doesn't mean the plans actually existed. Did the searches uncover such plans? If so, show us the proof.

There were sporadic incidents of violence in the Twin Cities. Perhaps 200 anarchists actually fomented violence, as the police claim, but the FBI and Ramsey County Sheriff have yet to reveal strong evidence of that assertion. What is certain is that not all of the "nearly 300 people [arrested] since Saturday in pre-emptive raids and at protests" actually violated the law.

Consider this:

Of the arrests, 16 felony and 47 gross misdemeanor charges had been filed. All others arrested were either cited for misdemeanors and released, freed pending further investigation, or released outright. Two University of Kentucky journalism students and their adviser were among those freed without being charged.

It seems a reasonable guess that the journalism students and their advisers were not violent anarchists. We'll have to wait a few weeks to find out how many of the 300 arrests actually result in charges and convictions.

< Wednesday Dinnertime Open Thread | Late Night Song Requests >
  • The Online Magazine with Liberal coverage of crime-related political and injustice news

  • Contribute To TalkLeft


  • Display: Sort:
    Just a smaller version of Shock & Awe (none / 0) (#1)
    by Dadler on Wed Sep 03, 2008 at 08:17:20 PM EST
    And just as useless.  Proof?  There won't be any and they'll offer no apologies, or second guessing or thoughtful reflection.  Just more of the same law and order, chest out, no freedom to dissent if it's not boxed properly.  Heaven forbid if someone actually got up on a soapbox on a streetcorner and isnpired people.  Boom boom boom, they're gone.  

    Chicago redux (none / 0) (#2)
    by sebimeyer on Wed Sep 03, 2008 at 08:32:05 PM EST
    I already thought on Monday that this is quickly turning into a Chicago 1968 redux.

    Just like in Chicago the police is claiming threats were issues, but offer no proof. They also arrest people on "conspiracy to riot" charges, including Amy Goodman, that are bound to be dropped.

    The kicker is though that they can arrest any protester, hold them for 36 hours (!), which does not include holidays or weekends, and keep them in jail without charge. Because, there's really no harm in people sitting in jail without cause, right?

    Hopefully this is the last throws of the dying Republican regime.

    explosions (none / 0) (#3)
    by jharp on Wed Sep 03, 2008 at 08:56:53 PM EST
    Long time fan. First post.

    Watching that I can't help but think of the right wingers belief that we need more citizens carrying guns.

    And by the way, your blog has gotten really, really good lately.

    Thank you and peace.

    Thanks Twin Cities PD! (none / 0) (#4)
    by echinopsia on Wed Sep 03, 2008 at 09:16:09 PM EST
    For making even Denver cops look good!

    It happened in Denver too (none / 0) (#5)
    by coast on Wed Sep 03, 2008 at 09:20:44 PM EST
    Let's be clear that this is not a RNC issue only.  It happened at the DNC convention as well.  The problem is that the protesters have a issue that they wish to be heard on, but the specified areas for protest don't offer much of a venue to push their agenda.  So they leave the specified areas and go into or near restricted areas.  Once they left the specified area, they opened themselves up.

    It's not smart... (none / 0) (#6)
    by diogenes on Wed Sep 03, 2008 at 10:00:32 PM EST
    If it's not smart to try to taunt the police into arresting you or firing pepper spray at you in order to create a scene, then why do it?  Are journalism students short in the brains department?

    I didn't (none / 0) (#7)
    by TChris on Wed Sep 03, 2008 at 10:23:28 PM EST
    see anything in the links suggesting that the journalism students were involved with taunting.  The taunting reference is with regard to the video. The arrests weren't limited to people shown in the video.

    Parent
    we're all suspected anarchists (none / 0) (#8)
    by Joe Bob on Thu Sep 04, 2008 at 12:15:21 PM EST
    The search warrants were a joke. I read an excerpt in the Minneapolis newspaper; the warrants included: "flammable liquids, paint, and rocks." Well damn, I have all of that stuff in my garage or in my yard. The police also made a big deal of the fact they found a gun and a bow and arrows. Well damn again, I have those things too. Since when were the 2nd Amendment and common hunting implements a problem?

    Of course the real tell is what else the police confiscated: camcorders, cameras, cellphones, laptop computers, notebooks, and political literature. Ostensibly, it's so they could search all of these electronic devices for evidence that would support criminal charges. By coincidence, it also prevents dissenters from organizing protests and documenting police misconduct.

    It's frightening. The police can draft, and apparently a judge will sign, a warrant to search to break into your house with a SWAT team to look for innocuous household items and otherwise legal possessions. It seems that if you associate with a disfavored political group no pretext is too flimsy for allowing the police to enter your home and confiscate your belongings.