Home / Crime in the News / Duke Lacrosse
Comments on the last Duke thread are about to hit 500. Here's a new one to keep the conversation going.
Don't forget to bookmark TalkLeft's separate Duke page, where all the posts and comments since the beginning are on one page.
(189 comments) Permalink :: Comments
The Dukesters haven't had an open thread all week and they are busting the comments at the seams, so here's one for them.
(483 comments) Permalink :: Comments
Duke lacrosse player Colin Finerty's parents are abandoning their silence. His father says he has passed a polygraph administered by a former FBI polygrapher and that he has "eyewitness testimony, phone records and receipts showing it was "impossible" for him to have committed the crimes."
The polygrapher came out of the interview room after administering the recent test and said, "'This boy is innocent. He's telling the truth,'" Kevin Finnerty said. "He passed with flying colors."
Finnerty's mother, Maryellen, said the accuser's photo identification of her son "was sort of a pin the tail on the donkey."
Finnerty's parents are speaking out against the advice of Colin's counsel. An interview with them by Dan Abrams was aired on the Today show Friday. [link here.]
(374 comments, 258 words in story) There's More :: Permalink :: Comments
Ryan McFaddan, the Duke lacrosse player who sent an offensive e-mail after the party at which the accuser says she was raped, has been reinstated. Details about the e-mail are here.
Also, the county commissioner pondering a run against DA Nifong has gathered the necessary signatures to make it onto the ballot.
(318 comments) Permalink :: Comments
The Dukester commenters on TalkLeft cannot stop from discussing every detail and nuance of the case. For every post I write, even on days when there's no news, they post 200 to 500 comments.
TalkLeft's webmaster Mike Ditto has made them a gift -- a TL duke blog just for them.
So now when you want news and opinion on duke, just go here. It has every entry since April 2 and all of your comments, with links to each. New Duke posts will also show up on Talkleft's main page, but now those who come here just for Duke can bypass the more important issues of the day and duke it out to their heart's content.
For the rest of you that could care less about the Duke case, I'm still going to make a new entry every time the Duke comments on the latest entry top 250 or so, so just scroll on by when you see the graphic.
A huge thanks to Mike. And yes, this is another Duke open thread.
(341 comments) Permalink :: Comments
New motions were filed by the defense in the Duke lacrosse players' alleged rape case. You can read them here and here.
The accuser's name does not appear to be blacked out in the motions, but please don't use it in the comments.
(271 comments) Permalink :: Comments
Yesterday's Duke thread is filled to the brim. Lots of talk about the police report in which the accuser said she was raped by five men at the party and that there were four dancers, not two. More details here.
And how about this? The accuser's cousin claims the accuser turned down $2 million to walk away from the case. (hat tip La Shawn Barber.)
Also: Sports Illustrated: The Damage Done
(515 comments) Permalink :: Comments
There was a hearing in the Duke lacrosse players' alleged rape case today. Reade Seligman's bond was reduced.
DA Mike Nifong confirmed he had not turned over a toxicology report to the defense -- but he refused to say whether toxicology tests had been performed. Update: Fox News is reporting Nifong said no toxicology tests were conducted. So why did Nifong put out the date rape drug theory?
Among the items Nifong has yet to turn over is an analysis of the accuser's computer, which he said was still pending, and records from the mental health facility where authorities took the woman before she told police she had been raped. The only record from the facility, Nifong said, is a single page from a log book he is still working to obtain.
Also, the judge ordered Nifong to turn over reports from the accuser's 1993 gang rape allegation.
(289 comments) Permalink :: Comments
The Dukesters need a new thread, comments are overflowing at the last one. In today's Duke lacrosse player news:
- Coach breaks silence--Basketball coach Mike Krzyzewski discusses the scandal caused by the rape allegations
- USA Today editorial saying the facts are growing shorter for Nifong, i.e., the case keeps unraveling
- Michael Gaynor in the Post Chronicle tells the accuser to pray and apologize and calls her by her real name in a very nasty opinion piece. I'd still like for commenters not to do that just yet.
(380 comments) Permalink :: Comments
Yesterday I wrote about the latest Newsweek article on the Duke lacrosse players alleged rape case. Today, DA Mike Nifong released the e-mail he sent to Newsweek. It's long, you can read it here.
Shorter version: The defense is spinning, the media s*cks and he's prepared to let 12 jurors decide.
(389 comments) Permalink :: Comments
Newsweek has a new detailed analysis of the Duke lacrosse players' alleged rape case, asking whether it has collapsed. The facts revealed to date don't seem to support the charges. But DA Nifong is sticking to his guns:
Asked for an interview last week by NEWSWEEK, Nifong declined, but sent an angry e-mail accusing the national media of getting spun by defense lawyers and sticking to his earlier comments to the press. "None of the 'facts' I know at this time, indeed, none of the evidence I have seen from any source, has changed the opinion that I expressed initially," he wrote. He lashed out at "media speculation" (adding, "and it is even worse on the blogs"). He said that he was bound by ethics rules against commenting any more about the case or evidence.
(344 comments, 828 words in story) There's More :: Permalink :: Comments
Yesterday's Duke lacrosse thread generated 300 comments, so it's time for another. And a commenter got banned and had all his/her comments deleted because of repetitive insults to other commenters. So be forwarned, disagreement is fine, name-calling and personal attacks are not.
(270 comments) Permalink :: Comments
<< Previous 12 | Next 12 >> |